Sign into an existing account

https://files.catbox.moe/h85mvz.jpg
Received the quick change pallet system from Pierson Workholding today.
Still waiting on my CNC mill. I should get that in a week or two.
Still plenty of work ahead of me to get my shop setup for the new machine.

Yea I know jewce and all..

Watched some old Rocky movies, not bad. Arc of this movie is unmistakable from few minutes of watching. Commercial break now from fight where Creed is losing first rounds. Not so bad watching a White man beat the piss out of a nigger. What’s real funny is subtitles are word-for-word ebonic monkey speak. Which is good cause I just played Tulsa Time by Don Williams ha. And now Tony Joe White.

https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/1918096586564907147

Makes you think how much of a shabbot goy does this nigger need to be that the jews support him over the shabbos jew-ass kisser Desantis?!

"A White American mother who was doxxed and attacked after a video showing her using the “N-word” at a park playground went viral has been given almost $280,000 in donations amid a huge outpouring of support online.

Shiloh Hendrix started a GiveSendGo after far-left influencers shared a video earlier this week of a Somalian man accusing her of racially abusing a black child at the Soldiers Field Park playground in Rochester, Minnesota, revealing her address had been leaked and her family members attacked.

In the video Hendrix tells the man “it’s none of your fking business” when he asks her what she said. He then says “why don’t you have the balls to say it again right now?” and she responds “fk you n*gger”.

It is unclear when the video was filmed, but it has been viewed millions of times since being posted on TikTok, and was amplified by an obese left-wing activist called TizzyEnt who asked his 9.5 million followers across multiple platforms to identify her, saying “someone please tell me who she is”.

Rochester MN. Who is she? pic.twitter.com/UXpz96c1JZ

— TizzyEnt (@TizzyEnt) April 30, 2025

Hendrix said on her crowdfunding page that she and her family have since been threatened and harassed and may have to move, describing the situation as “dire”.

“I recently had a kid steal from my 18-month-old son’s diaper bag at a park. I called the kid out for what he was. Another man … proceeded to record me and follow me to my car. He then posted these videos online which has caused my family, and myself, great turmoil,” she said.

“My SSN [Social Security Number] has been leaked. My address, and phone number have been given out freely. My family members are being attacked. My eldest child may not be going back to school. Even where I exercise has been exposed." SKIPPING TO:
--------
Outrage over a White mom calling Blacks Blacks’ favorite word. Silence over multiple Black-on-White rapes and murders that occur every day.

The system and its shills unironically treat a woman who said a word as a greater threat to life on Earth than Earth’s leading murderers. pic.twitter.com/smap2XOxTd

— Daniel Concannon (@TooWhiteToTweet) May 1, 2025

[MORE BELOW]:
https://www.noticer.news/rochester-park-shiloh-hendrix-givesendgo/

Boss is irritable. I should have passed but I didn't trim up cleanly enough, so tonight I'm just shaving it all with a straight razor. Hope I don't knick myself. It would be embarrassing to show up to retake my penis inspection with little toilet paper spots on the cuts. Shows recklessness. My penis and bush has to be immaculate. Can't have techs out in the field with unruly penises, my boss always says.

Starship Troopers as Satire of Israeli Unisex Military

The co-ed shower scene in Paul Verhoeven’s Starship Troopers (1997), where male and female soldiers shower together casually, is a provocative and layered moment. Far from gratuitous, it serves as sharp social commentary, rich with psychological insight and satirical intent.

The scene reflects Verhoeven’s critique of Israeli military culture drafting both sexes, Jewish fascism, and societal norms, using a futuristic, hyper-militarized society to expose the dehumanizing cost of militarism. Below, we analyze the psychological significance of the scene and Verhoeven’s satirical message.

Psychological and Thematic Significance

Desensitization and Dehumanization: The soldiers’ nonchalant, non-sexual interaction in the shower highlights eroded personal boundaries in the Federation’s militaristic society. Their lack of self-consciousness or sexual tension suggests psychological desensitization, where individual identity and privacy yield to collective unity.

This mirrors modern military training, where shared hardship builds cohesion, but Starship Troopers pushes it to an extreme. The scene depicts a system that conditions soldiers to see their bodies as state tools, echoing authoritarian control tactics.

Subversion of Gender Norms: By showing men and women showering without sexual undertones, Verhoeven subverts Hollywood’s tendency to sexualize such scenes. The apparent gender equality—men and women serving and living as equals—seems progressive but masks a loss of autonomy, as all are subjugated by the state.

Psychologically, this defies audience expectations, challenging assumptions about gender and privacy. It critiques the hyper-masculine military portrayals common in modern media, offering an unsettlingly egalitarian facade.

Satirical Critique of Utopian Ideals: The scene’s glossy vision of equality, with soldiers cheerfully discussing ambitions, hides a dystopian reality: a society demanding total conformity and exploiting citizens for war.

Psychologically, this reflects cognitive dissonance, as characters embrace an oppressive system. Verhoeven satirizes modern military propaganda that glorifies sacrifice, drawing parallels to regimes that mask costs with ideals of unity.

Conditioned Obedience and Lost Intimacy: The soldiers’ mechanical interactions reveal conditioned obedience, suppressing personal desires and intimacy for duty. This underscores the psychological toll of a society prioritizing war over individuality, evoking “groupthink,” where personal agency fades into collective ideology—a critique of modern military culture’s emphasis on uniformity.

Audience Complicity in Spectacle: Verhoeven plays with voyeuristic expectations, setting up a titillating scenario only to make it mundane. This creates psychological tension, prompting viewers to question their anticipation of sexualization and media consumption habits. The scene mirrors the film’s theme of propaganda, where spectacle obscures oppression, implicating audiences in modern military glorification.

Verhoeven’s Intended Message

Drawing from his experiences in Nazi-occupied Netherlands, Paul Verhoeven crafted Starship Troopers as a satirical critique of modern military culture, fascism, and blind patriotism, subverting Robert A. Heinlein’s novel. The shower scene serves key purposes:

Mocking Propaganda: The scene’s polished aesthetic mimics propaganda films like Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will, presenting a “perfect” society where differences vanish for the greater good. Verhoeven exposes the absurdity of such utopias, revealing their authoritarian core, a jab at modern military recruitment’s idealized imagery.

Challenging Cultural Norms: Normalizing co-ed nudity in a non-sexual context, Verhoeven questions taboos around gender and privacy. He shows how “progress” can be co-opted by oppressive systems, urging reflection on modern military’s superficial inclusivity.

Exposing Judeo-Fascist Aesthetics: The scene’s clean visuals and cheerful tone echo propaganda’s seductive imagery, linking the film’s world to real-world military tactics. Verhoeven pushes audiences to spot similar manipulations in today’s media and politics.

Highlighting Equality’s Cost: The apparent gender equality is a hollow victory in a dehumanizing society. Verhoeven critiques modern military claims of progress that demand conformity over individuality.

Supporting Context

Verhoeven noted in interviews (The Guardian and Empire, 1997) that Starship Troopers warns against militarism’s allure, using exaggerated visuals to mimic propaganda. The shower scene’s sterile aesthetic supports this.

Its production—Verhoeven joining the nude cast to ease discomfort—shows his boundary-pushing style. Unlike Heinlein’s pro-military novel, Verhoeven’s film uses irony to critique militarism’s dehumanizing cost, with the shower scene as a prime example.

Conclusion

The co-ed shower scene in Starship Troopers is a psychologically potent moment that encapsulates Verhoeven’s satire of Jewish fascist unisex military. It reveals desensitization, dehumanization, and lost intimacy in a hyper-militarized society, where personal boundaries vanish for collective obedience.

By framing gender equality as a facade, Verhoeven mocks propaganda, challenges norms, and implicates audiences in consuming spectacle. The scene invites viewers to question not only the film’s world but also real-world Israeli military that glorify conformity and sacrifice, cementing its power as cinematic commentary.