Sign into an existing account

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349850528_The_Combination_of_Bromelain_and_Acetylcysteine_BromAc_Synergistically_Inactivates_SARS-CoV-2

A promising new study demonstrates that two common supplements have a synergistic effect when taken together to dissolve the spike protein. This is huge news if true. They demonstrated that two common supplements, Bromelain and NAC (N-Acetyl-Cysteine) will work together to break down the Covid spike protein. Additionally the same supplement cocktail will break apart the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein and it will perform hole Virus Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2.

They have demonstrated this in-vitro, meaning that if they put the spike protein in a petri dish and then add Bromelain and NAC, they see the spike protein pulled apart and destroyed. This does not work if you add either supplements by themselves. You need to have both present. This is huge because up until now we thought the spike protein was in effect a prion and would stick around in your body forever. This won't fix damage that has already been done by the spike protein but it will prevent any more damage and it will allow your body to actually start healing.

Given that pfizer has acknowledged "protein shedding" by the vaccinated and that these could be transmitted to the unvaxed, I am planning on adding Bromelain and NAC to my personal supplements diet.

https://www.amazon.com/Now-Supplements-N-Acetyl-Cysteine-1000-Tablets/dp/B00KT3H13C
https://www.amazon.com/NOW-Supplements-Bromelain-Proteolytic-Capsules/dp/B000I2028A

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273886169_WAS_RIFE_RIGHT_A_32-YEAR-OLD_INFECTION_CURED_IN_2_HOURS_BY_A_PLASMA_TUBE_RADIATION

"In the thirties, in the USA, Royal Raymond Rife reported the killing of bacteria by means of the radiation of a plasma tube. So, it was decided to try a compassionate treatment using Bare/Rife system (photo 3). The radiation was produced by a plasma tube filled with argon (80%) and neon (20%) gas at a pressure of 50 mm of mercury. The tube lighting was accomplished using a highly (>300 %) over modulated, AM type, radiofrequency electronic discharge. By using the square wave generated frequencies for modulation, along with overmodulation of the carrier wave, a pulsed emission was achieved. Treatment was done successively with the following modulation low frequencies : 723 to 730 Hz (Staphylococcus aureus), 877 to 884 Hz (Streptococcus pyogenes), 749 to 755 Hz (Proteus vulgaris), 756 to 761 Hz (Enterococcus faecalis), 764 to 771 Hz (Proteus mirabilis), 800 to 807 Hz (Escherichia coli). The session took place on the 4th of February 2005 at the rate of 3 minutes per frequency (135 minutes for the set) and ended at 16 o’clock. At night the fever had disappeared with a body temperature at 37°C. Four days later, suddenly, Mrs R. spat out a stinking, putty-like substance coming from the left side of her throat. Laboratory analysis revealed a pile of polymorphous bacteria mixed with fungus filaments."

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/48408238_Sneeze-vector_And_Sexually_Transmitted_Vaccines

"in cases where a harmful virus threatens a large population of individuals who have poor access to vaccines, the idea of inoculating a few individuals with a vaccine that can spread like a virus might be nothing to sneeze at."

"A sexually transmitted vaccine would represent an alternate transmission pathway. For example, retransmittable vaccines could be given to individuals who come to clinics with respiratory and sexually transmittable viruses. The effect would be to introduce the vaccine to social networks of people who would otherwise have received virus. Developing optimal re-transmittable vaccines would require overcoming various engineering problems. However, a person might already, in principle, be able to inoculate another by sneezing after receiving Flumist, simply through mechanical transmission."

https://nypost.com/2021/04/20/herpes-infection-possibly-linked-to-covid-19-vaccine/


https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Tertiary-contact-vaccinia-in-a-breastfeeding-Garde-Harper/3a85aae92bb82f6979ea9c9f7cb713e255cd6aac

Tertiary contact vaccinia in a breastfeeding infant.
V. Garde, D. Harper, M. Fairchok
Published 2004
Medicine
JAMA

"On May 4, 2003, a US Army soldier received primary smallpox vaccination and experienced a primary uptake reaction at the inoculation site on days 6 through 8. The vaccinee reported observing all of the standard precautions to avoid household spread. In mid May, his breastfeeding wife developed vesicles on both areolas. On May 29, their infant daughter developed a papule on her philtrum. Contact vaccinia was confirmed by positive polymerase chain reaction and culture for vaccinia of both the maternal and infant lesions. This is the first documented case of inadvertent contact vaccinia transmission from a mother to her infant through direct skin-to-skin and skin-to-mucous membrane contact while breastfeeding. The mechanism of transfer from the vaccinee to the spouse is uncertain. This report demonstrates that breastfeeding infants living in close contact with smallpox vaccinees are at potential risk for contact vaccinia, even if the vaccinee is not the breastfeeding mother, and highlights the need for special precautions to prevent secondary transfer to breastfeeding mothers"