Sign into an existing account

A man is on trial for a hate crime. Maybe it's for something minor like vandalism or it could be manslaughter. As part of his defense, he references James Fields.

"James Fields was sentenced to 419 years for the crime of hating niggers. I am facing a comparable sentence today. 419 minutes is a tiny sliver of time in comparison. So allow me this chance. 419 minutes of your time to make the case for why you should hate niggers too."

Man goes on the most epic of rants. During one of the recesses, the nigger on the jury has a meltdown. At a few points during his rants, he's interrupted about his other statements made before the trial, the ones that has him on trial for hate crimes.

At the end of his 419 minutes, "And that is just the tip of the iceberg. I could do 419 hours about jews."

https://youtube.com/shorts/f3EAr7BqZJM

This guy is dying of Parkinson's and it's kind of living out in the wild in his last days and is invited everybody to watch his progress as he declines.

He has a good attitude and seems like a good guy.

https://youtube.com/shorts/MXFPyPW7eQ4

Anyone know what city this was

Today when you come across a black person that seems angry, I want you to ask them...to look inward.

You may have other things to say to them, but start with the words, "Look inward." Can you do that for me? This also works for any non-Whites.

We are in a real transition with the use the meaning and the connotation of the word nazi.

Young people are waking up and realizing that they may have been the good guys. And so it used to kind of be fun and effective to say progressives are Nazis to try to imply they were cracking down on Free speech etc etc which was of course the common held belief about what's Nazis were for the past 20 years. But now people are realizing Nazis were probably the good guys and we're fighting for good things like getting rid of Jewish debt and promoting families so this is no longer an effective tactic.

You see the confusion in the word Nazis when it's used in relationship to Ukraine some people like to cause alinsky's troops Nazis when zelensky is a Jew and they're trying to imply that he's the bad guy because his troops are Nazis and Putin falls into this trap sometimes but the problem is the Nazis fought against the Jews and zelinsky's a Jew and all the murderous rampage and killing of a hole generation of Ukrainian Christians as being led by Jews not nazis. Now they may have hired some sons and grandsons of former Nazis or people who like to put Nazi symbols on their arm but the Jews apparently really love the idea of using his Jewish money to hire people who dressed up as Nazis and then persecuted christians.

The long and the short of it is remember that the word Nazi is now starting to come out good guy and so don't fall into the trap of using the term Nazi as a bad guy. Now a lot of you would never do that here anyway but some of us or some people who are trying to outthink the progressives and use their own terminology against them we're doing it and it's just not going to work much longer. It's just confusing.

Dad and continue to promote them as the good guys they actually were such as the ability to have a one man working family instead of women in men both having to suffer and work for the Jew. I think the answer is to call the progressives what they really are which is stalling as Jewish communists. And you need to educate the young people that the stallingness were much worse murderers than even the Fable about Nazis.

All communism is Jewish.

Merrick Garland is head of our justice department and Jewish and has locked up white Christians like you.

Victoria nuland is Jewish and overthrew the elected government of Ukraine to install a Jew who got them into a war with Russia that has now killed a whole generation of Ukrainian Christians. That was the goal.

China's communist revolution was started by American Jews Rosenfeld and rittenburg and (the other guy I can't remember now) who created Mao and enslaved a nation.



Don't commit crimes while holding up signs.

But remember anti begging laws do not mean you can't hold up messages in the same place like at intersections.

Body sized posters allow the space.

But we still have this right and it's the fastest way to inform people.


More sign suggestions.

Why is so much of Biden's cabinet Jewish?

Jews enslaved black people and owned the biggest slave ships and ran the slave auction houses (I personally think this is the most powerful information to stop the Jewish division of whites and blacks.)


Put other ideas in comnents

Don't hold up swastikas or Nazi flags while doing it.

Look nice.

Don't give people an excuse to ignore focusing on the message of the sign.


An absolutely great idea would be; f you could get college kids of all colors shapes and sizes to hold up signs together. Kids say they want to escape oppression and get involved? Educate them. Organize them. If they see other kind D's doing it they will think it's the right thing (it is) and do it.

Remember everything college kids are doing now was taught to them and they blindly followed. They will follow this truth even more.

Imagine a purple haired angry fat girl holding up one of these signs. Imagine a black person. Go to the black college organizations. See if you can't get some involved.

I asked ChatGPT how many jews were in the holobunga camps when they were liberated using the number of survivors alive today as a reference point. Naturally I didn't state it like that. tl;dr, ChatGPT estimates there were 4.9 Million jews liberated from the camps. Here's the details:

Me:
An event happened 80 years ago. There are 245,000 people alive today that were participating in that event. How many people can we estimate to have participated in the original event 80 years ago? Include all ages. We can assume they are average Europeans for the purpose of life expectancy. Explain your answer including assumptions.

ChatGPT said:
To estimate the number of participants in the event that took place 80 years ago, we need to account for survival rates over time based on life expectancy. Since we assume the participants were average Europeans, we will use European life expectancy data to guide our calculations.

Step 1: Understanding Mortality Rates
The average life expectancy in Europe today is around 78–82 years.
Life expectancy in the early 20th century was lower, but for simplicity, we'll assume that at the time of the event, participants had a similar long-term survival pattern.
Mortality rates increase with age, so younger participants in the event would have had a better chance of surviving to today.
Step 2: Survival Rates by Age Group
We assume the participants in the event were a mix of ages, from infants to elderly individuals. Using life tables (mortality rates per age group), a rough estimate of survival rates to today (from 80 years ago) can be made:

Age in Event Survival Rate to Today (%)
0 (newborns) ~3%
10 years ~6%
20 years ~10%
30 years ~20%
40 years ~12%
50 years ~5%
60+ years ~1% or lower
The survival rates are lower for older participants at the time of the event, with most centenarians today having been very young at the time.

Step 3: Backward Estimation
If 245,000 people from the original event are still alive today, we work backward by estimating what percentage of participants survived.

A reasonable weighted average survival rate across all age groups would be around 5–10%, considering that a large portion of the original population consisted of young and middle-aged adults.

Using this assumption:

Original Participants
≈
Current Survivors
Survival Rate
Original Participants≈
Survival Rate
Current Survivors
​

Using a 7% survival rate as a reasonable midrange estimate:

245
,
000
0.07
≈
3.5
 million participants
0.07
245,000
​
≈3.5 million participants
Final Estimate
Thus, we estimate that about 3 to 4 million people originally participated in the event 80 years ago.

Key Assumptions
Participants were of average European life expectancy.
Survival rates are derived from historical and modern life tables.
A weighted average survival rate of 7% was used, balancing younger and older age groups.
The event had participants of all ages, but younger individuals were more likely to survive to today.
Would you like a more precise breakdown or alternative calculations?

Me:
5% survival rate for 50 year olds is unreasonable they would be 130 years old! Also 12% survival rate for 40 year olds is unreasonable. They would be 120 years old! Please reconsider your survival rate estimates.

ChatGPT said:
You're absolutely right—my initial survival rate estimates for older participants were too high. Let's refine the analysis with more realistic assumptions based on mortality data.

Revised Survival Rate Estimations
We will assume that:

Participants were of all ages, from infants to elderly.
European life expectancy trends apply.
Survival rates decline significantly with age.
A reasonable survival rate for different age groups at the time of the event (80 years ago):

Age in Event Survival Rate to Today (%) Current Age
0 (newborns) ~5–7% 80
10 years old ~10–15% 90
20 years old ~6–8% 100
30 years old ~2–3% 110
40 years old ~0.5% 120
50+ years old Effectively 0% 130+
People who were 50 or older at the event (now 130+) are essentially non-existent today.
Those who were 40 at the time (~120 today) have near-zero survival.
The vast majority of living participants today were likely children, teenagers, or young adults at the time.
Step 2: Backward Estimation
We now assume that 245,000 people alive today primarily come from age groups that had reasonable survival rates.

Weighted Average Survival Rate
Most of today's survivors were likely between 0–30 years old at the time. Let’s take an overall survival rate of ~5%, assuming that:

Children (0–10) had the highest survival (7–10%).
Young adults (20s) had moderate survival (6–8%).
Older adults (30+) had much lower survival (~2% or less).
Revised Calculation
Original Participants
≈
Current Survivors
Survival Rate
Original Participants≈
Survival Rate
Current Survivors
​

Using an overall survival rate of 5%:

245
,
000
0.05
=
4.9
 million participants
0.05
245,000
​
=4.9 million participants
Final Estimate
We estimate that around 4.5 to 5.5 million people originally participated in the event.

This range is based on:

Realistic survival rates considering age at the time.
The fact that most of today's survivors were young at the time.
A weighted survival rate of ~5%.
Would you like further refinements or considerations?