I would leave, and I would never speak with that person again. Although, if we're honest, there are gonna be dozens of signs before you ever get to the point of being a guest in her home. That "I think crystals do things other than just being crystals" look is usually a deterrent for me. I'm glad you're in tune with lunar cycles and stuff, but I'm not shitting in your back yard you fucking retard.
It has to pass the senate. This is highly controversial. I would not be surprised if it does not make it. Biden has his hands tied, or so it seems. This liberal pro-Palestinian crowd, which is not small, is not a bunch of Trump voters. You could see veto power come into play here. In any event, the law would be trying to get way too much work done, in a way analogous to narcotics bans or gun bans. The bigger worry is what judges would do with it, which could be a partisan nightmare.
The thing is, we always need to be mindful of the move we're not supposed to see. We are harmed when we get caught up in the narrative being woven for us. The actual move here could very well involve creating this "hands tied" conflict for the current administration where the law gets "reluctantly" passed, but for altogether different partisan purposes. They drum up this controversy here and now for the benefit the law will have in the future, not for this particular contrivance. If they up the ante by doing some kind of false flag right now, you can pretty much guarantee that the bill gets passed, and now you have a legal infrastructure for the future.
This is pretty much a summary of the Jewish Problem, right? You let Jews in, and over the years you start having all of these social problems, and there are a series of laws that get passed to "handle" every one of them, even though it isn't necessary that any single problem *appears* directly relevant to Jewish interests. Then, some clever people take a step back and realize, "Hey, this whole legal edifice sure looks like it has differentially benefitted Jews." Ding ding ding.
Cool. It will be illegal to even politically criticize Israel because. . .'self-determination'.
In the particular article I read, one of the examples given of a criminal form of speech under this law would include making comparisons between Israel and the Nazis.
The irony is that Israel is defending all of this by claiming its *right to self-determination*, when this was basically the Nazi rallying cry as well. So, wait, why do Jews have this right but ethnic Germans didn't? Why do Jews have justification to ethnically cleanse a land area for the sake of their own ethnic purity, but this was supposedly the greatest conceivable evil when it was attributed to the Nazis? Hmmm.
Let's simplify. You made a claim that paganism has two essential features. One of these is the endorsement of human slavery. I pointed out that in Leviticus, a book of the Old Testament (an aspect of Christian cannon), God endorses slavery. I identified Leviticus bibliographically. It was just to cite where the endorsement is found.
The distinction between old and new covenant is irrelevant. God's identity does not change anywhere in the Bible. So unless you are mistaken, your God did endorse half of what you said is essential to paganism. That's all there is to it.
I was pointing out the hypocrisy in your original post, since it is clear you overlooked slavery's role in the O.T.
As for human sacrifice, I'd agree that Christianity was a force for the abandonment of these practices. However, this also needs to be recognized for the development that it represents. The Israelites were historically a Canaanite group. There is no serious historian who takes the Exodus story literally. The Israelites were a group of people who sacrificed children, and the earliest evidence we have for the YHWH cult does suggest that your God, in his earliest instantiations in the written tradition, called for sacrifice too.
This didn't really shift until post-exile, and it changed because of Judaism's exposure to the Greco-Roman traditions. I mean, YHWH called Abraham to sacrifice his son to prove his fidelity to God. Sure, he was stopped, but this is still clearly a pagan signifier in your earliest tradition. Together with the slavery fact I already pointed out, it just looks obtuse and parochial to separate yourself from so-called pagans. Yes, your traditions was very fortunately the beneficiary of Greco-Roman influence, which is the raison d'etre for its possibility to become as sophisticated as it is today. Yes, pagans are the reason why your tradition moved toward the "new covenant."
I was just going to say, ah, this is the angle they are playing with the Palestinian sympathy. Hey, why worry about the genocidal actions and the coerced exile. . .you can come to the US! Not only will Israel get off scot free, it will be aiding their efforts.
I usually fancy myself someone who can see this stuff in advance, but I have to say I am a little ashamed about this one. I didn't think this was the move.
Their liberal idiot hordes are already primed to cheer for this. "This will ease domestic tensions!", says the talking head. Bipartisan satisfaction!
Why are you focusing on Leviticus? Is the God conceived there not the God conceived in the other books of the O.T.? The answer is yes, and that means it doesn't matter what book we are talking about.
You said that slavery was a defining feature of paganism. Your God condoned it against Gentiles. You then say "specific people, specific time", but this is irrelevant. Slavery per se was identified by you as a feature of paganism.
So, what, it's pagan just in case it isn't your God?
You are meandering a little bit. Your response said "old covenant". In so far as the O.T. is, in the main, a set of books that describe events under the old covenant, then anything that God condones in the O.T. could be said to fall under it if it applies to the Israelites.
So when I referred to the "entire prophetical basis", I was referring to the O.T. There is nothing unreasonable about this as long as we assume thr God of Leviticus is not a different God than the God of Exodus or Judges or whatever.
Your op said slavery was a defining feature of paganism. It doesn't matter what God's reason is for doing this just as long as you haven't pled, "...unless it's *our* God who does it at some past time." But that is in some sense what you are doing. You are saying, it's different in our case because. . .reasons.
There is some interesting research on the psychological effects of birth control, with large differences in female mate preference on and off the drug. There are women who have reported losing all attraction to men they'd been with for years, who they were sometimes married to. At the end of the day, you have to pay the piper. Nature doesn't just permit a fuckaround.
Are you claiming the Old Testament pertains to paganism? You realize that its the entire prophetic basis for affirming the identity of Jesus as God. . .the same God that permitted slavery under the old covenant.
I did what the government told me to do, so you should respect me by default.
Listen, I get it. If we idealize the situation, the sacrifice a soldier makes is honorable. . .but it has to be for something honorable. The fact is, most of the soldiers who join up in the US military today are doing so because (a) they're deceived, (b) they feel some obligation because of family legacy in the service, and/or (c) it seems like a better economic choice for them given their other alternatives.
This appeal to a default respect for military is, unfortunately, dissipating really quickly, if it isn't already gone. I said it's unfortunate because I do think many men feel an honorable impulse to serve, yet our leaders in government have exploited it for all of the wrong reasons for the last century.
It may not be their fault for trusting a government they had no reason to distrust at the time. It is their fault for persisting in a prideful slumber and failing to wake the fuck up at this point, maintaining the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps like me!" mentality. Their failure is complete and unreflective self-optimism and the way it causes them to misidentify the problems this country is facing. Things are going south because they were the golden generation and they just coddled the young too much! Israel is a friend, and younger people are lazy! Durrrr.
A boomer will suck the government's cock if it means social security doesn't see cuts. They'll sacrifice their own children to Moloch if it means they get to keep their entitlement programs, because they earned 'em god dammit. Just go and get a job at General Motors and work the line like I did! I bought a house when I was 19! Too many videogames!
It's not as if boomers have woken up and extended an olive branch to millennials. Gen X'ers are in a fog of pills and regret. Boomers are just as responsible for generational division.
Joe is Napoleon Bonaparte, and he has talked with Putin. Also, he can show you lots of jailbait tiddies, and you'll either be impressed or sickened by the detailed biographical knowledge he has about random prostitutes from eastern Europe.
As far as I know, which isn't far, it is already off-shore. What the legislation is doing is enforcing a ban on access to the site in the US *unless* the company agrees to a divestiture, which basically means licensing to a different company to operate in a given territory (the US in this case). It looks like flagrant anti-competitive protection of (((private))) interests here, namely, the ability for Jews to sterilize the platform of things that will wake up the goy.
And people still have difficulty getting out of the pig pen. They still want to discuss these things in the abstract.
No, it's just meant to make the birth rate decline and increase the chances of racial miscegenation. That's it. It's a long game. It's numbers and statistics across decades. It's an attack by inches that over time gets them miles.
All the conceptual stuff that the European mind loves to dabble in, that is, in the abstract, is how they get us. Intellectual people love being intellectual, and it can be a weakness. On the whole, this entire strategy (which has been remarkably successful) has been to have us fight in the space of reasons, over abstract ideals, while our enemy is targeting very concrete outcomes.
We either get our heads out of the clouds or we die. The only way to defeat an ideology is to forget God and remember blood/soil.
Nobody likes being detained, but you have to know how to handle yourself. Part of the problem with these apes is they think that their feelings are justification for every action. Nigga, I don't want cops close to me either, but this bitch is gonna get close to you if you keep acting like a retard.
Eh, they'll just accelerate WWIII. With FEMA mass hiring currently, I have a feeling they'll need to get out of this one with something really catastrophic. Every time Israel makes a move this big, it's because the entire world is caught up in a war. The only question is going to be what event they orchestrate to kick it off. It's going to be an interesting year, folks.
CHIRO 0 points 46 minutes ago
Oh, I bet they were just raised the wrong way...
(a news story is audible in the background: "Yet another pitbull attack.. .")
. . .fuck.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=663567dd88c82
CHIRO 2 points 9 hours ago
Okay, the bikes. Yeah, yeah. Niggers.
But two other things are driving me nuts.
The travesty that is that back lawn.
Also, the partially painted stairs and balcony. How are you gonna leave it like that?
Hahaha. I just noticed that the stairs lead down to a huge pile of crutches. . .for when you need to show up to the DHS office for sympathy bux.
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=6634731a14dff
CHIRO 3 points 10 hours ago
This is why the US government, puppeted by Israel, is trying to force ByteDance to divest TikTok. A little too much of this noticing going on.
/v/USPolitics viewpost?postid=6634dc2e2e3a9
CHIRO 0 points 18 hours ago
I would leave, and I would never speak with that person again. Although, if we're honest, there are gonna be dozens of signs before you ever get to the point of being a guest in her home. That "I think crystals do things other than just being crystals" look is usually a deterrent for me. I'm glad you're in tune with lunar cycles and stuff, but I'm not shitting in your back yard you fucking retard.
/v/WhiteWomen viewpost?postid=66344e0556a65
CHIRO 3 points 1 day ago*
It has to pass the senate. This is highly controversial. I would not be surprised if it does not make it. Biden has his hands tied, or so it seems. This liberal pro-Palestinian crowd, which is not small, is not a bunch of Trump voters. You could see veto power come into play here. In any event, the law would be trying to get way too much work done, in a way analogous to narcotics bans or gun bans. The bigger worry is what judges would do with it, which could be a partisan nightmare.
The thing is, we always need to be mindful of the move we're not supposed to see. We are harmed when we get caught up in the narrative being woven for us. The actual move here could very well involve creating this "hands tied" conflict for the current administration where the law gets "reluctantly" passed, but for altogether different partisan purposes. They drum up this controversy here and now for the benefit the law will have in the future, not for this particular contrivance. If they up the ante by doing some kind of false flag right now, you can pretty much guarantee that the bill gets passed, and now you have a legal infrastructure for the future.
This is pretty much a summary of the Jewish Problem, right? You let Jews in, and over the years you start having all of these social problems, and there are a series of laws that get passed to "handle" every one of them, even though it isn't necessary that any single problem *appears* directly relevant to Jewish interests. Then, some clever people take a step back and realize, "Hey, this whole legal edifice sure looks like it has differentially benefitted Jews." Ding ding ding.
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=66338cdba1817
CHIRO 10 points 1 day ago
Cool. It will be illegal to even politically criticize Israel because. . .'self-determination'.
In the particular article I read, one of the examples given of a criminal form of speech under this law would include making comparisons between Israel and the Nazis.
The irony is that Israel is defending all of this by claiming its *right to self-determination*, when this was basically the Nazi rallying cry as well. So, wait, why do Jews have this right but ethnic Germans didn't? Why do Jews have justification to ethnically cleanse a land area for the sake of their own ethnic purity, but this was supposedly the greatest conceivable evil when it was attributed to the Nazis? Hmmm.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=6632f414278d0
CHIRO 0 points 1 day ago
Let's simplify. You made a claim that paganism has two essential features. One of these is the endorsement of human slavery. I pointed out that in Leviticus, a book of the Old Testament (an aspect of Christian cannon), God endorses slavery. I identified Leviticus bibliographically. It was just to cite where the endorsement is found.
The distinction between old and new covenant is irrelevant. God's identity does not change anywhere in the Bible. So unless you are mistaken, your God did endorse half of what you said is essential to paganism. That's all there is to it.
I was pointing out the hypocrisy in your original post, since it is clear you overlooked slavery's role in the O.T.
As for human sacrifice, I'd agree that Christianity was a force for the abandonment of these practices. However, this also needs to be recognized for the development that it represents. The Israelites were historically a Canaanite group. There is no serious historian who takes the Exodus story literally. The Israelites were a group of people who sacrificed children, and the earliest evidence we have for the YHWH cult does suggest that your God, in his earliest instantiations in the written tradition, called for sacrifice too.
This didn't really shift until post-exile, and it changed because of Judaism's exposure to the Greco-Roman traditions. I mean, YHWH called Abraham to sacrifice his son to prove his fidelity to God. Sure, he was stopped, but this is still clearly a pagan signifier in your earliest tradition. Together with the slavery fact I already pointed out, it just looks obtuse and parochial to separate yourself from so-called pagans. Yes, your traditions was very fortunately the beneficiary of Greco-Roman influence, which is the raison d'etre for its possibility to become as sophisticated as it is today. Yes, pagans are the reason why your tradition moved toward the "new covenant."
That's all I have to say about this.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=663255bad7e57
CHIRO 1 point 1 day ago*
I was just going to say, ah, this is the angle they are playing with the Palestinian sympathy. Hey, why worry about the genocidal actions and the coerced exile. . .you can come to the US! Not only will Israel get off scot free, it will be aiding their efforts.
I usually fancy myself someone who can see this stuff in advance, but I have to say I am a little ashamed about this one. I didn't think this was the move.
Their liberal idiot hordes are already primed to cheer for this. "This will ease domestic tensions!", says the talking head. Bipartisan satisfaction!
/v/ClownWorld viewpost?postid=6632a86bd6958
CHIRO 0 points 2 days ago
Why are you focusing on Leviticus? Is the God conceived there not the God conceived in the other books of the O.T.? The answer is yes, and that means it doesn't matter what book we are talking about.
You said that slavery was a defining feature of paganism. Your God condoned it against Gentiles. You then say "specific people, specific time", but this is irrelevant. Slavery per se was identified by you as a feature of paganism.
So, what, it's pagan just in case it isn't your God?
/v/videos viewpost?postid=663255bad7e57
CHIRO 0 points 2 days ago
You are meandering a little bit. Your response said "old covenant". In so far as the O.T. is, in the main, a set of books that describe events under the old covenant, then anything that God condones in the O.T. could be said to fall under it if it applies to the Israelites.
So when I referred to the "entire prophetical basis", I was referring to the O.T. There is nothing unreasonable about this as long as we assume thr God of Leviticus is not a different God than the God of Exodus or Judges or whatever.
Your op said slavery was a defining feature of paganism. It doesn't matter what God's reason is for doing this just as long as you haven't pled, "...unless it's *our* God who does it at some past time." But that is in some sense what you are doing. You are saying, it's different in our case because. . .reasons.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=663255bad7e57
CHIRO 3 points 2 days ago
There is some interesting research on the psychological effects of birth control, with large differences in female mate preference on and off the drug. There are women who have reported losing all attraction to men they'd been with for years, who they were sometimes married to. At the end of the day, you have to pay the piper. Nature doesn't just permit a fuckaround.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=663265e3c796c
CHIRO 6 points 2 days ago
Bitch is gonna kill him because she doesn't comprehend he can't move voluntarily while being tased.
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=6632695292ba8
CHIRO 5 points 2 days ago
Are you claiming the Old Testament pertains to paganism? You realize that its the entire prophetic basis for affirming the identity of Jesus as God. . .the same God that permitted slavery under the old covenant.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=663255bad7e57
CHIRO 6 points 2 days ago
God literally permits taking Gentiles as slaves in Leviticus 25.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=663255bad7e57
CHIRO 0 points 3 days ago
Can't wait for $10/lb for chuck.
/v/Covidicences viewpost?postid=66311eb4d7cb0
CHIRO 1 point 3 days ago
I did what the government told me to do, so you should respect me by default.
Listen, I get it. If we idealize the situation, the sacrifice a soldier makes is honorable. . .but it has to be for something honorable. The fact is, most of the soldiers who join up in the US military today are doing so because (a) they're deceived, (b) they feel some obligation because of family legacy in the service, and/or (c) it seems like a better economic choice for them given their other alternatives.
This appeal to a default respect for military is, unfortunately, dissipating really quickly, if it isn't already gone. I said it's unfortunate because I do think many men feel an honorable impulse to serve, yet our leaders in government have exploited it for all of the wrong reasons for the last century.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=663073bc0c6c2
CHIRO 7 points 5 days ago*
It may not be their fault for trusting a government they had no reason to distrust at the time. It is their fault for persisting in a prideful slumber and failing to wake the fuck up at this point, maintaining the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps like me!" mentality. Their failure is complete and unreflective self-optimism and the way it causes them to misidentify the problems this country is facing. Things are going south because they were the golden generation and they just coddled the young too much! Israel is a friend, and younger people are lazy! Durrrr.
A boomer will suck the government's cock if it means social security doesn't see cuts. They'll sacrifice their own children to Moloch if it means they get to keep their entitlement programs, because they earned 'em god dammit. Just go and get a job at General Motors and work the line like I did! I bought a house when I was 19! Too many videogames!
It's not as if boomers have woken up and extended an olive branch to millennials. Gen X'ers are in a fog of pills and regret. Boomers are just as responsible for generational division.
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=662e5660018ec
CHIRO 2 points 1 week ago
Joe is Napoleon Bonaparte, and he has talked with Putin. Also, he can show you lots of jailbait tiddies, and you'll either be impressed or sickened by the detailed biographical knowledge he has about random prostitutes from eastern Europe.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=662b95f8f02e4
CHIRO 1 point 1 week ago
As far as I know, which isn't far, it is already off-shore. What the legislation is doing is enforcing a ban on access to the site in the US *unless* the company agrees to a divestiture, which basically means licensing to a different company to operate in a given territory (the US in this case). It looks like flagrant anti-competitive protection of (((private))) interests here, namely, the ability for Jews to sterilize the platform of things that will wake up the goy.
/v/news viewpost?postid=662bb45b23d03
CHIRO 3 points 1 week ago
Watch one of these guys pull the trigger and kill some 20-yr old midwestern white kid. Watch the diplomatic nightmare unfold.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=662b82e3d92c1
CHIRO 5 points 1 week ago*
And people still have difficulty getting out of the pig pen. They still want to discuss these things in the abstract.
No, it's just meant to make the birth rate decline and increase the chances of racial miscegenation. That's it. It's a long game. It's numbers and statistics across decades. It's an attack by inches that over time gets them miles.
All the conceptual stuff that the European mind loves to dabble in, that is, in the abstract, is how they get us. Intellectual people love being intellectual, and it can be a weakness. On the whole, this entire strategy (which has been remarkably successful) has been to have us fight in the space of reasons, over abstract ideals, while our enemy is targeting very concrete outcomes.
We either get our heads out of the clouds or we die. The only way to defeat an ideology is to forget God and remember blood/soil.
/v/FeminismIsCancer viewpost?postid=662b61de1dbc7
CHIRO 6 points 1 week ago
Well, that ruined my morning. Poor guy. He has no idea what's going on. He just sees the car disappear. Fuck niggers.
/v/dogs viewpost?postid=662b48b7951d7
CHIRO 2 points 1 week ago
Nobody likes being detained, but you have to know how to handle yourself. Part of the problem with these apes is they think that their feelings are justification for every action. Nigga, I don't want cops close to me either, but this bitch is gonna get close to you if you keep acting like a retard.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=662ab8531da21
CHIRO 0 points 1 week ago
Eh, they'll just accelerate WWIII. With FEMA mass hiring currently, I have a feeling they'll need to get out of this one with something really catastrophic. Every time Israel makes a move this big, it's because the entire world is caught up in a war. The only question is going to be what event they orchestrate to kick it off. It's going to be an interesting year, folks.
https://youtu.be/8OyBtMPqpNY?si=rFym3i0zlsF2GOxx&t=49
/v/Screenshot viewpost?postid=6629f9f74569c
CHIRO 3 points 1 week ago
. . .paper, scisso...okay, new game.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=662a7cfb0e886