Sign into an existing account

Google search is fucking terrible and anyone whose ever googled anything worth a damn knows it. You searched through 30 billion results in .56 seconds and the best you got is:

- a link to the home page of the thing I'm talking about
- a ten year old article that doesn't answer the question
- the opposite of what I asked
- by the 4th/5th result it's even more worthless

A few things,

- fucking try harder. Maybe search for .8 seconds. How is it economical when I have to do 50 variations of the search (.56*80) when you could do a search that isn't SHIT and get me the answer with less queries.

- me and people like me have searched for this before. What was the last page(s) we visited then? That would indicate where the solution was. Why Google not remember that and suggest those pages?

- why Google show exactly the same page when I obviously have not found the answer in it? They have no concept of a search session? Stop showing me the same useless shit, it didn't help the first 20 times. There's no way to tell Google that result isn't helpful?

-Google believes in diversity even in its search results and they are wrong about diversity yet again. Yes, give me all the stackoverflows before joms blog from 10 years ago.

- there are no tools other than fake "advanced search". It's just the one search box which ironically people proclaim as brilliant. No it's fucking not. I need more options to do a good search. More tools and widgets and features. I'm not searching for "what celebrity wore today". I need filters, history tools, regex tools, similar user search graphs, etc. And gonna need more horsepower than fake 30 billion in .56.

- political bias, selling you shit bias, God knows what else, taint their results.

I'm sure I could go on. But the idea that Google is unbeatable in search, I believe, is the biggest fraud in tech today. Google (and Bing) SUCK at search and I think I could beat them by fixing the problems mentioned above. Now what they DO have is infrastructure. For example scraping and storing all those pages would be a challenge but not, I believe insurmountable. I think search is rife for disruption by something that's not another Google clone.

--------

Extra:

Oh yeah, I think this could be done by leveraging NLP machine learning to check for similarities between things but I suspect you could get that part of it done without having to become an expert in it. If need be hire someone to hook up a basic phrase comparison function or rent an existing library to get the project off the ground. Anyways, I laugh at the idea that Google is using brilliant AI in their searches because their searches suck. A little NLP combined with literal comparisons and better search tools would work better, I think. At least for search sessions where you don't get your result instantly.

Censorship is at all time high but I don't think it's the ISPs doing that and I bet if they did do that they'd do it NN or not.

Anyways if I was wrong about NN maybe I'm wrong about other things and I find that thought too much to bear.

Libtards love Nazis now. Voat for the most part isn't taking sides or is more on Russia's side. You should all want to move to Ukraine. Don't tell me voat has as few principals as libtards. I demand you go to Ukraine and fight the Russians.

Oh sorry, I meant intercontinental ballastic missiles with nuclear warheads, my bad.

imo Russia is (indirectly) fighting for every freedom loving U.S. citizen in this one as their enemy (an unholy corporate/government alliance) has made freedom its enemy.

Oh and I don't want to hear shit about using Sputnik news. Fake intellectuals latch onto the source of information instead of looking at the information itself which is why they wore masks like a dumb fuck and injected themselves with mystery goo cause puppy torture funding anti-science Fauci told them to.

The dollar vigilante points out that Ethereum contracts are public so no company would want to use it for actual contracts. Furthermore, do they have a killer app or anyone using it at all for anything yet? To me it seems like just another speculative coin but with the phantom foundation that public contracts would actually be useful to someone. The dollar vigilante recommends dero instead because it's like Ethereum but private. What do you think about that? I don't think anyone is even using smart contracts though, years after Ethereum was launched.

btw I think I have the dollar vigilantes game figured out. He invests in a coin, then pumps it hard, then sells. Maybe if you subscribe to his newsletter he tips you off that something is about to get pumped ($.01 to $1 is 100x) so you can maximize your profits and then he tells everyone else sometime later. The thing is he also says a lot of crazy shit (drink your own pee, moon landing was fake, there's no such thing as viruses, confident his ontological views are correct) that make me have doubts but I don't think that stuff matters when picking coins.