I saw an article the other day about Australia\ ruling the largest medical damages in their history against J&J.
Now I'm seeing a blurb from the New Yorker talking about J&J executives' "brazen" "war on consumer protection". It doesn't seem to be prompted by the Australia story (via a quick ctrl-f search).
\ You'd think if they were going to blame an organization for failing to foresee negative consequences of a treatment, they'd blame the Department of Health for failing to be as all-knowing as it insists.
J&J is a family owned business founded by a White family.
It is not 100% under Jewish control. So it needs to either be destroyed, or damaged enough to come under Jewish control.
J&J is HUGE. They are in every part of the medical industry. If the Jews are going to "poison the wells" once again and get away with it, J&J needs to come under their complete control.
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 3 points 2.7 yearsSep 16, 2022 14:26:52 ago (+3/-0)
It is not 100% under Jewish control. So it needs to either be destroyed, or damaged enough to come under Jewish control.
J&J is HUGE. They are in every part of the medical industry. If the Jews are going to "poison the wells" once again and get away with it, J&J needs to come under their complete control.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 16, 2022 18:58:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 16, 2022 13:24:51 ago (+0/-0)