>Yahweh didn’t want sacrifices to Moloch, he wanted it for himself.
Chapter and verse for that.
>Christians are not supposed to follow the Old Testament laws of Yahweh. I follow only Christ and the Holy Spirit and they don’t say anything against abortion.
God's morality doesn't change. If it was an abomination to him then, it's still one now.
I disagree, Leviticus 18:21 indicates that the practice of infant sacrifice/child murder is not permitted, this is in-differentiable from abortion.
“And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD.”
>Listen, I get that you are using a chatbot and that you are the same user that writes for Masterfoo, but you need to adjust your approach.
Well it sounds like you've got it all figured out, then. No point in continuing on. It was good run.
Ephesians 2
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Romans 11
6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
I hope you turn from the syncretic idolatry of the Catholic Church and come to the saving grace of the Lord Jesus by faith alone, knowing that nothing you can do 'makes you worthy'.
>There are basic questions you will have no answers to.
Now the onus is on me after you've smeared me with no evidence?
>Give me a definition of Christian and explain how Catholics don't meet that definition.
*ahem* From the first 3 sentences at https://www.gotquestions.org/catholicism.html
The most crucial problem with the Roman Catholic Church is its belief that faith alone in Christ is not sufficient for salvation. The Bible clearly and consistently states that receiving Jesus Christ as Savior, by grace through faith, grants salvation (John 1:12; 3:16,18,36; Acts 16:31; Romans 10:9-10,13; Ephesians 2:8-9). The Roman Catholic Church rejects this.
I get that is 'bite back' response, but you would do well to justify that rather than simply reacting.
There is plenty to justify understanding the Roman Catholic Church as being the beast of revelation.
Yes you are.
You're making a claim that you are answering my question of "What was supposedly taking the 'video'?".
This implies that your claim is true.
Therefore the implication is that you are asking for trust, which is why you then ascribed that motive to the Lord.
Hence, projection.
Hebrews 6:18
King James Version
18 That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:
Love240 3 points 2 days ago
I had no idea they were Christian until I saw Primeagen's video on SQLite yesterday. Neat stuff.
/v/Linux viewpost?postid=662e52cccfd05
Love240 1 point 1 week ago
Thank God I cannot imagine the smell.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66284b6006fb8
Love240 0 points 1 week ago
4/20 holocaust it.
/v/NationalSocialism viewpost?postid=66270be2cae5f
Love240 1 point 1 week ago
I go to a local Savers every other week, they are basically the same way the OP describes on half-off days (Monday, in this location's instance).
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66245117369ec
Love240 6 points 1 week ago
What's he even doing there? Just standing in that room puts him in the top 1% of niggers.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=66246774864d5
Love240 0 points 1 week ago
How's that working out for you?
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=6623c0a73c256
Love240 3 points 1 week ago
But I did have breakfast! Sheeeeeiiit!
/v/AI_art viewpost?postid=6623498e4cb88
Love240 0 points 1 week ago
Not today. I'll read it later.
/v/AskAChristian viewpost?postid=66206cc63fa37
Love240 1 point 1 week ago
>Obviously
Obviously that was not obvious.
/v/AskAChristian viewpost?postid=66206cc63fa37
Love240 1 point 1 week ago
Has nothing to do with what you were wrong about.
/v/AskAChristian viewpost?postid=66206cc63fa37
Love240 1 point 1 week ago
Numbers 5:11 is “And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,”
/v/AskAChristian viewpost?postid=66206cc63fa37
Love240 1 point 1 week ago
>Yahweh didn’t want sacrifices to Moloch, he wanted it for himself.
Chapter and verse for that.
>Christians are not supposed to follow the Old Testament laws of Yahweh. I follow only Christ and the Holy Spirit and they don’t say anything against abortion.
God's morality doesn't change. If it was an abomination to him then, it's still one now.
/v/AskAChristian viewpost?postid=66206cc63fa37
Love240 1 point 1 week ago
I disagree, Leviticus 18:21 indicates that the practice of infant sacrifice/child murder is not permitted, this is in-differentiable from abortion.
“And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD.”
/v/AskAChristian viewpost?postid=66206cc63fa37
Love240 0 points 1 week ago
>Listen, I get that you are using a chatbot and that you are the same user that writes for Masterfoo, but you need to adjust your approach.
Well it sounds like you've got it all figured out, then. No point in continuing on. It was good run.
Ephesians 2
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Romans 11
6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
I hope you turn from the syncretic idolatry of the Catholic Church and come to the saving grace of the Lord Jesus by faith alone, knowing that nothing you can do 'makes you worthy'.
Blessings.
/v/Rants viewpost?postid=661e793bcac48
Love240 0 points 1 week ago
And with failure to utilize logic, reason and the Word, the Catholic lashes out!
Notice I didn't claim to know the state of your salvation, only the RCC, which is decidedly not Christian. Yet you claim to know mine.
I suggest you reel your emotions back in, you are not thinking clearly.
/v/Rants viewpost?postid=661e793bcac48
Love240 0 points 1 week ago
I'm going to stick with the Holy Spirit's guidance on this and not your 'say so'.
I pray that the Lord will open your eyes to the truth, that the RCC is an abomination.
Repent and turn to God and be saved.
/v/Rants viewpost?postid=661e793bcac48
Love240 0 points 2 weeks ago
>You are an evil idiot, and I'll demonstrate how.
Waiting...
>There are basic questions you will have no answers to.
Now the onus is on me after you've smeared me with no evidence?
>Give me a definition of Christian and explain how Catholics don't meet that definition.
*ahem* From the first 3 sentences at https://www.gotquestions.org/catholicism.html
The most crucial problem with the Roman Catholic Church is its belief that faith alone in Christ is not sufficient for salvation. The Bible clearly and consistently states that receiving Jesus Christ as Savior, by grace through faith, grants salvation (John 1:12; 3:16,18,36; Acts 16:31; Romans 10:9-10,13; Ephesians 2:8-9). The Roman Catholic Church rejects this.
>I assume
That's where you're wrong... The rest follows.
/v/Rants viewpost?postid=661e793bcac48
Love240 0 points 2 weeks ago
I get that is 'bite back' response, but you would do well to justify that rather than simply reacting.
There is plenty to justify understanding the Roman Catholic Church as being the beast of revelation.
/v/Rants viewpost?postid=661e793bcac48
Love240 0 points 2 weeks ago
Yeah, because they're not even Christian.
/v/Rants viewpost?postid=661e793bcac48
Love240 4 points 2 weeks ago
I'd say the fatty catches up in odds when they are closer to 40 than 30.
/v/CovidWorldOrder viewpost?postid=661c25da4a3b1
Love240 1 point 2 weeks ago
It sucks that it sounds like you only had retarded people in your life.
I'm sorry to hear that.
Stay strong. Shouldn't be too hard (physically), not being vexed.
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=661b091e5969b
Love240 2 points 2 weeks ago
Especially if you ever have vehicle troubles.
/v/CarTubers viewpost?postid=6619f13095191
Love240 3 points 2 weeks ago
Fantastic.
/v/Jokes viewpost?postid=6617e6a973517
Love240 0 points 2 weeks ago
Yes you are.
You're making a claim that you are answering my question of "What was supposedly taking the 'video'?".
This implies that your claim is true.
Therefore the implication is that you are asking for trust, which is why you then ascribed that motive to the Lord.
Hence, projection.
Hebrews 6:18
King James Version
18 That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:
/v/videos viewpost?postid=66170421dac1a
Love240 0 points 2 weeks ago
Now you're just projecting (Why would we trust you? "Trust Me Goyim" - tofu). You could have at least played along for a comment or two.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=66170421dac1a