×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
32
68 comments block


[ - ] Prairie 10 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 18:54:07 ago (+10/-0)

after Baldwin’s prop gun fired a live bullet

So much wrong with that. It wasn't a prop gun, it was a real gun. And it didn't fire a bullet, Baldwin fired a bullet.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 8 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 18:55:40 ago (+8/-0)

The real question that the buttfucker Alec Baldwin shills won't raise is "whose fingerprints are on the shell casings."

[ - ] VitaminSieg 4 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 19:16:58 ago (+4/-0)

Fingerprinting is the fakest and gayest.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 19:40:43 ago (+3/-0)

yes, well, most people aren't aware of the many potential failures, but a shell casing is pretty good at capturing a print, of all things.

[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 22:34:02 ago (+3/-0)

Hey, can you load my magazines for me?🤣

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 7 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 22:40:32 ago (+7/-0)

Every time I let someone hold one of my guns, I always say, "Always good to have another set of prints on it."

[ - ] VitaminSieg 3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:04:46 ago (+3/-0)

I'm gonna use that one and not credit you.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:05:17 ago (+2/-0)

Please do.

[ - ] dassar 3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:32:29 ago (+3/-0)

Similar reason why i collect fresh cigarette butts from public ashtrays. Never know when some 'forensic evidence found at the scene' might be useful as a subterfuge.

True story i recall years ago in NZ, some guy was convicted of a murder based on his shoe prints, hair samples and cigarette butt found at the crime scene (iirc) Years later after he had been convicted and jailed - it came out another guy from the halfway house he resided in at the time - took his shoes and wore them that night, after also taking some of the guys hair from a hair brush and his butt from a lounge ashtray and placed them at the scene.
Literally recall the initial court case - police prosecutors fizzing at the overwhelming forensic evidence pointing to the perpetrator - despite the dudes claims of innocence. Lol

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:33:35 ago (+2/-0)

you can always collect rando cash receipts for fake alibis

[ - ] Crackinjokes 1 point 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 04:15:14 ago (+1/-0)

I think there have been several criminals in different movies that would go to barber shops and collect bagfuls of hair to leave at crime scenes

[ - ] dassar 0 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 16:35:07 ago (+0/-0)

Yea, life imitates art imitates life kinda thing.

[ - ] 2017Fallout 1 point 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 04:55:54 ago (+1/-0)

I wondered where this was going at this point "after also taking some of the guys hair from a hair brush and his butt"

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 0 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 01:53:50 ago (+0/-0)

I grow my hair and donate it to charities that make wigs for kids!

[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:08:26 ago (+2/-0)

You ever wipe down everything before putting it away? I’ve had friends like that who thought that was a thing, like it being in your safe or at your house doesn’t matter.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:21:18 ago (+2/-0)

Always. But I have enough experience to know that guns are basically designed to capture prints. A casual wiping is often not enough especially if you leave a fat whole print for cyanoacrylicate vapor.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 1 point 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 17:57:47 ago (+1/-0)

[ - ] VitaminSieg 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 20:57:23 ago (+2/-0)

Right, but the whole 'science' of matching prints is bogus.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 21:57:23 ago (+2/-0)

I get where you're coming from. The whole science isn't bogus, but it is far from 100& and it can easily be exploited and finagled and prints are easily planted, nowadays.

DNA has the same problem and it equally problematic, far from perfect and has resulted in bad test results plenty of times and... can also be planted.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:04:07 ago (+3/-0)

And yet they're both taken as gospel in court.

[ - ] canbot 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:47:19 ago (+2/-0)

Then why does the defense not show that the data is flawed?

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 3 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 01:52:34 ago (+3/-0)

Talmud

[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 13:40:02 ago (+0/-0)

Judges won't hear it. It makes their job easier.

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 3 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 01:52:05 ago (+3/-0)

Remember when iphone fingerprint unlocking first came out and people were using rubber gloves with sharpies to unlock them

[ - ] Prairie 0 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 19:04:06 ago (+0/-0)

Interesting, are you suggesting it might be Baldwin? That would be a big twist.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 19:39:44 ago (+2/-0)

i can't think of any reason why they'd bury that evidence if it wasn't him, but we just have to "trust the government" thus far.

[ - ] observation1 1 point 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 02:51:31 ago (+1/-0)

This wont stick. If youre an actor playing the part of a cowboy and your producer hands you a prop gun to shoot somebody in an upcoming scene then its a prop gun.

[ - ] TheYiddler 2 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 05:46:45 ago (+2/-0)

He shot the person behind the camera. Who happened to have done a documentary on human trafficking.

[ - ] namefagsrgay 1 point 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 10:48:08 ago (+1/-0)

She was a good one. She got fired from the show I worked with her on because she kept fucking off on the directors long winded bullshit to go do more important things.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 1 point 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 04:13:05 ago (+1/-0)

It really depends on how reckless he was being with the prop gun. If he was playing around and pulling it people and pulling the trigger before the actual scene was being shot then he'll be convicted of involuntary manslaughter.

[ - ] namefagsrgay 1 point 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 10:45:31 ago (+1/-0)

Almost all the guns used on set are real. I worked that job and actually worked with this woman as well.

All the guns are either supplied by the armourers, rented, or actually purchased by production under the names of the armourers.

My friends got a lot of sweet free guns from that job, and we definitely went and shot all the cool ones on the weekends.

The difference is the people hired by this production were retards.

[ - ] SirNiggsalot 1 point 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 12:25:15 ago (+1/-0)

Another tragic case of gun violence ! Damn guns going around killing people

[ - ] Belrial 0 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 07:03:28 ago (+0/-0)

All prop means is that it belongs to the studio. Real guns have been used as props for a.long time.

[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 5 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 22:32:57 ago (+5/-0)

Alec Baldwin has killed more people than my guns have. The irony is thick. He should have taken an NRA safety course.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 22:39:49 ago (+3/-0)

I posit he may have done it on purpose.

What are the odds that you quick draw, pull the trigger on someone and get a kill shot?

Since we don't know who actually put the bullets in the gun, any other criminal case (not involving a rich liberal) would be looking at occams razor on this one.

Plenty of us can do hip/thigh draw and deliver a lethal shot, but it is a usually a very intentional act.

Accidentally? I don't think it is easy to do accidentally.

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 2 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 01:56:50 ago (+2/-0)

He was the EP of that film. He should have had 3 different people check that gun, including himself

[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 1 point 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:10:11 ago (+1/-0)

I believe it was scripted that he raise and level the gun at the camera, therefor aiming at the producer right at the people at the camera.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:21:49 ago (+2/-0)

he did it "joking around" and there were no cameras running iirc

[ - ] dassar 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:36:27 ago (+2/-0)

He was fcking around like a retard - and literally thinking it wasn't loaded purposely pointed it at the chick in question and pulled the trigger as a 'it's just a prank bro' that went sideways.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 5 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 16:20:20 ago (+5/-0)

must have stopped paying into the blackmail pyramid scheme

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 3 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 01:50:09 ago (+3/-0)

Good. Smug prick

[ - ] NedsHead 3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 23:57:42 ago (+3/-0)

I saw a report that his wife fell pregnant just after this incident, so killing made him horny?

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 0 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 15:56:25 ago (+0/-0)

Yeah, that makes sense.

[ - ] Leveraction 3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 19:30:53 ago (+3/-0)

Piece of shit should have had murder #1 charges

[ - ] VitaminSieg 3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 19:19:33 ago (+3/-0)

Not directly punished for his bad acting, but this will do, this will do.

[ - ] 2017Fallout 2 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 04:59:03 ago (+2/-0)

I wonder what she knew that got her publically executed

[ - ] TheYiddler 2 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 05:48:34 ago (+3/-1)

She did a documentary on human trafficking.

[ - ] Peleg 1 point 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 10:38:28 ago (+1/-0)

I'm having a hard time remembering. Was it the same documentary that Anne Heche was working on, you know, right before she "got drunk and died in a car wreck"?

[ - ] 2017Fallout 0 points 3 monthsJan 21, 2024 13:46:25 ago (+0/-0)

Do you know the name of the documentary?

[ - ] Conspirologist -6 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 16:56:29 ago (+1/-7)

This is bullshit. The only one responsible of murder it the whore responsible for guns on set. But nobody talks about her.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 9 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 17:04:23 ago (+9/-0)

No, you retard.

The first thing you do when you pick up a gun is to check to see if it is loaded.

Kill yourself to prevent your idiocy from further contaminating the gene pool.

[ - ] AtomicForeskin 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 17:21:39 ago (+5/-3)

The context of acting in a movie and thinking it’s a prop because it always is a prop and there is a professional whose job it is to make sure it’s a prop changes all that. Obviously.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 4 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 17:32:05 ago (+5/-1)

No, you retard. I literally work with prop guns all the time, even ones with blocked barrels.

YOU ALWAYS CHECK THE WEAPON.

I work with them because LEO and military need to be desensitized to live gun fire.

I am supplied by the same exact companies that modify guns for movie sets to make them unable to deliver a projectile.

I shoot at cops and soldiers all day long with these weapons and I never aim directly at them. Even though I know they can't deliver a projectile.

There are some very, very basic safety standards.

And, the retard girl in charge did not put real bullets in the weapon.

WHO DID?

The prints are easy to get off the shells.

Her lawyer already specified that her prints were not on the shells.

So, you are too fucking retarded to weigh in.

You don't know shit about computers, you don't know shit about guns...

Do you actually know anything useful? Or are you just some retarded millenial?

[ - ] AtomicForeskin 0 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 18:06:41 ago (+2/-2)

“Company that modifies guns to not be able to deliver a projectile”

Exactly

Why would an actor ever think he has been handed a gun that could actually kill someone. The legal system uses a know or should have known standard. A reasonable person in that situation would never think he is being handed something that can kill. Now the fact that someone intentionally loaded live ammo is interesting and if Baldwin’s prints are on that ammo then there is a strong case to be made.

Working in some sort of law enforcement simulation scenario is not the same thing as being on actor in a movie. I’m not even going to waste my time making that distinction for your low iq ass.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 18:07:38 ago (+3/-1)

Again, even the modified guns are still checked and they are still potentially dangerous.

People have died on multiple movie sets.

If you put a real bullet in a modified gun, it will explode in your hand.

How low IQ are you to come and pretend to be an expert?

Your "common sense" (aka your retardation) has lead to multiple deaths.

[ - ] Prairie 5 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 18:56:15 ago (+5/-0)

I think this needs to be taken further. You must check every object in case it's a covert gun, to be sure it doesn't fire. /s

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 0 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 18:58:37 ago (+2/-2)

retarded hyperbole

what is with the pro alec baldwin shills showing up to defend the scum bag?

Alec Badlwin is at fault. Simple.

Additional fault lies with whoever's fingerprints are on the shell casings... the person who put them in the gun... a simple matter the police can clear up but won't

[ - ] Prairie 4 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 19:03:16 ago (+4/-0)

It's just a joke man. Baldwin pointed and pulled. Someone loaded it and mixed it with stage weapons. And people on set had warned of poor safety well before that, and someone ignored that. They are all responsible, but Baldwin was the most direct cause.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 2 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 19:39:19 ago (+2/-0)

if they won't release the identity of the fingerprint on the shells, then we're all playing a guessing game

[ - ] Conspirologist -3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 17:57:51 ago (+1/-4)

Seethe harder, autistic fucktard.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 18:07:06 ago (+4/-1)

Why be so confidently incorrect about basic facts?

It shows that you are literally a low IQ retard.

And you accuse me of seething?

Maybe stop being wrong about basic shit.

You are literally not smart enough to weigh in on basic issues.

Ponder that.

You are so fucking dumb that, even when you are wrong, you persist.

[ - ] Conspirologist -3 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 18:16:00 ago (+2/-5)

Go fuck yourself, autistic kike.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 4 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 18:54:40 ago (+5/-1)

you make a very intellectual argument.

post your nose, bitch, and we'll see who the real degenerate is

i promise

[ - ] AtomicForeskin 5 points 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 22:15:06 ago (+5/-0)

He’s Indian cut him some slack. He literally learned not to shit in the street like a month ago.

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 1 point 4 monthsJan 19, 2024 22:29:23 ago (+1/-0)

Once upon a time, I set up a bunch of customized rss feeds, then found a way to take lots of information and convert it into rss for my own personal feeds, then redistribute the good stuff across multiple sites.

The censorship industrial complex hit me hard in 2016/2017, but it was still going strong. In 2019, well before Giuliani, I posted Hunter Biden passwords and some emails and whatnot and the machine really tried to shred all my feeds and ban all my accounts everywhere. I haven't really bothered to rebuild because they've shut down so many APIs and are trying to eliminate rss, so I've given up, for now.

I did get annoyed that the poster known as Q copied tons of stuff from my feeds, acting like it was some original inside information. When I cut out a screenshot to share, I like to add a small something to make sure I know it was me, when it comes back around again... to watch the virality.

Either way, some of the bots trudge along, still.

https://old.reddit.com/r/NewsWhatever/

But you will see, where I had 25 accounts sharing articles from many different places, it is now down to one in most places, if any at all.

Conspirologist, maybe knowingly or unknowingly (he has been in many of the same places reposting a lot of my same stuff), has attempted to MANUALLY do the same thing. I can't imagine how much time he is wasting doing it, too. Especially when it is trivial to make a bot to repost from his feeds.

So, while I don't really complain about how he uses the Internet, his idiocy around it is always surprising to me because he spends WAY MORE TIME than myself and, at this stage, he is just going over old information and old jewish tricks, ad nauseum, like they are new... indicating some other kind of retardation.

We all know by now... nothing ever happens. Until we have term limits or publicly execute corrupt politicians and pedos... or something fundamentally different than we, as a society are doing now, nothing will continue to happen.

Conspirologist doesn't seem to understand this and... fuck... is wasting his time and our time.

I get he maybe, sincerely, maybe, sincerely, maybe wants to share information, but he is really into hot takes and getting information first, rather than taking a day to see what is really important information.

And, he isn't ever going to be first because he does it manually and he has never improved in like 6 years.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 2 points 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 04:14:37 ago (+2/-0)

I bow to your RSS skills

[ - ] MasterSuppressionTechnique [op] 1 point 4 monthsJan 20, 2024 04:30:01 ago (+1/-0)

rss is so incredibly useful, especially when you can convert raw data into your own rss feeds. chatgpt is so good at telling you exactly how to do it, now, too. When I next begin anew, it will be better than ever. OSINT throughput is already darn good.

I just need to set up my own server again. While I really, really tried to keep my operation going via free services and spreading it out all over the place, it is just no longer feasible and I've got to put it all in one place.

It'll happen, but I won't get a fire under my ass about it until the election gets closer.