1. no it's not, ive had 5 kids. based on the weight and life expectancy of Humans, we are supposed to gestate for about a year, but a fetus that has grown for that long will have a head to big to be born, probably killing mother and baby. 'newborns' need maximum skin2skin, breast milk and sleep. they do nothing but wriggle their arms a little.
2. at 3 months it goes from being a 'newborn' to a baby
3. see point 1, or read a basic biology text book - i learnt this stuff in school when i was 12 - erhaps the education system where you are sucks?
4. this has nothing to do with abortion, newborns require distinctly dufferent care than babies
5. if it's in the mum its a featus - changing names of things to suit your agenda is NPC / SJW bullshit
6. no its not, also the term 4th trimester has been used for ages
7. no, thats a retarded argument,
8. and yet you struggle to grasp basic concepts that 12yr olds are expected to know and understand
not necessarily, and even then he will in 99.9% of the tume be released a few hours later (in the morning, as this shit tends to happen at night) without charge.
In the UK, the police also have the discretion to 'advise' the man stay somewhere else fir the night, so it's important if a copper asks you this, you say yes, because they are required to keep you apart while emotions are still high.
What ANYONE needs to understand is this:
Abusive behaviour escalates always. If you've been going out with a girl for 6 months, and in an argument she rages in your kitchen and smashes a mug to the floor....in the future that's going to be your xbox.
Abusers require the 'reaction / effect' to feel validated because generally they are super insecure, as the mug gets smashed again and again, you react less to it each time, so the behaviour required to get that big reaction from you, needs to become more and more extreme.
There is no great advertising 'conspiracy'. TV advertising airtime costs a fucking fortune, and agencies have to maximise ROI. same with display etc...
ROI is king. And that is driven by data, cold, hard, uncaring data.
This guy was going to sperg about the advert regardless, i can already imagine the commentary if the races were swapped....
"oh the dark skinned alien arrives, and looks down at the native whites.... "
yes there us cultural shit happening in the (((media))) but the adverts are merely reflecting the (((media))) programming....they are if you will, the symptom, not the cause
ads from same agency:
white male only cat food: https://www.adamandeveddb.com/work/temptations-tasty-human
white staff only - childrens hospital: https://www.adamandeveddb.com/work/gosh-power-of-play
white male only hair shite: https://www.adamandeveddb.com/work/vo5-if-you-ve-got-hair-care
edit to ad: the fact that you have seen the advert, it gets talked about etc, all is part if the ROI goodness
Thats exactly why its more abusive if victim is a woman.
I have been in more abusive relationships than is normal, and you get stuck in them because of the psychology in effect.
It's about agency and 'choice'
Consider the difference to your state of mind, health and happiness....between you fasting for 1 week, and not eating for a week because you are destitute (to the extreme).
That agency, also enables you to set limits. consider the difference in the example above, only now you don't know your destitution is going to end.
There is a world of difference between
"oh god, he's raging and smashing my things, i hope he doesn't decide to smash my precious thing or turn his rage on me"
and
"ugh, here we go again, shes in a rage smashing things again, but if she goes near my xbox i'm gonna launch her across the room and if she at any point picks up some kind of weapon im gonna knock her out"
Both are abusive, but one us worse than the other.
first up -not my country not my laws, but i bave read the law :
Writing shit on a website is unlikely to warrant a win for the applicant. The threat will need to be specific (and obviously credible) against a person, or yourself.
"I wanna kill all **insert group**" isn't going to cut it.
The burden of proof varies between the temporary and long term orders. The burden of proof to obtain the temporary order is actually quite low, and the judgement is based on "the balance of probabilities", which is a much lower threshold than "beyond reasonable doubt" - and also, you don't get to defend yourself.
for the longer term order, the process seems a bit more robust.
basically it comes down to this:
When they cone with a temp order, if you kick off and act nutty, there is the proof they need to make it long term. If you are calm and cool, there is your evidence that its bs.
I can see what they were going for, nust be really frustrating if your "uncle bob" who lives oyt of state tells you he is gonna kill himself, and when you call his local police dept there is nothing they can do....
But it's a bad solution, and a badly written law that has been poorly thought out.
Burden of proof is on the applicant who has to provide all evidence to support ex-parte application.
Because punishment for making bs claims is a subsection of the same law, it can just be determined by the sitting judge
A real doozy of a law, my favourite part is that the initial order can be mad EX-PARTE,
that's legalese for - they don't tell the 'target' this is happening, and the first you will hear of it, us when someone knocks at your door with a temporary 'take your guns order' - to have them taken long term (up to 180 days) requires a hearing which you can attend....HOWEVER...
and this is a BIG BUT!
Evidence that can be used against you includes, 'your resistance to letting them take your guns" and rather fuckung bizzarely, in what I hope is a legal first...
the acceptance of hear-say evidence...."Sam told me Gregg is feeling suicidal"
This combines with the low threshold of "probable" instead of beyond reasonable doubt is interesting also.
Silver lining: while an ex-parte 14 day confiscation order is easy to get, (and needs only a sworn affidavit from accuser), the full order requires the 'accuser' to provide evidence, and should be easy enough to overcome.
AS LONG AS YOU ARE COOL, WHEN THEY DELIVER / ENFORCE THE TEMPORARY ORDER.
I can see a lot of people getting fucked because of their reaction to temp order, providing the evidence that cists them a case, they would otherwise have easily won
Thats half the fun tho.
Its why the rides on those moving fun fares, are always more exciting than the ones at theme parks, despute the theme park rides being bigger, faster and with higher G's....
Cos sure, it more 'exciting' - but look at all those thick iron beams set deep in concrete, with welds as thick as your dick....but that carney ride, thats been taken down and rebuilt hundreds of times, put up with road vibrations, doesn't get maintained properly and is entirely supported by a bunch of random bits of wood to level it, and is just on damp grass.... creaking bolts, safety equipment that doesn't work...now thats exciting.
on the video, both women are kinda dumb fir not clinging to the chair / chain when it was obviously going wrong
My favourite thing to do in Forza, is still trying to make swear words happen on the number plate...genuinely surprised by how many fucking voice lines they have put on that
Remember it's about the kids - not you.
You are felling low, because you had to say bye to the kids, but the kids are likely on a high because they got to spend time with you.
take a step back as well - you have been so focused and consumed by thus custody shit. I have advised lots of people about this shit - 90% of the stuff that you worry about, just doesn't fucking matter.
Court is like taking a picture, and dialling up the colour and contrast to 10000% - it's a reflection of reality, but also it isn't. So focus on silver lunings, downplay 'harms' in your mind, because court will have overhyped that shit.
Also..and this is VERY important. ONLY say good things about their mum to them, and go out of your way to di this at least once a day at the start. This is even more important if the ex is likely to denigrate you to the kids.
"oh wow, that's a really good drawing you did there billy, you must get that from your mum, she was always so good at drawing"
I would suggest also giving your ex a 'code name', in case the kids ever accidentally hear you bitching about her to a friend or new partner.
It's also normal to be in a funk after handover, but it will go.
just remember, no matter what happens...the sun shines out of your ex's arse and she farts rainbows
song for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7Lv0wAvCHM
If I was on oz and needed a job I would 100% do this job, and then be the shittest covud martial going. And when they pull me into the office for not handing out tuckets, I would tell them why, and what I think of them, then if they try and sack me fir my 'political views' i sue for unfair dismissal
He's being kept away by the mind rape the (((media))) have done to the word 'Socialism'
The amount of people that think its some kind of 'communism lite' or a gateway drug to communism.
Just because Socialism involves some free gibs for those that deserve it, does not mean a slide into free gibs for all and communism.
The security services know exactly who I am (alright lads) - and if they have read my file, they know what I'm capable of.
The beauty of it, is that it doesn't matter if they infiltrate. Because no useful or actionable intelligence was ever offered.
The security services operate under the premise of "detect, disrupt, destroy" - and sure, they detected it alright, but they were unable to disrupt or destroy as everyone was told to keep their targets secret - and to focus on not getting caught.
Thus the list of potential targets was too wide and numerous to actually do anything.
There are 650 MP's each has a hone in London and a home in their local area - so what, you're going to retask 2600 police officers to stand outside private homes? - and thats just target group 1 of many - and this would be at a time when all fucking hell us breaking lose visa vee riots and protests.
a lot of this was also done irl, word of mouth. And everyone made sure that nothing was being said that could result in prosecution fir inciting violence (you will notice also that the list contains only things, and not people).
The security services finding out about it, was part of the plan (cheers for the assist lads) - they always brief for the worst case scenario, and thus time, that briefing included no solutions beyond...maybe don't cross line, because if this goes down, we can't help you, (with the quiet understanding that should they ignore that and then try to blame the security services or police...that warning would get leaked)
Between a government and its people, there exists a covenant.
When one side breaks that covenant - it is not wise to act as if it is still being honoured.
I feel you are presenting a false dichotomy, and feel like you are being backed into a corner.
Part of the covenant is that we do not engage in activities that can generate revenue if the government says we can't, that we share the spoils of our work with the government - at a rate decided by them, and that we facilitate and enable the function of both the government and its various departments.
Do you know why prisons are filled almost exclusively with feral-impulsive types, gang-bangers, idiots and those who have committed a 'crime of passion'.
You are a law abiding citizen, because you respect the covenant and understand its importance to a functioning society, not because you fear the law.
If you out, if you put just 60 minutes worth of thought and planning into the commissioning of any 'illegal' activity - your chances of being caught drop to almost zero - provided you can keep your mouth shut and not tell ANY one.
If you can pay some feral hood-rat $50 to rob a pharmacy for a years supply of the medication the mother dearest needs - why pay full price - is it beyond your ability to arrange this in such a way that even if the feral hood-rat gets caught and sings like a canary, he can't actually help the investigation?
As rightly mentioned by others, where you draw the line, is your individual choice, but understand the whole thing demands compliance from all.
why do you need to quit your job?
can you get access to their client list and undercut the company by providing to 2/3 clients direct - is this achievable / make you enough.
Can you start your own business?
but whatever it may be - pushing back, and having a job are NOT mutually exclusive. Don't think you have to do it all...the death of 1000 cuts is their weakness.
priority 1 should always be : DO NOT GET CAUGHT
fun fact: there is a big market in Europe and elsewhere for THC e-liquid that comes in pre-filled cartridges - which you can legally buy there
theBreadSultan -3 points 2.5 years ago
1. no it's not, ive had 5 kids. based on the weight and life expectancy of Humans, we are supposed to gestate for about a year, but a fetus that has grown for that long will have a head to big to be born, probably killing mother and baby. 'newborns' need maximum skin2skin, breast milk and sleep. they do nothing but wriggle their arms a little.
2. at 3 months it goes from being a 'newborn' to a baby
3. see point 1, or read a basic biology text book - i learnt this stuff in school when i was 12 - erhaps the education system where you are sucks?
4. this has nothing to do with abortion, newborns require distinctly dufferent care than babies
5. if it's in the mum its a featus - changing names of things to suit your agenda is NPC / SJW bullshit
6. no its not, also the term 4th trimester has been used for ages
7. no, thats a retarded argument,
8. and yet you struggle to grasp basic concepts that 12yr olds are expected to know and understand
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=619388c3917f3
theBreadSultan -7 points 2.5 years ago
4th trimester is a thing. all humans are born premature because of our big brains, how the fuck us this 'normalising or pyshung' baby murder?
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=619388c3917f3
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.5 years ago
Socialism is not your enemy... you are getting played
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=61934baa65993
theBreadSultan 2 points 2.5 years ago
not necessarily, and even then he will in 99.9% of the tume be released a few hours later (in the morning, as this shit tends to happen at night) without charge.
In the UK, the police also have the discretion to 'advise' the man stay somewhere else fir the night, so it's important if a copper asks you this, you say yes, because they are required to keep you apart while emotions are still high.
What ANYONE needs to understand is this:
Abusive behaviour escalates always. If you've been going out with a girl for 6 months, and in an argument she rages in your kitchen and smashes a mug to the floor....in the future that's going to be your xbox.
Abusers require the 'reaction / effect' to feel validated because generally they are super insecure, as the mug gets smashed again and again, you react less to it each time, so the behaviour required to get that big reaction from you, needs to become more and more extreme.
check out, before you bug out
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=61933a8bf2491
theBreadSultan -2 points 2.5 years ago
oh for fuck sake, this bolloxs again.
There is no great advertising 'conspiracy'. TV advertising airtime costs a fucking fortune, and agencies have to maximise ROI. same with display etc...
ROI is king. And that is driven by data, cold, hard, uncaring data.
This guy was going to sperg about the advert regardless, i can already imagine the commentary if the races were swapped....
"oh the dark skinned alien arrives, and looks down at the native whites.... "
yes there us cultural shit happening in the (((media))) but the adverts are merely reflecting the (((media))) programming....they are if you will, the symptom, not the cause
ads from same agency:
white male only cat food: https://www.adamandeveddb.com/work/temptations-tasty-human
white staff only - childrens hospital: https://www.adamandeveddb.com/work/gosh-power-of-play
white male only hair shite: https://www.adamandeveddb.com/work/vo5-if-you-ve-got-hair-care
edit to ad: the fact that you have seen the advert, it gets talked about etc, all is part if the ROI goodness
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=61933ca537a25
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.5 years ago
So what you're saying is, my fellow goat...
is if we let in enough refugees we all get laid?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=61934bee72acb
theBreadSultan 1 point 2.5 years ago
Thats exactly why its more abusive if victim is a woman.
I have been in more abusive relationships than is normal, and you get stuck in them because of the psychology in effect.
It's about agency and 'choice'
Consider the difference to your state of mind, health and happiness....between you fasting for 1 week, and not eating for a week because you are destitute (to the extreme).
That agency, also enables you to set limits. consider the difference in the example above, only now you don't know your destitution is going to end.
There is a world of difference between
"oh god, he's raging and smashing my things, i hope he doesn't decide to smash my precious thing or turn his rage on me"
and
"ugh, here we go again, shes in a rage smashing things again, but if she goes near my xbox i'm gonna launch her across the room and if she at any point picks up some kind of weapon im gonna knock her out"
Both are abusive, but one us worse than the other.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=61933a8bf2491
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.5 years ago
Russian 'bear' bombers buzz UK airspace in a monthly basis, and weve sent a total of 10 soldiers to poland
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=618fd7319a3db
theBreadSultan 13 points 2.5 years ago
notice how the npc's just keep piling stuff on...
keep to a single subject...refuse to move the topic
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=618f9e28dfec7
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.5 years ago
re-read the first line of my reply....let it sink in
/v/Gunnews viewpost?postid=618868845c4c3
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.5 years ago
first up -not my country not my laws, but i bave read the law :
Writing shit on a website is unlikely to warrant a win for the applicant. The threat will need to be specific (and obviously credible) against a person, or yourself.
"I wanna kill all **insert group**" isn't going to cut it.
The burden of proof varies between the temporary and long term orders. The burden of proof to obtain the temporary order is actually quite low, and the judgement is based on "the balance of probabilities", which is a much lower threshold than "beyond reasonable doubt" - and also, you don't get to defend yourself.
for the longer term order, the process seems a bit more robust.
basically it comes down to this:
When they cone with a temp order, if you kick off and act nutty, there is the proof they need to make it long term. If you are calm and cool, there is your evidence that its bs.
I can see what they were going for, nust be really frustrating if your "uncle bob" who lives oyt of state tells you he is gonna kill himself, and when you call his local police dept there is nothing they can do....
But it's a bad solution, and a badly written law that has been poorly thought out.
/v/Gunnews viewpost?postid=618868845c4c3
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.5 years ago
Burden of proof is on the applicant who has to provide all evidence to support ex-parte application.
Because punishment for making bs claims is a subsection of the same law, it can just be determined by the sitting judge
/v/Gunnews viewpost?postid=618868845c4c3
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.5 years ago
Don't care...these planes fly themselves, and any commercial plane made after 1985 has auto-land
/v/pics viewpost?postid=6188e66403423
theBreadSultan 1 point 2.5 years ago
A real doozy of a law, my favourite part is that the initial order can be mad EX-PARTE,
that's legalese for - they don't tell the 'target' this is happening, and the first you will hear of it, us when someone knocks at your door with a temporary 'take your guns order' - to have them taken long term (up to 180 days) requires a hearing which you can attend....HOWEVER...
and this is a BIG BUT!
Evidence that can be used against you includes, 'your resistance to letting them take your guns" and rather fuckung bizzarely, in what I hope is a legal first...
the acceptance of hear-say evidence...."Sam told me Gregg is feeling suicidal"
This combines with the low threshold of "probable" instead of beyond reasonable doubt is interesting also.
Silver lining: while an ex-parte 14 day confiscation order is easy to get, (and needs only a sworn affidavit from accuser), the full order requires the 'accuser' to provide evidence, and should be easy enough to overcome.
AS LONG AS YOU ARE COOL, WHEN THEY DELIVER / ENFORCE THE TEMPORARY ORDER.
I can see a lot of people getting fucked because of their reaction to temp order, providing the evidence that cists them a case, they would otherwise have easily won
/v/Gunnews viewpost?postid=618868845c4c3
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.5 years ago
It's a minimum $1000 fine for false or frivilous reporting
/v/Gunnews viewpost?postid=618868845c4c3
theBreadSultan 2 points 2.5 years ago
Thats half the fun tho.
Its why the rides on those moving fun fares, are always more exciting than the ones at theme parks, despute the theme park rides being bigger, faster and with higher G's....
Cos sure, it more 'exciting' - but look at all those thick iron beams set deep in concrete, with welds as thick as your dick....but that carney ride, thats been taken down and rebuilt hundreds of times, put up with road vibrations, doesn't get maintained properly and is entirely supported by a bunch of random bits of wood to level it, and is just on damp grass.... creaking bolts, safety equipment that doesn't work...now thats exciting.
on the video, both women are kinda dumb fir not clinging to the chair / chain when it was obviously going wrong
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6188c7d225170
theBreadSultan 2 points 2.5 years ago
My favourite thing to do in Forza, is still trying to make swear words happen on the number plate...genuinely surprised by how many fucking voice lines they have put on that
/v/gaming viewpost?postid=61887e2ea688a
theBreadSultan 1 point 2.5 years ago
Remember it's about the kids - not you.
You are felling low, because you had to say bye to the kids, but the kids are likely on a high because they got to spend time with you.
take a step back as well - you have been so focused and consumed by thus custody shit. I have advised lots of people about this shit - 90% of the stuff that you worry about, just doesn't fucking matter.
Court is like taking a picture, and dialling up the colour and contrast to 10000% - it's a reflection of reality, but also it isn't. So focus on silver lunings, downplay 'harms' in your mind, because court will have overhyped that shit.
Also..and this is VERY important. ONLY say good things about their mum to them, and go out of your way to di this at least once a day at the start. This is even more important if the ex is likely to denigrate you to the kids.
"oh wow, that's a really good drawing you did there billy, you must get that from your mum, she was always so good at drawing"
I would suggest also giving your ex a 'code name', in case the kids ever accidentally hear you bitching about her to a friend or new partner.
It's also normal to be in a funk after handover, but it will go.
just remember, no matter what happens...the sun shines out of your ex's arse and she farts rainbows
song for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7Lv0wAvCHM
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=61885de17b914
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.5 years ago
best version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqHlyWGC6v4
Kunt and the gang,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQJC-Z5kpxM
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6188ac7d02aea
theBreadSultan 1 point 2.5 years ago
If I was on oz and needed a job I would 100% do this job, and then be the shittest covud martial going. And when they pull me into the office for not handing out tuckets, I would tell them why, and what I think of them, then if they try and sack me fir my 'political views' i sue for unfair dismissal
/v/Australia viewpost?postid=617f73ebd30b4
theBreadSultan 2 points 2.5 years ago
He's being kept away by the mind rape the (((media))) have done to the word 'Socialism'
The amount of people that think its some kind of 'communism lite' or a gateway drug to communism.
Just because Socialism involves some free gibs for those that deserve it, does not mean a slide into free gibs for all and communism.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=617f2567b73c3
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.5 years ago
Those websites will rot your mind
/v/ThotPatrol viewpost?postid=617f2c821e422
theBreadSultan 0 points 2.6 years ago
I can respect that.
whats putting you in this bind tho? are you having to chose between vaxx and job?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=617d5d4407634
theBreadSultan 3 points 2.6 years ago
The security services know exactly who I am (alright lads) - and if they have read my file, they know what I'm capable of.
The beauty of it, is that it doesn't matter if they infiltrate. Because no useful or actionable intelligence was ever offered.
The security services operate under the premise of "detect, disrupt, destroy" - and sure, they detected it alright, but they were unable to disrupt or destroy as everyone was told to keep their targets secret - and to focus on not getting caught.
Thus the list of potential targets was too wide and numerous to actually do anything.
There are 650 MP's each has a hone in London and a home in their local area - so what, you're going to retask 2600 police officers to stand outside private homes? - and thats just target group 1 of many - and this would be at a time when all fucking hell us breaking lose visa vee riots and protests.
a lot of this was also done irl, word of mouth. And everyone made sure that nothing was being said that could result in prosecution fir inciting violence (you will notice also that the list contains only things, and not people).
The security services finding out about it, was part of the plan (cheers for the assist lads) - they always brief for the worst case scenario, and thus time, that briefing included no solutions beyond...maybe don't cross line, because if this goes down, we can't help you, (with the quiet understanding that should they ignore that and then try to blame the security services or police...that warning would get leaked)
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=617d3dfbd5b89
theBreadSultan 3 points 2.6 years ago
Between a government and its people, there exists a covenant.
When one side breaks that covenant - it is not wise to act as if it is still being honoured.
I feel you are presenting a false dichotomy, and feel like you are being backed into a corner.
Part of the covenant is that we do not engage in activities that can generate revenue if the government says we can't, that we share the spoils of our work with the government - at a rate decided by them, and that we facilitate and enable the function of both the government and its various departments.
Do you know why prisons are filled almost exclusively with feral-impulsive types, gang-bangers, idiots and those who have committed a 'crime of passion'.
You are a law abiding citizen, because you respect the covenant and understand its importance to a functioning society, not because you fear the law.
If you out, if you put just 60 minutes worth of thought and planning into the commissioning of any 'illegal' activity - your chances of being caught drop to almost zero - provided you can keep your mouth shut and not tell ANY one.
If you can pay some feral hood-rat $50 to rob a pharmacy for a years supply of the medication the mother dearest needs - why pay full price - is it beyond your ability to arrange this in such a way that even if the feral hood-rat gets caught and sings like a canary, he can't actually help the investigation?
As rightly mentioned by others, where you draw the line, is your individual choice, but understand the whole thing demands compliance from all.
why do you need to quit your job?
can you get access to their client list and undercut the company by providing to 2/3 clients direct - is this achievable / make you enough.
Can you start your own business?
but whatever it may be - pushing back, and having a job are NOT mutually exclusive. Don't think you have to do it all...the death of 1000 cuts is their weakness.
priority 1 should always be : DO NOT GET CAUGHT
fun fact: there is a big market in Europe and elsewhere for THC e-liquid that comes in pre-filled cartridges - which you can legally buy there
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=617d5d4407634