Sign into an existing account

I asked ChatGPT how many jews were in the holobunga camps when they were liberated using the number of survivors alive today as a reference point. Naturally I didn't state it like that. tl;dr, ChatGPT estimates there were 4.9 Million jews liberated from the camps. Here's the details:

Me:
An event happened 80 years ago. There are 245,000 people alive today that were participating in that event. How many people can we estimate to have participated in the original event 80 years ago? Include all ages. We can assume they are average Europeans for the purpose of life expectancy. Explain your answer including assumptions.

ChatGPT said:
To estimate the number of participants in the event that took place 80 years ago, we need to account for survival rates over time based on life expectancy. Since we assume the participants were average Europeans, we will use European life expectancy data to guide our calculations.

Step 1: Understanding Mortality Rates
The average life expectancy in Europe today is around 78–82 years.
Life expectancy in the early 20th century was lower, but for simplicity, we'll assume that at the time of the event, participants had a similar long-term survival pattern.
Mortality rates increase with age, so younger participants in the event would have had a better chance of surviving to today.
Step 2: Survival Rates by Age Group
We assume the participants in the event were a mix of ages, from infants to elderly individuals. Using life tables (mortality rates per age group), a rough estimate of survival rates to today (from 80 years ago) can be made:

Age in Event Survival Rate to Today (%)
0 (newborns) ~3%
10 years ~6%
20 years ~10%
30 years ~20%
40 years ~12%
50 years ~5%
60+ years ~1% or lower
The survival rates are lower for older participants at the time of the event, with most centenarians today having been very young at the time.

Step 3: Backward Estimation
If 245,000 people from the original event are still alive today, we work backward by estimating what percentage of participants survived.

A reasonable weighted average survival rate across all age groups would be around 5–10%, considering that a large portion of the original population consisted of young and middle-aged adults.

Using this assumption:

Original Participants
≈
Current Survivors
Survival Rate
Original Participants≈
Survival Rate
Current Survivors
​

Using a 7% survival rate as a reasonable midrange estimate:

245
,
000
0.07
≈
3.5
 million participants
0.07
245,000
​
≈3.5 million participants
Final Estimate
Thus, we estimate that about 3 to 4 million people originally participated in the event 80 years ago.

Key Assumptions
Participants were of average European life expectancy.
Survival rates are derived from historical and modern life tables.
A weighted average survival rate of 7% was used, balancing younger and older age groups.
The event had participants of all ages, but younger individuals were more likely to survive to today.
Would you like a more precise breakdown or alternative calculations?

Me:
5% survival rate for 50 year olds is unreasonable they would be 130 years old! Also 12% survival rate for 40 year olds is unreasonable. They would be 120 years old! Please reconsider your survival rate estimates.

ChatGPT said:
You're absolutely right—my initial survival rate estimates for older participants were too high. Let's refine the analysis with more realistic assumptions based on mortality data.

Revised Survival Rate Estimations
We will assume that:

Participants were of all ages, from infants to elderly.
European life expectancy trends apply.
Survival rates decline significantly with age.
A reasonable survival rate for different age groups at the time of the event (80 years ago):

Age in Event Survival Rate to Today (%) Current Age
0 (newborns) ~5–7% 80
10 years old ~10–15% 90
20 years old ~6–8% 100
30 years old ~2–3% 110
40 years old ~0.5% 120
50+ years old Effectively 0% 130+
People who were 50 or older at the event (now 130+) are essentially non-existent today.
Those who were 40 at the time (~120 today) have near-zero survival.
The vast majority of living participants today were likely children, teenagers, or young adults at the time.
Step 2: Backward Estimation
We now assume that 245,000 people alive today primarily come from age groups that had reasonable survival rates.

Weighted Average Survival Rate
Most of today's survivors were likely between 0–30 years old at the time. Let’s take an overall survival rate of ~5%, assuming that:

Children (0–10) had the highest survival (7–10%).
Young adults (20s) had moderate survival (6–8%).
Older adults (30+) had much lower survival (~2% or less).
Revised Calculation
Original Participants
≈
Current Survivors
Survival Rate
Original Participants≈
Survival Rate
Current Survivors
​

Using an overall survival rate of 5%:

245
,
000
0.05
=
4.9
 million participants
0.05
245,000
​
=4.9 million participants
Final Estimate
We estimate that around 4.5 to 5.5 million people originally participated in the event.

This range is based on:

Realistic survival rates considering age at the time.
The fact that most of today's survivors were young at the time.
A weighted survival rate of ~5%.
Would you like further refinements or considerations?

And it's fucking hilarious! They just want to KILL!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/spain/video-3289999/Video-Moment-Princess-Leonor-overlooked-Royal-Palace-reception.html

Gotta be better stuff there than Megan.

Netflix has announced they will be doing a movie about this religious fictitional character with the lead character to be played by Chris Rock . The movie which is set to be released in February 25 is expected to be a big hit with Chris set to be pit against another screen legend Dwayne Johnson . The Rock vs Rock with nothing but a Rock .

Jews around the world will love seeing the story of their hero portrayed in this comedy movie as a queer bi polar with tourettes .

Dwayne Johnson adds an element rarely seen in his other movies by playing the role of a openly gay bdsm bully who has a history of sodomizing his defeated opponents.

https://m.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-804047?utm_source=00e24904e6bc54c4c5dd4a4f8e88b88f35&utm_medium=jpostbow&utm_campaign=0001fb1811226f5d67e57900ca60a674c3&utm_adtitle=British+Rock+Legend+Eric+Clapton+Drops+Truth+Bomb%3A+Israel+Runs+the+Wor&dicbo=v4-rmR2MZ1-1075783007

Link is to the Jerusalem Post. I don't know how to change that.

Basically says that Eric Clapton claims Israel runs the world. Basically, he is coming at it from the angle of a liberal that supports Palestine. But maybe he will wake up some fans to realizing jews control America and much of the West, if not the world.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qPoaX3vn7R8

There's a picture late in the video of him as her father was a picture earlier in the video of what looks like him as a woman standing next to her mother at 4:39. And in the video at one point they say her parents Alice and Cindy and Cindy apparently is the dark-haired real woman.

Of course the premise of the whole video which is obviously AI narrated and stupid just for clicks is that this young girl who wore extremely sexualized skimpy bikinis to get attention somehow got upset when she got attention

Anyway it's just sort of a whatever happened to kind of a video because that girl's photo sure went around the internet like crazy when it was snapped.

She's a beautiful combination of that old flashdance star Jennifer beals and AOC and some other attractive women. In fact sometimes you look at her face and it almost looks like an AI mashup of some other beautiful dark haired Stars.



But this ai narration is just the worst kind of filler text made just to extend the video length for more view minutes while they show pictures. This channel does this always.