×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
71

HughBriss and blumen4alles have been banned for doxxing

submitted by system to whatever 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:20:15 ago (+72/-1)     (whatever)

I have zero tolerance for doxing. I don't care who is doing the doxxing or who is getting doxed. Doxxing users of this site will result in a ban.


166 comments block


[ - ] Centaurus 16 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:28:01 ago (+16/-0)

Good riddance to anyone who thinks it is okay to doxx other users.

[ - ] goat777 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 22:27:35 ago (+1/-0)

Oh no, somebody might know I said nigger tranny faggot on the internet!

[ - ] RabbiKinderschtupper 16 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:31:10 ago (+17/-1)

[ - ] system [op] 13 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:52:28 ago (+13/-0)

I don't have a problem with self promotion. That should be encouraged. But I can see the issue if it's all an account does. I'll ban these accounts. ProudAmerican at least engages somewhat. How much engagement should be required in order to post links which self promote?

[ - ] SecretHitler 8 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:19:35 ago (+8/-0)

It's such a fine line. Yeah his sites kind of suck and are obvious click farms, but sometimes the articles have interesting tidbits.

But banning shit articles is like banning bad jokes in a way, like ok it's not funny but they tried.

I liked what you did to another user by rate limiting their posting depending on their score, it's not a ban and higher quality results in more posting opportunities. But that also opens the door to more vote farming problems.

I think you do just fine with your policy decisions though. It's great you're asking for feedback too.

[ - ] rhy 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 01:23:00 ago (+2/-0)

I agree with @SecretHitler 💯%. On this post at least.

[ - ] paul_neri -2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 05:00:27 ago (+0/-2)

Wtf! No-one agrees with SecretHitler!

[ - ] Laputois 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 07:45:10 ago (+1/-0)

You could say that they are news aggregators. I have had posters give me shit for not posting a link to a widespread current event and replied to them that I am not their news aggregstor they have the ability to research the item. I find that cleaner because when you post a singular link you are interjecting the bias of that source.

[ - ] SunDriedjews 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:02:43 ago (+6/-1)

For self-promoters, maybe a minimum of one comment outside their own posts for each SP post? Not sure if that's too strict, too lax, or in the ballpark.

[ - ] rhy 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 01:21:10 ago (+4/-0)

Sounds good to me. As long as we're lenient.

Full disclosure: I self promote a lot. 🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️

I'm ok with kicking doxxers. But let's take our responsibility seriously: This is the last place for free speech.

Love you niggerfaggotkikes.

Can't say I'll miss the pedo shit. 🤣🤣🤣🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

[ - ] deleted 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:03:59 ago (+7/-2)

deleted

[ - ] dalai_llama 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 05:30:38 ago (+3/-0)

Perhaps assessing the frequency of posting is appropriate. I think the users @rhy and @tnewsline represent the best examples of this spectrum. Even if every single post and comment that rhy made was self promoting, I wouldn't consider him spam because he's posting at a frequency that can't really be considered spam. I've never seen all/new monopolized by his posting. Conversely, I have seen all/new dominated by tnewsline posts, one after the other, sequentially monopolizing all/new at a frequency that is disrupting the normal course of posts.

[ - ] RabbiKinderschtupper 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:05:14 ago (+1/-0)

Thank you. 🧹

It's easy to engage in discussions. It's also very easy to sus out bot comments. There won't be a perfect ratio though.

[ - ] beece -1 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:19:37 ago (+3/-4)

@system - How about if a certain amount or percentage of downvoats hit, the person is restricted in the amount of posts they can put up. I understand that many will think that is anti-semitic (diggernicks), however, it will make the site stronger for those of us who want a community.

Hope you reconsider the bans. Or reinstate if a Mea Culpa is given. They were good dudes, esp. Hugh.

[ - ] diggernicks 7 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 20:02:05 ago (+8/-1)

Nah

Free speech isnt a popularity contest

Thatll just incentive reddit minded niglets who love censorship to downvote brigade

Calling someone Jewish on voat is the equivalent of dems saying racist lol

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 00:43:51 ago (+3/-0)

I agree, about Hugh

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:55:26 ago (+0/-0)

I can kind of agree with that for self promote. If people like your links then is it a problem? If they don't then it is. As for the free speech not being a popularity contest I agree for comments and non self promote. It's more like self promotion gets an exception if people like it.

I guess someone who thinks the world needs to be micromanaged could vote brigade, but I guess that's the test if the content is good enough.

[ - ] PygmyGoat 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 17, 2023 02:06:42 ago (+0/-0)

I’ve seen accounts with large negative point numbers still allowed to post with no problem. Makes me wonder what’s the point of getting points if it doesn’t matter what you have and can still post.

[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 10 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:35:03 ago (+11/-1)

Yes please. These two are pure spam accts and have no reason to exist here. Please ban these.

[ - ] WanderingToast 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 02:44:37 ago (+0/-0)

I give tsnewsline a soft pass on account.

1. But if media diversity isn't a bad thing

B. They have been very open about it with their username

[ - ] Steelerfish 12 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:49:02 ago (+12/-0)

This is turning out to be quite the entertaining day here….

[ - ] Centaurus 11 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 21:50:19 ago (+11/-0)

HughBriss and blumen4alles are a pair-a-doxx.

[ - ] rhy 8 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 01:25:42 ago (+8/-0)

PedoDox. 🤣🤣🤣

[ - ] paul_neri 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 05:01:26 ago (+3/-0)

Not bad.

[ - ] NiggerNiggerZooPals 11 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:02:18 ago (+11/-0)

Thank god those faggots are gone. I’m waiting for blumen5alles to appear.

Thanks for the work system

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 05:55:08 ago (+1/-0)

Why didn't you like Hugh?

[ - ] lurker 8 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:06:10 ago (+13/-5)

blumen has been a massive contributor on this site and real voat. I'm not pretending to know what was going on or anything but I'm going to take this as a warning sign of compromised integrity. Just gotta keep moving from site to site as history repeats itself over and over.

[ - ] didyouknow 14 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:31:15 ago (+16/-2)

blumen has been a massive contributor on this site and real voat

Yeah, maybe for those that likes to see pictures of little girls.

[ - ] lurker 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 20:18:13 ago (+7/-3)

I've never seen any of that and that in and of itself seems to be qualification for a ban and referral to the authorities but that's not the offense of which he is accused of here now is it? Does this site overlook kiddy porn but doxing is where the line is drawn? I think not, I suspect your accusation is baseless and defamatory.

[ - ] rhy 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 01:33:12 ago (+4/-0)

Blumen is an edge Lord. Consistently posting shit that clearly appealed to pedos, But maybe not actually illegal.

[ - ] observation1 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 04:09:35 ago (+5/-0)

No. Edgelord is a word reserved for a jokester. He admitted he had hard drives full of little girls. In addition - He didn't just pretend to like Mark Rydan. He genuinely enjoyed his collection of naked little girl paintings. He's accumulated them over years. It's not a long running joke. He posted the naked tweens photo twice. He needs to hang.

[ - ] WanderingToast 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 03:04:28 ago (+1/-0)

Yea this was my general take on the b4a 'peadogate' thing.

[ - ] lurker 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 07:52:34 ago (+1/-0)

I've seen his content for years, I do not recall seeing a single thing involving sexualization of minors or even pictures of children in general. If I had seen any content from him of that nature I would have judged him accordingly as I find that stuff as disgusting and disturbing. Time to abandon this ship?

[ - ] MuricaPersonified 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 09:05:12 ago (+2/-0)

He usually posted those late or during slow times, and the threads would get buried quick.

Every time I let my guard down by thinking "you know what? He's just being edgy with that art", he'd show up out of the blue and post what looks like real CP. He's done it enough where it became hard to appreciate his otherwise good comments and posts.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 08:57:05 ago (+0/-0)

I do not recall seeing a single thing involving sexualization of minors or even pictures of children in general.

The stink around (((blume))) is there for a reason: https://www.talk.lol/viewpost.php?postid=62e55e54349cf&commentid=62e6060ca6e0d

[ - ] Her0n 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 21:07:16 ago (+3/-1)

Well I used to say just look at his post history in the markryden sub but that won't work anymore

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:20:08 ago (+6/-1)

His most beloved "artist." I'm glad I'll never come across his works on here again.

[ - ] Centaurus 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:16:15 ago (+4/-0)

One of his alts down voted you.

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 08:47:05 ago (+1/-0)

It probably made him feel better about himself.

[ - ] Vrbllpollushin 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 13, 2023 12:21:02 ago (+1/-0)

Which is funny because I don't really talk shit about users here other than anusAOUexpander.

[ - ] Vrbllpollushin 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 21:11:21 ago (+3/-1)

Ohhh. That was him? No shit!

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:35:56 ago (+1/-0)

He posted a lot of art of nude preteen girls. Not technically illegal but borderline pedophilic. Since it's technically in the realm of legal art and the site's rules are nothing illegal and no doxxing, he was allowed to stay, and users were allowed to regularly shit on him for being a borderline pedophile.

[ - ] UncleDoug 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 00:32:23 ago (+2/-0)

He posted actual paedo content once and pulled it down within the hour.
It should have been archived as proof, but who’s going to do it?

[ - ] MuricaPersonified 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 08:58:02 ago (+2/-0)

He posted actual paedo content once and pulled it down within the hour.

He's done that more than once, and some of those ittybittytittycommittee
posts looked like legit jailbait. Blocking his subs became as tiring as blocking the ones that clutter this place with Bible verses.

It should have been archived as proof, but who’s going to do it?

In cases like that, screencap and censorbar the relevant parts. Not a screencap I'd want to take, though.

[ - ] x0x7 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:10:25 ago (+6/-1)

Wait. You are arguing that a site has compromised integrity for enforcing one of it's very very very very few rules? Just because a person posts a lot they are above rules? Is that your standard for a non-compromised site?

[ - ] shigeridoo 8 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:11:41 ago (+9/-1)

Lol, lmao even.

[ - ] paul_neri 7 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:48:04 ago (+9/-2)

I'll miss Hugh. He regularly replied to my subs/comments. Never said anything nice but...that's not the point!

[ - ] dassar 7 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:06:47 ago (+7/-0)

'FCK OFF NERI !! ....'

[ - ] paul_neri 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:32:51 ago (+3/-1)

Hi dassar.Long time no chat. Presumably you've been on vacation?

[ - ] dassar 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 02:47:13 ago (+3/-0)






i've never chatted with you, fckwit ...

[ - ] paul_neri 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 05:02:50 ago (+3/-1)

Then start.

[ - ] dassar 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 21:32:03 ago (+0/-0)

Eat a dic faggot

Go groom elsewhere ...

[ - ] Centaurus 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:17:57 ago (+4/-0)

lol. Good one.

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 00:46:20 ago (+1/-0)

Well fuck you then!
(Do you love me?)

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 06:01:48 ago (+1/-0)

Not sure if this is addressed to me but...Yes!Yes!Yes! if you're female.

[ - ] rhy 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 06:45:11 ago (+2/-0)

you're.

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 06:50:11 ago (+0/-0)

Hurtful, damn hurtful and totally unnecessary for the discussion which is about boxing two doxxers.

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 14, 2023 01:05:34 ago (+0/-0)

Sorry, not female and aren't you married supposedly agent Neri?

[ - ] NukeAmerica 6 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 20:16:06 ago (+8/-2)

Ban @diggernicks for being JIDF

[ - ] diggernicks -4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 20:20:54 ago (+2/-6)

Post birth abort nukeamerica for being a closeted homosexual

[ - ] shitface9000 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 00:46:30 ago (+5/-0)

who did they dox and what are the deets

[ - ] Sunman_Omega 6 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:48:22 ago (+8/-2)

That kind of sucks. This place already has a small userbase and blumen did post a lot. Oh well. Rulez be da rulez.

[ - ] Steelerfish 10 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:52:58 ago (+11/-1)

About a quarter were decent material, a quarter questionable, a quarter were shit posts, and a quarter skirted on being child porn.

Not really a loss, and I’m sure he/she/it has several alts anyway to enlighten us…

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:02:44 ago (+3/-1)

I don't really include the porn that was clearly of adult women with girlish bodies or dressed up like little girls to be skirting on child porn. It's porn. It's one of the most common themes in porn.

Porn can appear as child porn in 2 ways: 1, the subject looks way young, like pre-pubescent young. Or 2, some other implication that the subject is underage. If the subject appears to be 16-20, you just assume they are adult, whatever that amounts to.

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 00:48:17 ago (+0/-0)

Yeah because no one's ever jumped ban with a different account 🙄

[ - ] PORTforceOne 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 03:56:20 ago (+0/-0)

Spamming child porn and dogs... yeah great material

[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 20:22:58 ago (+5/-0)

Until they make new accounts.

[ - ] jigganiggaboo 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:31:15 ago (+7/-3)

Fine with me he posted little girls and bestiality anyways so no more spamming of that

[ - ] shigeridoo -1 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:35:28 ago (+5/-6)

Oh that will continue under blumen's alts, like the one posting in this thread (barebackopsec). @System had no problem whatsoever with blumen's pedophilia and filth, he's only banning blumen now under a sudden new found fervor for enforcing muh site rules about doxxing. Even though blumen doxxed PA months ago and system pretended then to not know it's possible to post as anon with a vpn and machine ID spoof to appear anon.

[ - ] SecretHitler 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:05:51 ago (+5/-1)

I can see why they did it but it's also reassuring you hold our anonymity to a high standard.

Also thinking about it more I can't see how knowing his identity would change his spammy clickbait habits anyway.

I mean if voat was mine I'd be a tyrant to try and keep the quality up but voat is not mine so I'm just happy it exists.

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:37:22 ago (+1/-0)

I tell all my friends I know a Secret Hitler. They go: " Ooh Ahh".

[ - ] deleted 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:29:41 ago (+5/-1)

deleted

[ - ] system [op] 9 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:00:55 ago (+9/-0)

He's been doxxed twice now by different users and you've been the source of the info both times. Hugh admitted it. You are the source of the problem. I liked both you and Hugh, but doxxing is not ok.

[ - ] deleted -4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:11:37 ago (+2/-6)

deleted

[ - ] shigeridoo 7 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:14:06 ago (+10/-3)

Fuck off with your gaslighting you faggot. It was you the first time who posted it as anon, we're not stupid. Be glad system played dumb about it for as long as he did. Kill yourself.

[ - ] MaryXmas 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 20:01:39 ago (+6/-1)

I don't really know what is going on but I got a lot of popcorn and this is getting good.

[ - ] paul_neri -3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:45:37 ago (+0/-3)

It's not bad is it. There's no drama like goat drama!

[ - ] deleted -4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:23:01 ago (+3/-7)

deleted

[ - ] shigeridoo 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:31:56 ago (+7/-2)

I am right, don't even try to lie right now, faggot. I know from information mikenigger and others have confided in me that it was you. System can play dumb all he wants, not my problem.

[ - ] Fascinus 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:37:43 ago (+4/-0)

HughBriss did.

[ - ] Rob3122 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:43:12 ago (+3/-0)

What in the world happened?

[ - ] SecretHitler 9 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:00:50 ago (+9/-0)

He gave ProudAmerican's name, country, and business. His complaint was that he's a spammer of low content clickbait.

He knew it was against TOS and said so, his rationale was that a spammer isn't really a member here which imo isn't a great argument. But he also said he'd abide by system's decision so he knew it was a gamble.

I'm not sure how blumen was involved.

[ - ] Centaurus 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:20:21 ago (+4/-0)

He doesn't get to decide the rules arbitrarily.

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:42:08 ago (+1/-0)

Hugh could be arrogant.

[ - ] x0x7 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:08:06 ago (+4/-0)

So he acted like a liberal. "It's against a person I don't like so rules don't apply to me." They're a Nazi so I can assault people. They are an antivaxxer so do they really have speech rights.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:49:45 ago (+2/-1)

deleted

[ - ] Fascinus 7 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:53:03 ago (+7/-0)

[ - ] Rob3122 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:26:58 ago (+1/-0)

\o

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:27:36 ago (+1/-0)

Interesting... thanks for posting the thread in question.

[ - ] deleted -4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:06:40 ago (+2/-6)

deleted

[ - ] shigeridoo 7 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:10:54 ago (+9/-2)

^This is blumen4alles. Don't be fooled.

[ - ] Rob3122 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:32:01 ago (+2/-1)

Now you can fuck off for good, dangus.

[ - ] shigeridoo 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:37:16 ago (+2/-2)

I'll stick around and watch your confused boomerposting, it's too comical to pass up.

[ - ] Rob3122 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:14:03 ago (+2/-0)

Take care, dangus

[ - ] system [op] 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:46:21 ago (+6/-2)

But blumen4alles never shared the personally identifiable information publicly so he is getting punished for the actions of another user - doesn't seem fair.

I thought about that. I put myself in the shoes of the doxxed. If I was on poal, and a user was sharing my info to others who went on to share it publicly, I'd hope AOU would take action. And I'd be pissed if he didn't.

[ - ] Steelerfish 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:56:09 ago (+5/-0)

If you were on Poal, AOU would’ve our nuked or outright banned your account for some asinine reason within weeks just like the rest of us, so that is a moot point.

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 21:03:00 ago (+2/-0)

deleted

[ - ] chrimony 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 20:21:21 ago (+3/-1)

If I was on poal, and a user was sharing my info to others who went on to share it publicly, I'd hope AOU would take action

Lulz, wut? Not only did you look to Poal and AOU for guidance, you publicly admit this?

[ - ] system [op] 6 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 21:54:36 ago (+6/-0)

Lulz, wut? Not only did you look to Poal and AOU for guidance, you publicly admit this?

It's called looking at the problem from a different perspective. Has nothing to do with poal, just used that as an example. Disapointed you're too stupid to understand this.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 02:42:07 ago (+1/-1)

Disapointed you're too stupid to understand this.

I'm disappointed you would even think of using Poal or AOU as examples to go by, let alone acknowledge this in public. Also gotta laugh at any dick suckers that upvoted you.

[ - ] system [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 03:01:27 ago (+1/-0)

Are you retarded? Most of voat went to poal after it shut down, including myself. AOUs bullshit is why I built this place. Sooo angry over shit that doesn't even matter. Must suck to be you.

[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:16:25 ago (+1/-1)

That’s like saying the jews should be praised because they are chosen. In reality, they are an example of what NOT to do, as they are damned for eternity for denying Jesus.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:41:57 ago (+2/-2)

deleted

[ - ] voatersaredumbasses -1 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 02:30:21 ago (+0/-1)

So he didn't actually break the rules but you banned him for having a private conversation? You're a fucking idiot.

[ - ] mikenigger 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 01:04:35 ago (+5/-1)*

the pedo cries out in pain through his alt

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:22:10 ago (+3/-0)

Ive investigated that Defiant America website. The ownership and f that company seemd shady. He seems shady. No interaction.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:19:44 ago (+3/-0)

I will miss Hugh, great guy with good musical taste. Hope he is reincarnated, somehow.

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 01:30:25 ago (+3/-1)

If only there was a way...

[ - ] chump 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:10:31 ago (+3/-0)

this is almost as good as the crensch skizzy dramorama on old voat.

[ - ] Laputois 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 17:50:46 ago (+4/-1)*

No reason for the Dingus alts to hang around now. Maybe they will suddenly develop some shame and leave.

[ - ] shigeridoo 7 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:11:31 ago (+8/-1)

I'm just here for the lulz bro.

[ - ] 3Whuurs 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 00:26:46 ago (+2/-0)

Hasn’t blumen admitted to having a bunch of alt accounts ?

[ - ] Trumpman1488 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:57:04 ago (+2/-0)

BAN @DIGGERNICKS AND @PAUL_NERI !!!!!!

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 06:07:10 ago (+1/-0)

Oh man, that is hurtful, damn hurtful! Trolls don't hurt no-one. We are just annoying, that's all.

[ - ] diggernicks -1 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:58:54 ago (+3/-4)

If trumpman wants me gone you known I must be a pretty cool guy

[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 00:27:20 ago (+1/-0)*

So if blumenthePedo is banned, when does Dangus and co get reinstated?

There should be no issue now.

If you make an alt HughBriss pm me, you were a good poster.

[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:36:25 ago (+1/-0)

What about when I was doxed last year? You let that cocksucker stay here.

[ - ] shitface9000 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 00:48:35 ago (+2/-0)

what was the doxxed info?

[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 03:03:41 ago (+1/-0)

My name. Well, a juvenile version of it that they learned from talking to someone on Facebook who I was in elementary schoolmates with.

[ - ] JudyStroyer 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 08:46:36 ago (+2/-0)

Just curious, but was it your full name, or what? I dont want to know it, as even though I fuck with you constantly, doxxing would be real fucked up. And to be frank, I dont really have a problem with you, I just enjoy talking shit about your proximity to jews and niggers as well as your love of wristwatches, that you keep locked up in jew-vaults, surrounded by niggers. Oh yeah, and spics. A whole lot of spics.

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 06:05:04 ago (+0/-0)

Which is?

[ - ] x0x7 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:03:52 ago (+1/-0)

The problem with banning people for doxxing is now everyone wants the juice, but that would defeat the point in protecting identity. I still can't help the curiosity. Like who did he dox? I don't even care who they are in real life so I won't even look.

I just want to know what user Blumen thought was ok to dox.

[ - ] dulcima 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:21:44 ago (+2/-1)

Men are such drama queens.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:15:52 ago (+3/-0)

Rawr! Cat fight!

[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:07:54 ago (+2/-1)

I'm surprized the reddit style one up man jokesters didn't end up in this thread a serious discussion of the topic broke out.

I've doxxed my self lightly before I'm assuming self doxxing is ok? But not encouraged by me or any one but it needed to be done

[ - ] paul_neri 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:51:39 ago (+2/-0)

@sirrantsalot apparently doxxed himself - name and photo. Ditto @Trumpman1488 with a photo.

[ - ] OriginalGoat 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:20:41 ago (+1/-0)

I too have accidentally self-doxxed myself before...

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:54:10 ago (+0/-0)

We know, Milo.

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic -2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:32:41 ago (+0/-2)

You should be banned for pushing jews like cult daddy big gay bear owen benjewman and for pushing nigger loving.

[ - ] Gowithit 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:40:11 ago (+1/-0)

You should be banned

Never. I enjoy the owen benjamin sperg outs.

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:42:20 ago (+2/-1)

It is funny to watch the jew lover shills freak out. com pro has a few too. I make them cry. Its about time for me to take a big shit on owen the kike over there.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:44:19 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Ragnar 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 15:51:04 ago (+0/-0)

Good riddance

[ - ] PORTforceOne 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 03:59:50 ago (+0/-0)

Banned for doxing and not pedophilia? Shocking.

[ - ] SturmUndTrinker 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 00:31:46 ago (+0/-0)

Just as well, Blummen4alles was just a jew from Whitefish, MT.

[ - ] sguevar 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:17:18 ago (+1/-1)

Well this refreshing to see... Even if not for the degeneracy he spreads, I am glad that fat faggot has been removed... Though he will continue to use his alts... This did still putt a smile in my face.

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:25:54 ago (+2/-2)

watch doglegwarrior. he is a shill and pushes jews and niggers.

[ - ] Spaceman84 -1 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:59:00 ago (+0/-1)

The spammers are worse but system is probably desperate for content to attract a userbase.

[ - ] chrimony -1 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 20:26:59 ago (+2/-3)

I don't care who is doing the doxxing or who is getting doxed.

FightKnightHero was doxed, and we all celebrated. No deletions, no bans.

[ - ] system [op] 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 21:56:21 ago (+2/-1)

His location only. Which was publicly available searching his username. People doxxing his name or photo were removed.

[ - ] mikenigger 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 01:42:42 ago (+2/-0)

you gotta admit that photoshopped tlol profile was funny

[ - ] chrimony 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 03:09:08 ago (+2/-0)

His location only.

Which is personal information. And a prominent user on here living in Isreal is quite the info. Of course, I think a kike user on here going around calling everybody else a kike deserves to have this info known by the community, but it's still a dox. This is why free speech is important, and "doxxing" should not be against the rules.

Which was publicly available searching his username. People doxxing his name or photo were removed.

Which was true for all his docs, including his name and photo.

[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 07:29:10 ago (+0/-0)

Give me your and location so I can verify you

[ - ] TheYiddler 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 05:09:39 ago (+1/-0)

So calling out big guy from queens as being in queens, is that doxxing?

[ - ] JewChipper -1 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:03:07 ago (+1/-2)

I'm just relieved I was able to insult both of them a lot before they were murdered.

[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:14:28 ago (+7/-4)

You've definitely assumed the Crown of biggest fag on voat now

[ - ] beece 5 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:26:15 ago (+6/-1)

Careful diggernicks or you might get an upvoat, perhaps even 2.

[ - ] diggernicks -7 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:27:04 ago (+1/-8)

I tells it like it is

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 01:33:21 ago (+0/-0)

Wow, guess that didn't work!

[ - ] JewChipper 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:36:33 ago (+3/-1)

Come on now, you know as well as I, it's a dead beat between my two favorite trans waymenz Paul Neri and diggernicks the niggerdigger™

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:39:17 ago (+2/-2)

Meanwhile jewchipper is voats original trans man

That's why he can never sack up

[ - ] JewChipper 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:51:39 ago (+2/-1)

Imitation, however poor (and malformed by a mongoloid fetal alcohol syndrome) it may be, is the highest form of flattery. Yet you are still a gigantic faggot.

[ - ] diggernicks -2 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:53:26 ago (+2/-4)

Thanks niglet

Your salt can always to be counted on to provide some spice if nothing else

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 06:13:39 ago (+0/-0)

Thanks bro, never thought you cared. diggernicks is more a pro troll than me, imo. He looks for fights. I try and be witty.

[ - ] Fascinus 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:41:31 ago (+1/-0)

@Trumpman1488 would like a word with you.

[ - ] diggernicks -3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:42:47 ago (+1/-4)

I think he may be genuinely mentally unstable

Whereas jewchipper is just a faggot

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 22:48:48 ago (+1/-0)

You can be witty when you want.

[ - ] paul_neri -3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 18:39:32 ago (+3/-6)*

My two bob's worth...I hate to see an Original Goat slaughtered (unless it is dangus, Secret Hitler,Spaceman84, Fascinus, Ragnar or Judystroyer, Edit: or dassar). We all make mistakes and should be given a second chance, imo, after being suitably reprimanded.

[ - ] OriginalGoat 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 19:19:33 ago (+3/-0)

I too would be bothered if an Original Goat got slaughered.... err banned.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 11, 2023 23:05:04 ago (+3/-0)

Thats kind of a long list. Why you mad a fascinus?

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 01:44:25 ago (+1/-0)

What about me?

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 04:59:30 ago (+0/-0)

Sorry, bro, you don't make the list of truly evil people!

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 14, 2023 01:07:39 ago (+0/-0)

Well I tried at least! 😱

[ - ] JudyStroyer 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 08:36:29 ago (+2/-1)

I'm very glad to be on your list, you degenerate faggot cocksucker.

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 12, 2023 17:35:25 ago (+1/-0)

You are the meanest, meanest person I know in the whole wide world!

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 14, 2023 10:19:36 ago (+0/-0)

you dont know very many people do you