Sign into an existing account

"RFK Jr. Explains EXACTLY How They’re Doing The Chemtrails and Why No “Huge Conspiracy” In Necessary"

[The article has both the transcript and the twitter link to the video. Be sure to check the other link that's below this, too.]


"I’ve been talking about chemtrails on this website for 10+ years….

And each time I do, there’s always a small but very vocal group of people who have extremely strong cognitive dissonance reactions.

They get very angry with me, because their brain can’t quite process the fact that they’ve (1) been lied to for decades, and (2) are being actively poisoned by their Government.

I get it, that’s a very tough red pill to swallow.

But I’ve been right all along, and I want you to notice something: RFK Jr. was just asked about chemtrails AGAIN yesterday on Dr. Phil’s show, and I want you to notice what he says in response….

He doesn’t say “oh that’s not real” or “that’s just a conspiracy” or “I really don’t have any information on that.”

Nope.

None of that.

Instead, he confirms flat out that they’re real and then he says he believes DARPA is doing the spraying.

He also says he’s bringing on someone whose entire job will only be to investigate this and shut it down.

So to all the people who think this is just a huge conspiracy theory and you’re going to go down in the comments section and type “bUt NOah theSE aRe just CONtrails not chEmtrails” derpy derpy derp….you’re going to have to content with RFK Jr. who does not agree with you.

Also, there was one other thing that jumped off the screen to me….

Without even being asked, he confirmed something I’ve told you for YEARS now, and it’s in response to the common question I often hear that goes like this: “But Noah, how could such a huge conspiracy be kept quiet all these years? If they’re spraying every day and so many people are in on it, that means the pilots are in on it, the airports, the people who work on the planes, too many people are in on it for the truth to not come out!”

Have you heard that one?

The answer is very simple, and I’ve tried to tell you for years….

There is no longer any massive spraying jets hooked up to planes.

No, they knew that couldn’t be kept quiet. Not sustainable.

No, it’s much simpler now.

Now they’ve found a way to just put the chemicals directly into the fuel and as the fuel burns and the exhaust comes out, the chemicals come out with it.

Simple!

And almost no one needs to be “in on it”.

In fact, most people flying the planes or working on the planes probably don’t know any different.

But don’t take my word for it, take it from RFK Jr. himself.

Watch here:

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼
RFK JR on Stopping Chemtrails:

We don’t know Who’s Doing it, we think DARPA is doing it. 👀

He says he will bring on someone whose only goal is to stop it.

🔴 MY THOUGHTS:
The most concerning thing about this… how the hell do we not know who is spraying… pic.twitter.com/tQhmDAHNxy

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) April 29, 2025

TRANSCRIPT:

And my biggest concern is the stratospheric aerosol injections
that are continuously peppered on us every day.

Bromium, aluminum, strontium — it’s sprayed in our skies all day long.
And I know you’ve talked to Dane Wigington about this.
He seems to be one of the experts in the field.

Is there a question?
Yes. How do we stop it?

That is not happening in my agency.
We don’t do that. It’s done, we think, by DARPA.
And a lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel.

Yes, sir. Those materials are put in jet fuel…

I’m going to do everything in my power to stop it.
We’re bringing on somebody who’s going to think only about that,
find out who’s doing it,
and holding them.

Backup here with captions if needed:

RFK Jr. confirms exactly how they do the chemtrails….and why almost no one needs to be “in on it”. pic.twitter.com/kxA7Z1z9bf

— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) April 29, 2025

* https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1917262967000748277 * [THIS is the video link, in case you didn't recognize it above]

https://chemtrailsexposed.com/2025/04/rfk-jr-explains-exactly-how-theyre-doing-chemtrails/
-----------X
[Flanders]:
An excellent site at explaining chemtrails and the dangers associated with them is below.


"Chemtrails 10 0529 ghent (2)"

https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/chemtrails-10-0529-ghent-2/18562875
---------X

"This aerosol spraying is not the first time Americans have been used as un-informed experimental laboratory animals. Basically, plans to harm us have never stopped. In 2001, Clifford Carnicom posted an excerpt from the Neuremberg War Trials about biological consent of human “subjects.” This consent is essential, but is not part of these covert crimes." See:

https://wakeup-world.com/2013/08/23/chemtrails-the-greatest-crime-of-all-time/
---------X

"“Don’t confuse this with contrails”, said Vereecke. “Those are harmless condensation trails that are only visible for a few seconds. On the other hand chemtrails are clouds of chemicals and disease causing germs that are deliberately sprayed on us to manipulate our behaviour. The councilmen and – women were stunned and listened to his every word. At last some other subject than a loose tile or a backed-up sewage pipe."

https://www.saveourearth.co.uk/blog/2009/09/former-mayor-of-belgium-files-complaint-against-chemtrails/

Hold my hand ever so close
Hold my hand my dear
And remember who I once was
As I slowly disappear.

Hold my hand my dear
And remember not to fear
We who were once and now no more
All slowly disappeared.

Like the sunset which is fading
Like the joy mingled with your tears
Slowly, softly over these colorless days
unnumbered with the years.

Everyone says in parting
Wait, I'll find you again someday
But I have no more strength
To give to a weary world
Whose colors have all turned grey.

What for life are we building
To watch it all fade away
And in the parting like the fading flame
Greet the darkness of our final day.

Weary world this parting
Where merriment is no more
Cold comfort in the longing for
To have the things that make life worth clinging
so long in striving, we greet deaths door.

Travelers on a journey
With dirty feet no more.
On the earth we tread
To find our meager place
The earth upon us tread
And all around entomb
Life is the process of becoming dead.

All generations are lost
if lost generations there ever were
Nothing generations will hold in the hands, or in their heads
Robbed of everything that makes man a man
Except their daily bread.

DOGE is smoke an mirrors to fool only the stupidest of the stupid.

How many Trillions will Trump add to deficit before he's done this time?

Will there be covid checks this time? I could use some more beers.

In my career, I did time in Guatemala, Lebanon, the west bank, Moroccan ghettos. The world is shit and sometimes I understand suicide completely. I am a Christian but I also understand the futility of life on earth. And it's OK to think about it, at least I think, because sometimes it feels like the greater option, the better option, even the more pure option, more pure than trying to survive in this jungle hellscape we call life on earth. I pray for the strength to carry on often, but also recognize the strength in death.

"Peter Brabeck-Letmathe

Known more simply as Peter Brabeck, his WEF profile declares him the Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trustees. Brabeck was the CEO of Nestle Corporation for over ten years, and Chairman of the Board for part of that time. He is a former Board member of Credit Suisse, Exxon-Mobile, and L’Oreal, among many others. He was also the Former Chairman, of the 2030 Water Resources Group, a public-private partnership operating as part of the World Bank.

Brabeck provoked outrage and condemnation when in a 2005 documentary titled We Feed the World, he shared some of his own views. Only slightly distorted, this is a fairly good summary of Brabeck’s statements: “Brabeck believes that nature is not ‘good,’ that there is nothing to worry about with GMO foods, that profits matter above all else, that people should work more, and that human beings do not have a right to water.” He made others. Nestle has been involved in ongoing scandals in California for its low-cost access to major water sources for its high-priced bottled water sales, during extended drought when other Californians suffered rationing.

In 1998, for Israel’s fiftieth independence celebration, Israeli PM Netanyahu bestowed “the highest tribute ever awarded by the State of Israel, the Jubilee Award,” recognizing those individuals and organizations that have done the most to strengthen Israel’s economy. Peter Brabeck-Letmathe of Nestle was one of three recipients in the Food category.

This source is also highly suggestive:

Nestle owns 50.1% of Osem Investments, an Israel-based company engaged directly in the production and distribution of food products in Israel and abroad. The Nestle Purina Israel, Director and Corporate Executive at Osem Investment Ltd and CEO of Osem International Ltd., Gad Propper, is the Chairman of the Israel-European Union Chamber of Commerce. He is also Chairman of L’Oreal Israel, 30% owned by L’Oreal, another prominent supporter of Israel.

Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, CEO of Nestle, is also on the Board of Directors of L’Oreal, that has a history of breaking laws to support Israel. He is also a director of Credit Suisse, which is a board member of the Swiss-Israeli Chamber of Commerce. Brabeck-Letmathe is also on the foundation board of the World Economic Forum (WEF), which in 2006 removed from its Global Agenda Magazine an article that called for a peaceful boycott of Israel until it complied to international law and human rights. In contrast to the WEF’s promotion of peaceful free speech, the article was said to be “totally in contradiction to … the Forum’s mission and values.”

Nestlé, the world’s largest food company, set up their R&D Center in Israel (greatly enhancing Israel through their technical know-how, expertise and distribution channels). This R&D center was built on Sderot – stolen and illegally occupied Palestinian land that was once a town called Najd. The presence of Nestle’s plant effectively sabotages the Palestinians’ right to return as stated by UN Resolution 194 and also the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 13, Section 2." Continues with Peter Brabeck and MANY MORE of the jews interlocking network within the WEF and MANY associated corporations and organizations.

https://human-synthesis.ghost.io/2023/08/21/the-not-so-friendly-folks-at-the-world-economic-forum/

-----

"Very Disturbing: This is how the question was posed to the Marines: "The U.S. Government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non‑sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. "Consider the following statement:'I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government'." The question was then posed as to what degree the individual Marine agreed with the statement. According to results given in Cunningham's thesis, a total of 88 percent, or 264 Marines, responded to the question. Of the 264 who responded, 26.34 percent, or 79 Marines indicated they would be willing to fire upon U.S. citizens."

Of that total, 18.67 percent or 56 Marines, indicated they "agree" with the statement, and 7.67 percent or 23 Marines, indicated that "strongly agree." A total of 61.66 percent, or 185, indicated that they were opposed to firing on citizens.

Of that total, 42.33 percent, or 127 indicated they "strongly disagree" and 19.33 percent or 58, indicated they "disagree." In is thesis, Cunningham noted: "This particular question, unlike the others, elicited from 15.97 percent of the respondents with an opinion, either heavier pen or pencil marks on the response or written comments in the margin space. The responses to this scenario suggest that a complete unit breakdown could occur in a unit tasked to execute this mission."

In other words, if a commander asked the men of his unit to raise their hands in a simple poll, he could determine the position of such servicemen and those who responded in the affirmative could be tasked for such a mission. This is just one of the reasons the question, not to mention the fact that it was allowed to be asked, is obviously potentially dangerous. In fact, several months before the survey was taken at Twenty‑Nine Palms, the SPOTLIGHT, MODERN GUN and other publications revealed the question posed by Cunningham in his survey had ben asked of members of a U.S. Seal (Sea‑Air‑land) team. In addition, despite Navy and Marine Corps denials, there have been dozens of reports, unconfirmed, that the survey has been given to other servicemen, as well as various law enforcement agents.
--------
The results of another question, No. 45, posed by the survey indicates American soldiers are not eager to swear allegiance to the United Nations, although nearly one in four would do so. Question 45 states: "I would swear to the following code:'I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve in the forces which maintain world peace and every nation's way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense'." A total of 69.33 percent, or 208 Marines surveyed, indicated they disagreed, with 117, or 39 percent, indicating they strongly disagreed.

On the other hand, 71 Marines, or 23.66 percent, indicated they would be willing to swear such allegiance to the UN, with 19, or 6.33 percent, indicating they were strongly in favor of doing so. "For thousands of years." Cunningham notes in his thesis, "military organizations have required their soldiers to swear to some kind of code or allegiance. A code provides a standard for the soldiers to live up to and, in many cases, to die for. A code can be a powerful tool for establishing and sustaining unit cohesion. But what if the mission a solider is assigned to perform counters or confuses the code he has sworn to uphold? Question 45 was presented to determine if the solders would swear to such a code." No one knows if the American personnel traveling in the helicopter shot down over Iraq [by "friendly fire"] in April 1994 would have sworn allegiance to such a code.

Yet, Vice President Albert Gore stated that these Americans "died in the service of The United Nations." "It is patently clear," a retired high ranking Army Officer told The SPOTLIGHT,"that this survey raises some very serious issues, not the least of which is that U.S. servicemen are not being properly educated as to the limits of their service in the civilian sector. This is most dangerous, and, I should think the Congress has an obligation to the people to take a careful look at this, not to mention the people at the Pentagon."

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/FIRE-1%20[A].htm

is the modern man?
------

The puppet-masters say he is the
smartest, most advanced individual to ever strut the planet, the
most relatively liberated being in history. But Louis-Ferdinand
Celine said it well, "What does the modern public want? It
wants to go down on its knees before money and before crap!"

The public have been trained to do this by two principle
methods: direct "speaking" archetypal messages of pure terror
("psychic driving" as the CIA's Dr. Ewan Cameron termed it),
encoded in massively publicized "lone nut" mass murders, and
the sinister flattery heaped upon them by their masters in the
cult of civilization and progress.

The acid test of a human being's freedom and will to protect
the quality of his life, lies in a person's attitude toward his
oppressor. What is modern man's attitude toward Wall Street
and the bankers, toward Dan Rather and the ignorance-
bestowing media and advertising man, toward Lincoln and
Truman, FDR and Reagan, George Bush and Johnny Carson,
Exxon and Monsanto?

As one writer has observed, "The most amazing thing about
the American people is that they are constantly defending their
worst betrayers." Who then is the modern man? He is a mind-
bombed patsy who gets his marching orders from "twilight
language" key words sprinkled throughout "his" news and
current events. Even as he dances to the tune of the elite
managers of human behavior, he scoffs with great derision at
the idea of the existence and operation of a technology of mass
mind control emanating from the media and government.
Modern man is much too smart t o believe anything as
superstitious as that!

Modern man is the ideal hypnotic subject: puffed up on the
idea that he is the crown of creation, he vehemently denies the
power of the hypnotist's control over him, even as his head
bobs up and down on a string.

Michael A. Hoffman II - Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare Page 10
https://www.howardnema.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Secret-Societies-and-Psychological-Warfare-by-Hoffmann-1.pdf