Sign into an existing account

This is a bit long, but it's worth it. From Duke's "My Awakening", Chapter 9, The Roots of Racial Difference. There is a link below if you want to download the book.

- - - - - -

At the age of 10 I kept two white female rats in our garage in a large wooden box that I had built. It had a wood frame and fine-grade chicken-wire top that fit poorly. On a spring day, I discovered that one of my rats was showing signs of gestation. Even though I did not understand it, I supposed that I had mistaken a male rat for a female. I couldn't understand why the father looked so female, for I had a lot of familiarity with White rats, raising and selling them to the local pet stores and the Woolworth's store near my home.

The babies were finally born little pink sacks with four extruding legs and eager mouths but just outlines of closed eyes and ears. Each day I played with the little ones, but as they grew older they seemed decidedly different from their mother and the other rat whom I presumed must be their father. As they began to grow their new coats, the fur grew out not white but gray. More dramatically, their behavior seemed strange as well.

By the time they reached a few weeks old, equivalent to a human's teenage years, no matter how often I held them, the brood acted increasingly wild and uncontrollable. They had differences that went much further than simply the gray color of their coats. Their wildness progressed to the point that whenever I put my hand into the cage, the sawdust and wood shavings went flying as they scattered fearfully from the very same human hand that had lovingly fondled and petted them from birth. They were fast, excitable, quick to bite and physically superior to the domesticated breed. Pet white rats are very passive, slow-moving, deliberate creatures, whereas their wild rat cousins are excitable, lightning quick, aggressive and violent.

Finally I came to the realization that both white rats in the cage were actually female and that a wild rat had gnawed and squeezed into the wooden cage and mated with one of them.

A few years later, as I studied the realities of human race, I understood fully that the different breeds of rats are the genetic equivalent of human races. Breeding can occur between different races, even when there may still be dramatic genetic differences between them. The contrast between races can be in physical or psychological traits and in social or individual behavior. The behavior of those half-white, half-wild rats obviously was not a result of their environment. I had provided them with the same nurturing as for my white rats. In fact, they were suckled by their white rat mother and raised with two white rat females and constant human intervention, but their behavior was *wild*.

As a teenager looking into the race question, I looked back on the rat episode of a few years earlier. It seemed obvious that the difference in the behavior of my rats was wholly the result of genetics. The fact that the environment for the mixed-breed rats was the same as that for the completely domesticated ones suggested that there was a physical difference between the brains and hormones of the domesticated white rats and those of the breed of half-wild, gray rats. These genetic differences had powerful behavioral effects.


https://ia601404.us.archive.org/6/items/myawakening_202206/myawakening.pdf

Paprikash caught my interest about a year ago, and even though I'd never made anything like it, I found a recipe I liked and gave it a try. The sauce was flawless. I made a point of using Szeged Hungarian paprika, even though it was much more expensive. It was worth it. American paprika is fairly bland.

I had a lot of trouble with the spaetzle, though. The recipe called for a lot of flour, which made it very thick and doughy. It took forever to spoon it one by one into the water, and when it began to boil, the pieces expanded and became very large. They tasted like bland, chewy dumplings and the texture took away from the fantastic sauce.

I discovered there are spaetzle tools that will help with this, to make proper "riced" spaetzle. Some show pictures with very fluid and runny spaetzle dough, which will flow on its own through the holes in the grater.

Does anyone have any experience with this? Can anyone recommend a recipe for spaetzle or a good tool to rice it for boiling? Thanks!

It requires only four things: poached eggs, English muffins, Canadian bacon, and Hollandaise sauce. Poaching eggs properly can be tricky if you've never done it before, but it gets easy with practice. Always poach eggs in water, never dry, and leave the yolk a bit runny.

This is the recipe for Hollandaise sauce I use. I used to think it was difficult to make, but I tried this one and it worked perfectly and it requires only a few ingredients.

3 egg yolks
1/4 cup water
1 to 1-1/2 tablespoons lemon juice (try with just 1 tablespoon at first, and adjust to taste for later preparations)
1/2 cup butter, melted
salt and pepper to taste

In a double boiler or metal bowl over simmering water, constantly whisk the egg yolks, water and lemon juice until mixture reaches 160° or is thick enough to coat the back of a metal spoon. Reduce heat to low. Slowly drizzle in warm melted butter, whisking constantly. Whisk in the salt and paprika until it is thick and creamy.

This will make enough sauce for four eggs.

Fry the Canadian bacon until lightly browned. Toast the English muffins to one's preference.

I prefer using a double boiler because it's easier to control and has easy clean-up. Don't bother with Knorr's packaged mix, and the kind you buy in a jar is overpriced. This is easy enough for anyone to make.

Even as a child, I always disliked Christmas cartoons, except for "A Charlie Brown Christmas". This special was very personal for Charles Schulz, who was a religious man and though what had been done to it was terrible. I disliked all of these 60s and 70s Christmas specials because they had fuck-all to do with the holiday (holy day). I never understood what Santa Claus, giving presents, snow, elves, and all of that had to do with Jesus.

Mr. Magoo's Christmas Carol (1962)
The Year Without Santa Claus (1974)
'Twas The Night Before Christmas (1974)
Frosty the Snowman (1969)
Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer (1964)
Santa Claus Is Comin' To Town (1970)
The Little Drummer Boy (1968)

I'm kind of on the fence with "How the Grinch Stole Christmas" (1966). It's heartwarming, but it still loses sight of the reason for Christmas.

At the time they released this, I had two cars full of stuff that I was going to donate to them. I donated a bunch of stuff earlier in the year, twice. But no more, never again. I also decided that Goodwill also isn't worthy of my charity, partly because they are no longer a real charity (I recommend reading about that) after the snide way I was treated when I didn't want to wear a mask in one of their stores.

Fuck both of them. I'd sooner give my second-hand goods to the Mormons (Deseret). Unless it's a local, single store thrift store where the proceeds are actually used for local charity, it's probably not a real charity.

E: Crap, there's a typo, one of my most common ones. It should read "that there are racists". Serves me right for not proofing it before I posted.

Sorry guys, it bums me out too, but ya gotta rip that band-aid off quickly. The more you know. Who even knew there were jews in Oklahoma?

This is a clip from "Community" from about 2010 or so. Blackwashing was been around since the 1930s, most notably when Orson Welles produced and directed a version of Macbeth with an entirely black cast. Since negroes don't have any culture or history of their own to use as source material for performance, they have to use that of White people.

Hollywood jews do this intentionally, but they will NEVER do something like what's in the clip, a black version of "Fiddler on the Roof". Treyf! Taboo! Off limits!

Yoav Shamir uses his ethnicity as an Israeli jew to talk with insiders, who talk frankly with him as an insider, as they explain how they use "anti-semitism" as a tool to control Gentiles. Among others, he talks with that fat, vile lying piece of shit Abe Foxman, the national director of the jewish Anti-Defamation League. Coming from an Israeli jew, this is incredibly objective and balanced. This is description from the WatchDocumentaries site:

"In his exploration of modern Israeli life, filmmaker Yoav Shamir travels the world in the hunt for the most recent manifestations of anti-Semitism, and comes up with some startling answers as highlighted in his documentary Defamation. As a Jew raised and born in Israel, Shamir claims he has never experienced first-hand anti-Semitism, so he embarks on a journey to find it. He follows American-Jewish leaders to the European capitals, as they warn government officials of the rising anti-Semitism threat, and tags along with Israeli high school students on a trip to Auschwitz.

What Shamir discovers often surprises him. For instance, he accompanies a group of Israeli students on a trip to Poland, in a quest to help open their eyes to the realities of the Holocaust. Yet, the youngsters have been so groomed by their leaders to dread the worst from the local citizens that they wind up envisaging anti-Semitic views where none may really exist. Indeed, his remarkably nuanced and provocative documentary Defamation becomes more of an assessment of the internecine warfare happening amongst the Jews themselves than of the attitude portrayed by the gentiles towards Jews."

Archived so I don't drive traffic to Snopes. Apologies for the shit source, but this is the only place I could find this information. In its defense, a lot of it was provided by Mr. McCloskey himself.

https://archive.ph/p4tBl

This began in 2013 with an encroachment on the McCloskey's northern property line. The synagogue acknowledged in a 2000 letter when the synagogue was built that the property line extends 10 feed beyond the north brick wall. But in 2013, the synagogue built a wooden structure and intended to keep bees for one of their pagan rituals. The structure was well within the McCloskey's property, being placed very close to the brick wall. This is shown in the article.

I examined this picture carefully and used Google Maps to identify where the structure was. It seems to have been placed to the west of the property, nearly at the corner. This can be identified by the telephone pole in the picture. He placed a notice that the structure constituted a trespass and directed the synagogue to remove it by a particular date and time. He also provided a picture of this also.

He was accused of tearing down the structure and destroying the hives. He states emphatically that he did not, nor is there any evidence whatsoever that he did.

It appears however that McCloskey had enough of these lying jews and erected a wire fence directly on the property line to prevent any such incursions. This can be seen in the link below.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Portland+Pl,+St.+Louis,+MO+63108/@38.6475367,-90.2647303,122m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x87d8b52e7fc13547:0xf00fea7349f4ac1e!8m2!3d38.6474166!4d-90.2689436

I find it very easy to believe that the jews in the synagogue used the BLM mob to break into and trespass onto private property to harass and threaten the McCloskeys.

So the moral is, there's always a jew behind it.

That's it. Quick one-liner.

That magazine only lasted about a year, about 1996-1997, but it was extremely helpful finding useful sites before there were search engines (or at least, effective search engines). I'm pretty sure that's where I discovered this stupid ass cartoon. The "Ate My Balls" cartoon with Mr T was possibly one of the first truly viral memes. It sparked a million imitators.

This is why I don't trust anyone who talks about revolution or secession all the time. Almost no one has the aptitude for leadership on a large scale, and those who keep pushing for revolt have an agenda and already know who will fill the power vacuum. And they aren't White.

So what do the people who call for revolution or secession actually want? How do they benefit? Whatever it is, it doesn't involve you, except in a service capacity.

Why are the talking about so much in the media? Why do they want it done so quickly? So that no one has time to think it through clearly enough to realize that in a power vacuum, the only people who will step into power are exactly the sort of people who should never have it.

Do you have the aptitude for large scale leadership? I certainly don't, and you probably don't either. Can you tell the difference between a leader with the best interests of the people at heart and a sociopath demagogue? You probably can, but most people can't.