Sign into an existing account

Sergei Witte sets the last stages that would be used to end Tsarist Russia.

Recommended read before reading this; https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=643d99d987436 I go through how Sergei Witte was an agent for jewish banker and how his decision led to the decay of Imperial Russia.


The beginning of the end for Tsarist Russia was the October Manifesto, the Russian Constitution of 1906 was based on this Manifesto, It led to the creation of a parliamentary system (Duma) in which the first time the Tsar would agree to share his power with the parliament. This signed the death warrant of Tsar Nicholas II because it would be the Duma that removed the Tsar from power entirely. Let's look into what led to the October Manifesto and why it set the stages for the downfall of the Tsarists.


**RUSSIAN REVOLUTION 1905**


Using the dissatisfaction that the Russian people had against the Tsar Nicholas II because of the economic strain the Russo-Japanese War was causing and the fact that Russia was doing badly in the war against Japan. This frustration was used to initiate the Russian Revolution of 1905. It's important to point out that Sergei Witte played a key role in causing animosity between Russia and Japan. Witte was instrumental in Russia's expansion into Far Eastern market and expanding Russia's influence in the Far East, putting Russia in antagonistic position against Japan which would culminate into the Russo-Japanese War.

Who initiated the uprising?

>''Many Jewish organizations and individuals took part in the Revolution of 1905-6. Liberal currents saw this as an opportunity for increased civil rights and cultural autonomy, and 12 were elected to the first Duma''

>''Sizable numbers of yeshiva students to radicalism, staging demonstrations that were sometimes accompanied by violence..''

>''Bundists fought with exceptional devotion, played the key role in the most events of the revolution, and suffered the largest causalities during the the clashes with the Russian army and police.''

>''Englert notes that: ''the Bund put itself at the central of the revolution and was largely recognized for it''

https://archive.ph/U1Zer

Leon Trotsky was one of the leaders of the 1905 Revolution

https://files.catbox.moe/q59j5d.png

Due to the Russo-Japanese War, Russia was on the verge of an economic collapse and the only way it could save its economy from crashing was to take a massive loan. The jewish bankers who put Russia in this dire financial situation through their agent Sergei Witte, threatened Tsar Nicholas II with an ultimatum; Either remove restrictions placed on the jews and give them full rights or they would ensure that no loans would be raised to save Russia from economic collapse.

>''It is recognized that the extremity of Russia is the opportunity of the Jewish financiers, for Russia is considered to be in a financial plight which will compel her to call for a loan whether peace or war is decided upon at Portsmouth. It is reported that the Jewish bankers of the United States have sent an ultimatum to Emperor of Russia through M. Witte, threatening to prevent any loan being raised abroad unless a formal undertaking is given that the Jews of Russia shall be given equal rights with other citizens, and the present restrictions on members of the Jewish race in the Russian empire shall be removed''

>''M. Witte, said the late Baron Alphonse de Rothschild, of Paris, was of opinion that no bargain could be made by Jewish bankers in respect to removing their disinclination of take part in Russian financial operations in consideration of the Russian government affording equal rights to the Jewish subjects of Russia. This view was shared by prominent European bankers, who held that the only way by which dealings could be resumed would be if the ground of complaint were removed, but the Jews would never consent to buy justice for their co-religionists. Since the Death of Baron Alphonse, doubtless Lord Rothschilds would be the best authority in the matter, as Mr. Samuel felt sure Jewish bankers in Europe would be willing to follow his lead, Jewish bankers, he said.''

https://archive.ph/7e8OO

We know that the agent of the jewish banker, Sergei Witte who had previously been the Minister of Finance and used this position to economically enslave Russia to jewish financiers, did indeed comprise with the jewish bankers Because Russia did receive a massive loan, in fact, according to the memoirs of Witte:

>''It was the largest foreign loan in the history of the modern nations''

https://files.catbox.moe/g8awdx.png

But there was a price to pay.. and that was the October Manifesto, drafted by Sergei Witte who also persuaded the Tsar to pass this manifesto.

While the manifesto did not include the full emancipation of jews, it however led to more liberal laws being implemented which allowed the jews and also the communist revolutionaries to now have political representation through the Duma. Again, it established the parliamentary system of Duma, the very same entity that would be used to remove Nicolas II from power. The October Manifesto was also highly beneficial to Witte himself as it made him Russia's first ever prime minister.

https://files.catbox.moe/68noc2.png

The October Manifesto proclaimed ''Fundamental civil freedoms will be granted to the population, including real personal inviolability, freedom of conscience, speech, assembly and association''. In other words, the previous implied prohibition on Freemasonry in Russia had now been lifted and thus the Council of the Grand Order of Eastern France opened lodges in Moscow and Saint Petersburg. The Freemasons in Russia played an instrumental role in bringing about the February Revolution in 1917, forcing Tsar Nicholas II to abdicate, and then ruled the Russian Provisional Government, paving the way for the Bolshevik Revolution.

https://files.catbox.moe/tlkstx.png

As the Duma was the implemented, it allowed jews and jewish communist parties to have political representation. 12 jews as mentioned earlier held seats in the first Duma. jews belonging to communist parties such as 'Russian Social Democratic Party' and Socialist-Revolutionary Party and other kosher parties such as the Kadets (co-founded by a jew) that advocated for jewish emancipation held seats in the Duma. Let's also not forget to include that parties run by Freemasons such as 'Progressist Party' and 'Octobrist Party' also held seats in the Duma. The Duma was being quickly filled with enemies of the Tsarist family.

As you would expect;

>''The Duma was one of the centers of opposition to Emperor Nicholas II''
https://files.catbox.moe/srxal4.png

Prince Felix Yusupov from the House of Yusupov had opposed the power given to the Duma in 1906 stating;

>''The Duma opened on April 27th, 1906. This was a moment of great anxiety for all, as everyone knew the Duma was a two edged sword which could prove either helpful or disastrous to Russia, according to the course of events. If all members of the Duma had been loyal Russians actuated only by patriotic motives, the Assembly might have done great service to the Government; but certain questionable and destructive elements among which were many Jews- made it a hotbed of revolutionary ideas''
https://archive.ph/PF9Ar

SERGEI WITTE THE MAN BEHIND THE OCTOBER MANIFESTO


Here is an anti-jewish propaganda from 1906 showing how Sergei Witte is involved in Russia's jewry's orchestration of the destruction of Russia. Quite fitting seeing his track record especially considering his role in bringing about the Duma.

https://files.catbox.moe/sjx0pt.png

Sergei Witte had a jewish wife. Naturally.

https://files.catbox.moe/bm6ebc.png

Sergei Witte criticized the discrimination of jews and spoke against the persecution of the jews. He also favored removing the restrictions on jews. Naturally.

https://files.catbox.moe/b7aes3.png

The organization Black Hundred had released a publication condemning Witte;

>''All of Witte's efforts can be characterized by their complete lack of love for Russia and an exorbitant pride that did not deter the statesman from causing deliberate harm to Russia''

>''The publication went on to characterize Witte as a politician ''who was imperious, insistent and vindictive in nature, and who at the same time did not shun any means to achieve his goals''

>''The publication continued, claiming that Witte was ''a cosmopolitan-Masonic bureacurat,'' exclaiming :''May the Lord protect Russia from bureaucrats of this kind, especially if they are of high rank''

https://files.catbox.moe/6h1ej1.png

Numerous Russian politicians opposed Sergei Witte, one of his biggest opponents was the Minister of Interior, Vyacheslav Plehve. In 1903, Plehve had given documents to Tsar Nicholas II that suggested that Witte was part of a jewish conspiracy, as a result, Witte was removed as Minister of Finance which shows that these documents had validity to them. This makes it all the more baffling to think why the hell Nicholas II would accept a manifesto drafted by Witte getting him appointed as the Prime Minister of Russia just two years after. A side note; the Inauguration of Nicholas II started with a disaster called the 'Khodynka Tragedy', which was a crowd crash that happened during the festivities after the coronation of Nicholas II. The death toll was up to 1,282 dead and 1,200 to 20,000 injured. People naturally saw this as a sign that the reign of Nicholas II would bring doom to Russia, and unfortunately, they were correct. Nicholas II lacked the leading capability Russians desperately needed for that time, he kept getting manipulated and tricked into making decisions through scums like Sergei Witte that did nothing but advance the jewish agenda until it caused his own and his family's end. Nicholas II's reign started as a disaster and ended as a disaster.

Back to Plehve. He also had refused to cooperate with the Zionist jews, refusing to support their Zionist program. Plehve had thus marked himself as an enemy of the international jewish bankers and he would shortly be assassinated by the terrorist group SR Combat Organization, which was run by the jew Yevno Azef, who was also an agent for the secret police, Okhrana.

Plehve, not so surprisingly, was replaced by a man who held liberal views and hoped ''to use his power to create a more democratic system of government''. A real politician was replaced with a shabbos goy. What a familiar story.

https://files.catbox.moe/0uwv6v.png

From 1817, It was legal for jews to convert to Christianity and no denomination could turn them away. By doing so jews could now achieve freedom and liberties they did not previously have in Russia. Thus jews started to convert to Christianity in the 19th century and waves of new conversions also occurred from 1907 to 1917

>A small minority of emancipated Jews in 19th century Europe, having tasted a whiff of liberty and freedom as equal citizens under the law, went one step further. They converted to Christianity, leaving behind Judaism once and for all and fully integrating themselves into Christian societies.

>From 1817 onward, Jewish converts could legally choose whatever Christian denomination suited them. After 1906, Jewish apostates could return to Judaism without penalty.

>Schainker’s data is derived from the Pale of Settlement, the western part of Russia where the majority of Jews were forced to live until the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. According to her statistics, this region produced 69,400 Jewish converts to Russian Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism and Lutheranism. A further 15,000 converted to other tolerated religions

https://archive.ph/02AlH

During the period between late 19th century and early 20th century, jews often attempted to change their surnames however it was not so easy as jews were not allowed to change their surnames by law, even if they had converted to Christianity. To change their surnames, they needed the permission of the Chancellery of Petitions first. However, there were numerous examples of jews that got their approval to have their surnames changed. Jews who converted and served in the military were not affected by this rule and could change their surnames. This gave jews a loophole to counteract this rule, all they needed to do was to join the military. However, numerous exceptions were made to converted jews who hadn't served in the military to change their surnames. Jews having the ability to change their religion and then their surnames meant that indications that they were of jewish heritage in their official documents were entirely removed and they could now be portrayed as fully Russian.

>Precisely because the Jewish surname carried so much symbolic weight, the Chancellery of Petitions rejected most requests. Only in exceptional cases did the Chancellery present a case for the tsar's approval that merited extra-legal considerations

>The law only made one exception—for Jewish converts in the military. 65 But Drajšpic never served in the military. Officials also noted an important precedent: a number of Jewish converts, who never served in the military, were allowed to change their surnames in the 1870s and '80s. Due to Drajšpic's exceptional moral qualities and genuine faith in Russian Orthodoxy, the Ministry of Justice as well as the Chancellery of Petitions found his request deserving.

>In most cases, the petitioners had to have been converted for a 'considerable' amount of time. Second, baptized Jews had to exhibit what was regarded as 'respectable conduct and ways of life'. Usually this meant that they had broken all ties with their Jewish parents and relatives, married a Russian Orthodox (or in some cases a Catholic or Protestant) spouse, and attempted to raise their children in a non-Jewish environment

>Second-generation baptized Jews and other individuals with Jewish-sounding names also petitioned for many of the same reasons discussed above, but these petitions were usually affirmed. The townsman Aleksandr Michajlov Berenštejn, for example, who was the son of a baptized Jew, petitioned to change his surname to 'Andreev', which he already used in common day-to-day affairs

As we got closer to the Bolshevik Revolution the amount of request made by jews to have their surnames changed to Russian sounding names were more frequently accepted by the state;

>In the late imperial period, with the rapid growth of ethnic consciousness and nationalist sentiment, officials were sensitive to such associations and respected the wishes of second-generation baptized Jews and individuals with Jewish-sounding names

Source: The Jewish Intelligentsia, state administration, and the myth of conversion in Tsarist Russia, Eugene Avrutin.

The Russian Orthodox Church recognized the threat of jews being able to change their surnames on top of having changed their religious affiliation so they made the decision in 1903 that the phrase 'evreev' (from the jews) be stamped on the passport of all jewish converts to Russian Orthodoxy so it can be recognized they were conversos.

This revealed two things. Many jews were trying to change their surnames to Russian-sounding names and if you did not have access to a jewish persons passport, jews would still be able to portray themselves as a non-jew to the non-jews around them and they'd have no way of knowing they were dealing with a converso.

It also reveals that the frequency that the jews wanted to hide their identity increased during the period leading up to the Bolshevik Revolution.

The children of a jew who had converted to Christianity could have their children aged 7 and under converted to Christianity. If a jew decides to intermarry with a Christian, this instead becomes mandatory.

>According to an 1842 Senate decree, made in consultation with the tsar and the Ministry of State Domains, if a Jewish parent converted, all children of the same gender ages seven and younger could be converted by that parent. In the case of intermarriage, when a convert from Judaism married a Christian, the laws regarding child conversion were stricter. All eligible children were required to be converted together with the spouse desiring intermarriage and these children were required to be reared as Christians.

https://files.catbox.moe/1bw6g3.png

On the topic of intermarriage, if a jewish woman were to marry a Russian Christian man, this would allow her change her surname to her husband's Russian name. Her children with him would make them fully jewish under jewish law, they would automatically have a Russian surname, and their appearance would appear more Russian due to this admixture. Increasing the potency of hiding jewish heritage. For a jewish man, it was not as easy to have his surname changed as mentioned previously, but not impossible. A converso jewish man marrying a Christian Russian woman would however increase the likelihood of him getting approval by the Chancelly of Petitions to have his surname changed.


In the late 19th century, jewish sects focused on 'assimilation' rose. These sects encouraged to drop the negative characteristics and behaviors that's associated with the jewish identity and focus on blending and assimilating with the Russians. The intentions were most likely not sincere as one of the sects admitted that this was their attempt to appease the Russian government to grant the jews full citizenship and rights. In other words, this was the early communist attempt by jews to implement liberal laws for jews in a non-violent but deceptive way. Naturally, these sects also pushed for intermarriage. This is to show that this mindset was increasing among jews in the late imperial period, were 'blending in' became an objective of to a sizeable portion of the jewish population in Imperial Russia. This was certainly true when it came to the Bolshevik jews.


https://files.catbox.moe/w7zhaf.png


By the time of the Bolshevik Revolution, the Russian populace was still very aware of the jewish problem, for many centuries jews were not given citizenship and access to the same freedoms and rights as a Russian for this very reason. It was only a few months before the Bolshevik Revolution had happened that jewish emancipation in Russia became a reality. So how exactly did the Bolsheviks, which the majority of its leaders were jewish, manage to take a country that was 'anti-semitic'? The simple answer to this question is that the majority of the Russian population had no idea they were jewish. The jewish Bolshevik leaders had changed their surnames to Russian-sounding names in an attempt to conceal their identity. Then you have the possibility of Bolsheviks who today is still identified as a non-jew but in reality, could be descendants of generations of conversos as crypto-jewry started to become more prominent in Russia starting from the 19th century. One big example of this would be Lenin himself who was identified as a 100% non-jew until the fall of the Soviet Union when it proven his maternal grandfather was jewish (the possibility of his maternal grandmother being jewish is still there only no evidence of this has surfaced yet).


**VLADIMIR LENIN**

Lenin did not like to talk about either his family's origins or background;

>''Vladimir lIyich Ulyanov, who took the name Lenin, was always reticent about the origins and background of his family''

Source: THE BOLSHEVIKS 'The Intellectual and Political History of the 'Triumph of Communism in Russia'-ADAM B. ULAM

The author above makes it seem like it's mostly because the origins of his family did not line up with the expectations of a Bolshevik leader based on their own phony propaganda with his father being a Tsarist loyalist and religious and his mother being a daughter of a small landowner with his family having non-Russian ancestry. However, I think the biggest reason is his non-Russian ancestry because Lenin did indeed have jewish blood in him which Stalin was aware of but ordered the sister of Lenin to keep it a secret.

Vladimir Lenin's maternal grandfather's family was the Blank family. It included Moshe Itzkovich Blank, a jewish convert to Christianity. He had changed his name to Dmitry Ivanovich Blank to conceal his jewish identity further. More examples are Abel Blank, baptized as Dmitry Dmitrievich Blank, and Lenin's maternal grandfather, Srul Moshevich Blank, baptized as Alexander Dmitrievich Blank. Lenin's jewish heritage was concealed throughout the existence of the Soviet Union, it was only revealed after the fall of the Soviet Union when a portion of Soviet archives was temporarily available to researchers. The first biography of Lenin was written by the jew David Shub, who had personally met Lenin. Schub biography of Lenin was one of the most authoritative sources on Lenin for the longest time, he had helped to conceal the jewish heritage of Lenin by claiming Lenin was mostly of German and Russian ancestry. Lenin is a perfect example of how jews used their modus operandi of infiltration by hiding their jewish identity through conversion and name-changing to deceive the non-jewish population, and through their offspring that was portrayed as Russians but secretly were carrying jewish blood in them managed to climb up to the highest rank of power, even in a country that was very jew aware, like Russia.

**LEON TROTSKY**

While Leon Trotsky jewish heritage was not kept a secret, he did however change his name from the very jewish name Lev Bronstein to Leon Trotsky to appear more Russian. According to Robert Service 'Trotsky':

>''Trotsky hated when people emphasized his Jewish background. He had spent his whole revolutionary career striving to escape the bounds of origins''

In fact, before the Bolshevik Revolution, Trotsky and other jewish Bolsheviks who became the leaders of Bolshevik Russia were not known figures to the public;

>''Given the widely conflicting opinions of Trotsky and his fame as a Marxist, it is well to remember that at one time his name was little known. Indeed, before the October Revolution Trotsky, like other Bolsheviks, was familiar only to a relatively small circle of revolutionaries and radicals. One of the many tasks of the newly proclaimed Bolshevik regime was to explain who its members were, and the history of their relations in the pro-revolutionary era''

Source: Trotsky, Ian D. Thatcher p.2

**YAKOV SVERDLOV**

Yakov Sverdlov's jewish identity was not kept a secret, but he still changed his name to sound more Russian, his original name was; Yankel-Aaron Movshevich Sverdlov. As pointed out previously, Sverdlov was one of the jews who were active in underground revolutionary activities and was thus not a known figure to the public, same goes for him being jewish. This is why shortly after the Bolsheviks came to power he was put into the very high position of 'Chairman of the Central Executive Committee of the All-Russian Congress of Soviets', making him the head of the Bolshevik state, a post he would until he died in 1919. However, his position as the head of the Bolshevik state became an increasing problem for the Bolshevik leadership during the Russian Civil War, the reasoning being that anti-Bolshevik propaganda focused on how jewish the leadership of the Bolsheviks was as this was not widely known to the public at this time. This is why after his death, he was succeded by the seemingly fully Russian, Mikhail Kalinin, in an attempt to make it less obvious how jewish the Bolshevik leadership was as a means to counter-act the effectiveness of the anti-Bolshevik propaganda.

>''Jacob Sverdlov, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Congress of Soviets and thus officially the head of the Bolshevik state, had just died. Sverdlov was of Jewish origin, something the Bolsheviks in the first hush of their victory considered as quite irrelevant to a man's fitness for this or that post. But now with the Civil War in full swing, with all the cries about the ''Jewish commissars,'' it was an excellent opportunity to entrust this figurehead post to a ''real'' Russian; Michael Kalinin.''

Source: The Bolsheviks; The Intellectual and Political History of the Triumph of Communism in Russia, Adam B. Ulam

**YURI STEKLOV**
The problem of jews hiding their real identity in Soviet Russia is not just found within the highest echolon of the Bolshevik leadership but also in their journalist and historian circles. One example would be Yuri Steklov who was a journalist, historian, and editor of the Soviet newspaper Izvestia. His real surname was Nahamkis;

>''To Tseretelli and the ''defenist'' majority of the Soviet one of the most loathsome opponents was Steklov. He was the editor of Izvestia, the official news organ of the Soviet, the closest approximation revolutionary Russia had to an offical gazette, and as such was sabotaging the policy of the majority. Yet it would have been ''undemocratic,'' a violation of the minority rights, simply to fire Steklov. Hence his opponents dug out a ''scandal''. Steklov, whose real name was Nahamkis, had petitioned first the Tsarist and then the Provisional Government authorities to have it legally changed to his party pseudonym. This was shameful, un-Socialist attempt to conceal one's Jewish origin! Steklov was dicredit as a revolutionary statesman, but continued editing Izvestia. Such were the concerns and issues that agitated the Soviet.

Source: The Bolsheviks; The Intellectual and Political History of the Triumph of Communism in Russia, Adam B. Ulam

**OTHER PROMINENT JEWISH BOLSHEVIK WHO HAD CHANGED THEIR SURNAMES TO MORE RUSSIAN SOUNDING ONES**


From Hirsch Apfelbaum to Grigory Yevseevich Zinoviev


From Lev Borisovich Rozenfeld to Lev Kamenev (His father was a jewish convert to Russian Christian Orthodoxy who married an ethnic Russian Orthodox woman)


From Enokh Gershevich Iyeguda to Genrikh Grigoryevich Yagoda


From Karl Sobelsohn to Karl Berngardovich Radek


**EFFORTS MADE BY THE BOLSHEVIK GOVERNMENT TO CONCEAL THE JEWISHNESS OF ITS LEADERSHIP**


>''What we do know for sure is that while the Soviet government and Communist spokesmen abroad have continued to exhibit both leaders as Russians, it has always been the policy to discourage any exploration of their antecedents''


Source: The Zionist Factor, A Study of the Jewish Presence in 20th century History, Ivor Bensen


>Except for Lunacharsky, Commissar of Education and Trotsky for Foreign Affairs, the names of the new rulers were little known. Such Bolshevik stars as Sverdlov, Kamenev, Zinoviev, and Bukharin were not included. The first three may have been left out because of their Jewish origin. The government had to find acceptance among the masses of peasants and soldiers, among whom anti-Semitism was thought a potent force; hence with the obvious exception of Trotsky no Jews were included.

>''Though it might be pointed out that few peasants would discern Jews behind the Russian names of Ziiloviev or Sverdlov, and anyway many anti-Bolsheviks were firmly convinced that Lenin himself was a Jew''

Source: The Bolsheviks; The Intellectual and Political History of the Triumph of Communism in Russia, Adam B. Ulam

So-called anti-Semitism was illegal in Soviet Russia as early as 1922 which could lead to capital punishment if found 'guilty'. Anti-Semitism included revealing who was a jew in the Bolshevik government as that had been the focus of anti-Bolshevik propaganda during the Russian Civil War which the Bolsheviks had classified as a movement of 'anti-Semites'.


>''Anti-Semitism is so strong that only the iron discipline imposed by the Bolsheviks and the fear of capital punishment restrains the Red soldiers and the women from starting pogroms everywhere.

https://files.catbox.moe/6lrz5z.png

When the Babylonians defeated the Assyrians, they created one of the most powerful states in the world which is what we know as the Neo-Babylonian Empire. Some might ponder as to how such a mighty empire managed to fall so quickly and with little effort by Cyrus. Did Cyrus manage to defeat the Babylonians through military might alone or did he receive some outside help which was essential to his victory over the Babylonians? This is what we will try to answer here.
The story begins with the rise of the merchant bankers in Babylon. The way merchants bankers operated is very similar to how our monetary system operates today, in fact, the origins of our current monetary system has its origin in Babylon.

**ESTABLISHING FINANCIAL DOMINATION**

>During the latter part of the **6th Century**, social and economic stability gave rise to the accumulation of wealth from land revenues, rents, slavery, etc. With prosperity came merchant bankers. Private archives written on cuneiform tablets from the time period show a large sector of the population participating in commercial and financial operations, whose operations were based on a silver standard and modeled on promissory notes.

>A typical contract of that day had these familiar lists; Object of the transaction, Names of lender and borrower, Duration of the loan, Method of reimbursement, Interest to be collected, Collateral to be held by the lender.

https://archive.ph/q221W

Who were the merchant bankers of Babylon?

In order to answer that question we need to pay extra attention to is the date given as to when the rise of the merchant bankers came about in Babylon.

What happened in the 6th century? The Babylonian Exile.

The rise of these merchant bankers and the usurous system implemented in Babylon coincidentally coincided with the Babylonian Exile after the Jewish-Babylonian War and the destruction of the first temple. Jews were foolishly transported en masse to Babylon and were kept ''captive'' in Babylon. But as we'll see that for being captives, they sure were given a lot of liberty, especially in the financial sector.

I will cite two examples of very prominent banking families from this era that have been identified as being jewish. Jews who were originally from Judea.

Murashu family:

From Wikipedia;

>The Murashu tablets provide a glimpse into what life was like for fifth-century Jewish descendants of the Babylonian Exile and captivity. After the Persian king Cyrus the Great captured Babylon in 539 BCE, he allowed and helped finance the return of Jews to Judea with the Edict of Cyrus in 538. The Murashu tablets are dated to this period after Jews were allowed to return to Judea. The fact that the banking house "Murashu & Sons" conducted business with Jews who decided to remain in Nippur rather than return to Judea suggests that life in Persian-controlled Nippur was at least somewhat tolerable for Jews.

>HV Hilprecht considers the group ("firm") to be bankers and brokers, who were engaged in money-lending and trading operations in southern and central Babylonia for a period of 50 years from the end of the 5th century (Dandamaev, Lukonin, Kohl)

https://archive.ph/L6jCS

>**The Murashu family stemmed from Judahite deportees** . After rooting in Nippur, a commercially important city southeast of Babylon, they became a leading banking family of Mesopotamia. The family was central to the region's economy for at least a century and a half. 730 tablets of the banking house of Murashu and Sons were recovered from the ruins of Nippur

>The surviving records of the Murashu business houses are mostly of three sons and three grandsons of the founder, covering a half century between 455 and 403 B.C.E. They make clear that the firm had long been a vital factor in the economy of the region, and continued to be so thereafter. The records provide a piercing view into the Persian/Babylonian economy of the times, as well as of the vital role of Jewish artisans and entrepreneurs active within it.

https://archive.ph/OzemA

The rise of this jewish banking family is dated to be after the collapse of the Babylonian Empire, however, this does not disprove the theory that they could have been active in money lending even before the collapse of the empire. It however gives us a clear insight at the financial freedom the jews had to engage in usurious activities even after the Persian take-over of Babylon.

The House of Egibi:

>The House of Egibi was a family from within ancient Babylonia who were, amongst other things, involved in mercantile activities. The family’s financial activities are known to archaeologists via an archive of about 1,700 clay tablets spanning five generations of the family, **dating to a period from around 600 to 482 BCE.**

https://archive.ph/rbh8q

> **The family name of the other banking house vital to the economy of the area, Egibi, is an Akkadian transliteration of Jacob.** A trove of the records of the family was fortuitously recovered because its inscriptions were incised upon clay tablets that were baked in a conflagration. The family's misfortune served to enrich the historical record.

>The ethnicity of this prestigious Jewish family was brought into question because of the name of the head of the firm, Ittl-Marduk-balatu, who also employed the first name of Istn. The theophoric inclusion of the god Marduk in the name was shown to be a fashionable acceptance of Babylonian norms without religious overtones. As noted above, many other confirmed Jews were known to have likewise pragmatically assumed such names. An example of the use of such names is that assumed by a governor of Judah, Sheshbazzar.

>The origins of the family are not doubtful. The Babylonian name of this member of the Egibi family was, in fact, a secondary name. The original and true name of the family was Shirik, an Aramaic name. What appears to have been his first name was Iddina, rendered in Hebrew as Nathan. The ancestor of another member of the family was Bel-iau, a name that obviously invokes the God of Israel.

>**It is clear that although the Egibi and Murashu families were wealthy Jews** , and while other Jews did well at court and in the service of the hierarchy, most Jews were busy at agriculture, crafts, and various enterprises

https://archive.ph/OzemA

The jewish banking family of Egibi has been nicknamed ''Rothschilds of the Ancient World'' with enough wealth that enabled them to give loans to States.

> **The firm of Egibi possessed enormous wealth and infleunce and have been designated the ''Rothschilds of the ancient world.'' They carried on every sort of financial transaction. They made loans to the State, as well as to private persons, and the finances of the court were entrusted to them for several generations. They collected the land taxes, tithes, and dues for the use of the public and paid them into the royal trasury. They also undertook what we should now describe as ''agencies'' for private individuals and in addition to their vast money lending transactions must also have engaged in what we now term bankers business, for we know that documents existed in those early days corresponding to modern cheques and bills of change. ** The various transactions of the firm were noted down on clay tablets, which were stored in great earthenware jars for safety, and there they remained until they were accidentally discovered some few years ago.

>All bear the names of the contracting parties and witnesses, and most of them are dated. The Egibi firm were not the only great trading firm in ancient Babylonia, as during the excavations

**JEWISH INFILTRATION OF THE BABYLON HIGHER SOCIETY THROUGH THEIR SHAPESHIFTING TACTICS; INTERMARRIAGE AND CHANGE OF SURNAMES**

The classic modus operandi of the jewish supremacist when it comes to subverting a nation is to be able to infiltrate and take it over from within by climbing to the highest echelon of every avenue of society. And this very M.O. can be seen in Babylon during the Babylonian exile.

>The second essay, ''Negotiating Marriage in Multicultral Babylonia: An example opf the Judean Community in Al-Yahudu by Kathleen Abraham, deals with marriage contracts from Al-Yahuda. The investigation shows that intermarriage occurred, especially in rural settings.

https://files.catbox.moe/r8vv61.png

From the Haaretz article; 'Intermarriage and the Jews: What Would the Early Israelites Say?'

>During the Babylonian Exile in the 6th century BCE, the issue of intermarriage seems to have become a more acute problem in certain minds

>Ezra not only expanded the law but enforced it retroactively, forcing all Judeans to divorce their foreign wives and excommunicating those who refused to comply

https://archive.ph/W9NLO

The Book of Ezra which describes events after the Persian conquest of Babylon focuses primarily on jewish men who had married non-jewish women and it's pretty obvious why. Because this ban most likely did not apply to jewish women who had intermarried with Babylonian men as their children were considered jewish under jewish law.

This created two scenarios; Jewish men who had Babylonian wives who decided to stay in Babylon rather than return to Judea because of this new law that was implemented in Judea after the jews were allowed to return by Cyrus and Jewish men who left their Babylonian wives with their half-jewish children in Babylon. Also just like not all jews left for Palestine when Israel was created, it was certainly also true for jews in Babylon after they were allowed to return to Judea. Meaning after the Persian conquest of Babylon, a sizeable number of jews still remained in Babylon.

We know that jewish women did indeed marry with Babylonian Elite as one example of such a marriage has been found.

>A second marriage contract is between Kaššāya, the daughter of a Judean named Amuše (=Hoshea, הוֹשֵׁעַ) son of Arih (אָרַח), to a Babylonian groom named Gūzānu, son of Kiribtu, from the urban elite family Ararru (“Miller”).[23] Two of the Judean woman’s uncles were royal merchants. This indicates the upper class (but non-elite) status of her family.

This also provides us with an example of jews changing their surnames to Babylonian surnames. Kaššāya was the name of one of Nebuchadnezzar's daughters and so was the name Amuše.

>Unlike the previous document, which was signed primarily by people with Judean names, here all the names are Babylonian. Even the son of Amušך (Hoshea) has a Babylonian name: Bēl-uballiṭ, “The LORD (Marduk) sustains,” and the bride, Kaššāya, bears the same name as one of Nebuchadnezzar’s daughters.
https://archive.ph/6tujH

Obviously, the children this marriage spawned were fully jewish according to jewish religious law, now part of the Babylonian elite crowd with Babylonian surnames, ready to continue the subversive mission of their mother Kaššāya.
It was not uncommon for jews to adopt Babylonian surnames

>Many Jews assumed Babylonian names, as is inevitably the case in a Diaspora.

https://archive.ph/OzemA

The Babylonian Talmud also gives us an insight that the jews were for the most ''part less subject to persecution than other jews who lived in other lands''.

This indicates that jews had political influence in Babylon, which makes sense as they had massive financial influence in Babylon, and with it came political power. We also saw an example of jews marrying into elite families as well.

https://files.catbox.moe/9a6tvg.png

**JEWISH MOTIVATION FOR WANTING THE BABYLONIAN EMPIRE DESTROYED**

Jews had clear motives for wanting to destroy the Babylonian Empire. After all the Babylonians invaded them, destroyed them in battle, destroyed their temple, and forced them to leave their ''holy land''. We can also cite examples from the Babylonian Talmud in which they express their hate towards the Babylonians;

>R. Hamnuna said in a discorse: If one sees the wicked Babylon, he should say five benedictions: **On seeing [the city] Babylon itself he says, Blessed be He who has desdtroyed the wicked Babylon. On seeing the palace of Nebuchadnezzar, He says, Blessed be He who destroyed the palace of the wicked Nebechadnezzar.** On seeing the lions'den, or the fiery furnace, he says, Blessed be He who wrought miracles for our ancestors in this place.

>When Mar the son of Rabina came to [the city of] Babylon, he used to put some dust in his kerchief and throw it out, to fulfil the text, I will sweep it with the besom of destruction.

Talmud - Mas. Berachoth 57b

>AND THEY MADE A CAUSE WAY FOR HIM etc. Rabbah b. Bar Hana said: These were not Babylonians but Alexandrians, and **because they [the Palestinians] hated the Babylonians** , they called them [the Alexandrians] by their [the Babylonians'] name. It was taught: R.Judah said, They were not Babylonians but Alexandrians. R. Jose said to him: May your mind be relieved even as you have relieved my mind!

Talmud - Mas. Yoma 66b

We find similar hostile passages from the Old Testament that call for the destruction of Babylon and demonize the Babylonians ;

>"Babylon, the jewel of kingdoms, the pride and glory of the Babylonians, will be overthrown by God like Sodom and Gomorrah. She will never be inhabited or lived in through all generations; there no nomads will pitch their tents, there no shepherds will rest their flocks. But desert creatures will lie there, jackals will fill her houses; there the owls will dwell, and there the wild goats will leap about. Hyenas will inhabit her strongholds, jackals her luxurious palaces. Her time is at hand, and her days will not be prolonged."-Isaiah 13:19-22

>"A sword against the Babylonians! Declares the Lord—against those who live in Babylon and against her officials and wise men! A sword against her false prophets! They will become fools. A sword against her warriors! They will be filled with terror. A sword against her horses and chariots and all the foreigners in her ranks! They will become weaklings. A sword against her treasures! They will be plundered. A drought on her waters! They will dry up. For it is a land of idols, idols that will go mad with terror."-Jeremiah 50:35-38

>"Before your eyes I will repay Babylon and all who live in Babylonia for all the wrong they have done in Zion,” declares the Lord. “I am against you, you destroying mountain, you who destroy the whole earth,” declares the Lord. “I will stretch out my hand against you, roll you off the cliffs, and make you a burned-out mountain. No rock will be taken from you for a cornerstone, nor any stone for a foundation, for you will be desolate forever,” declares the Lord."-Jeremiah 51:24-26

**DID JEWS HELP CYRUS TAKE OVER BABYLON?**

We have already established that within Babylon jews had managed to;

1. Gain huge amounts of financial control to the point where they can provide loans to states

2. Infiltrated Babylonian society through intermarriage and name-changing

3. Hated the Babylonians and thus had the motivation to want Babylon to fall

Cyrus II's father was Cambyses I, he was the king of Anshan which was a minor kingdom with not so much power, not only that but it was also a vassal of the Median Empire under King Astyages. According to Herodotus, Astyages had a dream that his daughter, Mandane, would give birth to a son that would bring destruction to his empire. Thus he decided to marry her off to Cambyses I as he considered him as a non-threat. This marriage spawned the birth of Cyrus II. Then it is claimed that Astyages had a second dream in which he was warned once again of his daughter's son, and that's when Astyages decided to send one of his generals, a man by the name of Harpagus to kill his daughter's son, Cyrus. Harpagus however decided not to kill the boy. It later came out that Harpagus had disobeyed Astyage's orders and as punishment, Astyages had fed him his son at a banquet.

According to some historical records, Cyrus II built his empire by bringing down the Median Empire first and did so by gathering other Persian tribes to fight under his banner and then he decided to rebel against King Astyages. How Cyrus II managed to beat the enormous empire that was the Median Empire. It is said that he was betrayed by his own general Harpagus as revenge for the murder of his son. Harpagus decided to suddenly change his allegiance and fight alongside Cyrus II instead.

Interestingly, Cyrus II started his endeavor by first gathering Persian tribes to strengthen his army and then went off to start a rebellion, and then as luck would have it for Cyrus II, the key to success was the betrayal done by Harpagus, something we couldn't have possibily relied on. Or maybe he did?

The story behind Harpagus having his son fed to him could have been a made-up lie to demonize Astyages because as they say, the victors write history. It could have also been a cover for the real reason why Harpagus decided to betray Astyages, that he was paid off to do it. It's also possible that Cyrus II managed to convince the other Persian tribes to join him by offering them huge amounts of money that he had received from rich financial bankers from Babylon who had a vested interest in making Cyrus king over an enormous empire which they could then use to their benefit. We have already established who these rich financial bankers are who had the means to provide loans to states.

Who is known for supporting rebellions throughout history? The jews of course.

Why Cyrus II?

Jews have always been known to support leaders who are 'tolerant' and 'liberal-minded' because they know with such a leader they will receive more benefits and freedoms and as it turns out the characteristics of tolerant and liberal-minded are what fit Cyrus II.

>Religious toleration was a remarkable feature of the Persian rule and there is no question that Cyrus himself was a liberal-minded promoter of this humane and intelligent policy

>Reference has recently been made by Dr. R. D. Barnett: he sees it in an expression of the oecumenical attitude of the Achaemenian kings who, from the time of Cyrus onwards, adopted a liberal policy of tolerance and conciliation towards the various religions embraced within their empire.

With this in mind, it makes total sense why jews would choose Cyrus II to give financial backing to and to help him take over the Median Empire and also Babylon.

On top of the theory that jewish bankers based in Babylon might have backed Cyrus II and helped him rise to power thus contributing to the creation of the Achaemenid Empire, there is also a strong indication that jews assisted the invading Persian empire by opening the gates to the city of Babylon which is something jews have been historically known for, a popular example is the opening of the gates of Toledo to the invading Muslim horde who were also more 'liberal-minded' towards the jews in comparison to the Visigoths.

>It seems most probable that Cyrus' entry had been assisted by the large community of Jews which had been deported by Nebuchadrezzar II from Judah under Jehoiakim sixty years before; these exiles believed that in spite of their captive prosperity they would receive more liberal treatment at Persian hands. In this they were right and as we learn from the book of Ezra, Cyrus gave a charted to the Jews for the restoration of the temple in Jerusalem and the return of the utensils sequestered by Nebuchadnezzar.

https://files.catbox.moe/14rg0g.png

From the Old Testament;

>Thus said the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have held, to subdue nations before him; and I will loose the loins of kings, to open before him the two leaved gates; and the gates shall not be shut
Isaiah 45:1

Quoted from a Christian website dedicated to Bible study;

>But inside the city were many enemies of Belshazzar, who were friendly with Cyrus. These people opened the gates of Babylon to Cyrus. At night he brought his army quietly into the city and surrounded the palace of King Belshazzar.

https://archive.ph/SPhDm

Obviously, the people the quote is referring to could only be talking about the jews.

As it turns out, the day of the invasion was also coincidentally during a time of a massive feast to honor the gods in Babylon, thus the people were distracted and occupied by this festival. This means that it was perfect timing to sneakily open the gates to the invading Persians and have them take the city by surprise. This also indicates that the jews provided intelligence to the Persians on which time was the perfect moment to strike.. when everyone was distracted due to a religious festival.

According to Herodotus;

>But, as it was, the Persians came upon them by surprise and so took the city. Owing to the vast size of the place, the inhabitants of the central parts (as the residents at Babylon declare) long after the outer portions of the town were taken, knew nothing of what had chanced, but as they were engaged in a festival, continued dancing and reveling until they learnt about the capture. Such, then, were the circumstances of the first taking of Babylon.

Also according to Herodotus, had the Babylonians been aware of Cyrus II's attack on the city, he and his army would have been destroyed;

>Hereupon the Persians who had been left for the purpose at Babylon by the river-side, entered the stream, which had now sunk so as to reach about midway up a man's thigh, and thus got into the town. Had the Babylonians been apprised of what Cyrus was about, or had they noticed their danger, they would never have allowed the Persians to enter the city, but would have destroyed them utterly; for they would have made fast all the street gates which gave access to the river, and mounting upon the walls along both sides of the stream, would so have caught the enemy, as it were, in a trap.

https://archive.ph/jKtbz

**AFTERMATH**

As we touched upon already, jews did benefit from the Persian conquest of Babylon. They were allowed to return to Jerusalem with Cyrus giving a charter to the jews for the restoration of their sleazy temple. Then we have the Cyrus Cylinder in which Cyrus proclaimed his views on the rights of the nations and peoples under his rule, just as you would expect from a liberal-minded and tolerant leader, a kind of leader jews have always been known to support for obvious reasons.

Not only that. The jewish banking families in Babylon benefited greatly from this conquest.

>Even after the conquest of Babylon by Cyrus in 539 BCE, we have confirmation from the Egibi family archives that they continued their role of tax farmers during the Achaemenid hold over Babylon. But this required attentiveness and heavy lobbying in the Persian court. In fact, Itti-Marduk-balāṭu even went to the Persian court and lobbied his case to the high ranking Babylonians, ‘evidently to befriend the officials responsible for administering taxes under Persia’s empire.’ And his efforts bore fruit. The Persians gave many established families like the Egibis the right to collect taxes as these families were already acquainted with the pre-established local systems of Babylonia.

https://archive.ph/xLTxP

Not only was Babylon now under more liberal laws, just as jews always liked it. They befriended the Persian officials and were allowed to continue to collect taxes. One of those families was previously mentioned Egibi family, also known as the ''Rothschilds of the Ancient world''. This serves as further indications that Cyrus was financed by the jews and helped by them to take over Babylon.

When you have a liberal-minded leader that's friendly with jews, what kind of policy do you expect they would employ on their newly conquered land?

Multiculturalism, increased immigration, intermarriage, and the appointment of foreigners in administrative roles of course!

''The period of Achaemenid rule is notable for a sharp increase in intermarriages between the races and syncretization of their cultures and religious beliefs. The main reason for this was that contact between the various lands had become more regular. In particular, after the Persian invasion of Babylonia this fertile country became open to immigrants. Moreover, the Achemenids formed military colonies in Babylonia from members of various races, or not, infrequently appointed persons of foreign origin to posts in the administration. Hence Persians, Elamites, Lydians, Phrygians, Egyptians, Medes and others began to settle in the country. For example, about a third of all proper names in the documents of the Murashu archive from Nippur are not of Babylonian origin.

https://files.catbox.moe/k62n7i.png

This all sounds very familiar does it not? And we know today who is behind these genocidal policies that are currently active in all White countries, so I think it's safe for us to assume that the jews back in those ancient days were also responsible for these highly destructive policies which eventually led to the erasure of the Babylonian people and with it, its culture.

https://files.catbox.moe/v4v1yl.png

Beware of any king or queen that has the epithet 'the Great' because more often than not, they turn out to be ''great'' because of the benefit they brought to jews. In the case of Peter I, it was with him that the jewish infiltration of Russian society and leadership had started. Remember that the whole title of 'the Great' started with the liberal-minded Cyrus II who is looked up to in high regard by jews, described as the 'anointed one' because of his ''liberation'' of jews from the Babylonian ''captivity'' and called for the rebuilding of their sleazy temple.

>Israel is looking to address a major labor shortage, abruptly worsened by the conflict with Hamas, by recruiting tens of thousands of Indians at a time when Palestinians who have long played a crucial role in Israeli construction and other sectors are being barred from the country.

>Israeli authorities say they are hoping to see 10,000 to 20,000 Indian migrant workers in the coming months

https://archive.ph/5O5nd


>In October, Israeli construction companies reportedly requested their government in Tel Aviv to allow them to hire up to 100,000 Indian workers to replace Palestinians whose work licenses were suspended after the Gaza offensive began.

>Many Indian aspirants for the jobs in Israel said they were unfettered by the war in Gaza, with some workers even supporting Israel in its operation against the Palestinians.

>“Given a chance, I am even willing to work for the Israeli forces,” Yash Sharma, an aspirant from Haryana’s Jind region, told Al Jazeera.

https://archive.ph/kwQkJ

This was his successor as finance minister:

https://files.catbox.moe/m8nwpc.png

Baron vom STEIN

I can't be the only the one who think they don't look so particularly German 🤔