Sign into an existing account

I saw an article the other day about Australia\* ruling the largest medical damages in their history against J&J.

Now I'm seeing a blurb from the New Yorker talking about J&J executives' "brazen" "war on consumer protection". It doesn't seem to be prompted by the Australia story (via a quick ctrl-f search).

\* You'd think if they were going to blame an organization for failing to foresee negative consequences of a treatment, they'd blame the Department of Health for failing to be as all-knowing as it insists.

Seems like their DNS is down and they're not responding.

https://consumeproduct.win

The linked campaign seems to have some funding behind it and is telling NPCs to go out and sew chaos this weekend over the SCOTUS leak.

However you feel about abortion, this will probably be a good opportunity for goats to take part in controlling the dominant narrative. Grab your camera, go to one of the venues listed and see if you can't capture some retards acting retarded--or maybe just some evidence of wypipo being 'based'.

Moments ago, I pulled into a local gas station. Once I was close enough to the store-front, I noticed a big sign that said, "COVID TESTS ARE BACK". After some quick thinking, I decided to go in and let the guy know that the sign is going to cost him some business.

"Just to let you know: I came to buy some gas but saw your sign about covid tests and promoting the panic so now I'm going to go somewhere else."

At first he was confused, "whaddya mean?"

"People need to start calming down."

He started taking offense, "It's not a panic. People need tests and I'm letting them know they're available."

"It's a panic, though. So you're going to sell more test kits but less gas today." And I walked out. As an afterthought, I should've added, "You might want to think about which is the better long term business model."

What if all of us home gamers, who are too far from Ottawa to participate in person, parcel/ship a jerry-can to the Canadian capital building?

Address it to your favourite pro-mandate member of parliament or Trudy Castro to send 'em a can.

Address:

House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada
K1A 0A6

I got a couple messages from two sets of public schools (I know--I don't have many options right now) saying there definitely isn't any credibility to some vague threats we may have heard about. Even though we shouldn't take the 'tiktok trend' seriously, they will.

I checked for recent news about tiktok school threats and there's nothing older than the last couple hours. This feels very sudden and coordinated. Is some kind of astro-turfing going on?

Where did the ball start rolling? My guess is something like DOJ put out notice to schools saying, "we're tracking this threat. Be ready to announce it but not until we tell you to." Then maybe the media is just responding to the school announcements?