Sign into an existing account

Smoke Screen To Big Tent. Big Tent To Defense In Depth. Defense In Depth To Central Position:

The premise is simple: in an environment of pervasive social/economic/political suppression, through large scale opaque organizations (letter agencies, NGOs),
this situation resembles that of the central position strategy.
And while this may seem hopeless, in a diffuse environment, this becomes
a degenerate approach under deliberate counter-effort.
What would otherwise be outposts are reduced to screening forces.

Screening forces are easily broken, and easily demoralized. Under tight recon
requirements, vis-a-vis the sociological/political/economic equivalent of guerillas,
home field advantage converts pensioned and little-motivated 'dynamic' methodologies
into essentially static forces. Strategy for the regime, here, becomes a sort of noose
of diminishing returns, the loss of which accelerates with well-directed opposition.

What is advanced is a simple idea - all the organizations infiltrated? All the social
movements spied on? All the political groups monitored, threatened, entrapped, and
shutdown? These are numerous, many thousands of them exist locally across
the territories of the illegitimate u.s. regime.

It should be imperative to approach these groups, to recruit them, minimally.
The goal is to have them keep their ears to the ground, get them to assess their
available resources, and put them on minimal tasks.
This may seem counter-intuitive, but what is does is this:

1. decisively lowers the barrier to recruitment
2. minimizes the legal attack surface regime agencies use against populist movements.
3. provides a seductively-simple on-ramp for new and existing organizations and their
increasing involvement
And finally
4. embeds regime secret police directly in the movement.

Wait what? Thats right, in this case, number four is fact, desirable.

Under the correct conditions, the greatest asset of the u.s. regime is in fact its
most dangerous achilles heel. It is startling once you see it for what it is.
If you look at reports for example, of the proud boys, and various militias over
the last twenty-thirty years, the regime's secret police went so far as to embed
agents in groups as little as three or four people. The lack of "terrorism" in
the u.s. and the west is so paltry in comparison, we can only conclude these
behaviors are widespread policies that exist, not to prevent violence or illegal
action, but to act as nothing more than unlawful outright suppression measures against
things such as populist movements, boycotts, general strikes, and counter-political
movements to a government that has become wholly unresponsive, and utterly unaccountable
at any level whatsoever.

Therefore, why would it become desirable to provoke the maintenance, and even
intensification of these anti-natal and anti-populist policies?

Again, under the correct conditions, and with the correct counter-strategy, which
I will identify here, these 'embedded forces' of informants throughout american society,
become a resource and effective opportunity for shutting down the regime.
For example, one estimate puts the DOD's informant network
at 70k+, while the FBI employs an estimated 20-30K paid full and part time informants,
many even authorized to commit serious crimes, even purjury.

How can this geopolitical landscape be utilized to shutdown the regime in the u.s.?

THE BASICS

The existing policies of suppression, large-scale informant networks, and legal warfare
against organic organized movements, atomize the social, political, and economic landscape. This is inarguable. The utilization of silo-ing today allows high level
actors within the alphabet agencies (and associated NGOs) to, if they so desired,
kill, maim, coerce, threaten, blackmail, frame, bribe, or effectively rendition
anyone who opposes them--whether or not they do these things is another matter,
though ample evidence, enough to indict countless NGOs and alphabet agencies, exists
for anyone that doen't have their blinders on. Likewise the secretive nature
and the silo-design of information operations is such that wherever large scale
RICO-style crimes are (or could be) engaged in by these very agencies, high-level
and mid-level bureaucrats and officials no longer even need to throw up a smoke screen
after the fact in order to hide the intention of these policies, and programs from
lower level officials and agents. No, the silo system and state secrets guarantees that no one within the three letters who is low on the totem pole will even know of
such crimes to begin with, and if they ever do become so much as suspicious, they
are easily let go, or like any other sufficiently dangerous dissidents in the u.s., silenced in one manner or another.

But with every cloud, a silver lining. The very same atomization of society, reminiscent
if not in symbol and name, than in operation, to east germany under the communists--
that atomization results in something startling.

The state is spread startlingly thin. This would not be a problem if not for
the strategy of the 'central position' which they employed in the first space.
Into this gap enters a 'dead territory', that which is only superficially monitorable.
The regime is overwhelmed with information, so much so that it is reduced almost to noise.
The consequence is they are paralyzed about what to do.

This manifests in one of two approaches: They can ignore a great deal of it, and in the past they did. Or they can tamp down on dissent, increase division, apply further
secret police to ever greater suppression campaigns, and resort to even more
intense censorship of political, economic, social and religious thought, organization,
and action.

They have recently adopted the latter approach.

Because of this alienation in society increase.

The greatest initial cost of resisting an illegitimate and out of control regime is simply
man power.

The solution therefore is to start with recruiting not individuals, but entire small groups. The central positions 'screening' force of informants now becomes a system
by which they are pinned in place to one course and one outcome--the increasing irrelevance and exposure of their methods.

With each organization, in each area of operation, that is recruited, you will no doubt
take on more and more part time, and full time informants.

However because of the loose affiliation, strictly legal mission orders/activities given to each group, and limited contact, every group is
1. disposable
2. can quickly be disaffiliated
3. only dependent on a single contact, which can cut off contact
4. can be fed both true information to further the effectiveness of their participation, and false information which eventually feeds back to the regime and hampers their
efforts signficantly.

Here signficant effort is put into identifying informants, and rather than kicking them out, recruiting them into busy-work that misleads about organizational goals, keeps them busy, wastes resources, solicits resources from the state according to their policy
of providing resources to organizations they intend to setup/destroy--and in the process
those resources are instead allocated to legitimate means thus wasting agency budgets
and discrediting and demoralizing them.
Ideally this would look like them providing for example, money for weapons (which they intend to provide, talk about, or plant, not unlike they did with some J6 and proud boys), only for this to be exposed veritas style, or for this to be reported to the IRS or any other agency that will listen at all, exploiting inter-party rivalries for maximum exposure, such that it breaks the silo-effect of secrecy inter-agency officials use to commit crimes.

Likewise some percentage of informants (or likely informants) we identify should be
cultivated and 'moved up' in 'the organization'. They should believe they are moving
up, that they are "going deeper", while being exploited to misdirect the agencies and efforts of unlawful policies-of-suppression being committed against
political/social movements by illegitimate domestic federal police/intelligence
agencies.

In this way these agencies can be wielded against themselves and the very regime
and political rackets they have been co-opted into protecting.

This effect should be designed to maximize alienation by directing the coherence of the information to cause our short and midterm goals to be misidentified, to misidentify our
organizational charts, our money flows, our operational procedures, and everything else. The flow of information likewise should be designed to cause these suppressive and illegitimate agencies to misidentify bystander organizations as dissidents or extremists
as to maximize social instability and grievances in order to induce political upheaval
and economic instability. Likewise this should be used to damage politically,socially, and economic the credibility, stability, and public sentiment of their support networks,
political donors, NGOs, recruitment-flows to their organizations/campaigns/agencies/political parties/etc.

In the process their 'screening-force' of mass informants becomes our big tent movement
with the enemy right in reach, not for destruction, but for utilization toward a greater end.

This big-tent from here converts an offensive approach to a political/social/economic
"defense in depth", where the harder the regime's secret police attempt to shut down
populist movements, the more they harm their credibility, public support, and ultimately, their budgets. The goal is to reduce these agencies' budgets significantly, undermine public suppport for their pensions/bailouts, and increase political resistance to any further expansion of their workforce, capabilities, and legal powers.

THE FINAL PUSH

This is not where it stops though, because upon further insight, something else becomes
clear. This campaign, pushed far enough, long enough, itself manifests as the strategy
of the central position. You see, the informants, being the most easy to recognize, and
the most easily to interface with (the most reachable) are the outward face
of the illegitimate fourth (intelligence) and fifth branch (private sector) of the regime in the u.s.

Because they are the most visible, and lowest on the totem pole, by definition they are the weakest. By exploiting the central position created by the active persuit of
recruiting already-infiltrated or high-profile localized groups, while strictly
maintaining a public face and strictly legal operation, the atomization effect is
effectively neutralized.

In the central position strategy, a smaller force intercedes between two larger forces
before they can join together and defeat the one taking up the position between them. The smaller force then uses the relative advantage of its position to defeat the smaller of the two opponent forces. Extended to many forces, prioritized by size, this strategy converts to that of 'defeat in detail'.

In short, if this strategy is persued far enough, the u.s. regime will be forced into
two possible outcomes: a direct approach which will lead alienation of the populace and to large scale social unrest not unlike OWS or similar events. Or second,
they will be forced to dismantle the existing informant/social disruption networks,
leaving them dependant strictly on electronic control measures (Social media/media manipulation) which, with the failing public trust, and the failing dollar, will ultimately see a loss of control over populist movements entirely.

/legal bullshit/
Disclaimer (naturally): I am not a lawyer. This post, to the best of my intention and
knowledge, advocates no illegality. Consult a lawyer if you are unsure.

/End of legal bullshit/

This post is strictly for entertainment, and information-purposes only.