Sign into an existing account

because I need to lift more than that

I was on crackhead patrol this late afternoon, going around the hood looking for crackhead instances to report on the 311 app. Not lacking, of course.

Anyway, I as I was walking on a public sidewalk a camera from some house started beeping at me like I'm doing something wrong, so I flipped it off. Walking back to my house, right as I get on my property, some fat nigger in a car pulls up mad about me flipping off his camera. I try to explain to him how I also have a camera and how I set up zones so it wouldn't bother people who are on the public sidewalk. But he's a nigger so he just keeps repeating the same shit over and over. So I raise my voice and cuss him out. He drives away doing a shitty 5 point u-turn while calling me a bitch ass nigga. As he's doing that I tell him I have some spare tampons inside and if he would like one. He says I'm 'scary as fuck' (in nigger speak it means that I am scared, not that I am scary). I tell him I'm right here. He says do something. I tell him come out. He drives away. Guess he was the scary one.

I'll make it a point to walk by that nigger house and flip it off more often. I just did another crackhead patrol and when I walked by that house it beeped and I flipped it off and took a picture of his license plate.

My interpretation of events is that both the camera beeping at me and me flipping it off are first amendment protected activities. However, his chasing me down in a car is stalking CPC (646.9) and criminal threats CPC (422).

Well there's the story, but I would like some advice. Should I bring this matter to the attention of the sheriff so they have a back story in case one of us ends up getting shot?

So TIL armadillos run in packs. I was hanging out on my patio having coffee, as one does, and a four pack of juvenile dillos come skittering out from under the shed. I'm thinking they got a nest or burrow under there, as my back yard is completely fenced in. Pretty progressive considering there's also rabbits that live under that shed. Anyway, did you know a group of armadillos is called a fez? Yeah, I had to look it up. I was kinda disappointed they don't call it an Armada, but fez works I guess. Anyway, happy Friday fuckers. Y'all rock that armadillo energy today, just stay of traffic. Armored back plates are no match for a Toyota Prius.

The reason white people are increasingly recognizing that “colorblindness” seems to be a one-way street, lacking any equivalent to “white guilt” in other groups, is easy to understand through the lens of group selection.

Group selection theory suggests that certain groups evolve not only at the individual level but also at the collective level. This means traits can persist even if they are costly or dangerous to the individual, as long as they benefit the group as a whole. An example of this would be the loud alarm call of ground squirrels, which alerts the group to a predator’s presence but endangers the individual sounding the warning. Such behaviors persist, particularly in cooperative groups, because they promote collective survival.

When applied to white European-descended peoples, whose historical survival has relied heavily on group cooperation, this framework explains much of today’s social dynamics and the danger facing white people. Group selection can be an effective, some might argue superior, method for passing on a group’s genes. However, its success is dependent on one of two critical conditions remaining relatively stable, or the strategy rapidly falls apart.

First, it requires a high degree of in-group preference, meaning altruistic behaviors are directed primarily toward members of the same group. Without this, group-selected individuals risk serving foreign groups at the expense of their own, undermining their collective strength.

Second, it assumes minimal migration between groups, particularly between those employing group-selection strategies and those prioritizing individual survival. When significant migration occurs, the group-selection strategy begins to collapse at the genetic level. Self-sacrificing behaviors, once beneficial, become detrimental as resources are diverted from the group to outsiders now present due to migration. This explains the behavior of individual white people who appear driven to serve members of incoming foreign groups they perceive as “disadvantaged” in some way. Under normal conditions with low levels of migration inline with what would have been experienced historically, these people would have been serving the disadvantaged in their own group, enhancing the strength and survival of white people.

This dynamic also operates in reverse. These same altruistic individuals from the group-selected population may migrate to other regions, redirecting their sacrifices toward foreign groups in their new environment. Consider Christian missionaries who, rather than aiding the impoverished within their own communities, prioritize the poor in distant lands like Africa or Haiti.

In essence, mass migration poses a death sentence to group-selected peoples unless they maintain a robust level of in-group preference to counteract these challenges. Without such resilience, their altruistic tendencies become a liability, eroding the very foundation of their group’s survival.

In other words, mass migration, combined with the deliberate suppression of white collective identity, is at best a tragic combination of conditions brewing a toxic cocktail destined to erase white populations. More likely, it is a meticulously researched and intentionally wielded strategic weapon, purposefully deployed to orchestrate the inevitable outcome of white genocide.