What about Romans 2:28-29?... The Jews he is talking about, is Jews in the Spirit - meaning anyone that accepts Jesus as their Christ. Not jews in the letter.
Proverbs 26:4-5 King James Version (KJV)
Answer not a fool according to his folly, Lest thou also be like unto him. Answer a fool according to his folly, Lest he be wise in his own conceit.
The problem you are facing here is that you do not understand what the Word of God says about making the difference between the Jews in the Spirit and the jews in the letter. The latter are the members of the synagogue of Satan. Romans 2:28-29 KJV.
Even when having scripture telling you how to identify them, you keep basing your stance on false doctrines and dogma from false denominations of Christianity. Which we encourage to rebuke and denounce.
You don't even understand the fact that persecuting Christians helps the Synagogue of Satan, hence you are aiding the jews in the letter by being a stooge/pawn of their lies.
To be fair, Hittler was* a zionist also funded by zionists.
The fact that he executed jews in the letter communists doesn't change the well documented final solution to give the jews in the letter their own land in madagascar sooooo... zionism though I recon is a satanist dogma, doesn't mean anything in your statement. The one thing that saved it, was your comment on Trump's love and support for the satanic state of israel that bears the star of Remphan on its flag.
> Listen you little shit.I got a ASE master cert, tech diving and underwater rescue cert, pilots license, fork lift license, I can shoot dead on bullseye with iron sights at 100 yards and I'm hoping to learn farrier services soon.
And I should care because...?
> If you want to pay me 200 dollars a week to walk your dog I'm going to take that fucking money. I'm going to put in my pocket and then walk your dogs.
But then again you never argued against any of the things I said... You just answered like a little triggered cunt to add value to yourself and then proved my point of "of promoting dog owners laziness"...
Dog walker... I would never trust my dog to anyone besides me.
Specially because they will not give the proper care to my dog given the high numbers of dogs they have to handle.
Additionally, I would never trust a woman to handle, not even one dog. They always humanize them, always spoil them, and never act or talk with authority and character to handle them.
Now getting into the numbers, if a woman can barely handle a small size dog less alone handle 8 big size or middle size breeds.
Probable abuse from her, or from one or more of the owners of the pets and something set the dogs off. Also, dogs may have gone against each other and the woman tried to stop them and they redirected the aggression towards her.
Finally, if someone comes up to me and tells me that he or she are a dog walker, I would remove myself from that interaction right away, as they are definitely not dependable or trustworthy given "the work" field they have chosen... Promoting laziness from dog owners. Can't be with your dog? Don't fucking have one.
Well this refreshing to see... Even if not for the degeneracy he spreads, I am glad that fat faggot has been removed... Though he will continue to use his alts... This did still putt a smile in my face.
> I have a weather app on my phone that tells me what the visibility is each day. Weather can affect visibility. It can't affect curvature. If you can't understand the concept of fog impeding your vision then you are too kiked to ever understand what a mirage is.
I will restrain myself from calling out your obvious - lets call it "naivety" - that require you to simply default to calling someone kiked or kike by not holding your point of view. This just as a courtesy given the fact that you provided calculations which seem to fit your narrative but avoid other variables.
Regarding your app in the phone.That is irrelevant as well, and the reason for that is that in several pictures I have looked for which were taken from the same place, the mirage is not showing up. And I did this little research again as courtesy given the fact that you provided calculations. But then again... fitting your narrative.
> No. A mirage is an inverted image caused by a reflection. We are not looking at an inverted image.
Wrong. You are taking just one part of the definition to fit your narrative. The first definition is: "an optical phenomenon, especially in the desert or at sea, by which the image of some object appears displaced above, below, or to one side of its true position as a result of spatial variations of the index of refraction of air."
It doesn't necessarily means that it always have to be inverted. Specially not from a place that can reflect the light, such as the sea.
Additionally, what do you call an illusion of an oasis in the Desert? You don't see that inverted. You see it above the ground in the horizon due to what? a mirage.
> I'm telling you that mirages have to be inverted and are irrelevant anyway. Even if this was the only picture, which there are other examples such as lighthouses, mountains, ships, and so on, it would prove that there is no curvature.
What you tell me falls beside the point. Flat earthers always try to use some part of the whole scheme at convenience of what they want to say and when proven wrong the default into tantrums just as I have seen you do in your entire post.
"Muh people don't agree with me... they are kikes..."
It doesn't help your position and instead of proving to be right you keep digging your own hole where to crawl.
You asked for proofs, you can easily research pictures of the same place with different weather conditions in which the mirage does not appear. And see that in fact the illusion is posible.
If your reply is going to be something in the sorts of "muh you kiked or dumb" thing... well refrain from doing it... You can only project so much when you are incapable of listening to others, or agree to disagree... so in that tone... fuck off we are full.
The question I have is the following, why 15 feet if the the picture was taken from Michigan shoreline. Meaning at the coast. Eyesight level should be way lower.
If The shore line is at sea level then my eyesight would be at 1,76 m. As sea level = 0.
If the Michigan shoreline is higher than sea level then the visibility is higher as well.
You are not white... your answers come from a low IQ individual that is simply not capable of reading correctly. You have been answered your false claims and you keep repeating yourself... You are definitely the best example that the "jew's high IQ" is a myth.
>lol typical lying rat christian tactics. it states clearly to destroy Rome.
Really? Show me the passage and I will show you your willful ignorance conveniently avoiding the purpose of the chapter.
> you 'save' all by converting them
You save yourself. That is the point of Christianity. We do not save anyone because we do not have the power of salvation. We have been gifted salvation through Grace. Is a gift that each one has to accept. Again with your dumb ass convenience.
> and if not they are to burn in hell or be wiped out in the end times.
Well every action has it's consequence. But you are still free to live as you wish. It is YOUR decision.
> you very clearly are instructed to hate on Rome, and your twisted logic of thinking you're 'saving' them doesn't change this.
Nope I am instructed to spread the Truth and rebuke false doctrines and false testimonies like the ones you are spewing like a kike stooge who is possibly a kike himself. And again, we have no power to save anyone. Salvation is a personal choice. What a faggot that keeps going on in circles when you have been answered those claims before already.
> yous are so dumb and brainwashed that if we expose muslim tactics and hypocrisies, yous will agree with whatever we say, but then when we show that christians do the same, suddenly your little brains hit a block wall and you can't comprehend the two are exactly the same.
Muh you dumb... reee... gonna scream tantrums because I lack argumentative skills to defend my own stance... If you are white, you are white trash with really low IQ.
sguevar 0 points 2.1 years ago
What about Romans 2:28-29?... The Jews he is talking about, is Jews in the Spirit - meaning anyone that accepts Jesus as their Christ. Not jews in the letter.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6417d9d3ac220
sguevar 5 points 2.1 years ago
Proverbs 26:4-5 King James Version (KJV)
Answer not a fool according to his folly, Lest thou also be like unto him. Answer a fool according to his folly, Lest he be wise in his own conceit.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6417d9d3ac220
sguevar 3 points 2.1 years ago
says the jew in the letter that keeps roaming this place...
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6417d9d3ac220
sguevar 4 points 2.1 years ago
The problem you are facing here is that you do not understand what the Word of God says about making the difference between the Jews in the Spirit and the jews in the letter. The latter are the members of the synagogue of Satan. Romans 2:28-29 KJV.
Even when having scripture telling you how to identify them, you keep basing your stance on false doctrines and dogma from false denominations of Christianity. Which we encourage to rebuke and denounce.
You don't even understand the fact that persecuting Christians helps the Synagogue of Satan, hence you are aiding the jews in the letter by being a stooge/pawn of their lies.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6417d9d3ac220
sguevar 0 points 2.1 years ago
To be fair, Hittler was* a zionist also funded by zionists.
The fact that he executed jews in the letter communists doesn't change the well documented final solution to give the jews in the letter their own land in madagascar sooooo... zionism though I recon is a satanist dogma, doesn't mean anything in your statement. The one thing that saved it, was your comment on Trump's love and support for the satanic state of israel that bears the star of Remphan on its flag.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=641552da16e75
sguevar 0 points 2.1 years ago
Should probably change your title to False prophet... but hey convenience is a dangerous drug isn't it schlomo?
/v/Christcucks viewpost?postid=6413627072f38
sguevar 1 point 2.1 years ago
I am so glad you keep posting these.
/v/Christian viewpost?postid=6412ccf26f4e3
sguevar 1 point 2.3 years ago
> Listen you little shit.I got a ASE master cert, tech diving and underwater rescue cert, pilots license, fork lift license, I can shoot dead on bullseye with iron sights at 100 yards and I'm hoping to learn farrier services soon.
And I should care because...?
> If you want to pay me 200 dollars a week to walk your dog I'm going to take that fucking money. I'm going to put in my pocket and then walk your dogs.
But then again you never argued against any of the things I said... You just answered like a little triggered cunt to add value to yourself and then proved my point of "of promoting dog owners laziness"...
/v/shitbulls viewpost?postid=63c32e841435a
sguevar 2 points 2.3 years ago
Dog walker... I would never trust my dog to anyone besides me.
Specially because they will not give the proper care to my dog given the high numbers of dogs they have to handle.
Additionally, I would never trust a woman to handle, not even one dog. They always humanize them, always spoil them, and never act or talk with authority and character to handle them.
Now getting into the numbers, if a woman can barely handle a small size dog less alone handle 8 big size or middle size breeds.
Probable abuse from her, or from one or more of the owners of the pets and something set the dogs off. Also, dogs may have gone against each other and the woman tried to stop them and they redirected the aggression towards her.
Finally, if someone comes up to me and tells me that he or she are a dog walker, I would remove myself from that interaction right away, as they are definitely not dependable or trustworthy given "the work" field they have chosen... Promoting laziness from dog owners. Can't be with your dog? Don't fucking have one.
/v/shitbulls viewpost?postid=63c32e841435a
sguevar 0 points 2.3 years ago
Well this refreshing to see... Even if not for the degeneracy he spreads, I am glad that fat faggot has been removed... Though he will continue to use his alts... This did still putt a smile in my face.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63bf361f52b13
sguevar 1 point 2.3 years ago
Fake... They won't reach that age... 🤣
/v/Troons viewpost?postid=63bc1f048e20c
sguevar 1 point 2.3 years ago
> I have a weather app on my phone that tells me what the visibility is each day. Weather can affect visibility. It can't affect curvature. If you can't understand the concept of fog impeding your vision then you are too kiked to ever understand what a mirage is.
I will restrain myself from calling out your obvious - lets call it "naivety" - that require you to simply default to calling someone kiked or kike by not holding your point of view. This just as a courtesy given the fact that you provided calculations which seem to fit your narrative but avoid other variables.
Regarding your app in the phone.That is irrelevant as well, and the reason for that is that in several pictures I have looked for which were taken from the same place, the mirage is not showing up. And I did this little research again as courtesy given the fact that you provided calculations. But then again... fitting your narrative.
> No. A mirage is an inverted image caused by a reflection. We are not looking at an inverted image.
Wrong. You are taking just one part of the definition to fit your narrative. The first definition is: "an optical phenomenon, especially in the desert or at sea, by which the image of some object appears displaced above, below, or to one side of its true position as a result of spatial variations of the index of refraction of air."
It doesn't necessarily means that it always have to be inverted. Specially not from a place that can reflect the light, such as the sea.
Additionally, what do you call an illusion of an oasis in the Desert? You don't see that inverted. You see it above the ground in the horizon due to what? a mirage.
> I'm telling you that mirages have to be inverted and are irrelevant anyway. Even if this was the only picture, which there are other examples such as lighthouses, mountains, ships, and so on, it would prove that there is no curvature.
What you tell me falls beside the point. Flat earthers always try to use some part of the whole scheme at convenience of what they want to say and when proven wrong the default into tantrums just as I have seen you do in your entire post.
"Muh people don't agree with me... they are kikes..."
It doesn't help your position and instead of proving to be right you keep digging your own hole where to crawl.
You asked for proofs, you can easily research pictures of the same place with different weather conditions in which the mirage does not appear. And see that in fact the illusion is posible.
If your reply is going to be something in the sorts of "muh you kiked or dumb" thing... well refrain from doing it... You can only project so much when you are incapable of listening to others, or agree to disagree... so in that tone... fuck off we are full.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63af42c371126
sguevar 0 points 2.3 years ago
The problem with your view here is that there are other pictures taken from the same area which show no buildings at all.
Your whole point uses just one picture but there are plenty showing the existence of the mirage. Or are you telling me they were all photoshopped?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63af42c371126
sguevar 0 points 2.3 years ago
The question I have is the following, why 15 feet if the the picture was taken from Michigan shoreline. Meaning at the coast. Eyesight level should be way lower.
If The shore line is at sea level then my eyesight would be at 1,76 m. As sea level = 0.
If the Michigan shoreline is higher than sea level then the visibility is higher as well.
Where does this 15 feet come from?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63af42c371126
sguevar 2 points 2.3 years ago
This cracked me up... after so long of not seeing it
/v/music viewpost?postid=63aee66315d1a
sguevar 1 point 2.3 years ago
Sometimes you do make me laugh. Credit where is due.
/v/flatearth viewpost?postid=63ad6c65eeac8
sguevar 1 point 2.4 years ago
Good memories
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63a58e14b4b04
sguevar 0 points 2.4 years ago
Stfu you glow nigger.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63a4866af0b41
sguevar 8 points 2.4 years ago
The level of repulsion this made me feel is off the charts... disgraceful.
/v/Controlavirus viewpost?postid=63a3ef15a0be6
sguevar 0 points 2.4 years ago
You mean San Fransicko
/v/ClownWorld viewpost?postid=63a348ffce36d
sguevar 3 points 2.4 years ago
Not really, I am circumcised in the Spirit. Not the flesh. Like others that have daddy issues such as yourself
/v/religion viewpost?postid=639be20521dcf
sguevar 1 point 2.4 years ago
You are not white... your answers come from a low IQ individual that is simply not capable of reading correctly. You have been answered your false claims and you keep repeating yourself... You are definitely the best example that the "jew's high IQ" is a myth.
Enjoy serving the synagogue slave.
/v/religion viewpost?postid=639bc6b92cdeb
sguevar 5 points 2.4 years ago
The one circumcised and sodomized by a rabbi was you my dear stooge.
/v/religion viewpost?postid=639be20521dcf
sguevar 2 points 2.4 years ago
>lol typical lying rat christian tactics. it states clearly to destroy Rome.
Really? Show me the passage and I will show you your willful ignorance conveniently avoiding the purpose of the chapter.
> you 'save' all by converting them
You save yourself. That is the point of Christianity. We do not save anyone because we do not have the power of salvation. We have been gifted salvation through Grace. Is a gift that each one has to accept. Again with your dumb ass convenience.
> and if not they are to burn in hell or be wiped out in the end times.
Well every action has it's consequence. But you are still free to live as you wish. It is YOUR decision.
> you very clearly are instructed to hate on Rome, and your twisted logic of thinking you're 'saving' them doesn't change this.
Nope I am instructed to spread the Truth and rebuke false doctrines and false testimonies like the ones you are spewing like a kike stooge who is possibly a kike himself. And again, we have no power to save anyone. Salvation is a personal choice. What a faggot that keeps going on in circles when you have been answered those claims before already.
> yous are so dumb and brainwashed that if we expose muslim tactics and hypocrisies, yous will agree with whatever we say, but then when we show that christians do the same, suddenly your little brains hit a block wall and you can't comprehend the two are exactly the same.
Muh you dumb... reee... gonna scream tantrums because I lack argumentative skills to defend my own stance... If you are white, you are white trash with really low IQ.
Seethe harder.
/v/religion viewpost?postid=639bc6b92cdeb
sguevar 5 points 2.4 years ago
Hello fellow (((white man))) how is your yamaka holding up?
/v/religion viewpost?postid=639be20521dcf