Sign into an existing account

https://archive.ph/W9IoO

If you don't want to go to the site and risk cancer, I have done this for you.

More than a few subs have switched sub settings to NSFW as those subs then not only don't show for users who haven't opted in and people who aren't logged in but it also cuts off ad revenue on those subs. Other subs have removed all sub rules except those that the site itself imposes allowing some users to do things like post photos of their literal assholes in some of the default subs and make it to the front page (fucking god level shit, that one, honestly). Others are just taking on themes (like /steam is now about literal steam, whatever this Oliver dude crap is about, and so on.)

As a result, admins are now going in and unmoderating entire teams, locking those accounts, flipping the subs to "restricted" mode, un-NSFW toggling them, nuking posts and comments, replacing those mods. As of this moment, there are more than a few "unmoderated" popular subs and users are swarming the sub-reddit request sub to request them as they are unmoderated.

Comments are juicy, crying is abundant, powermods are tripping.

https://archive.ph/0u5ig







Pure nigger privilege. Where’s the hate crime charge? Oh yea, only White people get that.

https://archive.ph/hukVt

In censure of Cheney and Kinzinger, GOP frames Jan. 6 riot as 'legitimate political discourse'


“I’m a constitutional conservative and I do not recognize those in my party who have abandoned the Constitution to embrace Donald Trump. History will be their judge. I will never stop fighting for our constitutional republic. No matter what.”

Upon learning of the wording used in the censure resolution, she then posted a response on Twitter.

This was January 6th.
This is not “legitimate political discourse.” pic.twitter.com/lKgbVyVcJr

— Rep. Liz Cheney (@RepLizCheney) February 4, 2022

In all, just 17 Republican lawmakers voted in 2021 to impeach or convict Trump for his role in the Jan. 6 attack. Democrats, along with Cheney and Kinzinger, are continuing to investigate how far the plan to overturn the 2020 election extended.

Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger listen during a House select committee hearing on the Jan. 6 attack.
Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger at a House select committee hearing on the Jan. 6 attack. (Andrew Harnik/Pool via Reuters)
In theory, the committee's work could lead it to file a criminal referral for Trump to the Department of Justice, but even primetime hearings detailing Trump's efforts to keep Biden from becoming president could offer a serious impediment should Trump decide to seek reelection in 2024.

For Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, who twice voted to impeach Trump, the censure of Cheney and Kinzinger is an ominous sign for the party he represented as its presidential nominee in 2012. Romney's niece Ronna Romney McDaniel is the current chairwoman of the GOP and a staunch Trump ally.

Shame falls on a party that would censure persons of conscience, who seek truth in the face of vitriol. Honor attaches to Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger for seeking truth even when doing so comes at great personal cost.

— Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) February 4, 2022

Most Republican lawmakers remained silent in the immediate aftermath of the resolution, although Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., also criticized the RNC's decision. Cassidy and Romney are two of the seven GOP senators who voted to convict Trump after the Capitol riot.

The RNC is censuring Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger because they are trying to find out what happened on January 6th - HUH?

— U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (@SenBillCassidy) February 4, 2022

Read the full censure resolution below:

https://archive.ph/qOx77

Algerians.

https://archive.ph/YJNwz

Archive link:
https://archive.ph/YJNwz

Live link:
https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=64698870bf028

https://archive.ph/kMP32

This is the data my post is referring to:

https://archive.ph/kMP32/95e1b562ef3378bf0fd411992967ae72d8c091af.png





also this since the original link is from 2009, heres something from 2017


'White newlyweds, too, have experienced a rapid increase in intermarriage, with rates rising from 4% to 11%. However, despite this increase, they remain the least likely of all major racial or ethnic groups to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity.'

https://archive.ph/48zg6


Even almost ten years later, White females still prefer their own race more than White males


https://archive.ph/HmThA


also this study from 2011

'Data gathered from more than 1 million profiles of singles looking for love online show that whites overwhelmingly prefer to date members of their own race, while blacks, especially men, are far more likely to cross the race barrier in hopes of being struck by Cupid’s arrow...According to the study, more than 80 percent of the online dating contacts initiated by whites were to other whites, with only 3 percent going to blacks. This trend held for both men and women, young and old. Although black participants initiated contact to members of their own race more than to whites, they were ten times more likely to contact whites than vice versa, according the the study.'


https://archive.ph/HUsWf#selection-1177.144-1177.419



another study from 2011

For those who state a preference, both
white males and females are the least open to interracial dating within their genders–29
percent of white males and 65 percent of white females prefer to date only whites

https://booksc.org/book/38754602/eb831d

pdf version: https://files.catbox.moe/mhrppt.pdf




A study from 2013

All women except black women are most drawn to white men, and men of all races (with one notable exception) prefer Asian women.

https://archive.ph/KTgQF