Sign into an existing account

Because of big mean Trump ofc. Imagine how bad they felt watching all those accomplished whites, heebs and bugs getting attention while they would have preferred to hoot it up for Shaniqua's African American Studies triumph of barely being able to read and write.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/harvard-renames-dei-office-cancels-racially-segregated-graduations-for-affinity-groups/

Difference between Straight Fuck Off vs. Homo Fuck You Insult Types

Sexual insults are rough, in-your-face ways to slam someone, especially among guys. Straight insults like “faggot,” “cocksucker,” or “gay” are normal, used to tell someone to fuck off or call them worthless, often by labeling them homosexual or weak.

Homo insults like “suck my dick” or “fuck you” are disgusting for straight men because they imply sex between men, hitting hard with vivid male-male imagery. It’s possible homosexuals invented many of these insults, given their ties to sexual slang in gay subcultures.

This article lists examples of these insults, sorted into straight (normal, dismissal/contempt) and homo (disgusting, male-male sex) types, argues how homosexuals might have created them, and explains their linguistic differences with psychology and sexology insights.

Examples of Sexual Insults, Sorted

These are the exact insult examples provided, sorted into straight insults (normal, meaning dismissal or contempt, often labeling as homosexual) and homo insults (disgusting, implying male-male sex), with “gay” included in straight insults. Linguistic analysis (word roots, meanings) clarifies each.

Straight Insults (Normal, Dismissal or Contempt):

Asshole – Slams someone as annoying with anus reference. Root: Old English “ars,” slur since 1300s.

Bitch – Hits at weakness, sometimes effeminacy or homosexuality. Root: Old English “bicce” (female dog), contempt since 1400s.

Bugger off – Dismissal meaning “get lost,” tied to homosexuality. Root: Medieval French “bougre” (heretic), sodomy laws, 1200s.

Cock – Penis reference, calls someone aggressive or dumb. Root: 1600s penis slang.

Cocksucker – Labels as homosexual, implies oral sex to shame. Root: 1800s U.S. slang, gay stigma.

Cuck – Implies weakness, often homosexual undertones. Root: Medieval “cuckold,” alt-right slang, 2010s.

Dickhead – Penis-based, calls someone stupid. Root: 1900s U.S. penis slang.

Faggot – Labels as homosexual, implies hatred. Root: 1300s burning of heretics, later gays.

Fuck off – Dismissal, means “go away.” Root: 1500s “fuck” (sex), “off” for contempt.

Fruit – Slur for gay men, implies flamboyance. Root: 1900s U.S. gay stereotype.

Gay – Labels as homosexual, derogatory here. Root: 1900s slang for homosexual, used as slur.

Go fuck yourself – Self-directed insult, implies unworthiness. Root: 1500s “fuck” curse.

Homo – Labels as homosexual, derogatory. Root: 1800s medical term, now slur.

Pansy – Calls someone effeminate or homosexual. Root: 1900s flower name, gay stereotype.

Poof (or Poofter) – Slur for homosexuals, implies effeminacy. Root: British 1900s slang.

Prick – Penis-based, calls someone a jerk. Root: 1500s penis slang.

Sissy – Implies homosexuality or effeminacy. Root: 1800s “sister,” weak men.

Sod off – Dismissal tied to “sodomy,” labels as homosexual. Root: Medieval anal sex slur, 1300s.

Homo Insults (Disgusting, Implying Sex Between Men):

Blow me – Implies oral sex on a man, male-male act. Root: 1900s U.S. oral sex slang.

Eat me – Implies oral sex, homosexual when aimed at men. Root: 1900s oral sex slang.

Fuck you – Implies sexual violation, male-male sex when aimed at men. Root: 1500s sex curse.

Get bent – Implies anal sex, male-male reference. Root: 1900s anal sex slang.

Kiss my ass – Implies degrading act, male-male intimacy in context. Root: 1600s contempt, anal imagery.

Lick my balls – Demands male-male sexual act. Root: 1900s crude oral sex slang.

Screw you – Softer “fuck you,” male-male violation in context. Root: 1800s sex slang.

Suck it – Shorthand for “suck my dick,” male-male submission. Root: 1900s oral sex slang.

Suck my dick – Implies oral sex on a man, male-male act. Root: 1930s U.S. slang, sex work.

Up yours – Implies anal violation, male-male sex in context. Root: 1900s anal slang.

These are examples, not a full list, as more sexual insults may exist.

Possibility of Homosexual Invention

Homosexuals could have invented many of these insults, considering their history of sharp, sexual slang in subcultures under pressure. In the 1900s, gay communities—like those using Polari in Britain or camp slang in the U.S.—crafted bold, coded language to assert identity and flip stigma. Straight insults like “faggot,” “gay,” or “cocksucker” might have started as in-group terms. “Gay” was homosexual slang before becoming a slur.

Gay subcultures used in-your-face sexual humor to defy norms, and phrases implying male-male sex could have begun as provocative taunts. “Suck my dick” or “blow me” might have been playful jabs in gay spaces, adopted by straight guys for shock. “Fuck you,” with its raw edge, could have roots in subcultural bravado, where explicit sexuality was a way to own stigma.

Psychology shows oppressed groups often create cutting language to cope, turning shame into power. Sexology notes gay communities in the 1900s used slang to build identity and resist, suggesting they could have coined terms that leaked into mainstream slang, especially in gritty or creative hubs.

Difference Between Straight and Homo Insults

Straight Insults (Normal, Dismissal or Contempt):

These are normal in some male circles because they tell someone to fuck off or call them worthless without vivid sexual imagery, often labeling them homosexual or weak.

Linguistically, they’re nouns or dismissals (e.g., “faggot,” “gay,” “bugger off”) that brand someone as inferior or hated, using homosexual stigma. “Faggot” or “gay” mark someone as homosexual to shame.

“Cocksucker” implies being gay for contempt, not two men having sex. “Bugger off” and “sod off” say “get lost” by tying the target to a despised group. Terms like “asshole,” “prick,” or “cock” use body parts for disdain, while “cuck,” “bitch,” or “sissy” hit weakness, sometimes with gay undertones. Psychologically, they lean on anti-gay stigma for quick, socially accepted jabs, common where dismissal is the goal.

Homo Insults (Disgusting, Implying Sex Between Men):

These are disgusting for straight men because they describe sexual acts between men, like oral or anal sex, using verbs like “suck,” “fuck,” or “blow” to picture the target doing or receiving a male-male act. “Suck my dick” or “blow me” has the target giving oral sex to a man.

“Fuck you” or “screw you” implies violation, male-male when aimed at men. “Kiss my ass,” “up yours,” or “lick my balls” use anal or sexual imagery, evoking male-male sex. These hit harder because they force a vivid, disgusting image of male-male intimacy for straight men.

Psychology shows explicit male-male imagery triggers strong disgust in some male settings, clashing with masculinity norms.

Linguistic Difference: Straight insults are static, using nouns (e.g., “faggot,” “gay,” “cuck”) or dismissals (e.g., “fuck off,” “sod off”) to label or reject, focusing on identity or contempt. Homo insults are active, using verbs (e.g., “suck,” “fuck,” “blow”) to describe male-male sex acts, making them graphic and disgusting for straight men.

Sexology notes straight insults use historical stigma—like 1800s medical labels or medieval laws—to shame, while homo insults amplify this with explicit sexual imagery, cutting deeper in anti-gay settings.

Conclusion

The examples—straight insults like “faggot,” “gay,” or “cocksucker” (normal, dismissal/contempt) and homo insults like “suck my dick” or “fuck you” (disgusting, male-male sex)—show clear linguistic differences.

Straight insults label or dismiss, using homosexual stigma for normal, quick jabs. Homo insults picture explicit male-male acts, disgusting for straight men due to their vivid imagery.

Homosexuals might have invented these insults, as their subcultures, like Polari or camp slang, were hotbeds for sharp, sexual language that could have spread to mainstream use.

This linguistic creativity makes the idea plausible, reflecting gay communities’ skill at turning stigma into cutting slang.

The Truth About Satanism: A Confrontation of Three Forces

Three opposing forces—the Vatican, Satanism, and Luciferianism/Illuminati—rule society, clashing over sex, virginity, and morality. The early Vatican condemned sex as sinful, exalting virginity as divine.

Satanists, in truth, are pederasts and sadomasochists who engage in degenerate acts like pederasty, deflowering virgins, and zoophilia, hiding behind occult symbols such as the inverted crucifix and pentagram.

The Luciferians, known as the Illuminati, view sex as joyful, rejecting virginity’s importance. Rooted in ancient practices, this confrontation shapes societal control through competing visions of morality.

The Vatican’s Dogma

The early Christian Church, forming Vatican dogma, viewed sex as inherently sinful, tainted by original sin. Augustine’s On Marriage and Concupiscence (c. 418 CE) states that sexual desire, even in marriage, carries concupiscence, only justified by procreation.

Virginity was the highest virtue. Jerome’s Against Jovinianus (393 CE) declares virginity superior to marriage, reflecting divine purity. Tertullian’s On Exhortation to Chastity (c. 204 CE) urges abstinence, calling sex a concession to human weakness.

Any sex outside procreative marriage— fornication, masturbation, or other acts—was sinful. This ascetic stance, rooted in fear of fleshly corruption, shaped medieval laws and persists in conservative religious movements.

The Vatican’s influence opposes sexual freedom, clashing with modern liberal values and alternative ideologies.

Satanism’s True Nature

Satanists are pederasts and sadomasochists who commit degenerate acts, including pederasty, deflowering virgins, and zoophilia. They adopted “Satanism,” from Hebrew śāṭān (“adversary”), to mask their perversions as occult worship, gaining power through this rebranding.

Pederasty, the abuse of clueless, defenseless children, is sadomasochistic due to its cruel, non-consensual power imbalance, unlike consensual sadomasochistic role-playing between adults with agreed boundaries. Deflowering virgins is a perverse ritual, defiling purity.

Zoophilia, sexual acts with animals, marks their extreme degeneracy. Satanists invite the perverse to join their rebellion against Vatican morality, using their influence to normalize these acts.

Greek pederastia, described in Plato’s Symposium, normalized mentor-youth sexual relationships among elites. Strabo’s Geography (c. 20 CE) notes similar practices in Crete. Roman accounts, like Suetonius’s Lives of the Caesars and Tacitus’s Annals, detail emperors like Nero engaging in perverse acts.

Satanists claim this legacy, rebranding pederasty as occult ritual. Their influence appears in occult-themed media— horror films, music— subtly normalizing their imagery.

Luciferianism and the Illuminati

The Luciferians, known as the Illuminati, derive their name from Latin lucifer (lux, “light”; ferre, “to carry”), symbolizing enlightenment. They view sex as joyful and liberating, free from moral constraints.

Unlike the Vatican’s reverence for virginity or Satanists’ perverse rituals, Luciferians place no value on chastity. They embrace pleasure as a path to fulfillment, promoting sexual freedom without harm.

Their ideology, rooted in Enlightenment ideals, opposes Vatican repression and Satanist cruelty. Their influence appears in cultural pushes for individualism, seen in modern art and philosophy.

Comparative Confrontation

The early Vatican deemed all sex sinful, permissible only for procreation within marriage, with virginity as the highest virtue (Against Jovinianus).

Satanists embrace all sexual acts, including pederasty— abusing defenseless children, a sadomasochistic act of cruelty— zoophilia, and deflowering virgins as a perverse ritual.

Consensual sadomasochism, a sexual game between adults with agreed boundaries, differs from Satanists’ non-consensual perversions.

Luciferians see sex as fun and joyful, rejecting virginity’s Sex is a sacred act within marriage, intended for unity and procreation, as per the Vatican's teachings. The Luciferians, in contrast, view sex as a joyful and liberating act, free from moral constraints, and place no value on chastity, aligning with their ideology of personal freedom without harm.

Their conflicting views—Vatican restraint, Satanist perversion, Luciferian liberation—fuel their battle for societal dominance, each wielding distinct moral visions.

Distinguishing Luciferian and Satanist Pornography

Luciferian pornography features attractive actors in erotic scenes, emphasizing pleasure and good taste. Their “erotic perversions” are designed for fun, aligning with their joyful view of sex, and prioritize aesthetic appeal to reflect their liberation ideology.

Satanist mainstream pornography focuses on human sex but is tasteless, gross, and disgusting, lacking erotica’s nuance. Their pederasty and zoophilia porn, reflecting their sadomasochistic degeneracy, is non-mainstream or illegal, confined to hidden or illicit channels.

This distinction underscores Luciferians’ focus on tasteful pleasure versus Satanists’ obsession with crude degradation, mirroring their broader moral conflict.

Satanist Symbols of Degeneracy

Satanists use inverted symbols to signify evil and degeneracy.

The inverted crucifix, flipping the Christian cross, mocks divine sacrifice. The Malleus Maleficarum (1486) links it to blasphemy in medieval occultism.

The pentagram, when upright, symbolizes good and perfection, its five points reflecting divine order (10÷2=5). Inverted, it signifies evil, aligning with Satanist perversion.

Moloch, a Canaanite deity (Leviticus 18:21), is depicted as a bull-headed statue with arms over a fiery pit, tied to child sacrifice. Baphomet, a horned, androgynous figure with breasts and a phallus, drawn by Éliphas Lévi in 1854, symbolizes sexual perversion, including zoophilia.

Lilith, a seductress from Jewish folklore, depicted with wings and clawed feet, embodies sexual deviance. These symbols, used in rituals, glorify degenerate acts, masking pederasty and other perversions as mysticism.

Historical and Linguistic Roots

“Satan” (Hebrew śāṭān, “adversary”) reflects an opponent of divine order (Job 1:6). “Lucifer” (Latin) suggests enlightenment, tied to Venus as the morning star.

Greek pederastia, per Plato’s Symposium and Strabo’s Geography, normalized elite mentor-youth sexual relationships. Roman accounts, like Tacitus’s Annals and Suetonius’s descriptions of Nero, detail similar elite practices.

Satanists draw on this history, rebranding pederasty as occult worship to obscure their true nature. Modern Satanist groups, like the Church of Satan, deny such acts, emphasizing individualism, but historical precedents support claims of ancient perversion.

The Luciferians, as the Illuminati, promote freedom, their influence seen in cultural shifts toward liberalism, contrasting with Vatican asceticism and Satanist cruelty.

Conclusion

The Vatican, Satanism, and Luciferianism/Illuminati form a triad of opposing forces ruling society. The Vatican’s early dogma condemns sex as sinful, exalting virginity.

Satanists, hiding as pederasts, engage in pederasty, zoophilia, and deflowering, their mainstream porn tasteless and gross, while pederasty and zoophilia remain non-mainstream or illegal, masked by symbols like the inverted crucifix, pentagram, Moloch, Baphomet, and Lilith.

Luciferians embrace sex as joy, their pornography erotic and tasteful, rejecting chastity. Rooted in ancient practices and linguistic origins, this confrontation shapes society’s moral landscape, with Satanists’ deceitful occultism vying against Vatican restraint and Luciferian freedom.

The internet is dead. It is now useless for technical information. It's just ads and bots. Can't find forums, communities of mechanics. It's a data wasteland out there.