Sign into an existing account

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVI_smLgTY0

This is huge for the Linux community.

PewDiePie has 110 million subscribers and this video garnered 4,129,995 views in 2 days.

I was explaining how Shariah law was incompatible with White nations. Their only answer was that to prove God's kindness, my only choice is to sit there, and wait to get killed, so i can show the love of Jesus to others. I tried explaining there wont be any Christianity to spread if all those Christians are dead. Instead I was told that the only way to stop this is to placate and enable muslims, giving them the religious tolerance they need to practice. See Jesus is coming back soon, and since well all be dead soon, who gives a shit? (paraphrasing their words, not mine). As far as they're concerned, even bringing it up is too much. But if those same ass fucks criticize us? Well the onus is now on me to show the kindness of Christ by placating them. So let me get this straight, all i can do is sit there and get fucked by islam, whilst those same assholes can force demands on me and i have to listen? They can kill me, my family, and my entire neighborhood. But if i bring it up, im the bad guy?

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/lgUAAOSw0lVbGj2S/s-l1200.jpg

Walzer is a noted social scientist, Jew, and just war theorist controversial for his defense of terrorism. The crib notes is that he argues terrorism can only be justified if a people face annihilation. Ironically he was inspired by WW2 anti-fascist partisanship in making his case - but it has very obvious application in the here and now.

I have posted on Walzer previously:

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=67f5595eba0a4

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=6291e1c203055

The fuck n' suck is Sadean. You might call it Sade Arabia given its transvaluation of values and smashing of present bourgeois norms. But its more modern influence is late Freudian and how Freudians built on Freud.

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=68110622abb46&commentid=681153a467cfa

"In Civilization and Its Discontents, Freud theorized the fundamental tensions between civilization and the individual; his theory is grounded in the notion that humans have certain characteristic instincts that are immutable.[4] The primary tension originates from an individual attempting to find instinctive freedom, and civilization's contrary demand for conformity and repression of instincts. Freud states that when any situation that is desired by the pleasure principle is prolonged, it creates a feeling of mild resentment as it clashes with the reality principle.

"Primitive instincts—for example, the desire to kill and the insatiable craving for sexual gratification—are harmful to the collective wellbeing of a human community."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization_and_Its_Discontents

Which is to say Freud saw this repression of Eros, or sexual freedom, as necessary. The difference for Freudians like Norman O. Brown, Wilhelm Reich, and to a lesser extent Marcuse, was that they saw this repression as harmful and its overthrow as likely.

Irving Kristol pretty much summed up this thinking:

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/03/28/archives/pornography-obscenity-and-the-case-for-censorship-pornography.html

"It is true that, in our time, some quite brilliant minds have come to the conclusion that a reversion to infantile sexuality is the ultimate mission and secret destiny of the human race."

AI rundowns on Sade, Brown, Marcuse, and Reich pertaining to this:

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=67f0553cca3a1&commentid=67f06cf295a90

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=67f0553cca3a1&commentid=67f07467c80ae

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=67f0553cca3a1&commentid=67f17a1dd2305

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=67f0553cca3a1&commentid=67f07320cb75c