Blacks are on fact less targeted for arrests than whites are, despite ideological dogma saying otherwise.
The dogma is based on nothing but some purely speculative concept about thw structure of society, not on data.
The data refutes this claim, and we have it, so why give this weak asset reply when you can call out the lie and reveal them as just spouting urban legends which are not only unfounded in truth, but are in fact refuted by the evidence.
What this idiot has is a story, a false story, but one she's built her entire worldview on.
When confronted with evidence that conflicts with a part of her story, she retells the story in a way that explains away the discrepancy as being compatible with the tales ultimate reality.
But little dies she know, this new excusing of real data is also demonstrably wrong.
When it's revealed that the data goes even further to invalidate her newest modification to her tale, she will alter the story once more to try and railroad it back towards fitting her dogmatic view of the world.
This is good, we can keep pressing her with new empirical data, and she can keep trying to justify her belief in superstition.
This is often how honest cops and lawyers deal with a liar who has a story concocted, they will let them tell the tale, get maximum clarification, then hit them with the information they know that refutes their version of events.
Then the suspect will change their story to accommodate the new information, while still keeping the ultimate conclusion of their tall tales intact.
Then another clarification, then another reveal that even their newest edition to the story is known to be refuted in part or on the whole by the evidence these guys have access to.
It's the dragon in the garage, as said by Carl Sagan.
You can say that there's a dragon I your garage, and when I come with some way of testing the claim, you can modify the claim to accommodate the investigations latest findings, but at some point, you've exhausted your credibility.
This is how you beat a slippery fucker like this one, She's a religious zealot, with a narrative to explain away everything she sees, trying to make her views look like they are based on reason rather than faith.
Keep pressing her story with the evidence until her claims run dry of being testable, once she's living in the world of the unfalsifiable and therefore unprovable, you can ask her how she'd be able to know if her last version of reality could be shown false. If it can't be tested, then I guess it isn't that significant.
This is how God went from being evident in the workings of all things, to being some hypothetical fart that's largely irrelevant in daily affairs.
It's not just wrong when you think of how many crimes the niggerd get away with and how many unsoved murders there are niggers are probably doing 10 times the amount of crime actually being reported because they don't get caught 10 times for every time they do get caught... I mean the car jacker nigger how many times did they get away with it before the actual arrest and conviction? 10 times 20? 50?
Have a read of that other article posted here, the one posted that took a police officer's secret insider's confession about the state of race relations and criminality among races in America.
There are entire categories of crimes that are far more likely to have been committed by blacks, and even though they could be felonies, like crimes against person or property, the police are limiting the number of such crimes they investigate so that they wont catch too many black suspects and appear to the public to be discriminating against black people, even though they are not, and are actually doing the opposite, trying to get more whites so that they can get away with getting more blacks and not looking bad for doing so.
This is precisely because the public knowledge is wrong, black and white do not commit the same amount of crime, and the amount of criminality among blacks is so much higher that if it became commonly known, there'd be serious questions raised in our culture about this kind of thing.
Questions that would not only raise the merit of older policies, but also questions that would undermine much of the dogmatic beliefs that underpin our modern civilizations, challenging the very philosophical foundations of our societies.
It'd be bringing to doubt the entire operation of our system, the goals they are pursuing, etc. It'd be like questioning the Catholic church in the height of the dark ages, or the glory of Rome during the peak of the empire, or the validity of Communism during the greatest point in the history of the USSR, or questioning the american dream, divine mandate, and american exceptionalism when america was really rising to its spot as the world power (like at the world's fair).
You know what I mean, its taking the central concept of the country and its culture and saying its philosophy and design are wrong in some disastrous way.
When it's revealed that the data goes even further to invalidate her newest modification to her tale, she will alter the story once more to try and railroad it back towards fitting her dogmatic view of the world.
That's why we call them ideologues. Her and everyone else like her have extraordinarily weak trees of life. They defend their trees vehemently instead of letting them strengthen against the test of reality, or philosophically speaking, the wind. Their roots are shallow and require constant attention else their tree will fall and thus be subjected to having their identities destroyed.
You're trying too hard. NPCs don't care about data. To them, statistics is magic and they think they can wield it to gain power, even citing falsehoods. And it works. The only thing these idiots respect is power.
the only people who believe that are white suburban people. niggers readily admit to doing the things that are called "crimes," they just disagree that these things should get them in trouble.
This argument will never not be retarded. The easiest way to disprove this argument is to challenge these people to walk around Detroit at night. Majority White areas are safe at all hours. Majority Black areas are only safe at 6:00 AM to 2:00PM when all the criminals are still asleep and all the niglets are still in school.
But since people mostly commit crimes against people of the same race, that would mean whites are committing a ton of crimes against other whites that they don't get arrested for. Weird how cops don't arrest people for committing crimes against whites.
Or at least that'd be true if this claim wasn't bullshit. The reality is that according to crime victimization studies from the bureau of justice, the average black person is twice as likely to commit a crime as to be the victim of one, meaning blacks are the only race that commits as much interracial crime as intraracial crime.
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 11 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 00:03:58 ago (+11/-0)
Later on I lived in some of the niggerest neighborhoods in the country. tHeY cOmMiT tHe SaMe AmOuNt Of CrImE is the most blatant bullshit you can say.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 5 points 1.9 yearsJul 10, 2022 23:37:01 ago (+5/-0)*
Because it's dead ass wrong.
Blacks are on fact less targeted for arrests than whites are, despite ideological dogma saying otherwise.
The dogma is based on nothing but some purely speculative concept about thw structure of society, not on data.
The data refutes this claim, and we have it, so why give this weak asset reply when you can call out the lie and reveal them as just spouting urban legends which are not only unfounded in truth, but are in fact refuted by the evidence.
What this idiot has is a story, a false story, but one she's built her entire worldview on.
When confronted with evidence that conflicts with a part of her story, she retells the story in a way that explains away the discrepancy as being compatible with the tales ultimate reality.
But little dies she know, this new excusing of real data is also demonstrably wrong.
When it's revealed that the data goes even further to invalidate her newest modification to her tale, she will alter the story once more to try and railroad it back towards fitting her dogmatic view of the world.
This is good, we can keep pressing her with new empirical data, and she can keep trying to justify her belief in superstition.
This is often how honest cops and lawyers deal with a liar who has a story concocted, they will let them tell the tale, get maximum clarification, then hit them with the information they know that refutes their version of events.
Then the suspect will change their story to accommodate the new information, while still keeping the ultimate conclusion of their tall tales intact.
Then another clarification, then another reveal that even their newest edition to the story is known to be refuted in part or on the whole by the evidence these guys have access to.
It's the dragon in the garage, as said by Carl Sagan.
You can say that there's a dragon I your garage, and when I come with some way of testing the claim, you can modify the claim to accommodate the investigations latest findings, but at some point, you've exhausted your credibility.
This is how you beat a slippery fucker like this one, She's a religious zealot, with a narrative to explain away everything she sees, trying to make her views look like they are based on reason rather than faith.
Keep pressing her story with the evidence until her claims run dry of being testable, once she's living in the world of the unfalsifiable and therefore unprovable, you can ask her how she'd be able to know if her last version of reality could be shown false. If it can't be tested, then I guess it isn't that significant.
This is how God went from being evident in the workings of all things, to being some hypothetical fart that's largely irrelevant in daily affairs.
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 2 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 03:28:26 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 2 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 06:55:56 ago (+2/-0)
There are entire categories of crimes that are far more likely to have been committed by blacks, and even though they could be felonies, like crimes against person or property, the police are limiting the number of such crimes they investigate so that they wont catch too many black suspects and appear to the public to be discriminating against black people, even though they are not, and are actually doing the opposite, trying to get more whites so that they can get away with getting more blacks and not looking bad for doing so.
This is precisely because the public knowledge is wrong, black and white do not commit the same amount of crime, and the amount of criminality among blacks is so much higher that if it became commonly known, there'd be serious questions raised in our culture about this kind of thing.
Questions that would not only raise the merit of older policies, but also questions that would undermine much of the dogmatic beliefs that underpin our modern civilizations, challenging the very philosophical foundations of our societies.
It'd be bringing to doubt the entire operation of our system, the goals they are pursuing, etc. It'd be like questioning the Catholic church in the height of the dark ages, or the glory of Rome during the peak of the empire, or the validity of Communism during the greatest point in the history of the USSR, or questioning the american dream, divine mandate, and american exceptionalism when america was really rising to its spot as the world power (like at the world's fair).
You know what I mean, its taking the central concept of the country and its culture and saying its philosophy and design are wrong in some disastrous way.
[ + ] Mopar_or_nocar24
[ - ] Mopar_or_nocar24 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 00:25:15 ago (+1/-0)
That's why we call them ideologues. Her and everyone else like her have extraordinarily weak trees of life. They defend their trees vehemently instead of letting them strengthen against the test of reality, or philosophically speaking, the wind. Their roots are shallow and require constant attention else their tree will fall and thus be subjected to having their identities destroyed.
[ + ] WhiteCollarCriminal
[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 03:14:17 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 06:54:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Empire_of_the_Mind
[ - ] Empire_of_the_Mind 4 points 1.9 yearsJul 10, 2022 22:58:33 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 2 points 1.9 yearsJul 10, 2022 23:34:56 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 18:48:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 07:36:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] xachariah
[ - ] xachariah 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 04:50:47 ago (+1/-0)
She thinks they're not more violent than Whites are, so we can already tell she grew up around Whites and not around them. No need to say it twice.
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 18:46:15 ago (+0/-0)
Math checks out.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 01:51:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 18:51:44 ago (+0/-0)
When niggers chimp out you get destroyed buildings and fields they can't repair and stolen TVs that don't work.
Can't show that.
[ + ] EGGOD
[ - ] EGGOD 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 00:37:32 ago (+0/-0)
The easiest way to disprove this argument is to challenge these people to walk around Detroit at night.
Majority White areas are safe at all hours. Majority Black areas are only safe at 6:00 AM to 2:00PM when all the criminals are still asleep and all the niglets are still in school.
[ + ] Cantaloupe
[ - ] Cantaloupe 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 01:16:45 ago (+0/-0)
Except the last wild claim
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 00:35:37 ago (+0/-0)
Or at least that'd be true if this claim wasn't bullshit. The reality is that according to crime victimization studies from the bureau of justice, the average black person is twice as likely to commit a crime as to be the victim of one, meaning blacks are the only race that commits as much interracial crime as intraracial crime.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 02:49:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 11, 2022 00:28:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 10, 2022 23:35:38 ago (+0/-0)