Sign into an existing account

The chatter was that some element was planning on bumrushing the inaugeration.
DI believed they intended to use weapons and ammo smuggled by the cartels.
Reports suggested that 1% and mexican motorcycle gangs would be used to smuggle the weapons.

Foreign Intelligence assets on the ground in the U.s. directed disposable street gangs, and elements placed in the military, to affect the theft of humvees and police and military uniforms during the fires in california.

This was also the reason that leftwingers were being told to wear black "for a day of mourning", so security would be distracted by too many people dressed suspiciously, while an attack was carried out.

The police in D.C. did not in fact refuse to help the inauguration. Trump's own security refused them. To save face, the rumor was put out that the locals refused to cooperate.

Trump's security lookalike, a common practice with heads of state, stood in for him on the off-chance there was some unknown reason for why outside or inside actors would want the venue changed to indoors (there were security discussions about things like CBRN concerns).

There was also discussion that elements of the parties might try a legal approach. Because his SD was used, rather than him, they could later argue he wasn't actually inaugurated, but this overrode the immediate threat.

There is now also talk that the previous administration may have issued post-handover orders (timelocked orders to be executed at specific dates) to both the intelligence agencies and the military, though those are expected to be quickly overridden and rescinded.

The diplomatic cables of the iranians indicate they are worried that Trump will go to war with them over turkish and israeli interests, and that if they don't act, they'll be blamed anyway for things outside their control.

or "What The Move In Bakhmut Is Actually About, And Other Hot-takes"

This is a long read, so I've broken it up into sections for those only
interested in a particular topic. However most of the sections are tightly
coupled, so bear with me and read on if you want the big picture.
If you find spelling-issues or anything of the like, let me know.

WAGNER

They're bringing in chechens, while shipping out wagner.
I thought this might be a loyalty issue but it's not,
otherwise wagner would have been removed from its leading
role long ago, instead of being starved for ammunition.

What this says to me is that some of the rumors that russia
is having logistics issues are true, but not for the reasons
you might think. Why would they deprive their best fighters so far?

This isn't simply a holding pattern.

It's them stockpiling.

Which means bakhmut was a distraction this entire time.
It was a distraction to buy-time.

The russian's were always expecting escalation, and preparing
for it every second of every minute of every hour of every day.

But why buy-time with a distraction?

Remember all those troops they conscripted? People with no military experience?
The distraction was to buy-time to train them.

This explains the relative hard tone they've taken towards the u.s. in the
diplomatic sphere: they expected the effort to fail and the u.s. to be set on its
path to oblivion so they went directly to using threats instead.

If this is the case then we can follow up with a little further discussion,
namely the drone strike against putin.

THE ATTACK ON PUTIN

The operative question to ask is who benefits the most from an attack like this?
The second question to ask is why use hardware that cheap?
Unless the biggest risk was the identity of who sent it (and who made it) would
undo the desired effect. Which means--its not who we think it was.

And who benefits? The u.s. government first, simply because now it escalates, right
when the war was petering out (ukraine running out of options, zelensky fleeing, the
spring offensive going no-where). The regime in the u.s. gets to continue looting
through their laundry man zelensky, who in turn sends it back in part to those
in the u.s. that are part of it, as well as to israel, which in turn sends it on
to britian and london banks.

THE BANKS

Wait what? Thats right, british banks. And here
we go into a long aside, so bear with me. See whats happened is the brits established the
eurodollar, basically a counterfeiting scheme. And what they do is for every dollar of u.s.
currency, they put it into foreign reserves, and then use it as a backing asset to issue
eurodollars in the dollars place. Effectively they can use the eurodollar as weapon to
leverage the u.s. into any conflict, because the brits always have their native currency
to fall back onto. The eurodollar is a gun held to the head of the u.s.
The federal reserve attempted to decouple from this financial sabotage by raising interest
rates, which while in british foreign reserves effectively causes them to lose money
(amongst other things). And as a result the brits are using assets in the u.s.
government to prolong the ukrainian war, have money sent to zelensky, who pays back
a percentage to those assets, sends the rest on to israel and affiliates of israel, who
in turn forward it to the brits, who--stuff it into their foreign reserves I imagine,
which weakens the eurodollar by inflation, relative to the u.s. dollar.
What happens then? Bad money flees the eurodollar for the dollar and u.s. assets.
Which makes everything more expensive on our side. They're hoping to use a "little bit of inflation" in britain to cause a lot of inflation in the u.s., as retaliation for
the u.s. hoping to use a little bit of interest rate rises to cause a lot of interest
rate rises (bad debt/defaults) in britain and the U.K. (and not specifically the E.U.).

FOREIGN DEFAULTS

Why are we trying to cause foreign defaults? To destroy all the dollar-denominated debts
backed by foreign reserves. Why? So they don't come flooding "on shore" to the u.s.
when the u.s. financial system experiences another shock. Someone at some time realized
this was unsustainable (probably took a look at the derivatives market) and decided
this had to happen. Which means war was going to be the answer from the beginning, rather
than a mere unplanned reaction to the bad debt. Which explains why we're starting to
onshore some of our manufacturing again, and why all sides seem intent on sending
their older equipment to destruction first--biding their time and holding the newer
stuff in reserve. This is probably the clearest indicator I've seen yet.

We've seen this playbook before, three factions causing a region to be unsustainable
for business development and profit, so one faction, the weakest one is eliminated.
This is what happened when britain financed the 'young turks' to kill the armenians,
in order to persue a rail line for oil. This is britains playbook.

CHINA

If its britains playbook, british banks likely have a heavy hand in the ccp. China in
some fashion must answer to them. It has been interesting to observe how much of the
subversion in the u.s. has found its footing in universities originally founded by
the british, with endowments and large social networks extending out into the financial
system, who run much of wallstreet and k-street, all in part or in whole owned by
blackrock or vanguard, with heavy buy-in from the chinese.
All run by zionists, who incidentally call a nation home, that was absolutely setup first
and foremost on the prerogative of none other than britain itself.

So did the u.s. use a low-cost drone to attempt to attack putin? No.
Putin has already concluded this too. The u.s. would want to make it obvious
while blatantly denying it. I know this because thats what our regime does with unpopular but unofficial policies domestically. Thats the u.s. regime playbook. Thats how the intelligence
agencies think. We would have used something expensive, but made by a secondary nation,
not necessarily the u.s.

MONEY LAUNDERING

Putin knows the u.s. wouldn't escalate if we didn't have to either, simply because the
u.s. or elements of it, are busy looting, sending the money to zelensky so they can launder it back to him. You might be forgiven for thinking biden sending money to transgender pakistanis to learn english actually indicates him and his immediate cronies are out of the loop on this, and simply being goaded like useful puppets into the war, which would indicate this is
mostly looting by congress and the senate, but actually thats something less relevant at the moment: the fact its pakistan indicates they're using the money for intelligence, which probably means this is a minor signal to muslim nations that we want to cozy up to them further, and this doubles as a covert threat to india, that if they don't play along we
can perform a color revolution on them too--which in turn tells me the u.s. state department and cia is either extremely arrogant and incompetent (because they don't realize india is
going to do everything in its power to avoid taking sides and thus avoid a war with china, its neighbor), or the heads of those agencies (or their immediate advisors) are compromised
by british intelligence, because nothing would be more ruinous to u.s. relations with a major partner, india, than say, kashmir being annexed by pakistan, or india suffering a color change
operation. Nothing would be more destabilizing, or push india more readily into chinas arms,
then us pulling something like that.

COLOR CHANGE

The other element is the transgender element, which is both a minor and major thing to look at. It's a minor element, because it acts as an appeal during 'election' season--appearances
are at least still superficially important (otherwise they wouldn't have fought so hard to deny that we no longer have actual elections in the u.s.)
This indicates two things: The transgender issue is itself a broader confirmation that the
u.s. intelligence apparatchiks really do use social issues to manufacture violent movements
as pawns in domestic and foreign politics. And second the u.s. population and its perception
of the legitimacy of the u.s. government writ large, absolutely does threaten the stability
of the u.s. both domestically and abroad. They are scared of us and see us as a threat on
all fronts, economically, socially, religiously, politically, and militarily.
Otherwise they wouldn't have needed violent street gangs (antifa, blm, et al) to enforce their politics over the last seven years. They couldn't do it directly, see? Precisely because they wanted legitimacy. This indicates finding ever-new and more effective means of denying
the regimes legitimacy and alienating the public, is the most efficient and powerful means
we have to destabilize and take down the regime.

NATURAL GAS

Meanwhile the intensification of the war requires
russia to sell more oil and natural gas. What did
the u.s. do to soviet russia decades ago? Established
ties with saudi arabia to undermine the price of oil.
Which in turn starved russia for cash.
What are we doing with natural gas? Sending it to europe
to undercut the price of russian natural gas.
And also attempting to 'go green'--to undercut foreign
oil and natural gas now that theres too much competition
we can't control.
Thats what the green push is about, at least on the surface
level, to speak nothing of bankrupting us in service to
foreign nations that effectively own and give commands to
elements of the regime in the u.s.

IRAN

Ancillary to this discussion, but I wouldn't be surprised
if elements of Iran provided the drone-in-question, as retaliation
for russia refusing to back up iran when the u.s. and israel
attacked. Russia had to choose to back up an ally or refuse to
enter into a multifront war. It chose the latter. Probably as
john bolton intended.
With the overtures of the u.s. to the middle east, domestic
elements of the regime pulling away from israel (and thus britain)
in favor of the islamic sphere, is it any wonder Ilhan Omar was selected for congress?
Of course not, this is the u.s. playing the middle during a decoupling.
And in light of that it makes perfect sense that the u.s. is monetarily
attacking the euro, the eurodollar, and by extension britian, while
giving the cold shoulder to israel. It would also explain our sudden
foray into Iran, aiding israel. The policy seems bifurcated and insane,
but it isn't if you consider that the u.s., if it is in the middle
of decoupling from british financial elements and israeli global geopolitics,
would have every reason to appear as non-threatening as possible.
The cabinets are stacked with british-affiliated zionists, the u.s.
has ostensibly given into the brits desire to get us into another war,
(while both russia and the u.s. have tiptoed around escalation, mostly
bluffing and grandstanding whenever it was possible to do).

A STRETCH BUT I'M PROBABLY NOT WRONG

The regime has brought jihadists into the u.s. among the southern invasion, who have no care at all for the law and can thus be used to terrorize both the christian-supporters of zionists in the u.s. but also to terrorize the zionists themselves. This comports with the regime's
earlier use of antifa and blm as irregular pseudo-militant elements, and confirms
my earlier beliefs the u.s. would pursue an intensification of this strategy by using
muslim terrorists--who would in turn utilize the existing gang networks, both gangs-proper (bloods, crips, new generation) and the 'street patrols' of antifa and blm, while also
being driven by disgust towards antifa/blm, thus also co-opting any minor risk for
the rise of third-positionist counter-revolutionary movements against the regime, and eliminating the useful idiots that helped them co-opt the u.s. to begin with.


WE RETURN TO WHERE WE STARTED
All of this feeds back into the predominate view that there is a strategy in place, long in the tooth, to bring the u.s. to its knees in favor of china, with russia firmly pushed into the former's sphere of influence long-term. Global disputes are not sufficient by themselves.
Issues of international import are certainly cause enough to initiate the abandoning of the u.s. dollar, but the dollar itself will still live on domestically, making up a significant, if much more minor, chunk of global trade. Even after something like a bankruptcy or default.

Unless..

Unless the u.s. falls internally into conflict. It's the zimbabwe model. And we've seen
talk of that very nation, in reference to our social ills, but not what the explicit goal
for it was. The take down of the u.s. dollar globally must coincide with the takedown
of the u.s. domestically. A government whose very legitimacy is imperiled by none other
than open civil war and genocide going on in its streets (and im not talking about the low level killings being committed by transexuals or radicalized blacks)--is a government whose
currency every remaining nation will outright question. The myth of the petrodollar and the u.s. military will be all-but dead, outright on life support, never to be resurrected, if
these things come to pass.

Some elements in the alt-sphere talking about this are simply reading the tea leaves.
Others are intelligence putting it out there to front run any conflict into one they
can control (a false civil war) in order to preserve internal order long-term and
thus save the dollar domestically (and whatever position we can retain in global trade).

But this much is certain: This is the long-term plan by the regime, and by our enemies.
It is going to happen and I've explained why, in detail. It is already carved like holy
writ, into stone.

THE RESTRICT ACT

Basically the non-co opted (non-regime) elements of the u.s. government have almost lost
the information war outright, as well the social-issues war. We realized too late
we were under attack, not for years, but decades and were co-opted into it, right up
to this final phase. In order to pull off the final phase, they'll need complete
information control where possible. They won't need to reach 100%, as long as they can get
within a couple percentages of reaching the entire public without being front-run by open-source intelligence and journalists.
Likewise, the elements of the u.s. against this plot, having very nearly lost the infowar both
in the mainstream, and in the alt-sphere, hope that by passing something like the restrict act, it will do more damage to the regime than it will to them.
Therefore both sides have an incentive to pass this bill, thinking it will be their ultimate weapon.

The truth is, the restrict act is none other than the cyber equivalent of the patriot act.
And for the cyber equivalent of the patriot act, we must have the cyber equivalent of another
9/11. Having seen this, having seen the run up to the "cyberattacks" narrative, with all
the supporting rational so far, we must conclude this is foregone. It is coming, for all
the reasons mentioned in the last 15,000+ characters I've written.

The total doom mongering about "long term blackouts" is just that, softening us to the "cyber pandemic", which might last three days, or two weeks. Neither the regime, nor non-regime elements, will tolerate a systemic risk of losing control of the u.s. unless they know they
can reestablish control.

This likewise is necessary to establish centralized digital currency (and credit cards and bitcoin were a precursor to that), a two-fer: control the money, control the information.
Likewise, this in turn is necessary to impoverish the middle class, radicalizing them in
favor of other modes of government (the transition from socialism to communism or totalitarianism). This also pulls double duty by restricting their ability to retain guns (which require ammo, not just to shoot, but also to train). Lastly, once free speech
is de-facto dead in the u.s. (thanks to social credit), the roll-up of gun rights, and the
rest of the bill of rights, goes with it in a matter of ten, maybe fifteen years at the most.


And now you know the whole plan and why everything you see happening, is happening.

https://odysee.com/@dCo3lh0:5/Putin,-Bibi,-and-The-Bolsheviks:3

May or may not be genuine, not checked. Just posting for future reference.

Both russia and india feel secure because they will assume, china being rational, does not want to call BRICS into question. However china will assume it can push its luck and test the waters on border issues as a powerplay in upcoming exchange rate negotiations, assuming russia and india will not hold them to serious account. Likewise china is used to pulling stunts of this nature and then denying these stunts outright and feigning outrage over being questioned.

Likewise with Xi's position tentatively challenged by the stability of their economy, he has need for events that let him flex his position's authority in order to bolster his support in the party, rally the public, and distract them from the chinese economic question.

Her being gone won't fix anything.

They'd just find a replacement.

However, what she is, is a thread.

Pull that thread and you find her handlers.

Find her handlers and you find their funders.

Find who funds them and you find the entire network of NGOs, money launderers, banks, and media relations.

Her remaining alive, and people like her, are actually the achilles heel here.

Once you can demonstrate the connections, people will usually dot connect on their own.

It's why so much media makes fun with the 'nutty conspiracy theorists' archtype using red thread and pushpins to connect information on corkboards.

They don't want people engaging in visual demonstrations of connections because thats the language that best speaks to others.

The propaganda isn't for the public, its to discourage us.

Smoke Screen To Big Tent. Big Tent To Defense In Depth. Defense In Depth To Central Position:

The premise is simple: in an environment of pervasive social/economic/political suppression, through large scale opaque organizations (letter agencies, NGOs),
this situation resembles that of the central position strategy.
And while this may seem hopeless, in a diffuse environment, this becomes
a degenerate approach under deliberate counter-effort.
What would otherwise be outposts are reduced to screening forces.

Screening forces are easily broken, and easily demoralized. Under tight recon
requirements, vis-a-vis the sociological/political/economic equivalent of guerillas,
home field advantage converts pensioned and little-motivated 'dynamic' methodologies
into essentially static forces. Strategy for the regime, here, becomes a sort of noose
of diminishing returns, the loss of which accelerates with well-directed opposition.

What is advanced is a simple idea - all the organizations infiltrated? All the social
movements spied on? All the political groups monitored, threatened, entrapped, and
shutdown? These are numerous, many thousands of them exist locally across
the territories of the illegitimate u.s. regime.

It should be imperative to approach these groups, to recruit them, minimally.
The goal is to have them keep their ears to the ground, get them to assess their
available resources, and put them on minimal tasks.
This may seem counter-intuitive, but what is does is this:

1. decisively lowers the barrier to recruitment
2. minimizes the legal attack surface regime agencies use against populist movements.
3. provides a seductively-simple on-ramp for new and existing organizations and their
increasing involvement
And finally
4. embeds regime secret police directly in the movement.

Wait what? Thats right, in this case, number four is fact, desirable.

Under the correct conditions, the greatest asset of the u.s. regime is in fact its
most dangerous achilles heel. It is startling once you see it for what it is.
If you look at reports for example, of the proud boys, and various militias over
the last twenty-thirty years, the regime's secret police went so far as to embed
agents in groups as little as three or four people. The lack of "terrorism" in
the u.s. and the west is so paltry in comparison, we can only conclude these
behaviors are widespread policies that exist, not to prevent violence or illegal
action, but to act as nothing more than unlawful outright suppression measures against
things such as populist movements, boycotts, general strikes, and counter-political
movements to a government that has become wholly unresponsive, and utterly unaccountable
at any level whatsoever.

Therefore, why would it become desirable to provoke the maintenance, and even
intensification of these anti-natal and anti-populist policies?

Again, under the correct conditions, and with the correct counter-strategy, which
I will identify here, these 'embedded forces' of informants throughout american society,
become a resource and effective opportunity for shutting down the regime.
For example, one estimate puts the DOD's informant network
at 70k+, while the FBI employs an estimated 20-30K paid full and part time informants,
many even authorized to commit serious crimes, even purjury.

How can this geopolitical landscape be utilized to shutdown the regime in the u.s.?

THE BASICS

The existing policies of suppression, large-scale informant networks, and legal warfare
against organic organized movements, atomize the social, political, and economic landscape. This is inarguable. The utilization of silo-ing today allows high level
actors within the alphabet agencies (and associated NGOs) to, if they so desired,
kill, maim, coerce, threaten, blackmail, frame, bribe, or effectively rendition
anyone who opposes them--whether or not they do these things is another matter,
though ample evidence, enough to indict countless NGOs and alphabet agencies, exists
for anyone that doen't have their blinders on. Likewise the secretive nature
and the silo-design of information operations is such that wherever large scale
RICO-style crimes are (or could be) engaged in by these very agencies, high-level
and mid-level bureaucrats and officials no longer even need to throw up a smoke screen
after the fact in order to hide the intention of these policies, and programs from
lower level officials and agents. No, the silo system and state secrets guarantees that no one within the three letters who is low on the totem pole will even know of
such crimes to begin with, and if they ever do become so much as suspicious, they
are easily let go, or like any other sufficiently dangerous dissidents in the u.s., silenced in one manner or another.

But with every cloud, a silver lining. The very same atomization of society, reminiscent
if not in symbol and name, than in operation, to east germany under the communists--
that atomization results in something startling.

The state is spread startlingly thin. This would not be a problem if not for
the strategy of the 'central position' which they employed in the first space.
Into this gap enters a 'dead territory', that which is only superficially monitorable.
The regime is overwhelmed with information, so much so that it is reduced almost to noise.
The consequence is they are paralyzed about what to do.

This manifests in one of two approaches: They can ignore a great deal of it, and in the past they did. Or they can tamp down on dissent, increase division, apply further
secret police to ever greater suppression campaigns, and resort to even more
intense censorship of political, economic, social and religious thought, organization,
and action.

They have recently adopted the latter approach.

Because of this alienation in society increase.

The greatest initial cost of resisting an illegitimate and out of control regime is simply
man power.

The solution therefore is to start with recruiting not individuals, but entire small groups. The central positions 'screening' force of informants now becomes a system
by which they are pinned in place to one course and one outcome--the increasing irrelevance and exposure of their methods.

With each organization, in each area of operation, that is recruited, you will no doubt
take on more and more part time, and full time informants.

However because of the loose affiliation, strictly legal mission orders/activities given to each group, and limited contact, every group is
1. disposable
2. can quickly be disaffiliated
3. only dependent on a single contact, which can cut off contact
4. can be fed both true information to further the effectiveness of their participation, and false information which eventually feeds back to the regime and hampers their
efforts signficantly.

Here signficant effort is put into identifying informants, and rather than kicking them out, recruiting them into busy-work that misleads about organizational goals, keeps them busy, wastes resources, solicits resources from the state according to their policy
of providing resources to organizations they intend to setup/destroy--and in the process
those resources are instead allocated to legitimate means thus wasting agency budgets
and discrediting and demoralizing them.
Ideally this would look like them providing for example, money for weapons (which they intend to provide, talk about, or plant, not unlike they did with some J6 and proud boys), only for this to be exposed veritas style, or for this to be reported to the IRS or any other agency that will listen at all, exploiting inter-party rivalries for maximum exposure, such that it breaks the silo-effect of secrecy inter-agency officials use to commit crimes.

Likewise some percentage of informants (or likely informants) we identify should be
cultivated and 'moved up' in 'the organization'. They should believe they are moving
up, that they are "going deeper", while being exploited to misdirect the agencies and efforts of unlawful policies-of-suppression being committed against
political/social movements by illegitimate domestic federal police/intelligence
agencies.

In this way these agencies can be wielded against themselves and the very regime
and political rackets they have been co-opted into protecting.

This effect should be designed to maximize alienation by directing the coherence of the information to cause our short and midterm goals to be misidentified, to misidentify our
organizational charts, our money flows, our operational procedures, and everything else. The flow of information likewise should be designed to cause these suppressive and illegitimate agencies to misidentify bystander organizations as dissidents or extremists
as to maximize social instability and grievances in order to induce political upheaval
and economic instability. Likewise this should be used to damage politically,socially, and economic the credibility, stability, and public sentiment of their support networks,
political donors, NGOs, recruitment-flows to their organizations/campaigns/agencies/political parties/etc.

In the process their 'screening-force' of mass informants becomes our big tent movement
with the enemy right in reach, not for destruction, but for utilization toward a greater end.

This big-tent from here converts an offensive approach to a political/social/economic
"defense in depth", where the harder the regime's secret police attempt to shut down
populist movements, the more they harm their credibility, public support, and ultimately, their budgets. The goal is to reduce these agencies' budgets significantly, undermine public suppport for their pensions/bailouts, and increase political resistance to any further expansion of their workforce, capabilities, and legal powers.

THE FINAL PUSH

This is not where it stops though, because upon further insight, something else becomes
clear. This campaign, pushed far enough, long enough, itself manifests as the strategy
of the central position. You see, the informants, being the most easy to recognize, and
the most easily to interface with (the most reachable) are the outward face
of the illegitimate fourth (intelligence) and fifth branch (private sector) of the regime in the u.s.

Because they are the most visible, and lowest on the totem pole, by definition they are the weakest. By exploiting the central position created by the active persuit of
recruiting already-infiltrated or high-profile localized groups, while strictly
maintaining a public face and strictly legal operation, the atomization effect is
effectively neutralized.

In the central position strategy, a smaller force intercedes between two larger forces
before they can join together and defeat the one taking up the position between them. The smaller force then uses the relative advantage of its position to defeat the smaller of the two opponent forces. Extended to many forces, prioritized by size, this strategy converts to that of 'defeat in detail'.

In short, if this strategy is persued far enough, the u.s. regime will be forced into
two possible outcomes: a direct approach which will lead alienation of the populace and to large scale social unrest not unlike OWS or similar events. Or second,
they will be forced to dismantle the existing informant/social disruption networks,
leaving them dependant strictly on electronic control measures (Social media/media manipulation) which, with the failing public trust, and the failing dollar, will ultimately see a loss of control over populist movements entirely.

/legal bullshit/
Disclaimer (naturally): I am not a lawyer. This post, to the best of my intention and
knowledge, advocates no illegality. Consult a lawyer if you are unsure.

/End of legal bullshit/

This post is strictly for entertainment, and information-purposes only.

edit: 'assassination', god damn it.

Remember how a while back zelensky wanted assurance that putin wouldn't target him?

He could start by putting out a claim that the u.s. pressured him to ask for that assurance.
The immediate implication is the u.s. itself planned to hit Putin, but didn't want Putin killing their puppet in ukraine.
Zelensky could also threaten to put this claim out if the u.s. doesn't support him or make an effort to make it clear he wasn't behind it.

This pulls double duty because on the off-chance this was a false flag by russia itself, both russia and the u.s. have the opportunity to pin the attack on any nation they like in the face of a claim by zelensky.

And if zelensky DOES carry out the claim, he can choose which nation supposedly pressured him into asking for a no-hit assurance from putin, making that nation immediately suspect.

I'm mostly put this idea out there as a fuck you to D.C.

just like biden, trump works for obama. Obama works for the ADL. The ADL is the go-between for israel to lease america to china. Israel is a hostile proxy for britain, pretending to be a u.s. ally. Blackrock, and Vanguard, have their origins in the chicago school, atlanta georgia, and the CDC. These in turn are staffed by people that went through the approval process of yale and harvard, which are british intelligence cut outs. Most of wallstreet exists to loot america for china, on behalf of london. The eurodollar is a dollar-printing/currency fraud scheme used to strong arm the u.s when it fails to fall in line with these scams.

The british want to get america to force russia into the arms of china, forcing russia into an all out confrontation that leads to the annihilation of all three, russia, china, and america, while removing the pests that israel and judaism have become.

They'll kill 2-3 billion people to have their empire back.

Thats all you need to know.

London is the heart of the enemy. Switzerland is where they keep most of their money. The vatican is a large scale human trafficking operation (age of consent is 12-13 there and if you look at many billionaires, jewsih and non-jewish alike I'd be willing to bet they have dual citizenship with the vatican).

We're run by a global oligarchy, that while not a proper superstate, is composed of three major political and economic blocs covertly cooperating in a very tight-knit carefully orchestrated multigenerational political dynasty thats now fighting itself because its realized the debt scheme backed by oil is failing due to EROEI.

The three blocs are the north american syndicate, mostly as globalist military cartel with financialist elements (i.e. swift, nato, wef, etc) the british-lead zionist euro-sphere which is primarily a financial cartel, backed by five eyes, that engages in large scale economic looting/coercion. And finally we have the eurasia-asian sphere that primarily engages in large scale economic sabotage/theft and democide for demographic blockbusting.
Theres also an independent element, the religion cartels, run through italy, mostly old-world last generation intelligence, doing the same things as the other three, but at a less sophisticated level, we'll call them the old-world order.

Every bloc is aware of every other bloc, and engages in all the activities of the other bloc at some level or another, but each specializes as well. They are tightly interlocked, cooperation more than they compete (see the cooperation on covid across the globe), and their biggest threat is the demographic pyramid which drives boom-bust cycles and the organic breakup of empires, which these world powers have identified (unlike their predecessors) and tried to arrest or divert.

Their biggest threat is their own citizens, not the other blocs, and so each bloc is at constant war and in the planning or operational phase of actively and covertly genociding their own populations to 'manageable' (controllable) levels. These are multidecade plans, and the vehemency of their execution far exceeds any pretended competition between the blocs themselves.

We are the kulaks now, all of us in the middle classes and the poor, and we are at war with principalities and powers who mean to exterminate us.

The proof is in the pudding. If juror's were being selected or rejected, it would start
with checks on their background and political donation history.

That'd be pretty solid circumstantials for jury tampering.

Thats what it looks like.

When you cut through the endless doomporn. The 'alt-media' being flooded with predictions from glowies, and people who were associated with them in the past (navy vet talking heads, 'anonymous' sources, airforce guys), we see the same pattern that always ends the same:

Remain in crisis. Remain in stasis.

Thats their goal domestically.

As other things on the periphery, that are actually damaging go full throttle, like the abandonment of our borders and the torture
of political dissidents, and the disinformation produced by 'regulatory' agencies (mass censorship).

Whatever is happening in europe is meant to keep us distracted.

The regime is falling, it's massively losing credibility. They've lost control of the social-distraction narrative (yes, the regime itself pushed the lgbtq and in turn gave press to the parents-rights movement/anti-groomer). They did this intentionally to distract from the economic headwinds, the bank collapses, and bolster support for the right arm of the DNC (the GOP), knowing
none of these changes will affect the uniparty or the regime. Instead its blown up in their face, into full-blown boycotts
and radicalization of the public in general.

They're hoping by pushing the envelop as far as possible, they can 1. avoid a pushback exploding in their face domestically, 2. by agitating russia until russia does something big and giving justification to the regime to respond.

This is the u.s. federal regime acting desperate.

If I'm correct, then the charges against trump get dropped, he runs for office domestically, loses narrowly, is forced basically at gun point to endorse someone else who has "trump's blessing". And in 2028 they take us to war.

Good time as any for something to happen involving poland, and belarus.

That or 7 days after a new moon.

Which would be..today.