Sign into an existing account

JUDEO BOLSHEVIKS were masters of "bestial torture". Jews find entertainment in the suffering of others.

I have zero sympathy for a hurting jew...when, not if, but when their time comes I'll have ear plugs ready.

The word "immigration" is worn out. REFUGEE has more impact.

Just watch the millions of worthless shitskined worms that plea for sanctuary as REFUGEES, well Israelaid will make the plea for them and the West will swim in shit to get the refugees themselves.

And then, miraculously, in a geopolitical quest for peace, the West prevents a cataclysmic sewer disaster the likes of which is yet to hit the Western 1st world. And there'll be 50 million fresh shitskins wandering around North American.

And the ✡️ will hunch over whilst wringing it's hands with a devious smirk thinking to itself "this is good" .

Something ain't right here, for one thing, water is synonymous with war, more like immediate war. I've received no reports from my Intel sources as of yet nor have I received any satellite imaging
with respect to a nuclear flash, 130 nukes going off should produce some kind of bright flash...and Alex "BUNK MUFFIN" Jones hasn't spilled his slobber yet...and nothing gets "blown" up without him knowing about it.

Something stinks...or is it this egg salad and saurkraut sandwich that I left on my work bench last week? I can't see it, but stranger things have almost happened.

True loyalty is only guaranteed when it comes from someone who's compromised...always make sure that you've got dirt on those partnered with you.
One never wants to be the only one in need of a bath...or laundromat.

When dealings involve government officials, law enforcement (various branches), Prosecutors or idiot lawyers, always ensure that your interests are secured by loyal people WHO ARE COMPROMISED.
Other than that you've got nothing.

...and the fat dick licking jew suddenly resigns a few days ago.

All those who praised the WEF are the dumbest fucks on earth and I do not want them around me.
What pisses me off is that my solution is a losing venture for my mortal being.

In the days of antiquity in the time of 1st generation warfare, if the military didn't like the way things were going they turned on the present rule and installed one of their own choice, a general with a military behind him could be very persuasive. We need history to repeat itself, change can only come about if the military sees what we see.

Fat fags like schwab would have been offed the moment he opened his yap, 200 years ago the parasitic kike was isolated in a pale and now look, and Cromwell was a big part of the jew problem 300 years ago.

I'd like to think that the filthy sodomite swine kikes are starting to unravel.

Out of the White House and a tainted reputation that makes him persona non grata in media and pretty much the entire "private military contractor" service...he wouldn't even make a good criminal. Just a point of interest..."club" rule #1, never talk over the phone, a guy gets sloppy he pays for it. Hegseth would get very serious slaps for his fuckups.

I really can't see him being hired for anything.

...and clumsy as fuck, but funny. And they're lethargic.

What does the future hold for the warrior when there's nothing left to fight for...what kind of a future is not worth fighting for?

The word FUTURE is not without ambiguity. What misfortune befalls us 5 minutes after reading this post, will the UN issue a non binding edict for the sacrifice of the 1st born so as to fight climate change? Or an absurdity of some type will fuck things up.

And the warriors are neutered...the West is definitely in the mid way of the ACTIVE MEASURES stage of "DEMORALIZATION"...previous was the 1st stage of "DESTABILIZATION". It's not good when the warrior is demoralized. It's not good for the future.

The reason why today's women are more and more susceptible to a life of loneliness is that they defiantly refuse to accept the training required to live in a man's world...women have to purge themselves of the ✡️ brainwashing that has them believing that men are not a priority in these modern progressive times.
Strong willed men are a human imperative, women need men. A man will survive without a woman more than a woman without a man...and that's the truth.

Quick point of interest. I'm coming out of the jungle riding my 250 Yamaha Enduro, best mode of travel in the 3rd world, I'm a long ways from my destination, but it's normal operations for me, and it's Jamaica. I cross through the sugarcane field and onto the main rd, 2 minutes down the road and there's this White dame in the middle of nigger hell and she's waving me down...I was going to stop anyways, but I pulled up and notioned with my head to jump on back all while watching for trouble. I'm motoring against the clock, dark at 6.45, I'm 2hrs from destination and it's after 4.00pm. The first thing I asked her, "how in the fuck did you", I didn't even finish and she answered, she was on a tour bus to the waterfalls and heading back the bus stopped to let tourists out to grab some jerk chicken or whatever and she went looking for a washroom...the bus fucked off without her. Did she ever get the experience of a lifetime on back of my Enduro, 3rd world nigger land on a motorcycle. I saved her life and I'll leave it there. Without a man she was fucked...literally.

Women have to adapt to the way of their men or else.........

The jews fear our exceptional qualities so they fucked with the minds of the weaker element of society in order to fuck up thousands of years of prime human lineage

...a candle light vigil with a box of thumbtacks and a rubber chicken would really highlight your support.

I know a lot of you faggots here think that Laura Loomer is a hot looking kike who has a sexy nostril ramp and lips that somehow look like an aftermarket vacuum cleaner attachment that "Finch" would advertise on TV along with a "wopper chopper" that crushes nuts for the "little lady of the house", without a doubt Loomer could suck the chrome off a Chrysler, BUT I THINK SHE'S FUCKING UGLY.

A lot of you guys should get your eyes checked.

I feel it somewhat necessary to apply a measure of corrective penance for the manner in which a recent post was interpreted out of context by one of VOAT's stellar contributors, whom, by all indications, is a woman.

I realize being a woman in a man's world is not without complications as the constant burden of inferiority weighs heavily on the female mind...but I empathize with them and it bothers me to see good women complicate their lives with self inflicted pain due to irrational notions of suspicion that emanates from a simple misunderstanding or gendered inability to comprehend the superior thought process of their male counterparts.

Without lack of deference..."NO HARD FEELINGS POSTWALLHELENA"...regardless of your emotionally overboard belligerence you're still one of us and you can count on any one of us here to assist in your time of hurt...I'm sure anus_expander would be 3rd to step up right behind me.

PEACE OUT

A woman's irrationality most usually stems from conflicting perceptions that are misaligned with that of their male counterparts regardless of virtue or validity fundamentally supporting a man's position.

First off, for the record, I do not condone domestic violence or the physical application of recreational "open handedness", I am also of the position that a woman has 50% of household authority as well as responsibility, including the responsibility to respect and honor the man in her life to the same mutual degree as he. A committed relationship requires "give and take", the good times and bad times are shared equally and to the benefit of each other.

Whew...I finally got that out of the way. However, notwithstanding the aforementioned there are times when corrective measures in the physical form are inevitable. If a woman is of the mind that a man is something that can be directed and controlled by simply implying that her body is the ultimate reward rather than the loving companionship and intimate cohesion naturally expected of her (both), if she thinks that a man can be played as a pussy whipped sucker without repercussions or consequences then she is in line for a reality check. The reality being she's out of the house. This is where it gets uncivilized.

Women don't like the mess they make and when they abscond their obligations of mutual fidelity, loyalty or civilized acceptance of their fuckups, they scapegoat. Potentially their scapegoating furiously escalates and when it's realized that there's no practical substance in their (defensive) reasoning, just hollow, irrationally emotional excuses, things get physical.

I've been with a lot of women in my day with 3 maybe 4 serious relationships. I've never promised that which I could/would not fulfill and I haven't mislead any woman in exploitative fashion, in fact it was always my policy to have women gravitate towards me...BUT...on a very miniscule, few occasions there have been times when physically corrective measures were necessary and believe me it was not fun for them...let's just say that 2 of those dames wore sunglasses for a few weeks. And, yes I did drag one by the hair and I dragged her butt naked ass right outside in the middle of a snowstorm and let me tell you fucking hair extensions will withstand a lot of force. Just to set the story straight I did let her back into the house and she treated me like the royalty I am. She deserved it and she knew it, she didn't call the cops like one of the other bitches did but I didn't like what I did...but I had no regrets.

If women expect equality then they had better learn to accept what it means to be equal.

@PostWallHelena ...maybe in the next phase of human existence you and I will be an item...just remember I like my beef cooked medium rare, my scrambled eggs a little snotty and fresh squeezed grapefruit...and separate beds except for those placating periods of pleasure where we intimately engage in a game of scrabble or Chinese checkers.