Sign into an existing account

The jewdeo christian worships the jew rabbi jesus , a fake god from a fake jew book.

The rabbis mutilate infant penis then perform fellatio on the bloody mutilated infant penis.

This is what the jewdeo christian worship.

You need to be burned alive even more than faggots.

Testosterone-Driven Alpha Male Movies Shape Teen Psychology

Alpha male archetypes in film, characterized by dominance, courage, and resilience, have long captivated audiences, particularly impressionable teens.

Movies like Braveheart (1995), Gladiator (2000), and 300 (2006) exemplify this archetype, leveraging neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) principles to evoke endorphin rushes through vivid role models.

These films, presented in chronological order, tap into psychological mechanisms that inspire teens to emulate alpha traits, but Hollywood has since shifted toward beta or effeminate characters.

Braveheart (1995)

Braveheart follows William Wallace, a Scottish warrior leading a rebellion against English oppression. His unyielding defiance and physical prowess embody alpha masculinity. Psychologically, Wallace’s rousing speeches and sacrificial leadership trigger endorphin release by activating the brain’s reward system, particularly the dopamine pathways tied to goal-directed behavior (Schultz, 2015). For teens, Wallace’s archetype programs assertiveness and moral conviction via NLP-like repetition of empowering dialogue (“Freedom!”), embedding these traits as aspirational.

Gladiator (2000)

In Gladiator, Maximus Decimus, a betrayed Roman general, rises as a gladiator to avenge his family. His stoic resolve and physical dominance resonate with teens seeking identity models. The film’s visceral combat scenes stimulate the amygdala, heightening emotional arousal and endorphin release (LeDoux, 2000). Maximus’s journey reinforces NLP principles through repeated imagery of strength and honor, programming teens to associate alpha traits with emotional reward and self-worth.

300 (2006)

300 depicts King Leonidas and his Spartan warriors facing overwhelming odds at Thermopylae. The hyper-stylized visuals and Leonidas’s fearless leadership amplify alpha male ideals. The film’s intense battle sequences and chants (“This is Sparta!”) engage the brain’s mirror neurons, fostering emotional contagion and endorphin surges (Rizzolatti & Craighero, 2004). For teens, this creates an NLP-like feedback loop, linking courage and sacrifice to feelings of power and belonging.

Hollywood’s Shift

Since the mid-2000s, Hollywood has pivoted from testosterone-fueled alpha male narratives to beta or effeminate characters, reflecting cultural shifts toward inclusivity and emotional vulnerability. Films now often prioritize nuanced, less aggressive protagonists, reducing the emphasis on traditional alpha archetypes that once dominated.

References

LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.

Schultz, W. (2015). Neuronal reward and decision signals. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(2), 114–126.

A Jewry and Communist-Inspired - Martin Luther King, Jr.
FROM A STORMFRONT FORUM COMMENT [Link at the bottom of article]:

"As White Nationalists and White dissidents it is our sacred duty and responsibility to expose the fraudulent legacy of Michael King for the filthy, sexually debauched, shamelessly plagiarizing, fallacious, America-hating Communist bastard that he was for his entire miserable, sordid life.

If you have a fair reading aptitude, and from the sound of your introductory post it seems that you are reasonably educated, then spend five or six minutes of your precious time reading what will follow this paragraph. For donating five or six minutes of your precious time you will be far more educated about the sexually degenerate, plagiarizing, radical Communist functionary, Michael King [Martin Luther King, Jr.'s actual birth name and still his legal name at the time of his death], than you were before reading what I have posted directly below.

To wit:

Reprinted with the express permission of the National Alliance. All rights reserved.
National Alliance – Post Office Box 4 – Mountain City, Tennessee, America 37683

The Truth About The Fallacious Legacy of Michael King (aka: Martin Luther King, Jr.)

WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that they did was to confiscate all the privately held weapons, to deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But even more insidious than the theft of the people's weapons was the theft of their history. Official Communist "historians" rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many countries, revered national heroes were excised from the history books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit Communist ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted into official "saints." Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts who murdered countless nations. Did you know that much the same process has occurred right here in America?

Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy of adulation for the so-called "Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr." King has even had a national holiday declared in his honor, an honor accorded to no other American, not Washington, not Jefferson, not Thomas Paine. (Washington and Lincoln no longer have holidays—they share the generic-sounding "President’s Day.") A federal judge has sealed the FBI files on King until the year 2027. What are the negroes, the federal government, and the Marxist/Communists, et al. hiding? Let’s take a look at this modern-day plastic god.

Even His Name is a Fake

Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the time only as "Daddy King." "Daddy King" named his son Michael. In 1935, "Daddy King" had an inspiration to name himself after the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his congregation that henceforth they were to refer to him as "Martin Luther King" and to his son as "Martin Luther King, Jr." None of this name changing was ever legalized in court. "Daddy" King’s son's real name is to this day Michael King.

King’s Brazen Cheating

We read in Michael Hoffman's Holiday for a Cheater: "The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled "Life is What You Make It," according to the testimony of King’s best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams. The first book that King wrote, Stride Toward Freedom, was plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow. And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of "The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr." (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose staff included King's widow Coretta), stated of King's writings at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary: "Judged retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism.... Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his major field of graduate study, systematic theology."

King's essay, "The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God," written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar S. Brightman, author of The Finding of God. Another of King's theses, "Contemporary Continental Theology," written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton. King's doctoral dissertation, "A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman," for which he was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer, "The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich's Concept of God." According to "The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.," in King's dissertation "only 49 percent of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five or more words that were King's own...."

In The Journal of American History, June 1991, page 87, David J. Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that King's wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated cheating. Reading Garrow’s article, one is led to the inescapable conclusion that King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary. Why, then, one might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89: "King’s academic compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost without exception little more than summary descriptions... and comparisons of other's writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting that King's professors did not expect more...."

The editors of "The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr." state that "...the failure of King's teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is somewhat remarkable...." But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us "...actually the malfeasance of the professors is not at all remarkable. King was politically correct, he was a negro, and he had ambitions. The leftist [professors were] happy to award a doctorate to such a candidate no matter how much fraud was involved. Nor is it any wonder that it [took] forty years for the truth about King's record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be made public." Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King's vision of a racially mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his cheating for decades. The cover-up still continues. From the New York Times of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that "There is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation." However, despite its finding, the committee said that "No thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an action the panel said, "[it] would serve no purpose."

No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful fraud as a student, the titles "reverend" and "doctor" should be removed from King's name.

Communist Beliefs and Connections

Well friends and readers, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn't really "Martin Luther King, Jr." What’s left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people. On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate demonstrations and riots.

From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King's associate, advisor, and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23, 1953 the Los Angeles Times reported his conviction and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he and King founded the "Southern Christian Leadership Conference," or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, who was later Jimmy Carter’s ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.

Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized the first of King’s famous marches on Washington. The official organ of the Communist Party, The Worker, openly declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left King's employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1963. Bayard Rustin's replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King was Jack O'Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O'Dell. According to official records, in 1962 Jack O'Dell was a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O'Dell was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis Globe Democrat of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O'Dell’s party membership became known.

What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired O'Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare, immediately hired him again as director of the New York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the Richmond News-Leader of September 27, 1963. In 1963 a negro from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to Beijing, China. Exactly 20 days before King’s 1964 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf of King's movement. Mr. Williams was also around this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he made regular broadcasts to the southern United States, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title "Radio Free Dixie." In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by negroes against White Americans.

During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled Negroes With Guns. The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than "Martin Luther King, Jr." It is also interesting to note that the editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee. According to King’s biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, "King privately described himself as a Marxist." In his 1981 book, The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, "...we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution.... The whole structure of American life must be changed.... We are engaged in the class struggle." Jew Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King’s behind-the-scenes "handler." Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret funneling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA, was King's mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King's more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King's book, Stride Toward Freedom. It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King's income tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King's speeches. King described Levison as one of his "closest friends."

FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money

The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been aware of Stanley Levison's Communist activities. It was Levison's close association with King that brought about the initial FBI interest in King. Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media's lie about "racists" in the FBI being out to "get" King, you should be aware that the man most responsible for the FBI's probe of King was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself as a liberal and says that initially "I was one hundred per cent for King...because I saw him as an effective and badly needed leader for the negroes in their desire for civil rights."

The probe of King not only confirmed their suspicions about King's Communist beliefs and associations, but it also revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral degenerate, and a worthless charlatan. According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed to the "civil rights" movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor and numerous prostitutes, both White and negro, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King’s speaking and organizing tours. In fact, an outfit called the "National Civil Rights Museum" in Memphis, Tennessee, which produced a display of the two bedrooms from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he was shot, has declined to depict in any way the occupants of those rooms. That—according to exhibit designer Gerard Eisterhold—would be "close to blasphemy." The reason? "Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr." spent his last night on Earth having sexual intercourse with two women at the motel and physically beating and abusing a third. Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of numerous married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years with the Federal Bureau of Investigation had seen everything there was to be seen of the seamy, sordid side of life, King was one of only seven people he had ever encountered who was such a total degenerate. Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King's supposedly "non-violent" marches, Sullivan's probe revealed a very different King from the carefully crafted public image. King welcomed members of many different Black groups as members of his SCLC, many of them advocates and practitioners of violence. King's only admonition on the subject was that they should embrace “tactical nonviolence.”

Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a financial conference with Communist Party representatives, not knowing that one of the participants was an infiltrator actually working for the FBI. J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information on King’s Communist connections was provided to the President and to Congress. And conclusive information from FBI files was also provided to major newspapers and news wire services.

But were the American people informed of King's real nature? No, for even in the 1960s, the fix was in—the controlled media and the bought politicians were bound and determined to push their racial mixing program on America. King was their man and nothing was going to get in their way. With a few minor exceptions, these facts have been kept from the American people. The pro-King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even reported that a serious proposal has been made to add some of King's writings as a new book in the Bible.

Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this article is far greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of this sexually perverted charlatan, called King. I want you to start to think for yourselves. I want you to consider this: What are the forces and motivation behind the controlled media’s active promotion of King? What does it tell you about our politicians when you see them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to honor King as a national hero? What does it tell you about our society when any public criticism of this moral leper, sexual degenerate, and Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal? What does it tell you about the controlled media when you see how they have successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture of King that can only be described as a colossal lie?

You need to think, my fellow Americans. You desperately need to wake up.

Bibliography
1. Hoffman, Michael A., Holiday for a Cheater, (Wiswell Ruffin House, Dresden, New York, 1992)
2. Steffgen, Kent H., The Bondage of the Free, (Vanguard Books, Berkeley, California, 1966)
3. Garrow, David J., The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., (W. W. Norton & Co., New York City, 1981)
Further information on King’s Communist connections and the FBI surveillance of Stanley Levison can be found in the Congressional Record, October 3, 1983.

NO KING OVER US The Truth About Martin Luther King

This article was brought to you as a public service by local National Alliance members. For $24, we’ll send you 100 copies of this flier. To print out more copies yourself, visit:
Free National Alliance Fliers / Graphics | National Alliance

National Alliance – Post Office Box 4 – Mountain City, Tennessee, America 37683

National Alliance | Toward a New Consciousness; a New Order; a New People National Vanguard | News. For us. For a change.

https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1421391-2/?postcount=14#post16414070
------------X
MORE INFO HERE:
https://www.stormfront.org/forum/f81/

""Eleanor the Great" stars June Squibb as a grieving woman who finds herself at a support group for Holocaust survivors — all of whom are played by actual survivors.

Back in 2017, Jewish actress Scarlett Johansson discovered her family’s Holocaust history in “Finding Your Roots.” When her maternal great grandfather, Saul Schlamberg, immigrated to the United States and ended up on Ludlow Street on the Lower East Side, reportedly as a banana salesman, he left behind a brother Moishe in Grojec, Poland. Moishe’s entire family ended up in the Warsaw Ghetto, where three of his children died. Johansson teared up as she faced the harrowing discovery. “I promised myself I wouldn’t cry,” she told host Henry Louis-Gates. “But it’s hard not to.”

Johansson also cried when she first read the script of “Eleanor the Great,” which will be her feature film directorial debut and is premiering at the 2025 Cannes Film Festival this week as part of the Un Certain Regard lineup.

“When I read it, I cried, and that almost never happens,” she told Deadline, saying that another movie that elicited a similar reaction in her was “Jojo Rabbit,” Jewish director Taika Waititi’s Holocaust film. In “Jojo Rabbit” Johansson plays Rosie Betzler, Jojo’s mother, who is very anti-Nazi and who helps shelter a Jewish girl in her home.

Johansson’s upcoming film, too, draws on Holocaust history. In it, June Squibb plays the eponymous Eleanor, unmoored by the death of her best friend and roommate, Bessie, a Holocaust survivor who grew up in Nazi occupied Poland. Eleanor ends up in New York City, living with her daughter and grandchildren, feeling lonely and placeless. She finds solace by attending a local support group for Holocaust survivors, finding the echoes of Bessie’s story in the people around her. The group in the movie is made up of actual survivors; Johansson and her team worked with the USC Shoah Foundation and Congregation Rodeph Sholom in the city to find the right subjects to include in these scenes, whose stories become a focal point of the movie.

Squibb, who is Jewish and recently played a Jewish retiree in the delightful “Thelma,” plays a colorful, sassy Eleanor. In the first preview clip of the film, she has no problems making risqué jokes at the expense of her rude neighbor Clarice, who makes dismissive comments about Eleanor and her two daughters. “Say goodbye to Melvin for me,” Eleanor glibly tells her, referring to the woman’s husband. “We had such a wonderful time the other night. He’s very strong.” It’s such a funny and winning little clip that definitely has us thrilled to meet Eleanor. The character was inspired by the film screenwriter Tory Kamen’s own Jewish grandmother, Elinore, who she shares on Instagram, was “in fact, the greatest.”

When speaking about Johansson, Kamen celebrated the parallels between the two women and their grandmothers. “We had a really natural rapport,” Kamen, for whom this is also the first production of a feature film script she penned, said of Johansson. “Both of us telling stories about our grandmothers who we grew up with, and how much they meant to us, and how it felt like that generation’s stories were slipping through the cracks as they were leaving us.”

In the movie, Eleanor piques the interest of journalism student Nina at the Holocaust survivor meetings, and she ends up caught in a web of untruths as she takes ownership of Bessie’s story. Nina is played by British actress Erin Kellyman. Bessie is played by Israeli actress Rita Zohar, who herself was born in a concentration camp in World War II. Zohar was a legend of the Yiddish theater in Israel before having a prolific career in Hollywood in the 1980s, starring in movies like “Amadeus.” She later returned to Israel, where she starred in iconic and critically acclaimed movies like “Laura Adler’s Last Love Affair” and “Mrs. Moskowitz and the Cats.”

In an interview with Deadline, Johansson opened up about making a movie centered on Holocaust stories and Jewish stories.

“It’s complicated,” she said, “because the film to me very much is a movie about grief, it’s about human connectivity, and it’s also about forgiveness. It’s also about the truth versus reality, and it’s also about who has the right to tell someone else’s story, or do we have the right to tell someone else’s story? There’s a lot in it. Certainly, Jewish identity is a part of that.”

“We don’t have really too many films about what it looks like now, as these survivors are in the final chapter of their life, and what that looks like and what that means. It was an honor to be able to help tell some of these stories,” Kamen said in the same interview.

Stories about the late lives of Holocaust survivors and the ways we struggle to keep their stories alive feel more important to share now than ever before. It’s amazing to have this group of incredible Jewish women creatives doing this work as they helm such a special movie."

https://www.kveller.com/scarlett-johansson-tells-holocaust-survivors-stories-in-directorial-debut/

Particularly for when you’re already pretty low “body fat” and good regular workouts don’t seem to be working or working fast enough. Ie chicken tends to be good. Sugar bad. Salmon good? Beef bad for weight loss but good for muscle gain? Thanks!