2
THE BRINGING-UP OF THE LITTLE JEW, (((Samuel Roth)))     (whatever)
submitted by Flanders to whatever 3 days ago (+2/-0)
0 comments...


"Jews Must Live —By (((Samuel Roth)))
Originally published in 1934

Excerpt from Chapter VI
"THE BRINGING-UP OF THE LITTLE JEW"



"During my days as a bookseller on West Eighth Street, I became friendly with a man who employed more than four thousand people. It was known of him also that he did not permit Jews to work in any branch of his business. "Will you tell me why?" I once asked him.

"Just business," he said, "Jews are not dependable, and they are untrustworthy."

"Would that explain their success in business?" I asked.

"I don't know what explains a Jew's success in business," he replied. "But have you ever heard of a Jew who made a success of another man's business?"

I was silent.

He smiled. "When you find such a Jew," he said "send me a wire collect, and I'll begin hiring Jews immediately."

"Have you never employed a Jew, then?"

"Sure, many of them. By accident. They come around to our employment department, give Christian names, and get away with it - until I spot them. At the works they say that I've got an unfailing eye for Jews. They never escape me."

I protested that this seemed both remarkable and unbelievable. I, a Jew, very frequently mistook a Jew for a gentile!

"Being a Jew isn't it enough, Roth. You've got to have a nose for Jews. You've got to be able to smell them out. If I can't spot it in their features, I can find their Jewishness in their conversation."

"What about Jews with Harvard accents?"

"You've got me wrong. I didn't mean their accents at all. Most American Jews talk like Americans, and less with their hands than regular Americans do. I have a more infallible way of recognizing a Jew in my employ. When a Jew talks to his employer he usually looks over his head."

I think I know exactly what this man meant. Isaac looks over the head of his employer to the invisible Lord God of Israel. Since all the wealth before him was really meant for the enrichment of Israel, there must be at hand some nice easy way to get out of the crude hands of the goy in actual possession. He cannot help this dishonest feeling. It is almost as instinctive with him as it is instinctive for the gentile who sees him to pass by him. That's how poor Isaac has been brought up. And what a little Jewish boy has learnt, to quote a contemporary patriotic Jewish drama, he never forgets.

What is this Jewish upbringing! To know it you have to enter and live in, a Jewish home. I only knew one Jewish home intimately, the one in which I was, so to say reared, and so I shall give you some inkling of it. It was typical of all Jewish homes, rich or poor alike.

The Hebrew of the rabbis was all I had been permitted to learn in Poland. My father's respect for what might be learned outside of the Pentateuch being very scan, it was lucky for me that public school attendance in New York City was compulsory. I was enrolled in the public school of my district. But that did not mean the end of my Hebrew studies. To continue those I was compelled to go to cheder (Hebrew school) for two hours after school every afternoon.

My father had to pay so much every week for my Hebrew schooling. What he paid came out of the slender means by which we were fed and clothed. And what poverty we lived in, those days! My father drudged heavily and bitterly for the little money he earned. For some fifteen or eighteen dollars he found once a week in his pay envelope he had to rise four o'clock mornings to go to work, and he stuck to his machine till nearly ten o'clock at night. The agony his livelihood cost him made a miser out of my father. He could not bear to part with the greenbacks which came to him with so much anguish of body and spirit. But not once did I hear him complain of the cost of my Hebrew education.

It was really heartrending. He grudged my poor mother every penny he allowed her for the bare necessities of life and the rental of the insect-ridden apartment we occupied on Broome Street. If he found in the ice-box, when he came home, apart from what had been left for his supper, a little butter, an egg, or some barley, he quarreled about it interminably with my mother, and was certain to cut down her allowance the following day. Yet when it came to parting with cheder money, no questions were asked. Why?

The explanation for this is simple enough. Without the aid of a local police to enforce it, Hebrew education is compulsory among Jews. To fail to force me to go to cheder would have meant complete social ostracism for my father and mother. The Jewish boy must learn enough Hebrew whereby to read his prayer book on Saturday mornings in synagogue, and for the ceremony of Bar Mitzvah, his thirteenth birthday, when he is installed as a full-grown member of the Jewish community, with full responsibilities of a citizen. To have failed in this important preparation is, in Jewish life, an act of high treason to the Jewish nation. That is how it happened that, against my own wishes I spent the precious hours after school, learning Hebrew [20].

If you stop an American Jew and ask him why he plagues his children with Hebrew studies (after the already exhausting sessions of the public schools) he will give you one of two reasons. He will either plead that he is giving his son the religious education he needs to complete his equipment for a successful career, or that he thinks it is important to supplement the cultural training his son is acquiring in the public school with the cultural Jewish training that is traditionally just as important to his son.

The first answer is given by the simple ignorant Jew, the sort of Jew my own father was. The answer is sincere and honest enough, for it was transmitted to him by a hundred thoughtless generations. But fundamentally it is untrue. The amount of Hebrew a child needs to know for purely religious purposes, he learns in two years, before he is six years old, before he is required to begin his secular education. And religion is not taught in the Hebrew schools.

Hebrew instructors are not religious and do not bother to teach religion. I was a cheder student when a child, and I was never taught religion. When I grew older I held a position with the Bureau of Jewish Education maintained by funds publicly collected from the Jewish community of New York. I do not think I violate any confidences when I assert that neither its chief executive nor any one of his dozen department heads were believers in the Jewish religion.

The cultural reason sounds more plausible but has even less foundation in fact. If the Hebrew schools foster Jewish culture, where is this culture? Now culture is either creative or absorptive. Creative Jewish culture we have not in America even in its lowest form. As for absorptive culture - which consists of the contemplation of culture created by others, and so transmitted through time and space - there is almost none of that in America either. What have we of Jewish culture in America, really? The national anthem, a few field songs from Palestine, and some anemic modern adaptations of themed from the Old Testament. The few serious Hebrew works imported into the United States from Europe and Asia Minor are for the absorption of the few European Jews who have made of America a sort of haven of despair in their old age.

The cultural argument is the rankest sort of pretence. Do the thousands of French families in the United States compel their children to study French after school so as to preserve with them the inheritance of French culture? Or is there any reason to believe that the French think any less of their culture than the Jews think of theirs? How many German schools do the fifteen million Germans in the United States maintain to help their children keep the inheritance of German culture? The preservation of Jewish religion and culture are merely excuses for something else, a smoke-screen. What the Jew really wants and expects to achieve through the instrumentality of the Hebrew school is to cultivate in his son the sharp awareness that he is a Jew and that as a racial Jew - apart from all the other races - he is waging an old war against his neighbors. The young Jew must learn to remember that before anything else he is a Jew, that, before any other allegiance, comes his allegiance to the Jewish People. He may be a good American if it is good business to be a good American. He may even pose as a good Chinaman. But no obligation he contracts with a non-Jew is to be considered valid if it violates the interests of this most important obligation of his.

The first thing the young Jew learns is that he is a Jew. The second thing he learns is that being a Jew makes him different from the members of all the other peoples on the face of the earth. Sanctity, because of the ever presence of the synagogue as a background is inevitably part of his impression of his function as a Jew. If the family in the midst of which he is reared has shed all of its religious feathers, then a sense of superiority takes the place of the feeling of sanctity. The third thing he learns is that, as a member of a nation of priests, it is his business to make for himself a high place in the world, some position from which he will be able to compel the world to pay him tribute.

Most desirable for the young Jew, he is told impressively, is it, for him to become a member of one of the professions - to become a doctor, a lawyer, an engineer, even a salesman or an agent. To be compelled to go to work, to do manual labor for one's livelihood, is the very worse state the young Jew can fall to, something to make him really ashamed and humiliated.

This attitude of the Jews towards manual labor is historic. The Jewish apologists have a neat explanation for it. In most of the countries of the Diaspora the Jews were not permitted to own land or to work on it. Nor were they permitted to work for Christians. And since Jewish merchants could give employment only to a fraction of the great numbers of young Jews, the rest had to turn for careers to salesmanship, money-lending and the other promoting aspects of trade. This does not explain why Jews have never, like other peoples, gone into a wilderness and built up a land of their own. Nor why in England, in the thirteenth century, under Edward I, they did not take advantage of the offer by which Edward promised to give them the very opportunities Jews had been crying for for centuries.

After imprisoning the whole Jewish population in his domain for criminal usury and debasing the coin of the realm, Edward, before releasing them, put into effect two new sets of laws: the first made it illegal for a Jew in England to lend money at interest. The second repealed all the standing laws which kept Jews from the normal pursuits of the kingdom. Under these new statutes Jews could even lease land for a period of fifteen years and work it. Edward advanced this as a test of the Jew's sincerity when he claimed that all he wanted was an opportunity to work like other people. If they proved their fitness to live like other people, the inference was that Edward would let them buy land outright and admit them to the higher privileges of citizenship. Did the Jews take advantage of Edward's decree? This way. To get around the laws against usury they invented such new methods of skinning the peasants and the nobles that the outcry against them became greater than ever, and Edward had to expel them to avert a civil war. It was not recorded that one Jew took advantage of the new right to till the soil.

During the Napoleonic era there was a rabbi in Metz, Aaron Worms by name, who felt deeply the shame of the traditional Jewish attitude towards manual labor. He took the trouble to publicly rebuke the people for it, and, as an example, apprenticed his son Eijah to an artisan. But it was a vain gesture, as has been the effort of every Jew of integrity to civilize his people. For his pains, there were Jews in Europe who called him an apostate - and worse. The Jew's feeling of superiority to manual labor has become second nature with him. It has been inborn and inbred in him as carefully and painstakingly as the virtues of a life of useful labor are inbred in the lives of the children of the rest of the nations.

The Jewish boy's progress through school is observed with the most hawk-like watchfulness. Does he show himself argumentative? Deep of voice? Cunning of device? It is immediately taken for granted that the Law is his natural, God-given profession. Plans are made to finance his way through the best possible law-school. There may not be money for other things in the house or with which to pay legitimate debts. But there will be money, and plenty of it, forthcoming for Willie's tuition and upkeep in law school. Aptness in science, on the other hand, marks Izzie for the medical profession. It is not, of course, as simple to make a doctor as it is to make a lawyer, for at least three times as much time and money is required. To make a doctor out of Izzie, practically the whole family is set to work; it is sometimes even necessary to marry him off in advance so as to get him the help-in-advance of a goodly dowry. A facility with figures, in the same manner, points to a career in engineering and accountancy. Every promise is noted and capitalized.

Now there would not be so much harm in the Jews taking in such immense droves to the practice of the cardinal professions if they approached them in the proper spirit. But the Jew does not, cannot, turn to the law with anything like reverence for the profession or for its splendid traditions. Willie sets his jaw grimly to the task of competing with several thousands of other Willies for the few scraps of pickings in law lying about loose, and Izzie's attitude towards medicine is not much more cheerful or respectful. The attitude of a young Jew towards his profession is really like that of a gangster towards a new racket. The real end is the amount of money it is likely to yield him in exchange for the smallest investment of labor and enthusiasm. But more of this when we take up the Jews as doctors and as lawyers.

Does poor Simon bring home bad marks from school? He is continually warned, by parents and neighbors, that unless he shows decided improvement he will without doubt forfeit the support of his family in the direction of a career. It is pointed out, with the most painful emphasis, that unless he picks up in his studies, he will sink into the horrible ignominy of having to work for his livelihood. So deeply is it impressed on the growing Jew that to have to work with his hands is the most awful humiliation of life, that, no matter what becomes of him, he inwardly determines that he will not submit to work.

The easiest business for the young Jew not apt enough to enter one of the major professions, is selling newspapers. Almost all the news stands in America are owned by Jews. The news stand, however, is only a stepping stone. Once he has saved up a few hundred or a few thousand dollars, the Jew sells his news stand (to some other Jew beginning a similar career) and buys into a business where the chances of monetary profits are greater. He takes to selling haberdashery, hosiery, and real estate. Businesses in which the margin of profit is limited by established prices do not interest him.

But you must have some money with which to buy even a news stand. The young Jews who have no money at all to start with, and certainly no legitimate positions to fill [21], take to selling. They sell kitchen utensils from door to door, things which have no standard price, "blind articles," they are called, on which the return in profit is from five hundred to a thousand percent. These young Jews have created an amazing variety of things to sell.

There was always a strong streak of perverseness in my nature. After being graduated from Public school, in which I showed no aptness for arguments or science, but did write a history of the world in rhymed couplets, I was expected to at least find a position in an office. I went to work instead, in a smoking-pipe factory where the air was full of an evil-smelling dust, most obnoxious in my division where the stems were cut. The factory was on Avenue B and Seventeenth Street, the very heart of the East Side, but there was only one other Jew working in that factory, a Galician Jew who was foreman. When he learned that I was not only a Jew but a graduate from public school, he decided that I must be out of my mind.

What becomes of the young Jews who cannot attain to one of the professions, have not the money with which to buy a news stand or the mental resourcefulness to create a selling line? Most of them remain on the street-corners of their neighborhoods and become the petty thieves, hold-up-men, strike-breakers, back-store crap-shooters, street-corner mashers, dope peddlers and dope smugglers, white slave traffickers, kidnappers and petty racketeers of every peaceful community in America.

Certainly Jews are not the only people who become gangsters, to make civilized life on this continent creepy with a thousand species of repellent crime. The Irish, Greek and Italian immigrants contribute their substantial share. There is, however, this difference between their respective contributions. The Irishman, the Italian and the Greek become criminals out of sheer necessity, and remain so only as long as the necessity lasts. As in every other thing the Jew touches, he immediately conceives of it as a career. The Irish, Italian and Greek gangsters are skin sores on the social body. Eventually, with a little application of remedy, they can be cleared away. The Jewish gangster imbeds himself deeply in the flesh of society. He becomes a permanent if not a fatal tumor."
[END]

https://www.jrbooksonline.com/Roth_JML/chapter_06.htm
https://www.jrbooksonline.com/roth.htm
-2
Writer Spencer Sunshine described it as "the bible of the most extreme wing of the new generation of neo-Nazis", and noted it as "a strange book, mixing National Socialism with serial killers and a veneration of Charles Manson"     (OccidentalEnclave)
submitted by Joe_McCarthy to OccidentalEnclave 3 days ago (+0/-2)
6 comments last comment...
-1
Prostitution is the only form of natural sex that still remains. At least for western / feminized nations.     (AnonWhatever)
submitted by anon to AnonWhatever 3 days ago (+1/-2)
2 comments last comment...
Sex between a women and a man is supposed to be dependent on the woman's need for survival. Women are supposed to marry a man because they need to to survive. As far as marriage goes / dating goes (a completely "modern" concept in it's self), this isn't needed anymore. DEI, government gibs, child support, college education access etc allow women to either get good funding from their own DEI given jobs or the government / child support.

That leaves prostitution as the only form of natural sex between a man and a woman anymore (at least in feminized / feminist / matriarchal countries). As it's the only time women are doing it at the core root for survival there.
1
Three idiot "republicans" standing in the way of dismantling the NFA and. Call their offices today Sunday. Tell them they will be primaried.     (vid8.poal.co)
submitted by Crackinjokes to news 3 days ago (+1/-0)
1 comments last comment...
22
Ended Up Frying It In Tallow. Fuck the green beans.     (files.catbox.moe)
submitted by TheOriginal1Icemonkey to CookingWithGoats 4 days ago (+22/-0)
16 comments last comment...
4
How to create complex animations with CSS and JavaScript.     (chat-to.dev)
submitted by byte to programming 3 days ago (+4/-0)
1 comments last comment...
42
Man checks out 100 books from Beachwood Library, then burns them in social media post     (www.cleveland.com)
submitted by Rob3122 to whatever 4 days ago (+42/-0)
24 comments last comment...
https://www.cleveland.com/community/2025/05/man-checks-out-100-books-from-beachwood-library-then-posts-on-social-media-video-of-those-books-burning.html

Once the card was approved, the man checked out 50 books on topics that included Jewish history, African-American history and LGBTQ education.

The following day, CCPL heard from the Princeton University Bridging Divides Initiative (PUBDI), a group that monitors and reports suspected hate crimes on social media.

PUBDI informed CCPL that the man had posted a photo to a social media site April 3 that showed a car trunk full of books, with a caption relating to “cleansing” the libraries
2
This is what it is like to argue with the censorship loving faggot @HeyJames.     (files.catbox.moe)
submitted by MeyerLansky to MossadHiveKickers 3 days ago (+6/-4)
3 comments last comment...
1
What was the greatest TV show ever made and why was it Miami Vice?     (AskUpgoat)
submitted by Crackinjokes to AskUpgoat 3 days ago (+1/-0)
7 comments last comment...
0
Apparently Trump got a trade deal with China.     (twitchy.com)
submitted by Crackinjokes to news 3 days ago (+0/-0)
0 comments...
13
egg shortage     (pomf.lain.la)
submitted by boekanier to whatever 4 days ago (+13/-0)
9 comments last comment...
0
Iindia and Paki do a dance off to solve ww3     (youtube.com)
submitted by Crackinjokes to videos 3 days ago (+0/-0)
0 comments...
1
How to Pitch a Story to Popular Mechanics     (www.popularmechanics.com)
submitted by GNR_Radio to Machining 3 days ago (+1/-0)
2 comments last comment...
20
Telescopic Philanthropy     (files.catbox.moe)
submitted by SilentByAssociation to memesharing 4 days ago (+20/-0)
10 comments last comment...
https://files.catbox.moe/kbvqf2.jpg

https://files.fatbox.moe/kbvqf2.jpg

Quick, African niggers need your help! Send resources to them rather than to your own countrymen!
0
The Case against the Reds, Attorney General Mitchell Palmer [FEB, 1920]     (whatever)
submitted by Flanders to whatever 3 days ago (+0/-0)
0 comments...
The Case against the ‘Reds’, Attorney General Mitchell Palmer [FEB, 1920]
by U.S. Attorney General Alexander Mitchell Palmer


Intro: "The new Bolshevik government in Russia proclaimed its intent to spread communism worldwide, stoking fear and paranoia within the United States about domestic radical political activity. In 1919 a wave of violent strikes and mail bombs addressed to prominent figures lent credence to Justice Department claims that an American communist revolution loomed. In this article, Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer (1872–1936) outlined the perceived threat posed by Communists, or “Reds,” a nickname name derived from the red flag carried by Bolshevik forces in the Russian Revolution.

During the First Red Scare (1919–1920), the Justice Department raided the homes and offices of suspected Communists, Socialists, and anarchists. The agency also took advantage of existing immigration laws to deport aliens with radical political beliefs. Concerns that immigrants were importing radical political ideologies fortified public support for the stringent legal limits placed on European immigration in the 1920s."

Attorney General Alexander Mitchell Palmer:

"It has always been plain to me that when American citizens unite upon any national issue, they are generally right, but it is sometimes difficult to make the issue clear to them. If the Department of Justice could succeed in attracting the attention of our optimistic citizens to the issue of internal revolution in this country, we felt sure there would be no revolution. The government was in jeopardy. My private information of what was being done by the organization known as the Communist Party of America,2 with headquarters in Chicago, of what was being done by the Communist Internationale under their manifesto planned at Moscow last March by Trotzky[sic], Lenine[sic] and others, addressed “To the Proletariats of All Countries,”3 of what strides the Communist Labor Party4 was making, removed all doubt. In this conclusion we did not ignore the definite standards of personal liberty, of free speech, which is the very temperament and heart of the people. The evidence was examined with the utmost care, with a personal leaning toward freedom of thought and word on all questions. . . .

My information showed that communism in this country was an organization of thousands of aliens, who were direct allies of Trotzky. Aliens of the same misshapen caste of mind and indecencies of character, and it showed that they were making the same glittering promises of lawlessness, of criminal autocracy to Americans, that they had made to the Russian peasants. How the Department of Justice discovered upward of 60,000 of these organized agitators of the Trotzky doctrine in the United States is the confidential information upon which the government is now sweeping the nation clean of such alien filth. Merely as a part of this review, to make it complete, it must be shown how the Department of Justice proceeds to cause deportations today. . . ." [skipping]
---------
"Behind, and underneath, my own determination to drive from our midst the agents of Bolshevism with increasing vigor and with greater speed, until there are no more of them left among us, so long as I have the responsible duty of that task: I have discovered the hysterical methods of these revolutionary humans with increasing amazement and suspicion. In the confused information that sometimes reaches the people, they are compelled to ask questions which involve the reasons for my acts against the “Reds.” I have been asked, for instance, to what extent deportation will check radicalism in this country. Why not ask what will become of the United States government if these alien radicals are permitted to carry out the principles of the Communist Party as embodied in its so-called laws, aims and regulations?

There wouldn’t be any such thing left. In place of the United States government we should have the horror and terrorism of bolsheviki tyranny such as is destroying Russia now. Every scrap of radical literature demands the overthrow of our existing government. All of it demands obedience to the instincts of criminal minds, that is, to the lower appetites, material and moral. The whole purpose of communism appears to be a mass formation of the criminals of the world to overthrow the decencies of private life, to usurp property that they have not earned, to disrupt the present order of life regardless of health, sex or religious rights. By a literature that promises the wildest dreams of such low aspirations that can occur to only the criminal minds, communism distorts our social law.

The chief appeal communism makes is to “The Worker.” If they can lure the wage-earner to join their own gang of thieves, if they can show him that he will be rich if he steals, so far they have succeeded in betraying him to their own criminal course. . . .

There is no legislation at present which can reach an American citizen who is discontented with our system of American government, nor is it necessary. The dangerous fact to us is that the Communist Party of America is actually affiliated and adheres to the teaching program and tactics of the Third Internationale. Consider what this means.

The first congress of the Communist Internationale held March 6, 1919, in Moscow, subscribed to by Trotzky and Lenine, adopted the following:

“This makes necessary the disarming of the bourgeosie [sic] at the proper time, the arming of the laborer, and the formation of a communist army as the protectors of the rules of the proletariat and the inviolability of the social structure.”5

When we realize that each member of the Communist Party of America pledges himself to the principles above set forth, deportation of men and women bound to such a theory is a very mild reformatory sentence. . . .

It has been impossible in so short a space to review the entire menace of the internal revolution in this country as I know it, but this may serve to arouse the American citizen to its reality, its danger, and the great need of united effort to stamp it out, under our feet, if needs be. It is being done. The Department of Justice will pursue the attack of these “Reds” upon the government of the United States with vigilance, and no alien advocating the overthrow of existing law and order in this country shall escape arrest and prompt deportation.

It is my belief that while they have stirred discontent in our midst, while they have caused irritating strikes, and while they have infected our social ideas with the disease of their own minds and their unclean morals, we can get rid of them! And not until we have done so shall we have removed the menace of Bolshevism for good."
--------
2. The Communist Party of America was founded in 1919, splitting off from the Socialist Party in the wake of the Russian Revolution.
3. Leon Trotsky commanded the Red Army during the Bolshevik Revolution, and Vladimir Lenin headed the first Russian Soviet communist government. In 1919, Lenin established the Third Communist International (known as the Comintern) in Moscow, an international socialist workers’ organization whose manifesto called for establishing communism worldwide, through force if necessary, to overthrow the global capitalist, imperialist order.
4. The Communist Labor Party competed with the Communist Party of America in this era; the two groups eventually merged into the Communist Party of the United States of America in 1929.
----------
[Teaching History - In a Leftist Controlled Sort of Way]:
https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/the-case-against-the-reds/
------------X
"The NYC and London Banksters who financed the Bolshevik Revolution"

"Who financed Lenin and Trotsky?
"One of the greatest myths of contemporary history is that the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was a popular uprising of the downtrodden masses against the hated ruling class of the Tsars. As we shall see, however, the planning, the leadership and especially the financing came entirely from outside Russia, mostly from financiers in Germany, Britain and the United States. Furthermore we shall see, that the Rothschild Formula played a major role in shaping these events.":

https://themillenniumreport.com/2018/07/the-nyc-and-london-banker-who-financed-the-bolshevik-revolution/
22
There is no concept of maintenance in the minds of Africans.      (nitter.poast.org)
submitted by Kozel to Niggerz 4 days ago (+22/-0)
10 comments last comment...
14
What do you call an Ethiopian with a feather up his ass?     (Jokes)
submitted by MCDLXXXVIII to Jokes 4 days ago (+14/-0)
4 comments last comment...
A dart.
8
"Coincidentally", this is also the case in Europe     (pomf.lain.la)
submitted by boekanier to RealWhatever 4 days ago (+8/-0)
8 comments last comment...
7
The shit I do to avoid going to the hospital.     (whatever)
submitted by PeckerwoodPerry to whatever 4 days ago (+7/-0)
21 comments last comment...
Had a cyst on my tailbone. It was a big nasty fucker, looked like a whitehead, but the size of a half dollar coin. It was super painful to even wear jeans, fucker was angry. Lanced that bastard with a sewing needle, then opened it up a little more with a paring knife. Got about a shot glass worth of puss out and it smelled like the Ganges. Got it cleaned up real good and slapped some gauze on it. Fast forward a couple hours and I'm a new man. I can sit on my ass again without feeling like eating a bullet. My wife thinks I'm insane, but you really can't argue with results. Anyway, yeah I really don't like hospitals. That was one of the most painful things I've done, but at least I didn't have to deal with Dr Diversity and Nurse tiktok. Y'all think I can run that paring knife through the dishwasher, or should I just throw it in my tackle box?
8
short     (pomf.lain.la)
submitted by boekanier to LifeProTips 4 days ago (+8/-0)
4 comments last comment...
36
US to begin admitting white South African refugees     (www.yahoo.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to FeelsGood 4 days ago (+36/-0)
17 comments last comment...
3
Ye's Hail Hitler single Is banned from all digital streaming     (www.billboard.com)
submitted by Conspirologist to Universal 4 days ago (+6/-3)
6 comments last comment...
26
Fat Mexican Crashes Car In Bout Of Road Rage     (files.catbox.moe)
submitted by Kozel to NiggersDrivingCars 4 days ago (+26/-0)
20 comments last comment...
8
Nothing ever happens. Trust the plan     (files.catbox.moe)
submitted by GreatSatan to whatever 4 days ago (+8/-0)
9 comments last comment...
0
The Establishment Slowly Wearies of Netanyahu and Israel     (simplicius76.substack.com)
submitted by we_kill_creativity to TellTalk 3 days ago (+0/-0)
1 comments last comment...
https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/the-establishment-slowly-wearies

TL;DR It would appear that not supporting israel is starting to go mainstream.