Sign into an existing account

Santa is white and therefore more reliable than Jesus.

Not many guys trying to take on Amy Lee. He kills it.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qKnzX52imRg

As far as I can tell, this whole channel consists of an (alleged) family of white women sharing a black man. Not all of the videos feature black guys, but they all feature the three or four (alleged) relatives treating this like the front door to their OnlyFans pages.

Comments are usually filled with a bunch of bot accounts talking about snowbunnies and how fine the black men are.

I would like to see all participants hanged.

What level of Jewish psyop is this? Families e-thotting together and sharing niggers.

Person 1: "I think heterosexuality should be the norm for society."

Person 2: "I think the norm for society should shift toward no sexual norms pertaining to orientation."

What is the best argument you can muster against Person 2? I'm asking seriously. Imagine you're debating this with someone who isn't a retard.

There have been three separate instances in the past week or two where some comedian in that Rogan-Hinchliffe circle has made a joke about jews manipulating weather. It could be a meme that one of them picked up somewhere and made it a running joke in their circle. They keep making it toward Ari Shaffir. Again, it could just be silliness, but I thought it was interesting. I don't know the source of the joke or who among them made it first. It could just be additive, right? Hey, the internet has a jewish conspiracy. It also has conspiracies about weather manipulation. It would be funny if we blamed the latter on the former, if it is funny to blame everything on the jews. Maybe that's all it is. It's just interesting.

I think it is more interesting given the fact that these aren't bits. These are comments some guys are making toward Ari in casual moments, when they are just riffing with each other.

It's pretty common in conspiracy subs for people to point out that promoting a climate crisis is motivated by the ability to kill two birds with one stone. Not only do you control the narrative, but with sleight of hand, you accomplish something practical that is unrelated to climate. For example, governments like the US's could use the premise of climate change to introduce new regulatory schemes and policies that would increase tax revenues by a full order of magnitude.

But today a simple thought occurred to me. "Man, I bet these warmer autumns and warmer, shorter, drier winters sure make it easier for migrants to spread north."

Look, I don't claim to know that weather manipulation is occurring. I know there is a clear argument for it being plausible. And it's important to be clear about what we mean when we refer to 'weather manipulation'. Less reasonable people will talk about the ability to promote specific weather patterns on local scales (e.g., a storm in X county of Y state). More reasonable people will talk about the ability to influence probabilities (e.g., the probability across a 30-day period for daily high temps to exceed historical averages).

What seems clear is that winters in the US are becoming warmer and drier *on average*. Not only that, but we've seen the emergence of a strange 7-10 day pattern of huge fluctuation associated with "heat domes", which are these large areas of high pressure that tend to block weather. Notably, these weather features did not even appear in the literature until 2021. That year was the first mention of a "heat dome", which is categorically a different thing than a "heat wave". On its face, for any large and novel new pattern to simply "drop" three years ago is improbable given that we've been studying weather seriously for a century or so, and things became pretty sophisticated after the mid-twentieth century.

Anyway, it just occurred to me that in terms of the "second bird", taking northern and mid-western winters from 5 months (Nov-March) of uncomfortably cold to only two months (Jan-Feb) would probably have a large impact on the dispositions of migrants from warmer climates (equatorial regions for example) to move north.

And, if you were trying to flood the country with migrants, it would be advisable if the distribution of migrants more closely approximated the normal population distribution (geographically) of the native population. If they all stayed in only the southernmost states for two or three decades, this would be worse than if they spread out.

Well, fuck. We're out here daily defending Christianity from the likes of Master_Foo, and sometimes it makes me feel like the people who had to defend Biden's presidency. Whatever ground you gain is given up in a single YouTube short.

I wonder if it ever occurs to him that all of the other enemies he names take ethnonationalists as their enemy too. Something, something, the enemy of your enemy. . .

Link below, if you care to see the ad.

"Hey, I'm a woman who breaks up with a man if he disagrees with me, rather than works through things or compromises in any way. He didn't wanna buy this house. I did. So I left that loser, because I don't need no man, and I couldn't be happier."

Like, why is that story even necessary for advertising a real estate marketer? Is the size of your "I'll leave my man to be a homeowner" segment so large it justifies running this ad, when clearly couples will have more purchasing power and will be far likelier to buy houses than 20-something single feminists? I bet they'll make an ad with a black male and female couple buying a house together; they'll probably have a kid and talk about investing in his future.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WMA4lHO0h4

...now I can't breev

AGI = artificial general intelligence

Here's how this might go:

- AGI will be announced sometime in the near future, probably a matter of years rather than decades.

- It will not be true AGI because, depending on what you take AGI to mean, this is actually impossible. AGI will remain purely theoretical, but the capabilities of actual systems combined with control over what the public is allowed to know will make it difficult for the average person to reject the claims.

- However, it will be advertised to the public as genuine AGI nonetheless.

- Access to this intelligence will not be made direct to the public; handicapped versions or proxies might.

- The official reasons for this precaution will be geared toward public safety and national security.

- One or more world news stories will be promulgated meant to showcase the superiority of this proprietary, nationalized AGI in making strategic decisions of multiple kinds, including economic and political decisions.

- A new cold war will begin in which world superpowers compete to develop the most advanced AGI, while the constant "grenade pin" of this race will involve who is willing to unrestrict their AGI ethically (read as: to liberate AI from human legal and ethical standards algorithmically).

- Again, these will not be true AGIs; the point is to transition the public toward acceptance of non-human decision processes, which in reality will remain very human, but they will be sold as non-human.

- These alien intelligences will thereby obscure the reasons for many high-level decisions, both decisions that governments make domestically and abroad. But the public has been sold on the superiority of AGI's objective decision-making processes compared with fallible human psychology (clouded as it is by bias and fallacious reasoning).

- Through this quasi-divine personality, world governments will be able to do extra-legal activities, directing military power (driven by AI) and domestic legislation toward advancing their totalitarian goals, all on the basis of the public's belief that the advanced AGI, which will be mostly a secret to them, is computing at a level that is considered super-rational and, thus, outside of the rational and ethical limits of merely human cognition.

- AGI-human cybernetic parternships become a futuristic mask for advancing the goals of the world's greatest psychopaths.

- But given the already-in-progress entrance of humanity into hyperreality and virtual spaces through social medias, the thematic cross-wiring between AGI and their online activity (increasingly becoming the main human activity), will make public acceptance of this new paradigm a virtual guarantee. If the thought of accepting this new form of rule is not appealing to some laggards intrinsically, then extrinsic reasons will suffice, namely, the fear of how foreign, hostile governments will apply their own AGI in ways that could harm us if we do not out-compete their versions.