Sign into an existing account

That is all

Article reproduced:

A refugee from Yemen, who befriend two Dutch students aged 20 and 21, has been convicted of raping both girls at a party celebrating him winning asylum in Antwerp, Belgium. Prosecutors are now seeking 40 months in prison for the refugee.

The migrant, who name is reported as Ibrahim O., admitted in court that he had sex with the girls but claimed, “I only met their needs.”

The incident began in 2019 while he was working as a web developer for a non-profit organization, where he met the two Dutch students while they were interning there. One student was 20 years old and known only as “D.” while the other was 21 and known only as “M.” Both girls had moved to Antwerp to work at the non-profit, where they struck up what one girl described as a “friendly” relationship with Ibrahim, according to the Nieuwsblad news outlet.

The girls said that Ibrahim took advantage of their drunkenness to assault them. The Public Prosecution Service found these statements credible, adding that they could not give consent because of their drunken state.

“When Ibrahim made advances during the party, he was initially rejected. These young women lost their virginity with him. They were covered in blood after the incident,” the lawyer added.

Ibrahim O. told the police that he had not raped them because he had not ejaculated. However, according to prosecutors, sperm traces were found on one of the girls’ underwear. The semen belonged to the defendant.

According to Ibrahim’s attorney, there is too little concrete evidence that her client is guilty of rape.

“Maybe the girls agreed to have sexual relations but later regretted it. Isn’t it striking that they first called their parents and then the police?” said his attorney.

When Ibrahim O. himself spoke during his court trial, it became too much for the victims. They fled the courtroom crying when they heard Ibrahim portray to the judge how he had sex with both girls.

“I only met their needs. I have never hurt a woman in my life, neither in Yemen nor in Belgium. I am a good person,” he said.

One of the victims read a “victim statement” during the trial:

“How is it possible that we are still discussing permission or not. You had the choice to leave when we could not say “no” anymore. You chose to take advantage of the situation and assault us. Since that day, everything in my life has changed. It seems like I had to start all over again. I have lost faith in everyone around me, in myself. I worry all the time that I am giving the wrong signals. My life should be colorful. Since that night, everything in my life has been gray. And I thought we were friends,” M. told the court.

For those that aren't aware, here's the original video: https://files.catbox.moe/v0b32k.mp4

Shortly after the original video went up, a single weasel bootlicker faggot doxxed him and made a whiny kiked complaint to the company BodegaBro works for. A few moments later, he was fired: https://mobile.twitter.com/outreach_io/status/1542181628683833344

Make sure to let the fine folks at Outreach know what you think: 888.938.7356 | outreach.io

It's oddly specific language, or maybe I should say not-specific. "Engaged." What the fuck does that mean? If there was an exchange of gunfire, you know they'd make a big deal out of it to support their "hurr durr high powered rifle and body armor" meme, to show how outgunned the cops were.

But they didn't. They went with a simple "engaged." For all we know, this could mean they literally said hi to each other, made eye contact, showed their genitals, whatever.

And then of course the fact that what followed afterward is strangely reminiscent of the cops that waited outside the school during Sandy Hook. What were the cops here doing while the tranny beaner shot up the place? Playing tiddlywinks? They didn't give chase?

Very odd indeed.

It's very interesting how they give breakdowns by age, gender, location of shooting ("areas of commerce" are the highest), outcomes, even whether or not they wore body armor... but didn't mention race.

In fact, almost every incident recap begins with "On such and such date and time, an identified male opened fire..."

An *identified* male. Look no further.

Of the 61 "qualified" incidents, guess how many took place at schools? Two.

Here's the link to the report if you want to read it yourself (obvious proxy judaism hacker glownigger link warning): https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-incidents-in-the-us-2021-052422.pdf/view

Gee, I wonder what the FBI wants to imply with their ommissions here?

The jew must pay.