I considered just buggering off without saying anything, but for the past 3 years this has been my main forum, and before that Voat (Poal was just a layover). There are a lot of people who I wonder about that don't hang around anymore.
I don't want anybody begging me to stay. This is a goodbye. You don't give a fuck? Fine, it's not for you.
Wonderful, now I only need another 1,845 upvotes before I can downvote again. Because it's the Internet: that's sarcasm.
Instead of obsessing over downvote ratios, how about you just leave it the way it was?
Alternatively, allow only a certain # of downvotes per day. That would take care of your bot problem, and also limit the damage by anybody that wants to target a particular user. I suggested this many moons ago.
> jews in general support pedophillia. I don't recall these other alts spamming the same Ryden material that Blumen did
Only ONE person on the site would ever bring up Mark Ryden.
> Blumen didn't seem like a guy smart or resourceful enough to figure out how to implement bots
Even the flattard McNasty claimed to have worked as a 3D animator. Writing some basic scripts isn't genius level. Or you can even pay somebody to figure it out for you.
> Then again, you think DYB is FKH,
I laid out the evidence which you choose to ignore. Just "cohencidences", right?
> which is laughable because DYB has taken part in livechats and proven otherwise.
What, voice chats? Doesn't prove shit. Lots of people in Israel speak English. Plenty of people living in Israel started out living in the US or elsewhere. Even a video wouldn't prove anything, as realistic avatars are a thing now.
> A lot of goats are shouting "Blumen", but I don't think so.
These troll accounts came shorty after (((blume))) was banned. These accounts promoted pedophilia, including the nude child-painting artist Mark Ryden. And only (((blume))) promoted that pedo here.
"First of all, much of the tech to go to the moon the first time was built only for that purpose, so when you abandon that project for decades, you have to rebuild all the tech. Second, we spent like 10x more going to the moon the first time in a race against Kennedy's end of the decade deadline, and against the Soviets. There's no rush now, and no correspondingly huge budget. Third, the mission parameters have changed. They're not just repeating what was done in the Apollo missions. And of course there's all the modern diversity bullshit, more bureaucracy, etc."
And:
"Also, plenty of telemetry data still exists, it's just that having lost the tape with the higher resolution Apollo 11 landing on it gets the hoaxtards all excited, and then they inflate their claims into 'everything was destroyed'."
> You should be able to downvote what you want, but targeting a user is lame. Just block them.
I downvote what I disagree with. What is the problem? I'm not trawling through somebody's history to spam them with downvotes.
My votes: 17463 (+11946/-5517). Now to meet your new rule before I can downvote again, I would have to upvote approximately another 10,000 times. Fuck that. If I wanted stupid Poal bullshit, I would have stayed at Poal. I'm just going to stop voting altogether.
> No fucking way we went 6 times with 1960s tech and we can't easily go now.
You're a retard, so you don't know what is easy or not. First of all, much of the tech to go to the moon the first time was built only for that purpose, so when you abandon that project for decades, you have to rebuild all the tech. Second, we spent like 10x more going to the moon the first time in a race against Kennedy's end of the decade deadline, and against the Soviets. There's no rush now, and no correspondingly huge budget. Third, the mission parameters have changed. They're not just repeating what was done in the Apollo missions. And of course there's all the modern diversity bullshit, more bureaucracy, etc.
> We absolute wouldn't have taken a god damn buggy and golf club you fucking idiot.
Why not, retard? The buggy was good for driving around instead of walking to different areas, and the golf club was just a publicity stunt. In the grand scheme of things, does it matter? "Oh, we didn't go to the moon because they brought a golf club on one trip." Retard logic.
> And now the final straw look into the 3 body problem. There is no math to get to the moon it's why they made up the destruction of the telemetry data it was not possible still is not possible.
Lulz. You're a retard. You don't understand physics or the 3 body problem. The math to get to the moon was easy. Also, plenty of telemetry data still exists, it's just that having lost the tape with the higher resolution Apollo 11 landing on it gets the hoaxtards all excited, and then they inflate their claims into "everything was destroyed".
> I said you did, because you are nigger brained double digit IQ.
Says the flattard, literally the dumbest people on the site. The ones other conspiracy theorists think are government shills to make conspiracy theorists look bad.
> Our shitty governments did go to the moon,
Since when do flattards believe we landed on the moon?
> but those videos they showed us are fake as fuck
> We will never set another foot on the moon until we are allowed to. They let us do our missions once, while under strict supervision. That is all for now.
Your only evidence for this is: "Trust me, bro."
> You are welcome to believe the giant fucking rock hoax, but there is far more to our moon than that.
And you are welcome to fantasize about all kinds of horseshit.
> Also, is there some reason you think the government doesn't like to (((waste))) money???
They do, but their appetite for wasting money is not infinite, especially when the public grows bored, and even the government grows bored.
Shows 98 (let's call it 100) launches in 2023. Let's be generous and say a launch every 3 days. Hmm, well but only 5 of those 100 launches are for the Falcon 9 Heavy. And what's this on the legend at the bottom? "Used Falcon 9". Weird, I don't see any of those being launched. But we're talking Starship, their biggest spaceship ever, which isn't even fully implemented yet, and not only are you going to need roughly a dozen launches, you're going to have to dock these puppies in space to refuel cryogenic fuel while in orbit, something that's never been done before.
And too bad you didn't watch the rest of the video, because the fun doesn't stop there. You have to land this puppy safely on the moon's uneven surface standing upright without tilting over, something that has never been done before. SpaceX had plenty of problems getting their reusable rockets to land correctly on Earth, and that's on even launch pads built explicitly for that purpose.
Then there's also the six-day elliptical orbit around the moon, but we won't talk about that. Or the giant elevator that needs to be in the rocket to get them down and up to/from the moon's surface, but that's probably small potatoes compared to everything else.
This mission is fucking bonkers. But don't worry, I'm sure Artemis will be landing humans on the moon again in [2026](https://earthsky.org/spaceflight/the-artemis-program-nasas-mission-return-to-the-moon/):
"Artemis 2 will be the first crewed mission to orbit the moon in more than 50 years. Its new launch date is no earlier than September 2025. The following mission, Artemis 3, will be the first to return humans to the moon since the Apollo missions. Artemis 3 is now slated for September 2026."
Why wouldn't I, flattard? Russia also landed probes on the moon back during the Apollo era. You're just a knuckle-dragging monkey that believes the Erf is flat. The idea of somebody actually going to the moon would make your head explode.
> The reason we don't go back is because we were told not to
We landed six times on the moon. And many countries have sent probes there. The reason we didn't go back after Apollo finished is because it's a giant fucking rock and a waste of money to go there. The only reason we're going there again is because Chyna is going.
> Used to have 100,000 viewers on his live streams.
Like when, during Depp trial or Rittenhouse? Those numbers are special events.
Still, he had a good grift going. He obviously spiraled down and fucked it all up. He used to have an image as a family man with 5 kids (homeschooled) and a long-term marriage to his high-school sweetheart. Now he's a degenerate swinger, addict, and neglecter of kids. That last part is what pisses me off.
chrimony 1 point 1 year ago
Good times.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=665c845fd153f
chrimony 1 point 1 year ago
It's "g00nies". Don't tell anyone, and use it wisely.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=665c845fd153f
chrimony 6 points 1 year ago
I considered just buggering off without saying anything, but for the past 3 years this has been my main forum, and before that Voat (Poal was just a layover). There are a lot of people who I wonder about that don't hang around anymore.
I don't want anybody begging me to stay. This is a goodbye. You don't give a fuck? Fine, it's not for you.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=665c845fd153f
chrimony 5 points 1 year ago
Downvooted by a flattard! And I can't return the favor! Oh gods, why have ye forsaken me??
/v/UpgoatDev viewpost?postid=66595cf69aa45
chrimony 2 points 1 year ago
Wonderful, now I only need another 1,845 upvotes before I can downvote again. Because it's the Internet: that's sarcasm.
Instead of obsessing over downvote ratios, how about you just leave it the way it was?
Alternatively, allow only a certain # of downvotes per day. That would take care of your bot problem, and also limit the damage by anybody that wants to target a particular user. I suggested this many moons ago.
/v/UpgoatDev viewpost?postid=66595cf69aa45
chrimony 0 points 1 year ago
> Not sure exactly what you are expecting with a fantasy speculation, but ok.
How about not stating fantasy speculation as hard truths?
> There is far more evidence that the moon isn't a fucking rock than there is that Michael Obama is a man.
Ok, list it.
> It was the astronauts who said we couldn't go back and reported all the alien ships there. Not me. Those are facts reported by them.
Ok, cite your claim. You can't, because it's horseshit.
/v/Space viewpost?postid=66574fffeb082
chrimony 1 point 1 year ago
> jews in general support pedophillia. I don't recall these other alts spamming the same Ryden material that Blumen did
Only ONE person on the site would ever bring up Mark Ryden.
> Blumen didn't seem like a guy smart or resourceful enough to figure out how to implement bots
Even the flattard McNasty claimed to have worked as a 3D animator. Writing some basic scripts isn't genius level. Or you can even pay somebody to figure it out for you.
> Then again, you think DYB is FKH,
I laid out the evidence which you choose to ignore. Just "cohencidences", right?
> which is laughable because DYB has taken part in livechats and proven otherwise.
What, voice chats? Doesn't prove shit. Lots of people in Israel speak English. Plenty of people living in Israel started out living in the US or elsewhere. Even a video wouldn't prove anything, as realistic avatars are a thing now.
dirtywhiteboy = dirtykikeboy
/v/UpgoatDev viewpost?postid=665821ad25498
chrimony 3 points 1 year ago
> A lot of goats are shouting "Blumen", but I don't think so.
These troll accounts came shorty after (((blume))) was banned. These accounts promoted pedophilia, including the nude child-painting artist Mark Ryden. And only (((blume))) promoted that pedo here.
/v/UpgoatDev viewpost?postid=665821ad25498
chrimony 5 points 1 year ago
Most people. If your post doesn't register enough upvotes within an hour or two on new, it will never be widely seen.
/v/UpgoatDev viewpost?postid=665821ad25498
chrimony 0 points 1 year ago
What I wrote in another post on the moon:
"First of all, much of the tech to go to the moon the first time was built only for that purpose, so when you abandon that project for decades, you have to rebuild all the tech. Second, we spent like 10x more going to the moon the first time in a race against Kennedy's end of the decade deadline, and against the Soviets. There's no rush now, and no correspondingly huge budget. Third, the mission parameters have changed. They're not just repeating what was done in the Apollo missions. And of course there's all the modern diversity bullshit, more bureaucracy, etc."
And:
"Also, plenty of telemetry data still exists, it's just that having lost the tape with the higher resolution Apollo 11 landing on it gets the hoaxtards all excited, and then they inflate their claims into 'everything was destroyed'."
/v/Space viewpost?postid=66574fffeb082
chrimony 2 points 1 year ago
They determine what shows up on the front board.
/v/UpgoatDev viewpost?postid=665821ad25498
chrimony 12 points 1 year ago
> You should be able to downvote what you want, but targeting a user is lame. Just block them.
I downvote what I disagree with. What is the problem? I'm not trawling through somebody's history to spam them with downvotes.
My votes: 17463 (+11946/-5517). Now to meet your new rule before I can downvote again, I would have to upvote approximately another 10,000 times. Fuck that. If I wanted stupid Poal bullshit, I would have stayed at Poal. I'm just going to stop voting altogether.
/v/UpgoatDev viewpost?postid=665821ad25498
chrimony 8 points 1 year ago
> Also I changed the upvote to downvote allotted ratio from 2:1 to 4:1. If you can no longer downvote then try upvoting more.
Fuck you.
/v/UpgoatDev viewpost?postid=665821ad25498
chrimony 0 points 1 year ago
> No fucking way we went 6 times with 1960s tech and we can't easily go now.
You're a retard, so you don't know what is easy or not. First of all, much of the tech to go to the moon the first time was built only for that purpose, so when you abandon that project for decades, you have to rebuild all the tech. Second, we spent like 10x more going to the moon the first time in a race against Kennedy's end of the decade deadline, and against the Soviets. There's no rush now, and no correspondingly huge budget. Third, the mission parameters have changed. They're not just repeating what was done in the Apollo missions. And of course there's all the modern diversity bullshit, more bureaucracy, etc.
> We absolute wouldn't have taken a god damn buggy and golf club you fucking idiot.
Why not, retard? The buggy was good for driving around instead of walking to different areas, and the golf club was just a publicity stunt. In the grand scheme of things, does it matter? "Oh, we didn't go to the moon because they brought a golf club on one trip." Retard logic.
> And now the final straw look into the 3 body problem. There is no math to get to the moon it's why they made up the destruction of the telemetry data it was not possible still is not possible.
Lulz. You're a retard. You don't understand physics or the 3 body problem. The math to get to the moon was easy. Also, plenty of telemetry data still exists, it's just that having lost the tape with the higher resolution Apollo 11 landing on it gets the hoaxtards all excited, and then they inflate their claims into "everything was destroyed".
/v/SPACEisFAKEandGAY viewpost?postid=6657df46ab571
chrimony 0 points 1 year ago
> I said you did, because you are nigger brained double digit IQ.
Says the flattard, literally the dumbest people on the site. The ones other conspiracy theorists think are government shills to make conspiracy theorists look bad.
> Our shitty governments did go to the moon,
Since when do flattards believe we landed on the moon?
> but those videos they showed us are fake as fuck
Lulz, ok flattard.
/v/Space viewpost?postid=66574fffeb082
chrimony 0 points 1 year ago
> We will never set another foot on the moon until we are allowed to. They let us do our missions once, while under strict supervision. That is all for now.
Your only evidence for this is: "Trust me, bro."
> You are welcome to believe the giant fucking rock hoax, but there is far more to our moon than that.
And you are welcome to fantasize about all kinds of horseshit.
> Also, is there some reason you think the government doesn't like to (((waste))) money???
They do, but their appetite for wasting money is not infinite, especially when the public grows bored, and even the government grows bored.
/v/Space viewpost?postid=66574fffeb082
chrimony 0 points 1 year ago
Ok, flattard.
/v/Space viewpost?postid=66574fffeb082
chrimony 0 points 1 year ago
> SpaceX has put 5,800 StarLink satellites into orbit. In loads of 23 at a time. That’s a lot of rockets.
https://www.spacexstats.xyz/#launchhistory-per-year
Shows 98 (let's call it 100) launches in 2023. Let's be generous and say a launch every 3 days. Hmm, well but only 5 of those 100 launches are for the Falcon 9 Heavy. And what's this on the legend at the bottom? "Used Falcon 9". Weird, I don't see any of those being launched. But we're talking Starship, their biggest spaceship ever, which isn't even fully implemented yet, and not only are you going to need roughly a dozen launches, you're going to have to dock these puppies in space to refuel cryogenic fuel while in orbit, something that's never been done before.
And too bad you didn't watch the rest of the video, because the fun doesn't stop there. You have to land this puppy safely on the moon's uneven surface standing upright without tilting over, something that has never been done before. SpaceX had plenty of problems getting their reusable rockets to land correctly on Earth, and that's on even launch pads built explicitly for that purpose.
Then there's also the six-day elliptical orbit around the moon, but we won't talk about that. Or the giant elevator that needs to be in the rocket to get them down and up to/from the moon's surface, but that's probably small potatoes compared to everything else.
This mission is fucking bonkers. But don't worry, I'm sure Artemis will be landing humans on the moon again in [2026](https://earthsky.org/spaceflight/the-artemis-program-nasas-mission-return-to-the-moon/):
"Artemis 2 will be the first crewed mission to orbit the moon in more than 50 years. Its new launch date is no earlier than September 2025. The following mission, Artemis 3, will be the first to return humans to the moon since the Apollo missions. Artemis 3 is now slated for September 2026."
Lulz.
/v/Space viewpost?postid=66574fffeb082
chrimony 0 points 1 year ago
Why wouldn't I, flattard? Russia also landed probes on the moon back during the Apollo era. You're just a knuckle-dragging monkey that believes the Erf is flat. The idea of somebody actually going to the moon would make your head explode.
/v/Space viewpost?postid=66574fffeb082
chrimony -2 points 1 year ago
> The reason we don't go back is because we were told not to
We landed six times on the moon. And many countries have sent probes there. The reason we didn't go back after Apollo finished is because it's a giant fucking rock and a waste of money to go there. The only reason we're going there again is because Chyna is going.
/v/Space viewpost?postid=66574fffeb082
chrimony 0 points 1 year ago
That's like asking if your entertained by your wife being raped by a nigger.
/v/Australia viewpost?postid=66566fe337d1a
chrimony 4 points 1 year ago
I hate Clownworld.
/v/Australia viewpost?postid=66566fe337d1a
chrimony 1 point 1 year ago
> Your skin color is your uniform.
Christcucks like E. Michael Jones don't understand this. Or rather, they do, but they overrule their brain with their (((Christian))) faith.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=665687ac92ebb
chrimony 0 points 1 year ago
We need a National Libertarian party.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=6655eb1fbfa07
chrimony 1 point 1 year ago
> Used to have 100,000 viewers on his live streams.
Like when, during Depp trial or Rittenhouse? Those numbers are special events.
Still, he had a good grift going. He obviously spiraled down and fucked it all up. He used to have an image as a family man with 5 kids (homeschooled) and a long-term marriage to his high-school sweetheart. Now he's a degenerate swinger, addict, and neglecter of kids. That last part is what pisses me off.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6656274e6b1bd