Sign into an existing account

https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/history/the-french-revolution/war-in-the-vendee/

https://i.postimg.cc/zfDt9YG6/Vendee-Map.jpg

Massacre in the Vendée, 1793 - 1794.

Lessons of the Vendée, by Anthony Brandt.

The Forgotten Genocide - Remember the Vendee by Sophie Masson.

The Vendée Uprising, the Largest Counter Revolutionary Uprising of the French Revolution.

On Wednesday, January 17, 1934, there was a meeting of the leaders of the Hitler Youth in the Oberland 2nd district.

The purpose of the meeting was a call for "passive" or even "violent" resistance against all opposing Catholic youth movements.

It was declared that the actions recommended against the Catholic youth movements should not be ordered officially by the NSDAP but rather be a secret directive to be carried out.

The instructions for the actions to be taken against the Catholic youth movements were as follows:

Badges on clothing must be removed by any means, possibly by force.

Any unified appearance of Catholic youth is to be prevented or destroyed.

Any major undertakings by Catholic youth must be reported to the Ministry of the Interior, which has promised to protect the Bannführer in every way.

Every leader is forbidden to lead his Hitler youth into church. At most, he can say: 'If someone wants to go to church, he can do so.'"

The Hitler Youth naturally accepted the call to go on the attack against the Catholic youth movement and did not have to be asked twice.

The attacks began quickly, everywhere.

On April 26, 1934, Archbishop's Ordinariate of Munich reported the following attacks on the Catholic youth movements to the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior for the period from April 2 to 25:

Regensburg, Schliersee, Bad Reichenhall, Freilassing, Töging, Munich: St. Johann Baptist (twice), Neuhausen, St. Bonifaz (twice), St. Franziskus, St. Paul, Solln, St. Stefan, St. Rupert youth home on Berlepschstraße.

0n May 10, 1934, a prossession of the Catholic youth association from Oberaudorf and Kiefersfelden was "disrupted" by the Hitler Youth.

The following events took place....

At the entrance to Oberaudorf, SS men and Hitler Youths waited in a ditch and attacked the boys from the Catholic Youth Association who arrived on their bicycles.

In a rough and violent manner, they tore off the boys' blue shirts and christ symbols.

A rolled-up Catholic pennant was taken from one of their bicycles and dragged around in the dirt on the street.

When a truck arrived with 33 Catholic youth members, the SS men stopped it and took the blue shirts from the boys, while the league of German girls demanded the "White Rose" badge from the Catholic girls.

The SS then captured the second pennant.

In the evening, there was a joint victory celebration by the SS, Hitler Youth, and The League of German Girls, where they burnt the Catholic blue shirts and pennants.

The Catholic youth club in Wolfratshausen suffered a similar fate during an outing with a community mass.

30 Hitler youth members attacked the "Catholic youth dogs" and priest apprentices, beating them with their shoulder straps.

In Dorfen near Munich, not only were people threatened with a fence post, but the Hitler youth also destroyed the vicarage fence at night with an explosive device!

This caused the local priest to complain to the mayor.

In response to the priest's complaint, the mayor said helplessly:

"The problem is that you don't transfer the Catholic youth over to the Hitler Youth."

On a larger scale, acts of violence occurred against the Catholic youth of Berlin:

On Sunday, March 25, 1934, the Catholic youth leader of Greater Berlin called the Catholic youth to a meeting in Henningsdorf.

About 1,800 boys answered the call.

They were attacked by the Hitler Youth, and both their Catholic state insignia and about 150 church-sanctified banners and pennants were violently taken from them.

In addition to this "drilling" with shoulder straps and punches, the Hitler Youth tried to use kind words to "bring the Catholic youth to their senses" and persuade them to leave the catholic youth association and join the Hitler youth.

~Johann Neuhäusler~

Kreuz und Hakenkreuz: der Kampf des Nationalsozialismus gegen die katholische Kirche und der Kirchliche Widerstand.
Katholische kirch Verlag, Bayern.
Germany 1946. Page 167.

https://archive.org/details/MN5012ucmf_1/page/n170/mode/1up

Washington recognized America was a country of Christian Europeans with common cause and goals and it was important to keep it that way.

"With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles. You have in a common cause fought and triumphed together. The independence and liberty you possess are the work of joint councils and joint efforts, of common dangers, sufferings, and successes."

From his farewell address.

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/farewell-address

Also

"The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquillity at home, your peace abroad, of your safety, of your prosperity, of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that from different causes and from different quarters much pains will be taken, many artifices employed, to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth, as this is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly and insidiously) directed, it is of infinite moment that you should properly estimate the immense value of your national union to your collective and individual happiness; that you should cherish a cordial, habitual, and immovable attachment to it; accustoming yourselves to think and speak of it as of the palladium of your political safety and prosperity; watching for its preservation with jealous anxiety; discountenancing whatever may suggest even a suspicion that it can in any event be abandoned, and indignantly frowning upon the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts."

And also Washington and of course he was speaking of the opinion of the time by all the founders recognize that religion ( which I'll remind you he expressed in the same speech above was the common religion of Christianity which differed very little among the people of the country when it was formed) must be part of the government. The absolute opposite of the argument made today that should be excluded from government.

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness--these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked, Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."


Thus we have the man who was perhaps one of the most instrumental in the founding and discussions and writing of the Constitution and implementing it and its first president stating unequivocally that America was a Christian Nation composed of people of common origin meaning Europeans and that preservation of religion meaning that Christian religion of course in the government was essential and was the intention is f the founders.



(It's important to recognize at this time that jews were commonly excluded from request for citizenship in the new nation. Even very wealthy ones constantly petitioned the states and the federal government to be allowed to be a citizen of the nation were excluded because the founders knew their jewish beliefs and actions conflicted with the Christian morality of the nation.)

This was not just any speech from washington. This was Washington's farewell address where he used the sum of all his accumulated knowledge and his first terms as the first president of the United States to State these facts and summarize what he thought was the most important messages to those who would carry on.

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/farewell-address

https://gab.com/Robert_May/posts/114410135103766079

This is the ultimate proof that it is a completely false allegation.

The jewish holocaust is a lie

https://www.whitehouse.gov/founding-fathers/#thomas-jefferson

The White House has put up a very good series of official pages about the founding fathers. This one about Thomas Jefferson talks about as early work against slavery but fails to mention he outlawed the participation of America and the international slave trade when he became president which is a rather important oversight. His law against the international slavery participation was passed exactly 20 years after the ratification of the Constitution which legally was the earliest time according to the terms of the Constitution when slavery could be outlawed. The proponents of this legislation thought that it would end slavery in the United States and it would gradually die out as the importation of new slaves were forbidden. Be made to be outfitted to participate in the slave trade.

The only reason it did not end slavery in America with the gradual death of the original slaves was there became an increasing breeding program in America as well as an illegal slave trade run through smugglers.

Nonetheless Thomas Jefferson not Abraham Lincoln actually took the official action to officially end slavery in America nearly 20 years after the ratification of the Constitution and legally as early as it could possibly be done because the ratification of the Constitution included a clause that said slavery could not be addressed any sooner than 20 years after the ratification of that document to give the slave states sometime to adjust to what was going to be expected to be a world without slavery. This shows that even in the beginning of the Constitution when it was ratified the founding fathers who are often thought of as racist and slave owners were actually anticipating the end of slavery at 1787 at the time of the ratification of the constitution.

of course the largest Force against the ending of slavery or the Jews who dominated the slave trade who owned most of the massive slave ships which brought most of the slaves to America which owned most of the slave auction houses and also own most of the large plantations where slaves were used.

In fact it was the Jews who supported the South and the Confederacy the most to try to break away from the United States in order to keep their slave trade profits going.


Even though the official White House page does need to be corrected to include this egregious oversight it is a rather excellent page and I'm assuming some of the other pages they put up about the founding fathers will also dispel some myths that have been promoted by Jews recently to try to critique the founding fathers of America and make people hate the United States and white people.


More about Jefferson's laws outlawing participation in the slave trade and forbidding the importation's latest to America and behind here and some other places.
It is of course on purpose that this fact is excluded from discussions about Jefferson which things did like to include the lies that he had sex with his " slave who was actually his half his wife's half sister and who was free to leave him at any time they were in France yet she chose to remain with him. In which DNA has shown did not result from Thomas Jefferson himself but rather from his nephews.


Background and text of the anti-slavery log Jefferson promoted and signed and insured was made into law at the first legal opportunity
During Thomas Jefferson's presidency
https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/eras/colonial-postrev/act-to-prohibit-the-importation-of-slaves-1807/


https://libguides.snhu.edu/c.php?g=1184812&p=8902755


More about it

https://www.monticello.org/slavery/online-exhibitions-related-to-slavery/paradox-of-liberty/thomas-jefferson-liberty-slavery/jefferson-s-antislavery-actions/


Additional info lrmation including active seizing of Jewish ships involved in the slave trade

https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/slave-trade.html

It's never stated but it should be obvious to those with a thinking brain which includes most liberals but the idea of completely ending slavery would have left all slaves homeless as slaves were provided homes and food and sheltered by their owners based on their economic output. To outlaw that would have immediately made a huge number of these people homeless a much worse situation than the gradual eventual phasing out of slavery which the law anticipated in which of course indeed happened but not without struggle

https://youtube.com/shorts/Px6fASQOG_o

You see there was a reason white people kept away from black people because they were violent.

alAnd there was a reason they kept away from Jews because they were dishonest and distrustful and would cheat you.

Discrimination was well founded in behavior.

https://www.sott.net/article/498864-Unknown-human-lineage-lived-in-Green-Sahara-7000-years-ago-ancient-DNA-reveals


Translation: not niggers