Yes, but if he destroys Twitter along the way then I'm more than happy for him to do it. Him getting an advantage doesn't change the fact that Twitter is fake and gay.
Whites (non-hispanic) are down to 57.8% as of 2020, and it was 89.3% back in 1950.
If we had the same percentage as back then without all the immigration, the US population of 335 million would instead be 217 million (194m white, 23m non-white).
Think how much cheaper everything would be without having to support half the population being freeloaders, or how cheap land would be, or how much more space and natural resources we would have.
The government is a hierarchy of violence. It directs the whom/when/where/how/why of when it is acceptable to dole out violence. Every law is enforced with violence; every road is built with taxes that are extracted by threat of violence.
* The top of the government controls who we are violent against at the highest level. Eg, president is commander in chief, king rules the army, and both are responsible for waging war).
* Mid level government bureaucracy determines the acceptable frameworks for regular everyday violence. Eg, they choose which laws are enforced and how harshly, or they have police adopt the Deluth model.
* Lowest level government enforces violence. Eg, the police come arrest you if you disobey with the law.
* Regular people are on the bottom.
That's why it's inevitable that when you have a society that raises up blacks for example, they'll also forgive the violence they commit, while they condemn even the least violent thing done by those they want to push down. See: George Floyd Riots vs Peace Protests in Jan 6, or clear cut self defense in Kenosha or Charlottesville.
He's a disgusting nigger who deserves jail, but it's pretty dumb what he got convicted for.
From the way the news reports, the two key victims were a girl he ended up getting married to and a girl who got with him at 17 and he broke up with when she was 21, then she accused him decades later. Those particular incidents seem like bullshit.
Because the scariest thing is that the NWO doesn't have its shit together.
It's like a lynch mob. They all agree on the general direction and what they want to do (lynch whitey, steal money), and they all know that they're on the same side so they'll back each other up if challenged and shut down opposition. But beyond that? They're just fucking winging it.
It means they're very sloppy. That's scary to me because it means we're not getting a controlled collapse while they loot the treasury, but one that can easily overshoot into mad-max results.
>If we can decouple health care from jobs then everyone could be contractors and remove this nonsense.
Healthcare is only coupled to jobs in the US because it is a benefit employers pay that the government does not tax. Abolish the bullshit income tax and it would go away as a benefit. Or remove it as an exemption.
The problem as always is too much government distorting the market.
You can outlaw things without creating a police state. Don't believe for a second that government overreach was because of drugs.
It's antithetical to the current framework of governance, but by retracting the rule of law a lot of these systems would sort themselves out. Remove the protection of the law from drug dealers; drug dealers stop being able to operate if any of their buyers could legally kill them, steal their shit, and get paid for it. There are second order effects, but they're less bad than either junkies or police states. It is a tried and true system that worked for the vast majority of human history.
You're missing multiplying by 2 on the weapons. Those AR's are $2000 each.
$850 + $600 + $2000 + $800 + $2000 + $800 = $7050. Give or take a few hundred, since I think those scopes might be a little cheaper, but the magazines are probably twice what you've got listed. Bump it 1200 on mags, and price per round to $0.75 (which is common nowadays), and you easily hit $8k
Yes, both married to men and admitted that they were never lesbian. They considered their musical persona like an acting gig and the idea came from their producer.
Their producer is last name Shapovalov, which as far as I can tell is a traditional last name for Russian jews.
There's a bunch of different summer sausages. It's a term for catchall for any sausage that's prepared so it doesn't need to be refrigerated. Eg, pepperoni is one and isn't sweet.
I wouldn't trust OP though, because rye with caraway seeds is fucking disgusting.
Tucker Carlson is a wishy washy conservative who only half supports what's good for the country. But he's still better than 98% of what's on TV and one of the only people try to do a holding action against the globohomo narrative.
He could be better, but we'd be in a much worse state without him. And this one was a pretty good zinger.
>Not only that, but what possible need could there be to depict the naked bodies of adults having sex in the illustration?
Those aren't adults. The kid is presumably 8y/o, as that's the same age as the target audience, so his sister would need a 10 year age gap to be an adult.
The guy in the relationship is likely under 16 if he's driving a scooter, the girl is even younger since she doesn't have transportation, and there's a teddy bear on the bed.
They're trying to normalize early teens to preteens (12-14) having sex.
The term is Anarcho-Tyrrany, and has been blatant for at least a decade. Shit, it was even part of the build up to the civil war 160 years ago.
But I agree that the right wing needs to do the same and step it up even more. Pass a law saying that you've legalized shooting into any leftwing protests. Or pass a state law that the government will not prosecute anyone who commits any crime against the LGBT.
It'll get challenged and defeated as unconstitutional eventually, but in the mean time the citizens help you suppress them since they'll be safe from legal retaliation. And once the law is overturned, you just pass it again with slightly different wording, exactly like blue states do with unconstitutional gun laws.
Holy hell. In the year 2000, you could go into a room with 100 nigresses, and ~5 of them would have killed a child *that year* on average.
Considering that's a 30 year age range they had for demographics, that's ~75 niglets per 100 women that the zionists saved us from. I sure fucking hope that liberal states keep abortion legal.
You can get his manifesto by googling Industrial Society and Its Future.
Uncle Ted is the oldest one I've seen that identified how Leftists aren't rebels but just conforming to a different society than what America is (well, different than what the USA used to be, he wrote it 30+ years ago now). It seemed a crazy accusation at the time I read it, but I just hadn't realized that he was actually right.
>24. Psychologists use the term “socialization” to designate the process by which children are trained to think and act as society demands. A person is said to be well socialized if he believes in and obeys the moral code of his society and fits in well as a functioning part of that society. It may seem senseless to say that many leftists are over-socialized, since the leftist is perceived as a rebel. Nevertheless, the position can be defended. Many leftists are not such rebels as they seem.
>25. The moral code of our society is so demanding that no one can think, feel and act in a completely moral way. For example, we are not supposed to hate anyone, yet almost everyone hates somebody at some time or other, whether he admits it to himself or not. Some people are so highly socialized that the attempt to think, feel and act morally imposes a severe burden on them. In order to avoid feelings of guilt, they continually have to deceive themselves about their own motives and find moral explanations for feelings and actions that in reality have a nonmoral origin. We use the term “oversocialized” to describe such people.
>26. Oversocialization can lead to low self-esteem, a sense of powerlessness, defeatism, guilt, etc. One of the most important means by which our society socializes children is by making them feel ashamed of behavior or speech that is contrary to society’s expectations. If this is overdone, or if a particular child is especially susceptible to such feelings, he ends by feeling ashamed of HIMSELF. Moreover the thought and the behavior of the oversocialized person are more restricted by society’s expectationsthan are those of the lightly socialized person. The majority of people engage in a significant amount of naughty behavior. They lie, they commit petty thefts, they break traffic laws, they goof off at work, they hate someone, they say spiteful things or they use some underhanded trick to get ahead of the other guy. The oversocialized person cannot do these things, or if he does do them he generates in himself a sense of shame and self-hatred. The oversocialized person cannot even experience, without guilt, thoughts or feelings that are contrary to the accepted morality; he cannot think “unclean” thoughts. And socialization is not just a matter of morality; we are socialized to conform to many norms of behavior that do not fall under the heading of morality. Thus the oversocialized person is kept on a psychological leash and spends his life running on rails that society has laid down for him. In many over socialized people this results in a sense of constraint and powerlessness that can be a severe hardship. We suggest that oversocialization is among the more serious cruelties that human being inflict on one another.
>27. We argue that a very important and influential segment of the modern left is oversocialized and that their oversocialization is of great importance in determining the direction of modern leftism. Leftists of the oversocialized type tend to be intellectuals or members of the upper-middle class. Notice that university intellectuals constitute the most highly socialized segment of our society and also the most leftwing segment.
It then goes on to describe specific examples of how this plays out with regards to leftist causes, and why it results in more leftist violence. He seemed to accurately predict that the leftists would turn into moralizing authoritarians back when it was completely unthinkable and there was (basically) no sign of it in public.
xachariah 3 points 2.9 years ago
He is gay.
Gays used to be shunned because this is what gays always do.
/v/Faggots viewpost?postid=62d2011e0c945
xachariah 7 points 2.9 years ago
Yes, but if he destroys Twitter along the way then I'm more than happy for him to do it. Him getting an advantage doesn't change the fact that Twitter is fake and gay.
/v/FightingBackAgainstTheNWO viewpost?postid=62cd87f7c9daf
xachariah 1 point 2.9 years ago
> if you grew up in a wealthy white suburb like me
She thinks they're not more violent than Whites are, so we can already tell she grew up around Whites and not around them. No need to say it twice.
/v/KEK viewpost?postid=62cb901faf15e
xachariah 4 points 3.0 years ago
50 million? More like 100 million.
Whites (non-hispanic) are down to 57.8% as of 2020, and it was 89.3% back in 1950.
If we had the same percentage as back then without all the immigration, the US population of 335 million would instead be 217 million (194m white, 23m non-white).
Think how much cheaper everything would be without having to support half the population being freeloaders, or how cheap land would be, or how much more space and natural resources we would have.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62c57e0564501
xachariah 1 point 3.0 years ago
The government is a hierarchy of violence. It directs the whom/when/where/how/why of when it is acceptable to dole out violence. Every law is enforced with violence; every road is built with taxes that are extracted by threat of violence.
* The top of the government controls who we are violent against at the highest level. Eg, president is commander in chief, king rules the army, and both are responsible for waging war).
* Mid level government bureaucracy determines the acceptable frameworks for regular everyday violence. Eg, they choose which laws are enforced and how harshly, or they have police adopt the Deluth model.
* Lowest level government enforces violence. Eg, the police come arrest you if you disobey with the law.
* Regular people are on the bottom.
That's why it's inevitable that when you have a society that raises up blacks for example, they'll also forgive the violence they commit, while they condemn even the least violent thing done by those they want to push down. See: George Floyd Riots vs Peace Protests in Jan 6, or clear cut self defense in Kenosha or Charlottesville.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62bf7e10c6b06
xachariah 3 points 3.0 years ago
He's a disgusting nigger who deserves jail, but it's pretty dumb what he got convicted for.
From the way the news reports, the two key victims were a girl he ended up getting married to and a girl who got with him at 17 and he broke up with when she was 21, then she accused him decades later. Those particular incidents seem like bullshit.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62be4571e3a6e
xachariah 3 points 3.0 years ago
Lol, no they don't have the capability to plan ahead to lunchtime, let alone plan months in advance for a contingency event.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62b5fb5917ccf
xachariah 4 points 3.0 years ago
It's Amber Heard circa 2008.
/v/TellVoat viewpost?postid=62b4eabb503c5
xachariah 0 points 3 years ago
That's because they're doing a bad thing and are infected with monkey pox. Same reason they show straight couples on a mostly gay disease.
/v/ClownWorld viewpost?postid=62aca1480559b
xachariah 5 points 3 years ago
Because the scariest thing is that the NWO doesn't have its shit together.
It's like a lynch mob. They all agree on the general direction and what they want to do (lynch whitey, steal money), and they all know that they're on the same side so they'll back each other up if challenged and shut down opposition. But beyond that? They're just fucking winging it.
It means they're very sloppy. That's scary to me because it means we're not getting a controlled collapse while they loot the treasury, but one that can easily overshoot into mad-max results.
/v/Health viewpost?postid=62a97e846a61d
xachariah 0 points 3 years ago
>If we can decouple health care from jobs then everyone could be contractors and remove this nonsense.
Healthcare is only coupled to jobs in the US because it is a benefit employers pay that the government does not tax. Abolish the bullshit income tax and it would go away as a benefit. Or remove it as an exemption.
The problem as always is too much government distorting the market.
/v/Ottawa viewpost?postid=629f1dbfadca2
xachariah 0 points 3 years ago
Why would civilian be better? And since you seem to know what you're talking about, do you recommend anything specifically for night vision or camo?
/v/TellVoat viewpost?postid=629e06c05f789
xachariah 0 points 3 years ago
They're both dudes. One just thinks he's a woman.
/v/ClownWorld viewpost?postid=629e36ddf2194
xachariah 1 point 3 years ago
You can outlaw things without creating a police state. Don't believe for a second that government overreach was because of drugs.
It's antithetical to the current framework of governance, but by retracting the rule of law a lot of these systems would sort themselves out. Remove the protection of the law from drug dealers; drug dealers stop being able to operate if any of their buyers could legally kill them, steal their shit, and get paid for it. There are second order effects, but they're less bad than either junkies or police states. It is a tried and true system that worked for the vast majority of human history.
/v/ClownWorld viewpost?postid=629ccbbb65673
xachariah 0 points 3 years ago*
You're missing multiplying by 2 on the weapons. Those AR's are $2000 each.
$850 + $600 + $2000 + $800 + $2000 + $800 = $7050. Give or take a few hundred, since I think those scopes might be a little cheaper, but the magazines are probably twice what you've got listed. Bump it 1200 on mags, and price per round to $0.75 (which is common nowadays), and you easily hit $8k
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6292456c89218
xachariah 3 points 3 years ago
Yes, both married to men and admitted that they were never lesbian. They considered their musical persona like an acting gig and the idea came from their producer.
Their producer is last name Shapovalov, which as far as I can tell is a traditional last name for Russian jews.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=62900add591d0
xachariah 1 point 3 years ago
There's a bunch of different summer sausages. It's a term for catchall for any sausage that's prepared so it doesn't need to be refrigerated. Eg, pepperoni is one and isn't sweet.
I wouldn't trust OP though, because rye with caraway seeds is fucking disgusting.
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=628fd3cb6927c
xachariah 1 point 3 years ago
Tucker Carlson is a wishy washy conservative who only half supports what's good for the country. But he's still better than 98% of what's on TV and one of the only people try to do a holding action against the globohomo narrative.
He could be better, but we'd be in a much worse state without him. And this one was a pretty good zinger.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=628d846e2951d
xachariah 4 points 3 years ago
There were multiple options on that list at the same level, but the news decided to show the gay one as the good one.
Typical news propaganda.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=628977303e791
xachariah 6 points 3.1 years ago
>Not only that, but what possible need could there be to depict the naked bodies of adults having sex in the illustration?
Those aren't adults. The kid is presumably 8y/o, as that's the same age as the target audience, so his sister would need a 10 year age gap to be an adult.
The guy in the relationship is likely under 16 if he's driving a scooter, the girl is even younger since she doesn't have transportation, and there's a teddy bear on the bed.
They're trying to normalize early teens to preteens (12-14) having sex.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=627e6712097c0
xachariah 0 points 3.1 years ago
>Freakonomics
>the debut non-fiction book by University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt and New York Times journalist Stephen J. Dubner.
I'm gonna have to doubt that they've got our best interest in mind with their take on how great abortion is for us goys.
/v/LyingNewsMedia viewpost?postid=627d6c6180998
xachariah 3 points 3.1 years ago
I use Feather blades. The Japs know how to make a sharp blade, easily the best I've tried.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=627c624739f8b
xachariah 6 points 3.1 years ago
The term is Anarcho-Tyrrany, and has been blatant for at least a decade. Shit, it was even part of the build up to the civil war 160 years ago.
But I agree that the right wing needs to do the same and step it up even more. Pass a law saying that you've legalized shooting into any leftwing protests. Or pass a state law that the government will not prosecute anyone who commits any crime against the LGBT.
It'll get challenged and defeated as unconstitutional eventually, but in the mean time the citizens help you suppress them since they'll be safe from legal retaliation. And once the law is overturned, you just pass it again with slightly different wording, exactly like blue states do with unconstitutional gun laws.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6275302981af5
xachariah 2 points 3.1 years ago
Holy hell. In the year 2000, you could go into a room with 100 nigresses, and ~5 of them would have killed a child *that year* on average.
Considering that's a 30 year age range they had for demographics, that's ~75 niglets per 100 women that the zionists saved us from. I sure fucking hope that liberal states keep abortion legal.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=627427607488a
xachariah 14 points 3.1 years ago*
You can get his manifesto by googling Industrial Society and Its Future.
Uncle Ted is the oldest one I've seen that identified how Leftists aren't rebels but just conforming to a different society than what America is (well, different than what the USA used to be, he wrote it 30+ years ago now). It seemed a crazy accusation at the time I read it, but I just hadn't realized that he was actually right.
>24. Psychologists use the term “socialization” to designate the process by which children are trained to think and act as society demands. A person is said to be well socialized if he believes in and obeys the moral code of his society and fits in well as a functioning part of that society. It may seem senseless to say that many leftists are over-socialized, since the leftist is perceived as a rebel. Nevertheless, the position can be defended. Many leftists are not such rebels as they seem.
>25. The moral code of our society is so demanding that no one can think, feel and act in a completely moral way. For example, we are not supposed to hate anyone, yet almost everyone hates somebody at some time or other, whether he admits it to himself or not. Some people are so highly socialized that the attempt to think, feel and act morally imposes a severe burden on them. In order to avoid feelings of guilt, they continually have to deceive themselves about their own motives and find moral explanations for feelings and actions that in reality have a nonmoral origin. We use the term “oversocialized” to describe such people.
>26. Oversocialization can lead to low self-esteem, a sense of powerlessness, defeatism, guilt, etc. One of the most important means by which our society socializes children is by making them feel ashamed of behavior or speech that is contrary to society’s expectations. If this is overdone, or if a particular child is especially susceptible to such feelings, he ends by feeling ashamed of HIMSELF. Moreover the thought and the behavior of the oversocialized person are more restricted by society’s expectationsthan are those of the lightly socialized person. The majority of people engage in a significant amount of naughty behavior. They lie, they commit petty thefts, they break traffic laws, they goof off at work, they hate someone, they say spiteful things or they use some underhanded trick to get ahead of the other guy. The oversocialized person cannot do these things, or if he does do them he generates in himself a sense of shame and self-hatred. The oversocialized person cannot even experience, without guilt, thoughts or feelings that are contrary to the accepted morality; he cannot think “unclean” thoughts. And socialization is not just a matter of morality; we are socialized to conform to many norms of behavior that do not fall under the heading of morality. Thus the oversocialized person is kept on a psychological leash and spends his life running on rails that society has laid down for him. In many over socialized people this results in a sense of constraint and powerlessness that can be a severe hardship. We suggest that oversocialization is among the more serious cruelties that human being inflict on one another.
>27. We argue that a very important and influential segment of the modern left is oversocialized and that their oversocialization is of great importance in determining the direction of modern leftism. Leftists of the oversocialized type tend to be intellectuals or members of the upper-middle class. Notice that university intellectuals constitute the most highly socialized segment of our society and also the most leftwing segment.
It then goes on to describe specific examples of how this plays out with regards to leftist causes, and why it results in more leftist violence. He seemed to accurately predict that the leftists would turn into moralizing authoritarians back when it was completely unthinkable and there was (basically) no sign of it in public.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62742c79925ae