Sign into an existing account

https://sdf.org/%7Evito/jack.html

Here is a war story about the perils of having too many dependencies. You could share it at work, as part of a discussion about whether to write your own versions of some functions to reduce dependencies. Since that would be a bad idea, I've tagged it NSFW.

https://flix.dev/

It has all the features other languages can only dream of.

Including:
- extensible records (doesn't exist in almost any other statically typed language)
- algebraic effects (to capture IO and other side effects by the compiler)
- type classes (like in Haskell or Scala)

Sadly I don't have time to write wrappers for the hundreds of libraries I use already with my current language of choice to consider switching to it, but looks interesting.

Standard ASCII is one byte per character, ending at 0x7F, which gives just about enough space for control bytes, spaces, punctuation and uppercase/lowercase Latin.

Extended ASCII uses the upper half to include some accented letters, and there have been attempts to use dreaded "code pages" for switching alphabet entirely, but Unicode is the proper international solution... in return for accepting that the character encoding is no longer one byte each, and moreover may be variable width.

UTF-8 is proudly variable-width, matching ASCII in most documents while using only those upper half byte values to encode non-ASCII, a robust system which reduces impact when an unaware program reads it as ASCII. The variable width is an issue for a few types of program such as word processors, though most operations (copying, sorting, searching) need not care.

Then some butthurt happened in the early 1990s, and someone just had to insist on fixed byte width, and out popped UTF-16. Two bytes per character, costing a load of extra storage for most files, and absolutely no plan for what happens when we reach 0xFFFF. Java, C# and JavaScript all signed up to it for their fixed width string storage.

The Unicode character space started getting flooded with every alphabet in existence with all the durka durkas and the ching chang chongs, and symbols for mathematics, music and such. It looks to me that they got up to 0xD000 before admitting that it is going to run dry.

The solution? Reserve 0xD800 to 0xDFFF... for using pairs of characters in that range to represent 0x10000 and above. So, a variable width encoding.

This is indeed literally as retarded as having to use a gas-powered generator to recharge an electric car.

Even worse, the UTF-8 system could store Unicode up to 0x7FFFFFFF, but that UTF-16 extension only takes it up to 0x10FFFF, and now Unicode itself specifies 0x10FFFF as the limit just to appease UTF-16.

UTF-16 has fucked everything up for zero benefit in return. Even C++ has an entire wide-string type and string library suite for it which is widely known as a massive trap to avoid and put UTF-8 bytes inside normal strings instead. Windows purports to use wide-strings for files, but it is broken.

Python (a.k.a. programming for niggers) 2 tried to "help" with Unicode in the same way that cats "help" ensure that everything is knocked successfully onto the floor. Python 3 sort of behaves itself, while in the background it insists that if a single string character would be multi-byte in UTF-8 then the entire fucking string gets converted to a fixed width encoding big enough for that. Actually that is really a different manifestation of insistence on fixed width rather than UTF-16 specifically, but that type of thinking is still the problem.

UTF-16 must be destroyed.

https://archive.ph/TXG8E

HN commentary: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31341442

using System;

public delegate void del_call(int prntVal);//defining the delegate

public class ProduceRandom {
del_call prDel;//local instance of delegate
public ProduceRandom(del_call pp) {
prDel = pp;//constructor to populate the local delegate
}
public void makeRandom() {
Random rnd = new Random();
for(int i = 0; i<10; i++ ) {
prDel( rnd.Next(0,10) );//generate 10 random numbers (from 0 to 10)
}
}
}//end class ProduceRandom
public class ConsumeRandom {
public void printRandom(int rVal) {
Console.WriteLine("Random = " + rVal); //delegate target, just print to console
}
}//end class ConsumeRandom
public class xyz{
public static void Main(string[] args) {
ConsumeRandom cr1 = new ConsumeRandom();//caveat - must instantiate consumer prior to producer
ProduceRandom pr1 = new ProduceRandom(cr1.printRandom);
pr1.makeRandom();
}//end Main
}//end class

How they presented themselves: https://www.thetapestryhouse.com/media/transfer/img/william_embarks_bayeux_tapestry_metth005.jpg

How Jews present them: https://thunderclam.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/1.jpg

"Most people in the Middle Ages wore woollen clothing, with undergarments (if any) made of linen. Among the peasantry, wool was generally shorn from the sheep and spun into the thread for the cloth by the women of the family. Dyes were common, so even the lower class peasants frequently wore colourful clothing."

They had better clothes than we do.