Sign into an existing account

Anyone who is not asleep at this point can agree marxists took over this country either under obama's reign, or under biden.

It was a communist putsch like we had in 2020, or 2008.

What many are not aware of, is every communist revolution actually has two takeover events:
One where it institutes communism-in-practice. Here demoralization happens, normalization, the slow weakening of hope for ever returning to what a nation used to be. We call this a palace coup.

And second, the "october revolution" or the violent overthrow of what remains of normalcy.

The reason for this is that once the internal takeover is complete, they have to 'formalize' the takeover OFFICIALLY by "killing off" the old system in a sort of kabuki-theater secondary revolution, which is bolshevik-style mass massacres. This serves two purposes: removes any doubt that the old system is dead and not returning (killing hope, which can be deadly dangerous if not taken care of), and 2. removes any barriers to the OFFICIAL change over to communism-in-name.
Once two happens, theres no going back politically. The gloves are off and its get-with-the-program-or-get-disappeared.

Shortly america will be transitioning from stage one, to stage two. This will either be as a "counter revolution" lead by the zionist right, or under invasion.

This means the guns will have to be taken, so that is coming. Probably some form of limited controlled "real' insurrection, complete with revolutionaries, militias, and an "attempted secession" by people working for the regime and letter agencies under the CIA, DOD, or DHS.

This will be the pretext for disarmament. How they will get americans to participate after all these years I don't know. Most on the right are spooked by the feds antifada against even exercising the right to free association, let alone joining a militia.
It's pitiable really.

Probably an all or nothing pressure campaign to send home the psychological message of "now or never, do or die", will be needed by the feds to get people ready and willing to fight a real war against them. They don't want disorganized action. They don't want lone wolves (except the patsies they themselves manufacture to justify growing their cancerous organizations and their budgets).
None of these, no matter how frequent, will realistically be sufficient to create a large enough pretext to permanently move the conversation about guns nationally, towards massive restrictions (eventually leading to attempt regional disarmament).

Only a regime-organized 'revolution' that goes the distance, that dares to do more than make noise, that dares to risk their careers and exposure of their methods, will be enough to ever change the direction of the 'national conversation' on firearms, the gun rights movement, and dwindling anti-gun influence in america. I can say this for certain.

More importantly, this is a time constrained scenario, because after a certain momentum is gained by the gun movement in america, at this time when it appears america is increasingly heading for chaos and an uncertain future--the gun movement becomes extremely difficult to dislodge from influence or power. Elements of the DOD who see citizens as a lever against attempted invasion, will also assure this is the case.

Therefore marxist elements, having achieved communism-in-practice, will have to move quickly to institute subversion campaigns that support policies changing american attitudes, and greatly shrinking gun ownership. If not, their existing victory of regulatory capture, especially the legislative, intelligence, and executive branches, will be undone eventually. Their only option is forward, which is to the instituting of communism-in-name, and to do that they will have to do gun confiscation.

And to do that they will have to manufacture a full blown actual revolution in america, a revolution-in-the-small, like a regional revolt, complete with armaments, armies, generals, recruitment, heavy equipment and underground networks to support it.

I predict this is what comes next from the regime, because this is how I would do it if I were them. I see them using it not only for disarmament, but as a useful tool to nab the element of the public, military, and government who will be most problematic later on, and lastly as a way to make an example against anyone that stands against them.

it is all or nothing for the communist putsch in america. The only conclusion can be they will attempt something like this, simply because they must, because it is the only means that will work for them. A massive disaster, like campaign of nuclear terrorism, or a new deadly fast spreading genuine pandemic, neither of these will work for disarmament at this stage, precisely because any systems analysis of this scenario, shows that increases in uncertainty, or chaos, increase gunownership and support for gun ownership.
Only by making "guns" the core problem, and in a way the citizens or "right wing" must 'take ownership of', will
they be able to finally create the boogieman they intended.

You should all rest easy that they can't and won't succeed at this. They're too incompetent. They could barely keep a lid on the fake J6 insurrection. They'd never get away with creating a real revolt / rebellion, and pinning it on us.

Was talking with another user about a talk given at west point about secret military technologies, that narrative.
He mentioned that the talk was still given at west point, as if this made it more likely to be true.

And what I'd like to talk about here a little bit, is the idea of signs and symbols, and what they mean.

It could have been a talk given at the white house, or the pentagon, or the papal throne room for all anyone cares.

The fact it was at west point just means west point was the theater set is all.
And thats basically what I'm trying to highlight here.

The signs and symbols don't have their surface meaning. They only have meaning, as it were, in relation to the ascribed intent of whoever chose those signs and symbols (in this case, whoever chose west point). And to determine that you have to start by asking what you know. We don't know the 'who', so we can't ask that and get a useful answer. But we can start to pick at the edges of an answer on the 'what': whats the intention, the agenda, what agenda benefits from us assuming this is real? What direction does this move the needle on my own beliefs? What secondary beliefs are moved because of that? (say moving the overton window from impossible, to implausible, which by itself is a useful accomplishment). Etc.

The picture formed might (probably) be incorrect, but is the overall theme sending you in the right direction? Thats what you should ask about the assumptions you form from the impressions given by propaganda.
Thats how you start to observe whats true vs false.

Basically we've entered an era where nothing and anything could be true (well, disregarding the hard sciences, but even those are being distorted). And because of that, what you have to do is draw on what you knew before this era began, because without a past you have no anchor to orientate yourself to the future, and because of that both the present and your impressions of the future end up being whatever and external power decides they want it to be. Which is why it is so important for them to alter, redefine, and erase what we know about the past.

The past is all thats left of what we know about the truth anymore.
And because the artifacts of the past are mostly memory, the truth, which we can use like a sword to split twain fact from falsehood, mostly comes from within.

It's why the globalists want us all dead. We're the last, the remnant of the past that is holding back their control of the narrative over the past, present, and future.

And here they are, collaborating with the enemy again, threatening american citizens:
https://www.wnd.com/2023/06/stop-singing-national-anthem-rendition-children-deemed-protest/