I agree it's clearly AI, but apart from the claim that a photo from 1929 would be in such immaculate condition, what's the giveaway? Instinctively/intuitively I could see it was AI the moment I opened it, but I can't pinpoint exactly why. Definitely something with the shadows and skin sheen, but more than that I can't really say.
Way too concentrated/oily to add to the intake/carb (and probably never the cylinder - it's not ether!). No I just throw it in the tank at whatever the recommended dose is (I think 4 oz./10 gallons). And I mean I eyeball it - I've got a walk behind tiller that gets used once/year at most, and it's tank is probably about a pint. So I just put a splash in, swish it around, pull the cord on full choke a few times to get it into the carb bowl, then it fires up every damn time.
I was skeptical the first time that it was actually the MMO. 2nd time I thought "maybe." 3rd time I was like "no shit!?" 4th+ time I just expect it to work and it does.
Only reason I thought of it now was I had just finished a ~5 hour mow on my MZ61 with a Kawa 730V V-twin, and when I throttled down it had a really rough idle. Like starve, almost die, then recover... ran like that to about mid throttle. Checked the fuel flow, filter, pump, intake, changed the spark plugs (due anyway)... still rough. Was gonna call it a night, last ditch I threw about 2 oz. (again, eyeballed) of MMO in the 5 gallon tank, rocked the mower to mix it, fired it up, and the rough idle was gone. I think it *might* have taken a few seconds, but no more than 10 and the thing was idling smooth at low throttle. Another "no shit!?" moment brought to you by Marvel Mystery Oil.
If you want to add it straight to the carb bowl/intake I'd just dilute it in gasoline first.
I have mixed it in oil before - wanted to add Schaeffer's Moly EP to my aging truck, but the stuff is like molasses. So I thinned it 50/50 with MMO to make it closer to the 5W20 that the truck runs. Worked okay I guess? Idk, I just know for sure it works really well in fuel for small engines and, at worst, it doesn't hurt modern emissions systems in larger vehicles.
>Finally, I have magic gasoline that still starts mowers on the first pull after 10 years sitting around, and with no additives either
Marvel Mystery Oil for me thanks. No magic needed; just mystery (with a big helping of "I can't believe it was that easy/I can't believe that fucking worked!").
>"I'll still never get that moment back, like standing on the podium, as a sophomore, I'll never get that back cuz *they took it from me.*"
No nigger, *you forfeited it.* Peak nigger mentality. "He was just robbin they house and they shot him and took his life from him." Nope, you offered up your life for the opportunity to invade someone's home and steal from/harm them. You offered up that trophy, that moment, for the opportunity to do some stupid nigger shit.
This is why pro athletes should act with more decorum. I know it's too much to ask of niggers, but it's still what should be.
I think if they shell out the $200 for this shot, they should get the extra poisonous one. These fucks aren't doing anyone any good, and more likely they're slowing down the stronger members of the herd.
This is a point that we need to turn up the volume on. We have 2-3 White mass shooters now where the parents have been charged (that I know of, with [at least one conviction/max sentence](https://www.newsweek.com/crumbley-parents-sentenced-manslaughter-oxford-school-shooting-1888558)), yet despite all the mass shootings niggers commit, none of the neglectful pavement apes have been charged.
If you don't hold them to the same standard, then you don't consider them human enough to hold to that standard. Which is fine, but then treat them like the rest of the animals and euthanize them as necessary.
>Maelle Jacques, a trans athlete, stood on the podium after winning the girls’ 400-meter race with a time of 55.50 seconds, **her** expression a mix of triumph and defiance. But as **she** stepped down
>If we want to be genuinely Talmudic about all this, a suppressor isn’t an “arm” in the first place
Yes you, I, and the Talon guys all agree about that. But [the government's definition (26 USC Ch. 53)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title26/html/USCODE-2011-title26-subtitleE-chap53.htm) considers it a firearm:
>For the purpose of this chapter—
>
>(a) Firearm
>The term “firearm” means (1) a shotgun having a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length; (2) a weapon made from a shotgun if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length; (3) a rifle having a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length; (4) a weapon made from a rifle if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length; (5) any other weapon, as defined in subsection (e); (6) a machinegun; **(7) any silencer (as defined in section 921 of title 18, United States Code)**...
That's the case [for now, anyway](https://www.independent.org/article/2025/02/19/5th-circuit-holds-suppressors-not-to-be-protected-arms/). Which is the point I was trying to get across. They want to remove that protection, and the 5th circus has ruled to that end. Hopefully SCOTUS sees it your way.
Your point about bullets is sort of true. Ammo could be considered an arm do to the explosiveness, but you'd have to lump it in with firecrackers I suppose. But if you meant bullets like just the lumps of lead/copper/etc. then I have to agree with you - it could get out of hand quickly
>If we want to be genuinely Talmudic about all this
which you know they jew. But in that regard a gun w/out ammo is pretty useless as an armament unless it's got a bayonet.
"deregulate" was the wrong word - "declassify" or "remove the firearm classification" is what I should've said. They're protected by 2A because the gov. considers them a firearm (though clearly they aren't). If that classification is removed, they lose 2A protection and are subject to the regulation that loss of protection would bring (like bump stocks, except bump stocks suck).
I heard some gun guys analyze it on a podcast (Talon Outdoors Show, find it one iHeart Radio). Basically yea, they removed the tax stamp fee. But they're worried that if they completely declassify them as a firearm (take them off the NFA), then that removes any 2A protection they are currently afforded. Like they killed bump stocks in Florida cause they could (no 2A protection).
That's a real question no one's answered for me yet. What happens when someone figures out how to make these things murder? They already have soldiers of course - not what I'm talking about. When someone develops a hack to have the robot wipe its memory after some time period, and the last command is "go kill my bitch ex wife." Robot hitmen will absolutely be a thing.
Or y'know, what if you tell the robot to slice up some watermelon, and it cuts the baby out of your wife and kills them both? Who do you charge with double homicide? Or is it just a nice bouquet of whoopsie daisies?
>so this measure is not really aimed at them directly
Yea but they think *laws in general* are aimed at them directly. Which, as long as we consider them human, they kinda are. Laws (or more accurately, the punishment for breaking them) are generally aimed at the human-shaped animals in society incapable of a peaceful, civilized coexistence. That constitutes some 99% of niggers.
[He also allowed way more in than Trump.](https://www.visualcapitalist.com/charted-u-s-net-immigration-by-president-2001-2024/)
When you have 8 million opportunities vs. 3 million, even they deport at the same rate, you're going to deport more with the 8 million opportunities. Trump's net migration was way less; deportations are far from the full story. But I suppose it makes a nice "technically true" clapback to say "0bama deported more!"
InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 6 hours ago
I agree it's clearly AI, but apart from the claim that a photo from 1929 would be in such immaculate condition, what's the giveaway? Instinctively/intuitively I could see it was AI the moment I opened it, but I can't pinpoint exactly why. Definitely something with the shadows and skin sheen, but more than that I can't really say.
/v/WhiteBeauty viewpost?postid=684d645e46916
InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 1 day ago
>JUST IN: US military is helping intercept missiles that Iran fired in retaliation at Israel, US official says
Goddammit.
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=684b84c1f36dd
InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 2 days ago*
Mmm... handburger.
"Hey let's see what that sounds like..." [click] [click] "nope"
/v/NiggersDrivingCars viewpost?postid=684a0300b12ba
InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 5 days ago
Way too concentrated/oily to add to the intake/carb (and probably never the cylinder - it's not ether!). No I just throw it in the tank at whatever the recommended dose is (I think 4 oz./10 gallons). And I mean I eyeball it - I've got a walk behind tiller that gets used once/year at most, and it's tank is probably about a pint. So I just put a splash in, swish it around, pull the cord on full choke a few times to get it into the carb bowl, then it fires up every damn time.
I was skeptical the first time that it was actually the MMO. 2nd time I thought "maybe." 3rd time I was like "no shit!?" 4th+ time I just expect it to work and it does.
Only reason I thought of it now was I had just finished a ~5 hour mow on my MZ61 with a Kawa 730V V-twin, and when I throttled down it had a really rough idle. Like starve, almost die, then recover... ran like that to about mid throttle. Checked the fuel flow, filter, pump, intake, changed the spark plugs (due anyway)... still rough. Was gonna call it a night, last ditch I threw about 2 oz. (again, eyeballed) of MMO in the 5 gallon tank, rocked the mower to mix it, fired it up, and the rough idle was gone. I think it *might* have taken a few seconds, but no more than 10 and the thing was idling smooth at low throttle. Another "no shit!?" moment brought to you by Marvel Mystery Oil.
If you want to add it straight to the carb bowl/intake I'd just dilute it in gasoline first.
I have mixed it in oil before - wanted to add Schaeffer's Moly EP to my aging truck, but the stuff is like molasses. So I thinned it 50/50 with MMO to make it closer to the 5W20 that the truck runs. Worked okay I guess? Idk, I just know for sure it works really well in fuel for small engines and, at worst, it doesn't hurt modern emissions systems in larger vehicles.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=6846655784d56
InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 5 days ago
>Finally, I have magic gasoline that still starts mowers on the first pull after 10 years sitting around, and with no additives either
Marvel Mystery Oil for me thanks. No magic needed; just mystery (with a big helping of "I can't believe it was that easy/I can't believe that fucking worked!").
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=6846655784d56
InYourFaceNancyGrace 8 points 1 week ago*
>"I'll still never get that moment back, like standing on the podium, as a sophomore, I'll never get that back cuz *they took it from me.*"
No nigger, *you forfeited it.* Peak nigger mentality. "He was just robbin they house and they shot him and took his life from him." Nope, you offered up your life for the opportunity to invade someone's home and steal from/harm them. You offered up that trophy, that moment, for the opportunity to do some stupid nigger shit.
This is why pro athletes should act with more decorum. I know it's too much to ask of niggers, but it's still what should be.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68409be454474
InYourFaceNancyGrace 4 points 1 week ago
I think if they shell out the $200 for this shot, they should get the extra poisonous one. These fucks aren't doing anyone any good, and more likely they're slowing down the stronger members of the herd.
/v/NewsoftheFucktards viewpost?postid=6840969bedfc7
InYourFaceNancyGrace 6 points 1 week ago
This is a point that we need to turn up the volume on. We have 2-3 White mass shooters now where the parents have been charged (that I know of, with [at least one conviction/max sentence](https://www.newsweek.com/crumbley-parents-sentenced-manslaughter-oxford-school-shooting-1888558)), yet despite all the mass shootings niggers commit, none of the neglectful pavement apes have been charged.
If you don't hold them to the same standard, then you don't consider them human enough to hold to that standard. Which is fine, but then treat them like the rest of the animals and euthanize them as necessary.
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=6840194369022
InYourFaceNancyGrace 3 points 2 weeks ago
>Maelle Jacques, a trans athlete, stood on the podium after winning the girls’ 400-meter race with a time of 55.50 seconds, **her** expression a mix of triumph and defiance. But as **she** stepped down
And yet they continue to misgender him.
/v/news viewpost?postid=6839a52c259c9
InYourFaceNancyGrace 3 points 2 weeks ago
Damn dude NSFW. I'd rather see gore.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=683959a88b3b3
InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 2 weeks ago
Yea it's like you can't help but see the zoomed out picture where he's got his hands clasped and rubbing them together.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6838f3c6b0853
InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 2 weeks ago*
>If we want to be genuinely Talmudic about all this, a suppressor isn’t an “arm” in the first place
Yes you, I, and the Talon guys all agree about that. But [the government's definition (26 USC Ch. 53)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title26/html/USCODE-2011-title26-subtitleE-chap53.htm) considers it a firearm:
>For the purpose of this chapter—
>
>(a) Firearm
>The term “firearm” means (1) a shotgun having a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length; (2) a weapon made from a shotgun if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 18 inches in length; (3) a rifle having a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length; (4) a weapon made from a rifle if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less than 26 inches or a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length; (5) any other weapon, as defined in subsection (e); (6) a machinegun; **(7) any silencer (as defined in section 921 of title 18, United States Code)**...
That's the case [for now, anyway](https://www.independent.org/article/2025/02/19/5th-circuit-holds-suppressors-not-to-be-protected-arms/). Which is the point I was trying to get across. They want to remove that protection, and the 5th circus has ruled to that end. Hopefully SCOTUS sees it your way.
Your point about bullets is sort of true. Ammo could be considered an arm do to the explosiveness, but you'd have to lump it in with firecrackers I suppose. But if you meant bullets like just the lumps of lead/copper/etc. then I have to agree with you - it could get out of hand quickly
>If we want to be genuinely Talmudic about all this
which you know they jew. But in that regard a gun w/out ammo is pretty useless as an armament unless it's got a bayonet.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6838ad9927c40
InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 2 weeks ago
"deregulate" was the wrong word - "declassify" or "remove the firearm classification" is what I should've said. They're protected by 2A because the gov. considers them a firearm (though clearly they aren't). If that classification is removed, they lose 2A protection and are subject to the regulation that loss of protection would bring (like bump stocks, except bump stocks suck).
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6838ad9927c40
InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 2 weeks ago*
I heard some gun guys analyze it on a podcast (Talon Outdoors Show, find it one iHeart Radio). Basically yea, they removed the tax stamp fee. But they're worried that if they completely declassify them as a firearm (take them off the NFA), then that removes any 2A protection they are currently afforded. Like they killed bump stocks in Florida cause they could (no 2A protection).
So there's a few ways to look at it.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6838ad9927c40
InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 2 weeks ago
Holy shit spot on. Bam! Right in the nostalgia!
Fuckin makes it so much funnier lmao nice catch
/v/Diversity viewpost?postid=683808c826add
InYourFaceNancyGrace 3 points 3 weeks ago
Shit that Klitschko fight was straight up "If he dies, he dies."
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=683083a33ab35
InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 3 weeks ago
It is an ongoing error to consider them human. They are as human as a donkey is a horse.
/v/Niggerss viewpost?postid=68306bb348d15
InYourFaceNancyGrace 2 points 3 weeks ago
That is surreal to watch. Now do the banks.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=6830a57a2e1b1
InYourFaceNancyGrace 0 points 3 weeks ago
The charitable part of me wants to say he's pulling a Matt Walsh and being hyperbolic for satirical effect to mock people who actually think this way.
But, the part of me that knows Ben Shapiro's MO all too well says he's probably sincere. "Just get a soft hands white collar job bro!"
/v/funny viewpost?postid=682e51aa55680
InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 3 weeks ago
That's a real question no one's answered for me yet. What happens when someone figures out how to make these things murder? They already have soldiers of course - not what I'm talking about. When someone develops a hack to have the robot wipe its memory after some time period, and the last command is "go kill my bitch ex wife." Robot hitmen will absolutely be a thing.
Or y'know, what if you tell the robot to slice up some watermelon, and it cuts the baby out of your wife and kills them both? Who do you charge with double homicide? Or is it just a nice bouquet of whoopsie daisies?
/v/technology viewpost?postid=682d5dbe4d200
InYourFaceNancyGrace 3 points 3 weeks ago
>so this measure is not really aimed at them directly
Yea but they think *laws in general* are aimed at them directly. Which, as long as we consider them human, they kinda are. Laws (or more accurately, the punishment for breaking them) are generally aimed at the human-shaped animals in society incapable of a peaceful, civilized coexistence. That constitutes some 99% of niggers.
/v/Health viewpost?postid=682c2dccbd22d
InYourFaceNancyGrace 4 points 3 weeks ago
\*Community notes: Lacks context
[He also allowed way more in than Trump.](https://www.visualcapitalist.com/charted-u-s-net-immigration-by-president-2001-2024/)
When you have 8 million opportunities vs. 3 million, even they deport at the same rate, you're going to deport more with the 8 million opportunities. Trump's net migration was way less; deportations are far from the full story. But I suppose it makes a nice "technically true" clapback to say "0bama deported more!"
/v/NiggersDrivingCars viewpost?postid=682b72bbb86c1
InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 3 weeks ago
The real "Thanks, 0bama" meme
/v/NiggersDrivingCars viewpost?postid=682b72bbb86c1
InYourFaceNancyGrace 1 point 4 weeks ago
FAMU (Nigger U aka "HBCU") beat one of its drum majors to death in 2011 (on a bus, which is why this reminded me of it).
How fucking retardedly violent and uncontrollable do you have to be when your *band* beats *a fellow bandmate* to death?
Why would we ever want to associate with a group like that?
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=6827311075086
InYourFaceNancyGrace 2 points 4 weeks ago
0:26 had a nice [Wilhelm Scream](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn6hhrX34Pw) to boot.
/v/news viewpost?postid=682733aae6ee9