I've heard a better argument against race mixing, found in Genesis 2:18:
"And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an HELP MEET for him (woman)." Genesis 2:18
In a mixed marriage, the racial disparities in the mental, physical and moral realms will disqualify the woman from her created purpose: to be a good help meet to her husband.
"For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive." 1 Corinthians 15:21-22
If you didn't die in Adam then you won't be made alive in Christ.
'Unnatural population' by what context? SARS-COV/2 has been promoted as a threat to all peoples. If you want to hypothesize instead that SARS-COV/2 is a threat just to older folk then go ahead, but you are deviating from the official narrative which was the focus of my original comments. And I am happy to not only challenge the official narrative but your peculiar variation as well, would you care to provide a scientific experiment?
If you want to change the hypothesis to unhealthy specimens then you can kiss the pandemic claim goodbye, because a pandemic is something that affects most of the population.
science proves cause and effect, show me the hypothesis for cov-19 and subsequent experiments. I've looked and there aren't any. I could only find 1 experiment done in 2003 with monkeys with the original sars cov gene sequence, the short of it is that the monkeys did not get seriously ill whatsoever.
PCR test controversy is putting the cart before the horse. Root issue is whether or not cells that have gene sequence 'sars cov/2' are capable of producing serious illness when given to specimens. This has been tested on monkeys with original sars cov and symptoms were basically non existent thus no causal link has been established between the sars cov and serious illness. But alas causal links aren't necessary for pseudoscientists they work off of probabilities etc.
buxtehude 1 point 3.4 years ago*
I've heard a better argument against race mixing, found in Genesis 2:18:
"And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an HELP MEET for him (woman)." Genesis 2:18
In a mixed marriage, the racial disparities in the mental, physical and moral realms will disqualify the woman from her created purpose: to be a good help meet to her husband.
/v/RedPills viewpost?postid=61bd70bcc6a42
buxtehude 0 points 3.4 years ago
"For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive." 1 Corinthians 15:21-22
If you didn't die in Adam then you won't be made alive in Christ.
/v/RedPills viewpost?postid=61bd70bcc6a42
buxtehude 2 points 3.4 years ago
yes, at the very bottom look 1/3rd from the left at the person in red, he is repeated slightly below at 1/5th from the right
/v/news viewpost?postid=61a97fe417d0b
buxtehude 0 points 3.4 years ago
So it is unnatural by your context.. well I came here to challenge the official version of events not your personal ones.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=619f8f4f9889a
buxtehude 0 points 3.4 years ago
'Unnatural population' by what context? SARS-COV/2 has been promoted as a threat to all peoples. If you want to hypothesize instead that SARS-COV/2 is a threat just to older folk then go ahead, but you are deviating from the official narrative which was the focus of my original comments. And I am happy to not only challenge the official narrative but your peculiar variation as well, would you care to provide a scientific experiment?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=619f8f4f9889a
buxtehude 0 points 3.4 years ago
I said specimens not unhealthy specimens.
If you want to change the hypothesis to unhealthy specimens then you can kiss the pandemic claim goodbye, because a pandemic is something that affects most of the population.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=619f8f4f9889a
buxtehude 1 point 3.4 years ago
disloyal to their own kind? It's worse than that, most of them don't even have the will to live themselves.
/v/TellVoat viewpost?postid=619fc1bb66895
buxtehude 1 point 3.4 years ago
science proves cause and effect, show me the hypothesis for cov-19 and subsequent experiments. I've looked and there aren't any. I could only find 1 experiment done in 2003 with monkeys with the original sars cov gene sequence, the short of it is that the monkeys did not get seriously ill whatsoever.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=619f8f4f9889a
buxtehude 0 points 3.4 years ago
PCR test controversy is putting the cart before the horse. Root issue is whether or not cells that have gene sequence 'sars cov/2' are capable of producing serious illness when given to specimens. This has been tested on monkeys with original sars cov and symptoms were basically non existent thus no causal link has been established between the sars cov and serious illness. But alas causal links aren't necessary for pseudoscientists they work off of probabilities etc.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=619f8f4f9889a
buxtehude 0 points 4.2 years ago
Lel we're just immature buffoons who post racial epithets amirite
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60395e04e2121