Sign into an existing account

Many people saw the Saturn 5 rockets take off. Many people can calculate just from looking at the film how fast they were going and whether they would reach orbit and they would. And if you're going to build something like that and you're going to stack all that weight in it and you're going to launch it and it can reach orbit then you're going to go ahead and go to the moon. You would have already spent all the money in the engineering cost to make that happen you would go to the moon. Now there's no doubt that they were films made to educate the public about how it was going to happen and there were some made in stages that were broadcast by the networks while there was not a live feed from the rockets and they were shown before and after the event but that doesn't mean we didn't go to the moon. Anybody who sits down with a calculator or even a slide rule can simply do the calculations that show that the rocket weight and speed as it was leaving the launch pad and going up into an arc was enough to put in an orbit and once again if you've got a Saturn 5 three stages in orbit then you already spent the money to go to the moon so the cost to faking it would have been as expensive as the cost to go there.

The Apollo program was an enormous nation-wide undertaking involving over 400 000 people. All (((congress))) cares about is sending every single shekel to Ukraine. Who and WHY do you think someone would be funding a project of that size to run back and forth to the moon!? For what? Oh dear lord give me strength to bear your nonsense arguments.

Can you cuck any harder?

Did this documentary mention that the Bochum observatory in Germany independently recorded both telemetry and audio from the Apollo program with their radio telescope, coming from the moon.

I bet it didn't, because if it did, it would refute their theories.

Many independent astronomers also photographed or observed the Apollo spacecraft at their predicted locations in the sky during various points of the program.

See, many of these documentaries will load you up with all sorts of theories, but they leave out many inconvenient facts that go against their ideas.

A properly objective documentary would present ALL the facts, and analyze them objectively from all sides. A funny thing happened is not an objective documentary. It sets out to "prove" something from the start, without an objective analysis.

BIPPA BEEPA CALIFORNIA

Many people saw the Saturn 5 rockets take off. Many people can calculate just from looking at the film how fast they were going and whether they would reach orbit and they would. And if you're going to build something like that and you're going to stack all that weight in it and you're going to launch it and it can reach orbit then you're going to go ahead and go to the moon. You would have already spent all the money in the engineering cost to make that happen you would go to the moon. Now there's no doubt that they were films made to educate the public about how it was going to happen and there were some made in stages that were broadcast by the networks while there was not a live feed from the rockets and they were shown before and after the event but that doesn't mean we didn't go to the moon. Anybody who sits down with a calculator or even a slide rule can simply do the calculations that show that the rocket weight and speed as it was leaving the launch pad and going up into an arc was enough to put in an orbit and once again if you've got a Saturn 5 three stages in orbit then you already spent the money to go to the moon so the cost to faking it would have been as expensive as the cost to go there.

Dude, the Soviets left one too. According to your logic that means they send some Ivans there and never told us about it or what?

A little light turns on on a screen see there she proof.

Shut the fuck up you God damn morons we didn't go to the moon