Sign into an existing account

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDst3DlJhtU

You don't have to watch it all. About a minute of it might be all you can stomach.

Jackson, MS. Capital of Mississippi. Chock fucking full of useless shaved apes. These "people" don't care about or want education, work, accountability and accomplishment. They don't in Africa and they don't here. It's genetic. Like stupid, you can't fix useless with gibs.

The guy who produced this knows what the problem is. You can tell. But he wpn't say, "Niggers destroy everything." Instead, he just keeps asking how a third-world Haitian-like shithole like what Jackson has become can come about. You can go to Memphis, Little Rock, Shreveport, Baton Rouge, Birmingham, Atlanta, East St. Louis, Dallas, Monroe, Mobile, Jacksonville etc etc etc etc and find the exact same collapse of almost everything the White people built in those towns before we started letting dead niggers vote. There is nothing more blatantly useless than a nigger politician. They have no business voting.

Even though right now most White people would hate me because of my racial and politican views, I don't care. I love my gullible and naive people and I want them to wake the fuck up and realize we have to permanently solve this nigger problem while there is time.

https://www.yewtu.be/watch?v=i8j9hhdh-J0

YT ORIGNINAL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8j9hhdh-J0
Nietzsche hated ESCAPISM, and one of the prominent forms of this was the Romanticism he saw all around him in Germany. You've seen the rise of this recently among Millennials... and it begs the question: is this a sign of weakness?

…but is trusting random people, or worse misinformed familiars, in real life, really any better?

What is the standard for trust in the modern era?

On occasion I speak at length to people in real life and often they describe the experience as “perspective changing,” but since have no real platform from which to speak other than personal experience, why should they trust anything I have to say? I speak in platitudes and can be rude or brusque, which is to say I am no better than they in delivery, but despite this commonality, why is it that my perspective remains mostly the same while theirs alters in some more meaningful way? I’ve never thought to ask…

Many here have influenced my way of thinking, I admit, and am thankful for it, but it is not without a healthy amount of skepticism have I progressed forward in my own parallel journey — what quality is it then that makes one individual more trustworthy than another, even without direct objective proof?