Sign into an existing account

During the first seven decades of the new Republic, many states wanted to secede. The first states were New York and Massachusetts, and they attempted several times. Is secession a right held by the states? You bet your ass it is. The Southern states attempted it later, following legal procedure that the Founding Fathers followed when they seceded from Great Britain. The Founding Fathers established a precedent, which the Southern states followed.

The North's rebuttal was to invade and devastate the Southern states. This is not a legal response, and it doesn't answer the question of whether any state has the right to secede. The answer to whether a state has a right to secede is not that it will be invaded and conquered if it does. That's not law, it's subjugation.

Unfortunately, this is the real issue states are facing: Is it legal for them to secede? Yes, absolutely. If they do, will they be invaded and subjugated? Again, yes absolutely. I hope some states DO secede, particularly Texas. It has the strongest argument for secession.

But I'm getting tired of seeing posts of secession, insurrection, and revolution, particularly by a particular jew. This has been a thing jews have done for 160 years since jew started fomenting workers with labor unions. If you're just agitating, screw off. kikes like you are a dime a dozen.

The author is Jim Goad, a man who describes himself as filled with hate and who hates EVERYONE. But especially hypocrisy, and ever more especially white liberal hypocrisy. This book is a polemic against political correctness and how it is a tool to destroy us.

Two links for you:

Download: https://usa1lib.vip/book/5582394/03c661
Purchase: [bookfinder.com](https://www.bookfinder.com/search/?ac=sl&st=sl&ref=bf_s2_a3_t1_17&qi=OGCNRISsijy8MCak1aRH123PqT4_1655658609_1:201:37&bq=author%3Djim%2520goad%26title%3Dnew%2520church%2520ladies%2520the%2520extremely%2520uptight%2520world%2520of%2520social%2520justice)

I do not endorse or advocate his perspectives, I only found his description of the horror of the demonic, intolerant, violent left to be on the nose and compares it the sort of hypocrisy and loathsome judgmentalism some Christians are capable of.

Also remember he has no use for what's "popular" or herd mentality. This is a good example of his mindset:

"If you aren’t a just another simple, lowly, brainwashed, drearily predictable zombie witch-hunter and sincerely want to understand what makes me tick, the first thing you must accept is that I’m fundamentally antisocial and never, ever, ever, ever, EVER go with the crowd, no matter what crowd it is. I figure that wherever the crowd is standing at any given moment, they arrived there for entirely the wrong reasons. Wherever a crowd has gathered, there’s never enough space for me. Accordingly, I’ve had a lifelong affinity for heretics rather than for high priests. The problem is that they keep switching them around, but I always stick with the heretics."

I'm posting this because I told @Yargiyankooli I would suggest some things. I've been listening to orchestral music since the early 70s. I hadn't even started to notice girls when I discovered orchestral music and realized how much I liked it.

I'll start by saying that conductors who are the of the same nationality as the composer are the best interpreters of the music. Russian music is best performed by Russians. Gennady Rozhdestvensky was an excellent conductor of Tchaikovsky, particularly "Swan Lake". Herbert Von Karajan was an excellent German conductor and conducts the German composers brilliantly. French conductors seem to understand French composers best, etc.

You get the idea. Just make sure you look at a conductor's early history before you get one of his albums. Note that George Solti was a jew. He was a good conductor, especially for Bartok, but I can't listen to him any longer for that reason. And I just can't stand Leonard Bernstein because he was both a kike and a faggot.

Now, some recommendations. These are good for the new listener. Some of this you can find on jewtube.

Karl Richter's performance of Handel's "Messiah" with the London Philharmonic Orchestra is without question the best. It's easy to find if you do a search for those search terms. I have it on vinyl, with a paining by Salvador Dali on the front cover of the crucified Christ, but I also have it on DVD. Highly recommended.

Bizet's "Carmen" is the greatest opera ever written. Look for a version performed as opéra comique, which is where the musical segments are separated by spoken dialogue. Try to avoid a version with recitative, which is where the dialogue is sung rather than spoken.

"The Planets" by Holst should be familiar to most people. Very moving and inspirational.

I've always liked "The Grand Canyon Suite" by Ferde Grofe. It's the music used in the train ride at Disneyland during the Grand Canyon sequence.

Anything by Bach is perfect in every way, but his Brandenburg Concertos are lovely and very accessible.

"Symphonie Fantastique" by Hector Berlioz is surrealistic and strange but moving and captivating. One of the movements is in 5/4 time, unusual at the time.

"Scheherazade" by Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov is long, but lyrical and beautiful. It can be described as a tone poem that expresses the feeling of the various stories in the series of books "A Thousand Nights and a Night".

The Peer Gynt Suite by Edvard Grieg, which is the incidental music for the play "Peer Gynt" is lyrical and beautifully harmonious. You'll hear quite a lot that will be familiar to you.

Tchaikovsky's "Nutcracker" is an old and familiar stand-by, famous for good reason. It's accessible, fun, and has the composer's usual lush orchestration. If you're up to heavier stuff, try his First Piano Concerto. His Symphony #6 is very melancholy, and one of the movements is also in 5/4, but it requires some listening to appreciate it.

Prokofiev was a Russian modernist who wrote lyrically with some integrated dissonance, a bit jarring sometimes, but it works. His easier works are the Lieutenant Kije suite, music he wrote for a Russian film, his Symphony #1, called his "Classical" symphony, and "Peter and the Wolf". If you listen to the latter, listen to a version with the narration first so you understand the story and the breakdown of the instrumentation, and then find a version without the narration.

Aram Khachaturian was very much a modernist, and a nationalist commie as was Prokofiev, but neither of them were jews. His most famous work is the ballet "Gayeneh" or "Gayane". It has the "Sabre Dance", which you have probably heard before.

That's enough for now. I just turned the soil for the first row, and there's much, more to add, but I don't want to make this too long. If anyone has other good recommendations that could be accessible to the new listener, please feel free.

Sorry for the link to Henry Makow, but the information is good. Millions of parents from 1947 to the late 60s learned how to raise their children from Dr Spock's book "Baby and Child Care". Among other things, he recommended parents to be permissive with their children. This created a sense of entitlement in their baby boomer children, who became the worst, most narcissistic generation of people in several centuries.

He also recommended having babies sleep on the stomachs rather than on their backs, creating a sudden rise in infant deaths due to asphyxiation (SIDS).

The article doesn't say Dr Spock was a jew (he was of Dutch ancestry, his forebears were previously named Spaak), but if he was from a Dutch family, there's a good chance they was some intermarrying with jews.

I'm not suggesting anyone should excuse boomers' narcissism, self-centeredness, and failure in raising their own children, but it should give you some insight as to why it happened. It should also give you some understanding how long jews have planned the destruction of White civilization and the lengths they have gone to do it.

From the article:

"The Sokal affair, also called the Sokal hoax, was a demonstrative scholarly hoax performed by Alan Sokal, a physics professor at New York University and University College London. In 1996, Sokal submitted an article to Social Text, an academic journal of postmodern cultural studies. The submission was an experiment to test the journal's intellectual rigor, specifically to investigate whether "a leading North American journal of cultural studies—whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as Fredric Jameson and Andrew Ross—[would] publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions."

"The article, "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity", was published in the journal's spring/summer 1996 "Science Wars" issue. It proposed that quantum gravity is a social and linguistic construct. At that time, the journal did not practice academic peer review and it did not submit the article for outside expert review by a physicist. Three weeks after its publication in May 1996, Sokal revealed in the magazine Lingua Franca that the article was a hoax."

Sokol wrote it with good intentions and succeeded well beyond what his expectations. All in all, it was a pretty good troll.

Sorry for the jewtube link. I can't find this anywhere else, and this is the version posted by JBS. I'm old enough that I was alive when this was produced (although a child) and I remember how the JBS was reviled by students (mostly communists, like the SDS), the media (mostly leftists and communist sympathizers), and conservative elitists (like William Buckley). The latter describe the JBS as too "extreme".

Enjoy this prescient video, warning us more than 55 years what we should have been paying attention to and how jews stole our legacy and heritage.

People using that tired expression need to stop trying to initiate a debate. It used for work for that faggot Crowder, but it's overused. Just say what you think and let people respond.

We've all heard about Germany's "invasion" of Poland in 1939, but what really happened? It's nothing you've ever heard if you only know the official story.

In 1939, Britain and France gave a "guarantee" to Poland that in an instance of a German attack, these two nations would give aid and protection. That emboldened the Polish to commit atrocities on Germans, both in Poland and over the border in Germany. Eventually it became too much for Hitler and he decided that he would retaliate for these crimes. The key word here is "retaliate", not wage war.

On August 31, 1939, Poland mobilized irregular army troops outside Gleiwitz. Under the terms of the Geneva Convention, mobilization is a de facto declaration of war, whether it is stated or not. By this provocation, Poland declared its intentions against Germany. It committed to action at midnight on August 31, 1939, as it attacked Germans in Gleiwitz. It was not a German false flag. That story only came years later after the war ended, based on testimony (without evidence) from a man named Naujocks.

There are three very useful sources for learning more about this:

"What Counts as a Declaration of War? Poland Declares War on Germany First?"

https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=12870

The link to the "Table of Acts of Malice, Aggression and Declarations of War beginning in September 1939". This is significant, because it shows that Germany formally declared war only three times.

https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/nexus/NXdeclarations.html

The book referenced at the beginning of the article, "The Ruling Elite: Death, Destruction, and Domination" by Deanna Sringola.

https://u1lib.org/book/5207226/21f6b7

Just another reminder for all of us that JEWS ALWAYS LIE, don't believe what you're told, and always do your own research. (I'm preaching to choir here, of course.)

I preface this by saying there is no man "Miles Mathis". That web site is a collaborative effort by multiple propagandists who work for intelligence. So when I say "he", I mean the persona "Miles Mathis".

He says this on page 4 in his essay "The CIA and Art", where he discusses Shepard Fairey.

http://mileswmathis.com/obey.pdf

Mathis describes Andre the Giant, whose altered image Fairey uses in his OBEY posters. Mathis is making the point that while Andre had French, of Polish and Bulgarian roots, his real name was Roussimoff. This, says Mathis, means Andre was a Russian jew.

Following that, you will find this paragraph:

>I don't mean to be anti-Jewish here, I am just trying to make sense of a lot of covert information. [b]I am part Jewish: my great grandfather was named Moses Mordecai.[/b] But the Jewish angle helps us explain why Fairey chose Andre the Giant, and that in turn will help us understand other things.

(emphasis mine)

This is every reason not to trust a single word he says. If what he says is true, and that he's a jew, that's every reason not to trust him. If it isn't true, then he told a bald face lie to make a rhetorical point, and that's also every reason not to trust him.

He wrote this in 2013. Since then, he's gone full tilt into his "everyone is a jew and they control literally everything!" and "nothing is real! It's all a hoax!" themes.

Many of you may already be aware of this, but I want to provide sources and evidence that this is fact. There is a link to an article written by Arnold Leese, author of "Jewish Ritual Murder" and many other anti-jewish materials, titled "Chinese Communism? Yes, but it was JEWISH when it started".

https://www.islam-radio.net/islam/english/jewishp/china/jewinfl-chinacomm.htm

I know this is a site created by Muslims for Islam, but the fact remains, and this essay is in a collection of Leese's other writings.

Also there is this useful link:

https://big-lies.org/jews/how-jews-took-over-china-josh-2021.html

I'm reading his book "Made in Scotland", in which he briefly ruminates on Scottish cuisine:

"Food has always been a major bone of contention when people talk about Scotland. I think it’s fair to say that we don’t have the very best culinary reputation in the world. The Scottish sweet tooth is a legendary thing and critics allege there is a great desire in Scotland to deep-fry any food that is left hanging around. I’ve never actually seen a deep-fried Mars Bar or Bounty, although I did once see them advertised in a chip shop. However, I confess that I have had a deep-fried jam sandwich, and I can report back that it was delicious."

I've heard of the deep fried Mars Bar, but not the jam sandwich. Man, that's so bizarre. I love the Scots, but they're kind of weird.

https://ruth.ellis.scot/deep-fried-jam-sandwiches/#

It's AMAZING... I thought he killed himself after Gilbert Gottfried revealed that he raeped and killed a girl in 1990! Well, they're both DISGUSTING JEWS!!! I hope Gottfried gets the jew coof too!!!

By the way, some of you guys need to stop posting the same story. We get it. Do a search before you post.