Sign into an existing account

Ideological Hackers vs. Cybercriminals

In the digital underworld, a stark divide separates ideological hackers from ruthless cybercriminals. Ideological hackers target governments, banks, and corporations to expose corruption or challenge power, driven by political or social motives. Cybercriminals, however, prey on individuals and small entities for profit or chaos, causing widespread harm. This article examines their motivations, methods, and impacts, focusing on the cybercriminals who exploit the vulnerable.

Ideological Hackers: Striking the Powerful

Ideological hackers pursue systemic change, attacking high-profile entities to disrupt or expose. Their targets include government agencies, financial institutions, and multinational corporations. Using sophisticated techniques like phishing, SQL injections, or zero-day exploits, they breach fortified systems to leak sensitive data or halt operations. For example, in 2020, a hacker collective leaked documents alleging police misconduct during global protests. Others have targeted media outlets to counter perceived biases. Their actions aim to spark reform or accountability, sparing ordinary individuals from harm.

Cybercriminals: Exploiting the Vulnerable

Cybercriminals prioritize easy targets, exploiting weak cybersecurity for financial gain, thrill, or malice. Their tactics devastate individuals, small businesses, and public services. Below are their main categories and methods:

1. Ransomware Gangs

Operations: Organized syndicates like REvil or LockBit deploy ransomware to lock devices or encrypt data, demanding cryptocurrency ransoms. They target hospitals, schools, and individuals, exploiting outdated software or weak passwords.

Impact: A 2024 report estimated global ransomware damages at $20 billion, with victims losing savings or businesses collapsing.

2. Phishing Scammers

Operations: Using fake emails, texts, or social media, scammers impersonate trusted entities to steal credentials or funds. Retirees are frequent victims of investment or tech support scams.

Impact: In 2023, phishing scams cost U.S. consumers $3.7 billion, per the FBI, often draining retirement accounts.

3. Data Breachers

Operations: Hackers infiltrate systems to steal personal data, selling it on dark web markets. A 2022 Equifax breach exposed 147 million people’s details, fueling identity theft.

Impact: Victims face fraudulent charges or ruined credit, spending years recovering.

4. Trolls

Operations: Thrill-seekers deface websites, dox individuals, or hijack accounts like Steam profiles for resale or harassment.

Impact: Victims endure emotional distress or loss of digital assets.

Why Cybercriminals Target the Vulnerable

Cybercriminals exploit individuals’ weak defenses—reused passwords, unpatched systems—using accessible tools like phishing kits or ransomware-as-a-service. Cryptocurrency ensures anonymous profits, while low enforcement in some regions shields them. A 2024 cybersecurity analysis noted, “Gangs don’t discriminate; if you’re vulnerable, you’re a target.” Unlike ideological hackers, their motive is profit or disruption, not principle.

The Scale of Harm

Cybercriminals cause immense damage. A 2024 IBM report pegged average data breach costs at $4.45 million, with individuals facing identity theft or fraud. The FBI’s 2023 Internet Crime Report recorded $12.5 billion in losses from 800,000+ complaints, mostly from ordinary people. Ideological hackers, by contrast, rarely harm individuals directly.

Countering Cybercriminals

Combating cybercriminals demands action:

Individuals: Use unique passwords, enable two-factor authentication, and verify suspicious messages.

Governments: Enforce stricter cybercrime laws and global cooperation, like the 2023 Genesis Market takedown.

Tech Firms: Enhance default security and user education.

Ideological Hackers: Expose vulnerabilities through bug bounty programs.

Conclusion

Ideological hackers challenge the powerful with a cause, while cybercriminals exploit the vulnerable for gain or chaos. Their scams, ransomware, and breaches shatter lives, underscoring the need for robust defenses to protect society from digital predation.

TexasVet and bobdole9 were regular posters on my subs until 2025. First, TexasVet went full retard by insulting me out of the blue. Second, bobdole9 started fucking with me in his sneaky way with his alt account.

When ADHDFerret turned out to be a fed shill, I was really surprised, because we owned a sub together on Reddit. When he went full libtard retard I thought it was a fake account. Turns out it was really him, because he really demoded himself from our Reddit sub. Unless he was killed and replaced by a clone, LOL

Now about TexasVet and bobdole9.

TexasVet went full retard like Jew trolls do. End of story, morning glory.

bobdole9 keeps being sneaky like a fed. Still obvious, but not full retard.

He admitted that he started fucking with me with his alt account without even saying hi, even if he posted in my subs daily. The weird thing is he is talking like a robot, not like a human being. As far as I know, only feds and bots talk like robots. At least the other two went full retard.

As far as I know, feds do not go full retard, they are paid to pretend to be Nazis, that's it.

According to common sense, if these accounts go suddenly full retard, maybe they are kikes, not feds.

I know some people here who are still normal and really contribute to Upgoat, helping people. I'm really staying here only because of these few people who are normal.

Last question for all. Are they shills, or AI bots?

Highly likely all paid by USAID with US money anyway.

Take care.

Abstract:

This article explores how sexual norms evolved from ancient times to today, focusing on the psychological, neurological, and psychiatric effects of virtuous coupling versus perverse behaviors like prostitution and pornography.

Grounded in Juvenal’s maxim "mens sana in corpore sana" (1st century CE), meaning a sane mind in a sane body, it contrasts healthy soulmate relationships with the destructive cycles of promiscuity, STDs, and family breakdown.

Prostitution and pornography were historically synonymous due to shared linguistic roots and ignorance of STDs. Brain changes from reckless virginity loss, societal failures like poor education, and possible degenerate influence on lax laws fuel these issues. Historical, biological, and psychological evidence backs this up.

1. Historical Foundations: A Sane Mind in Sane Body

The Roman poet Juvenal wrote "mens sana in corpore sana" (Satire X, 1st century CE), meaning a sane mind in a sane body, tying physical discipline to mental health.

Ancient Greece and Rome prized sexual restraint—virginity symbolized purity, and marriage stabilized society (Plato’s Symposium, 360 BCE; Lex Julia, 18 BCE). Ignorance of STDs blurred lines between prostitution and pornography, making them linguistically synonymous.

Greek terms like porne (prostitute) and porneia (sexual immorality) covered both transactional sex and public sexual displays, like hetaerae’s performances at symposia, akin to live porn (Liddell & Scott, 1843).

Roman scortum (prostitute) described both brothel workers and staged sexual acts (McGinn, 2004). These shared linguistic roots reflected their role as commodified, voyeuristic spectacles, spreading diseases like syphilis unknowingly, harming the sane body. Virtuous coupling supported mental well-being.

2. How the Brain Breaks After Promiscuous Virginity Loss

The brain’s reward system, driven by dopamine and oxytocin, shapes love and bonding. Losing virginity in a committed relationship boosts oxytocin, strengthening intimacy and pudicity (modesty), creating a lifelong “us” feeling (Young & Wang, 2004).

Promiscuous or random virginity loss spikes dopamine, numbing reward pathways and weakening oxytocin-driven attachment (Volkow et al., 2016).

This kills the inborn instincts for lifelong coupling, like those in monogamous animals, and erases the deep love virgins feel. Couples become detached, seeing relationships as “me and somebody else” for temporary convenience, not “until death do us part.”

This neurological damage fuels divorce, as partners lack the natural reflexes for lasting bonds (Fisher, 2016), contributing to a 50% U.S. divorce rate (CDC, 2023).

3. Psychological Roots of Soulmate Relationships

Mentally healthy people find soulmates through shared values and emotional connection. Attachment theory says secure individuals build lasting bonds, with 80% of secure couples reporting high satisfaction (Bowlby, 1969; Feeney, 2016).

Waiting until marriage for sex correlates with lower divorce rates (5% in traditional societies vs. 50% in the U.S.; Busby et al., 2010). Psychiatric studies show monogamy cuts anxiety and depression, keeping the mind sane (Kiecolt-Glaser & Newton, 2001). Stable families raise kids with fewer personality disorders (Amato, 2005).

4. Weimar Germany: Hub of Sexual Degeneracy

In the Weimar Republic (1919–1933), Germany became the capital of sexual degeneracy. Post-WWI poverty and despair fueled Berlin’s cabarets, legal prostitution, and early porn films (Jelavich, 2006).

Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Research pushed liberal sexual ideas, normalizing deviance. Like Rome’s moral decline, rampant prostitution and drug use eroded society until Nazi crackdowns. This shows how chaos amplifies perversion, clashing with Juvenal’s ideal.

5. Origins of Sexual Perversion

Perversion began with deviations from procreative sex, notably through practices like fellatio and sodomy, pioneered in homosexual contexts. In ancient Greece and Rome, such practices were socially accepted, contributing to sexual deviance (Plato’s Symposium, 360 BCE).

Lacking a vagina as the anatomical opposite of a penis, same-sex partners developed non-procreative acts to accommodate identical genitalia (Havelock Ellis, 1901).

These practices, documented in ancient texts, marked early departures from reproductive norms, setting the stage for broader perversion. Such acts, driven by physicality over emotional bonding, undermined the sane body ideal.

6. Psychiatric Damage from Perversion

Perversion—sex deviating from procreation—drives prostitution and pornography. The $97 billion modern porn industry echoes Roman brothels’ exploitation (Shultz, 2020). Psychiatric research links childhood sexual abuse to borderline personality disorder and later sex work (Widom & Kuhns, 1996).

Porn’s violent content (88% of scenes; Bridges et al., 2010) breeds narcissistic and antisocial traits, harming the sane body (Zimbardo & Coulombe, 2015).

7. Pornography’s Role in Mental Illness and Divorce

Porn spikes dopamine, acting like a drug and impairing the brain’s decision-making center (Volkow et al., 2016). It increases divorce risk by 16% (Perry, 2018) and creates unrealistic expectations, leaving 41% of U.S. adults single (Pew, 2023). Teens (90% see porn online; Wolak et al., 2007) develop hypersexual disorders and distrust, wrecking mental stability (APA, 2013).

Without psychological love, the brain craves raw, intense physical sensations, escalating to perversions. Early porn depicted classic sex, but now 88% of scenes show violent or mentally ill acts, like extreme fetishism, reflecting this shift (Bridges et al., 2010). Promiscuous singles, lacking love and chasing only physical sex, become perverts, spiraling into increasingly deviant behaviors.

8. Natural Laws of Mating Success and Failure

Serial divorcees repeat failed relationships, reflecting a pattern of untrustworthy behavior. Key principles highlight why:

Einstein’s Quote: “Madness is doing the same thing over again and expecting different results.”

Probability Law: “Once may be a mistake. Twice may be a coincidence. Thrice is compulsion.”

These capture serial divorcees who repeat breakups after promiscuity destroys their bonding ability. Neurological damage from promiscuous virginity loss erodes the “us” of lifelong love, leaving them detached, chasing temporary convenience without insight (Volkow et al., 2016).

One breakup might be bad luck, two could be chance, but three or more reveal an unconscious compulsion to fail, marked by reckless negligence (Perry, 2018). This compulsion fuels the 50% U.S. divorce rate (CDC, 2023), signaling they’re untrustworthy partners best avoided.

In contrast, simple promiscuous attraction, driven by procreation instincts, differs from conscious, logical psycho-physical compatibility. A virgin, sane brain, with intact bonding instincts and reflexes, fosters lifelong love, enabling healthy families without divorce (Young & Wang, 2004). Promiscuity disrupts this, leading to compulsive failures.

9. Biological and Psychiatric Toll of STDs and Infections

Promiscuity spreads incurable STDs like herpes and HPV, needing lifelong treatment. Misinformed individuals believe condoms fully protect during promiscuous sex, but kissing transmits herpes or HPV (CDC, 2024).

Others pay prostitutes extra to forgo condoms, heightening STD risks. Even monogamous couples risk infections if clueless, such as performing oral or vaginal sex after sodomy, which can transfer E. coli and similar pathogens from the anus, causing severe urinary or genital infections (Workowski & Bolan, 2015). Parasites like Trichomonas vaginalis, transmitted during sex, also cause painful infections and increase HIV risk (CDC, 2024).

Chronic infections raise cortisol, worsening depression and shortening life by 5–10 years (Looker et al., 2008). Infected mothers pass damaged DNA to babies, causing defects (1 in 2,500 newborns with herpes issues; Kimberlin, 2004). STD and infection diagnoses trigger suicidal thoughts, as shame destabilizes mental health (CDC, 2024).

10. Limitations of STD Testing

STD tests are not 100% reliable. Some STDs, like HIV or herpes, may not show up immediately due to window periods before detection (CDC, 2024). Others, like chlamydia, need specific tests that miss infections if mistimed or asymptomatic, risking untreated spread.

By the natural laws of survival of the fittest, only a virgin relationship—where both partners have no prior sexual exposure—guarantees freedom from STDs, ensuring a healthy body and mind for lifelong bonding.

11. Education, Laws, and Degenerate Influence

Schools teach sex mechanics but skip soulmate bonding or family stability (Guttmacher Institute, 2022), like Rome’s moral collapse (Gibbon, 1776). This fosters impulsive, insecure attachments, driving promiscuity (Fraley & Shaver, 2000).

Degenerates—likely those profiting from or pushing perversion—probably influence this gap and weak laws. Only 20 countries ban porn, and prostitution is legal in 50% of nations, enabling exploitation (UNODC, 2020). This betrays Juvenal’s vision, exposing youth to perversion’s toll.

12. Restoring Sane Mind in Sane Body

A sane mind in a sane body demands virginity, monogamy, and soulmate-driven love. Psychological, neurological, and psychiatric evidence proves monogamy protects mental health and bonding. Perversion-driven industries exploit trauma, harm kids, and break families.

Schools must teach relational skills, STD risks, and safe practices, and laws should ban prostitution and porn. Drawing on ancient wisdom, promoting mental clarity and physical discipline stops STDs, infections, divorce, and exploitation, building healthier generations.

References:

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss.

Bridges, A. J., et al. (2010). Violence Against Women.

CDC. (2023). Divorce Statistics; (2024). STD Surveillance Report.

Ellis, H. (1901). Studies in the Psychology of Sex.

Feeney, J. A. (2016). Attachment and Couple Relationships.

Fisher, H. E. (2016). Anatomy of Love.

Jelavich, P. (2006). Berlin Cabaret.

Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. (1843). A Greek-English Lexicon.

Looker, K. J., et al. (2008). Bulletin of the WHO.

McGinn, T. A. J. (2004). The Economy of Prostitution in the Roman World.

Perry, S. L. (2018). Archives of Sexual Behavior.

Volkow, N. D., et al. (2016). Neurobiology of Addiction.

Widom, C. S., & Kuhns, J. B. (1996). Child Abuse & Neglect.

Workowski, K. A., & Bolan, G. A. (2015). CDC STD Treatment Guidelines.

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). Nature Neuroscience.

Abstract

University fraternities, while projecting an illusion of camaraderie to mask brainwashing, employ dangerous practices and psychological manipulation to destroy students’ independence, defined as conscious, free-willed decision-making, and transform them into amoral, unconscious agents acting on orders rather than moral, independent thinkers.

This article examines hazardous fraternity rituals, their parallels to CIA MKUltra brainwashing methods rooted in ancient Jesuit, Opus Dei, and other similar organizational techniques, and their use by elite-controlled fraternities to compel members to act against personal judgment or gain, often involving self-harm as a tool of control.

Supported by evidence of fatalities, psychiatric research, and historical context, it underscores the erosion of critical thinking, free will, and moral integrity.

Introduction

Behind the illusion of brotherhood used to enforce submission, some university fraternities harbor dark practices that reshape young minds. Independence, the ability to make conscious, free-willed choices, is systematically destroyed by brainwashing that instills unconscious obedience to orders.

Elite-controlled fraternities, tied to power networks and spanning over 750,000 members across 12,000 U.S. chapters, engage in extreme hazing and rituals akin to cult brainwashing, using techniques adapted from ancient Jesuit, Opus Dei, and other similar organizational methods.

These practices, often leading to tragic deaths, exploit young minds and erode the independence essential for ethical leadership.

Dangerous Practices and Fatalities

Hazing in some fraternities involves life-threatening tasks (forced binge drinking, physical abuse, or psychological degradation) to impose submission.

These extreme acts, designed to break down individual will, pave the way for psychological manipulation. The National Institute of Justice reports over 200 hazing-related deaths since 1838, with 40 between 2007 and 2017.

Notable cases include:

Walter Dean Jennings (2003): Died at SUNY Plattsburgh’s Psi Epsilon Chi from water intoxication after being forced to drink gallons of water during a hazing ritual, causing brain swelling and cardiac arrest.

Benjamin Klein (2018): Died by suicide at Tulane University’s Phi Kappa Sigma after psychological hazing, including verbal abuse and forced isolation, leading to severe depression.

J.B. Joynt III (2014): Severely injured at the University of Mississippi’s Sigma Chi; forced to endure prolonged exposure to extreme cold during a hazing ritual, resulting in hypothermia and permanent tissue damage.

Gary DeVercelly Jr. (2007): Died at Rider University’s Phi Kappa Tau from alcohol poisoning after being coerced to drink excessive liquor during a hazing event, with a blood alcohol level of 0.426.

Arman Partamian (2010): Died at the State University of New York at Geneseo’s Alpha Kappa Phi from heat stroke after being forced to perform intense physical exercises in a confined, overheated room during a hazing ritual.

A 2008 StopHazing study found 73% of fraternity members experienced hazing, with 26% enduring physical or psychological abuse, causing widespread trauma.

Brainwashing and Psychological Manipulation

Brainwashing, as defined by psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton, involves manipulating thoughts and behaviors through psychological coercion, targeting conscious independence and replacing it with unconscious compliance.

Fraternities mirror Lifton’s thought reform tactics (milieu control, confession, and identity erasure) via isolation (pledge periods), public humiliation, and degrading rituals that suppress free will.

Sleep deprivation, a common hazing tool, impairs cognitive function and heightens suggestibility, according to neuroscientist Matthew Walker’s research. Under such conditions, pledges become receptive to orders, and the CIA’s MKUltra program, drawing on ancient Jesuit, Opus Dei, and other similar organizational techniques, used sensory deprivation, forced intoxication, and stress to break independence.

Methods mirrored in fraternity hazing foster unconscious, order-driven behavior.

Jesuit and Opus Dei-Inspired Obedience Techniques

Some fraternities adopt obedience techniques inspired by the Jesuits and Opus Dei, rooted in Ignatius of Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises and Opus Dei’s emphasis on mortification, including self-discipline through pain.

These ancient techniques, shared with other organizations alike and long employed to enforce unconscious obedience, were adapted by the CIA and are now used by elite-controlled fraternities to mold pledges.

Both require unwavering submission to authority, often through self-harm to prove submission, eroding conscious independence.

Jesuit cadaver-like obedience and Opus Dei’s practices (self-flagellation or extreme fasting) condition individuals to suppress conscience for group subjugation, acting unconsciously on orders.

In fraternities, pledges are coerced into degrading or dangerous acts (self-harm, such as branding or beatings, public nudity, or extreme physical exertion), despite objections, instilling amorality. These obedience tactics, rooted in self-sacrifice, prepare members for elite socialization that demands domination over ethics.

Elite Influence and Amoral Obedience

Elite-controlled fraternities, like Yale’s Skull & Bones, with alumni including U.S. presidents and CIA directors, use secretive rituals to instill submission to power structures. These rituals transform members into unconscious agents who follow orders.

Sociologist G. William Domhoff argues these groups condition members into elite networks, instilling amorality and compliance. These agents, embedded in government and industry, shape policies that prioritize elite interests.

The Jesuit and Opus Dei obedience models amplify this, using CIA-adapted techniques rooted in Jesuit, Opus Dei, and other similar organizational traditions. They produce “agents” who serve elite interests over personal values, molded by rituals that stifle critical thought and free will.

Psychiatric Insights and Long-Term Harm

Brainwashing disrupts the prefrontal cortex, impairing conscious moral judgment and decision-making, as shown in fMRI studies by neuroscientist Antonio Damasio. This neurological disruption fosters unconscious, order-driven behavior, stripping free will and independence.

Hazing survivors report PTSD, anxiety, and diminished self-esteem, similar to those of cult survivors. A 2019 Journal of Interpersonal Violence study found 74% of hazed fraternity members experienced psychological distress, with 15% meeting PTSD criteria.

Conclusion

Elite-controlled fraternities use dangerous hazing, CIA-like MKUltra brainwashing rooted in ancient Jesuit, Opus Dei, and other similar organizational techniques, and Jesuit- and Opus Dei-inspired obedience techniques to mold students into obedient, amoral tools of elite agendas, acting unconsciously on orders rather than as moral, independent thinkers.

These practices, often fatal, exploit psychological vulnerabilities and erode independence and free will, threatening society’s need for ethical leaders who uphold critical thinking and moral integrity over blind submission. Universities must act swiftly to enforce stricter oversight and policy reform, protecting students and cultivating their moral integrity to ensure they contribute to a just and stable society.

References

Domhoff, G. W. (2018). Who Rules America?

Lifton, R. J. (1961). Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism.

National Institute of Justice. (2020). Hazing in Fraternities and Sororities.

Walker, M. (2017). Why We Sleep.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence. (2019). Psychological Impacts of Hazing.

Loyola, I. (1548). Spiritual Exercises.

The New York Times. (2003). Walter Dean Jennings Hazing Death.

The Times-Picayune. (2019). Benjamin Klein Hazing Suicide.

The Oxford Eagle. (2015). J.B. Joynt III Hazing Injury.

The Star-Ledger. (2007). Gary DeVercelly Jr. Hazing Death.

Democrat and Chronicle. (2011). Arman Partamian Hazing Death.

StopHazing. (2008). National Study on Student Hazing.