The who, the what, the where. Legit. Some real hot coffee.
Sorry to be cryptic goats.
Voat just wants the glowies to know that we know that you know we know--and what exactly it is we know.
And that this goat in particular figured it out, same way I figured out that russia would attack ukraine two weeks before when all the experts were adamant they wouldn't. The same way I figured out india would violate u.s. sanctions to trade with russia. The same way I figured out the u.s. and israel would launch an attack against iran three days before it happened.
edit: my question is why the fuck are the ****** helping america?
edit: beece wanted to point out that I wrote "russia would attack iran", which was a mistake on my part. Meant to write "russia would attack ukraine." Thanks beece.
[ - ] beece 1 point 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 22:08:20 ago (+1/-0)*
Wait, are you drinking again? This didn't happen: "...same way I figured out that russia would attack iran two weeks before when all the experts were adamant they wouldn't. "
Russia has not attacked iran for many many years. Was the last time 1941? Russia was allied with the Nazis, although Britan wanted their enemy, Russia, to take over all of Poland who was then Britans ally. No one has explained that yet.
[ - ] prototype [op] 1 point 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 22:50:23 ago (+1/-0)
Wait, are you drinking again? This didn't happen:
That definitely didn't happen, you're right. Meant to say russia attacked ukraine, the u.s. and israel attacked iran. Been awake going on 24 hours now. Thanks for the correction.
Post a single submission where you "figured something out" in advance. Here's one of your oh-so-insightful submissions, for example: "Chatter that something serious is going down in the next 24-48 hours."
Post a single submission where you "figured something out" in advance.
The iran thing did happen. Lot of the others were on poal and old voat.
And I wouldn't take someone serious if someone isn't willing to admit when they're wrong. Admission isn't a fault, its a virtue. You got yourself backward chrimony.
Besides, it doesn't matter, because in the next few months when the attacks in the u.s. happen, the ones I predicted, you won't need any proof.
May 26th is the earliest date I see anything happening at the moment. I predicted that date, four months out.
And now half the alt-sphere started predicting end-of-may early june for something happening. The odds are still stacked against it, but the risks are elevated significantly.
I'm not here to convince you. If you watch my account long enough, you'll slowly go from saying "this guy is a fucking schizo!" to "Wait a minute..how did he know."
Part of it I think was some covert group, I call the Iranian Laundry, essentially laundering information through accidental leaks posted across the alt-media. If you're reading a LOT of news, and collating competing narratives, certain details start to stand out. Thats the gist of it.
Your prediction: "Elements of the u.s. will drop a nuclear weapon on a major u.s. city before or on May 26th"
What you claimed was the successful fulfillment: Drone strikes inside Iran.
Where's the nuke on a US city, dude?
May 26th is the earliest date I see anything happening at the moment.
No, you predicted BY May 26th back in January. You have two days left, and we both know it ain't gonna happen. I asked for a single documented success, and the best you came up with is a huge miss with something tangentially happening in Iran.
and the best you came up with is a huge miss with something tangentially happening in Iran.
Thats fair, but the iran thing was important too.
You may not like that I'm not always right, but oh well. If its part of the prediction and I get it right, what you should be examining is what reasoning lead to the conclusion. If I get it wrong, that helps update the model as well and then it is important to look at, okay, what assumptions were faulty, what information lead to the wrong baselines? Etc.
The point is to get better with time, and with or without evidence long since lost to old voat/poal, I have.
The other issue is, as prediction quality improves, people analysis systems, models, and predicting outcomes, tend to 'flatten' the range of their expected outcomes, so you end up asking how do I improve quality, without losing sight of events that are outliers like black swans?
An attack on Iran (or Turkey) was supposed to be in response to a nuke, and supposed to force Russia into a multifront war, so this can't just be a drone strike in Iran, it would be an all out war. Iran is a semi-regular target by Israel/US for limited strikes like this.
You may not like that I'm not always right
Dude, you've been at this for years. I asked for your best shot, and this is what I get in return. You are NEVER right, and your analysis is worthless.
An attack on Iran (or Turkey) was supposed to be in response to a nuke,
Clarify for me, where I wrote the attack on turkey or iran would be because of an attack on the u.s. Last I checked the turkey/iran prediction was part of a larger body of predictions, not contingent.
Dude, you've been at this for years. I asked for your best shot, and this is what I get in return.
You wouldn't be satisfied if I gave the exact date of the next pearl harbor. Stow your shit and quit your whining.
If you have a link to the full post, give it. Regardless, you say, "force russia into a multifront war", so explain how a drone strike in Iran achieves this, when it's the kind of event that has happened several times in the past.
You wouldn't be satisfied if I gave the exact date of the next pearl harbor.
Puh-lease. You've been at this for years, and when I asked for your best shot, this is what I get in return.
^^^HAHAHAHAHA, the kike tries to hard to discredit people from actually noticing
You literally took a misspeaking, which anyone understands, and pretend like it was "totally what you meant to say"
You see kike filth, your behavior outs you, your mentality outs you online, I don't need to see your ugly hook nose, I can spot you through the screen faggot
kike chrimony hates it when White people are proven to be anything other then racist bigots lmfao hahahahahaha...predicting skills are suppose to be the kikes only ally in this war against Whites...predicting behavior by dictating responses and thoughts
Now the kike filth is crying because nothing they are trying is stopping Aryans from noticing kikes, in fact, the more they do the faster Aryans notice
They fail to realize we have hit critical mass and now the whining and crying will be glorious...biblical even.
Hilarious that you latch onto any little "deception" and try to call it out while deceiving us about your own ethnic heritage and purpose for being here
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 2 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 21:09:00 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 1 point 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 22:08:20 ago (+1/-0)*
Russia has not attacked iran for many many years. Was the last time 1941? Russia was allied with the Nazis, although Britan wanted their enemy, Russia, to take over all of Poland who was then Britans ally. No one has explained that yet.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 1 point 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 22:50:23 ago (+1/-0)
That definitely didn't happen, you're right. Meant to say russia attacked ukraine, the u.s. and israel attacked iran.
Been awake going on 24 hours now. Thanks for the correction.
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 0 points 11 monthsMay 25, 2023 15:22:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 11 monthsMay 24, 2023 00:30:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 11 monthsMay 26, 2023 06:53:48 ago (+0/-0)
just shut your filthy inferior mouth and fuck off back to israel
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 22:28:01 ago (+0/-0)
https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=63f49480b98cd
And even you admitted, "edit: Nothing happened."
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 22:48:28 ago (+0/-0)
The iran thing did happen. Lot of the others were on poal and old voat.
And I wouldn't take someone serious if someone isn't willing to admit when they're wrong. Admission isn't a fault, its a virtue. You got yourself backward chrimony.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 23:00:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 23:29:25 ago (+0/-0)*
Besides, it doesn't matter, because in the next few months when the attacks in the u.s. happen, the ones I predicted, you won't need any proof.
May 26th is the earliest date I see anything happening at the moment.
I predicted that date, four months out.
And now half the alt-sphere started predicting end-of-may early june for something happening.
The odds are still stacked against it, but the risks are elevated significantly.
I'm not here to convince you. If you watch my account long enough, you'll slowly go from saying "this guy is a fucking schizo!" to "Wait a minute..how did he know."
Part of it I think was some covert group, I call the Iranian Laundry, essentially laundering information through accidental leaks posted across the alt-media. If you're reading a LOT of news, and collating competing narratives, certain details start to stand out. Thats the gist of it.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 11 monthsMay 24, 2023 00:37:26 ago (+0/-0)
Your prediction: "Elements of the u.s. will drop a nuclear weapon on a major u.s. city before or on May 26th"
What you claimed was the successful fulfillment: Drone strikes inside Iran.
Where's the nuke on a US city, dude?
No, you predicted BY May 26th back in January. You have two days left, and we both know it ain't gonna happen. I asked for a single documented success, and the best you came up with is a huge miss with something tangentially happening in Iran.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 25, 2023 22:18:00 ago (+0/-0)
Thats fair, but the iran thing was important too.
You may not like that I'm not always right, but oh well. If its part of the prediction and I get it right, what you should be examining is what reasoning lead to the conclusion. If I get it wrong, that helps update the model as well and then it is important to look at, okay, what assumptions were faulty, what information lead to the wrong baselines? Etc.
The point is to get better with time, and with or without evidence long since lost to old voat/poal, I have.
The other issue is, as prediction quality improves, people analysis systems, models, and predicting outcomes, tend to 'flatten' the range of their expected outcomes, so you end up asking how do I improve quality, without losing sight of events that are outliers like black swans?
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 11 monthsMay 25, 2023 23:44:26 ago (+0/-0)
An attack on Iran (or Turkey) was supposed to be in response to a nuke, and supposed to force Russia into a multifront war, so this can't just be a drone strike in Iran, it would be an all out war. Iran is a semi-regular target by Israel/US for limited strikes like this.
Dude, you've been at this for years. I asked for your best shot, and this is what I get in return. You are NEVER right, and your analysis is worthless.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype [op] 0 points 11 monthsMay 26, 2023 03:09:13 ago (+0/-0)
Clarify for me, where I wrote the attack on turkey or iran would be because of an attack on the u.s. Last I checked the turkey/iran prediction was part of a larger body of predictions, not contingent.
You wouldn't be satisfied if I gave the exact date of the next pearl harbor. Stow your shit and quit your whining.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 0 points 11 monthsMay 26, 2023 06:06:08 ago (+0/-0)
I'm basing it off the image YOU linked: https://files.catbox.moe/26kfqy.png
If you have a link to the full post, give it. Regardless, you say, "force russia into a multifront war", so explain how a drone strike in Iran achieves this, when it's the kind of event that has happened several times in the past.
Puh-lease. You've been at this for years, and when I asked for your best shot, this is what I get in return.
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 11 monthsMay 26, 2023 06:57:10 ago (+0/-0)
You literally took a misspeaking, which anyone understands, and pretend like it was "totally what you meant to say"
You see kike filth, your behavior outs you, your mentality outs you online, I don't need to see your ugly hook nose, I can spot you through the screen faggot
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 11 monthsMay 26, 2023 06:55:52 ago (+0/-0)
Now the kike filth is crying because nothing they are trying is stopping Aryans from noticing kikes, in fact, the more they do the faster Aryans notice
They fail to realize we have hit critical mass and now the whining and crying will be glorious...biblical even.
Hilarious that you latch onto any little "deception" and try to call it out while deceiving us about your own ethnic heritage and purpose for being here
shut the fuck up untermench inferior kike filth
[ + ] drstrangegub
[ - ] drstrangegub 0 points 11 monthsMay 23, 2023 21:59:23 ago (+0/-0)