Liberals alway mischaracterize “nazi” paleo-anthropology and are eager to discredit those schools whereever they are proven wrong but fail to point out where they are correct and where leftist social scientists were wrong.
One of the most stark pieces of evidence is the near total replacement of “Farmer” Y chromosome G2 ( and indigenous Y chromosome I in some places like Ireland) with R1b and R1a from steppe related ancestry. The male lineages were almost entirely replaced in much of Europe, even in places with heavy Farmer ancestry, like Iberia.
I think its important to point out that the spread of indo-european language and steppe ancestry was not a total bloodbath in every instance. Scandinavia and the baltics might have been more of a draw between hunter gatherer heavy farmer groups and arriving steppe related people. The Etruscans seem to have been a people with steppe ancestry that adopted “farmer” language.
Other discoveries due to aDNA which have caused liberal consternation:
Native americans appear to be half “White” (largely descended from western eurasians.) or at least originally were. Ancient DNA from Anzac Child who lived 10,000 years ago in Montana had high levels of “Ancient North Eurasian” ancestry. South american indians carry similarly high levels, but north american indians are less related to Anzac Child, indicating genetic contribution from more recent Asian invaders after 5000 years ago. This of course completely up-ends the victimhood narrative of North American Indians since they derive more heavily from asian “colonizers” than original settlers.
Ancient DNA is also now disproving the Out of Africa dogma that has gone on for so long unquestioned. More recent analysis now asserts that Eurasians may be 20 to 30% descended from Neanderthals and other archaic homonins, rather than 2 or 3 % that was previously thought to be the case.
We also know that niggers were even more primitive before “back to africa” migration from eurasia occured in the last 10,000 years, thanks to genetic analysis on modern africans.
This guy Kossinna advocated a model in which the indo-european languages were spread violently through a genetic spread of a germanic northern european people ( a large population turnover). His ideas were popular in the 3rd reich. Later libtard social scientists poo-pooed his theories and favored a kinder gentler model of a cultural spread of indo-european. But at least in some instances, the analysis of ancient DNA (using relatively new technology) has undermined the libshit hypothesis in favor of a model closer to Kossinna and the “Nazis”. This has occured mostly in the last 10 to 15 years.
Many other liberal anthropological consensuses (sp?) have been overturned about the evolution of people in other regions and timeframes using ancient and modern DNA analysis in recent years. Anthropologists “got schooled” by the geneticists.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 3 daysMay 31, 2025 17:24:31 ago (+1/-0)
One of the most stark pieces of evidence is the near total replacement of “Farmer” Y chromosome G2 ( and indigenous Y chromosome I in some places like Ireland) with R1b and R1a from steppe related ancestry. The male lineages were almost entirely replaced in much of Europe, even in places with heavy Farmer ancestry, like Iberia.
I think its important to point out that the spread of indo-european language and steppe ancestry was not a total bloodbath in every instance. Scandinavia and the baltics might have been more of a draw between hunter gatherer heavy farmer groups and arriving steppe related people. The Etruscans seem to have been a people with steppe ancestry that adopted “farmer” language.
Other discoveries due to aDNA which have caused liberal consternation:
Native americans appear to be half “White” (largely descended from western eurasians.) or at least originally were. Ancient DNA from Anzac Child who lived 10,000 years ago in Montana had high levels of “Ancient North Eurasian” ancestry. South american indians carry similarly high levels, but north american indians are less related to Anzac Child, indicating genetic contribution from more recent Asian invaders after 5000 years ago. This of course completely up-ends the victimhood narrative of North American Indians since they derive more heavily from asian “colonizers” than original settlers.
Ancient DNA is also now disproving the Out of Africa dogma that has gone on for so long unquestioned. More recent analysis now asserts that Eurasians may be 20 to 30% descended from Neanderthals and other archaic homonins, rather than 2 or 3 % that was previously thought to be the case.
We also know that niggers were even more primitive before “back to africa” migration from eurasia occured in the last 10,000 years, thanks to genetic analysis on modern africans.
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 3 daysMay 31, 2025 11:35:11 ago (+0/-0)
CARE TO PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF WHAT THE DISGRACED THEORY WAS?
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3 daysMay 31, 2025 17:36:50 ago (+0/-0)
Many other liberal anthropological consensuses (sp?) have been overturned about the evolution of people in other regions and timeframes using ancient and modern DNA analysis in recent years. Anthropologists “got schooled” by the geneticists.