Sign into an existing account

Especially in packs. They will kill you or at least destroy your head with zero provocation. Which one am I even describing? You can't say for sure.

The living victims of niggers and pitbulls could populate a small town. Maybe if we saw them all togther we could fully appreciate the disgusting consequences of these beasts. Shit, if zombies were to attack they would be the third most dangerous of the three. I'd be so glad to see it is only some zombies.

Trying to show someone video proof of this danger is met with "holy fuck why are you showing me this turn it off bro jesus christ!!" Again you don't know if I'm talking pit bulls or niggers.

We don't need any of that.

Push pacifism. Speak softly while carrying a big stick.

Other people will get the message.

Everyone shouts "molon labe", and those are the ones also making jokes about "I lost my guns in a boating accident."
Because they don't have the backbone to use them in the event of an upscaled version of the 2020 riots or invasion or mass confiscation.

The subculture itself must create an atmosphere and perception that people are peaceful, but that the armed public writ large should not be fucked with.

FAFO taken to the level of religious fervor, or political ideology.

Do it right, and the message is written on the wall for the regime and they start walking back a lot of the bullshit policies. Career politicians, the selectees, start seeing what they have to support in word and policy action, in order to keep the public complacent and docile.

It sets the stage for mass refusals to comply.

1. Having dirt on Hillary Clinton
2. Having dirt on Kevin Spacey
3. Taking a Pfizer "vaccine"
4. Having dirt on Boeing and going public

I agree with everything he has to say. He's a master at talking about how and why (((corporations))) screw you. More people should be talking like him. However he pings my jewdar. I'm guessing he's Sephardic rather than Ashkenazi? Are Sephardic jews less evil? If he's jewish then maybe all jews arent bad.

Whenever i talk about jews i mention the talmud. Apparently, per the jews, its only a social commentary and no jews take it seriously. Except, when you read the talmud, it says lying to goyim is a-ok. Why does no one question how a book that says you can lie to your "slaves", would allow the people reading this book to lie to the slaves?

Then we have the torah which isnt much better. Since the talmud is based off the torah, then it stands to reason that the torah ALSO has the same writings that were used to create the talmud. If the New Testament of the Bible complements the old, why is this identical logical process not applied to the talmud and the torah?

It's simple logic. And many a christ cucks have told me the talmud irrelevant since its a social commentary and not relevant. Except, they never ask themselves, what is it a social commentary of? if its a social commentary of the torah, than its extremely relevant.

Its like the christ cucks just regurgitate shit without ever thinking it through.

https://files.catbox.moe/zjlj2n.png
@JosephGoebbels aka @Antiliberalsociety

lol jk

The fuck is this shit here?
Expect a few "fuck offs" when the Sherriffs reply.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ucw_OxnrgBE