Sign into an existing account

Anarchism is a political philosophy advocating for the absence of government and any other form of hierarchical authority, seeking to replace them with voluntary associations and free cooperation. It's often seen as a libertarian wing of the socialist movement, aiming to create a society without coercive structures like the state or capitalism.

Key aspects of Anarchism:

Anti-authoritarianism:

Anarchism fundamentally rejects all forms of hierarchical authority, including the state, law, and any system that forces individuals to obey.

Focus on individual liberty:

It prioritizes individual autonomy and freedom, believing that people should have the right to make their own decisions without coercion.

Emphasis on voluntary association:

Anarchists envision societies where individuals come together voluntarily to cooperate and achieve shared goals without coercion.

Anti-capitalism:

Many anarchists also oppose capitalism, viewing it as a form of economic exploitation and a source of inequality that reinforces hierarchical structures.

Diverse forms:

Anarchism encompasses various sub-movements and schools of thought, including anarcho-communism, anarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-primitivism, and green anarchism, each with its own approach to achieving a stateless society.
Important points to consider:

Misconceptions:

The term "anarchy" is often associated with chaos and disorder, but anarchists envision a society that is free, not chaotic.

Methods of change:

Anarchists employ various strategies, including non-violent direct action, protests, and the creation of alternative institutions to challenge existing power structures.

Contemporary relevance:

Anarchism continues to be a relevant political philosophy, particularly in movements against capitalism, globalization, and authoritarianism.

https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/military/deadly-new-chinese-missile-could-destroy-entire-us-fleet-in-20-minutes/news-story/3b91043978e4f3c42de83ae3a5cb1b3d

The Trump administration’s controversial Secretary of Defence Peter Hegseth has told US media that the United States Navy and Marine Corps “loses to China in every war game”.

Whenever you see a movie or go to a pastor, you are led to believe the Romans were the ones who killed Jesus. Whils this does sound plausible at first ... it doesnt. See Pilate himself said he washes himself of the sin of crucifying Jesus. Hence, the question becomes, who really killed Jesus? Was it really the Romans, or rather did the Romans simply let the pharisees kill him? Whilst Jesus is dead both ways the question of who actually commited the crime gives a very different meaning to the rejection of Christ. If the Romans did it the question becomes why would the Romans kill someone who by their own words posed no threat to them? And if the pharisees killed them, it proves they rejected Christ. One of these makes sense, the other is complete nonsensical horseshit