×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules


HughBriss
Banned
Member for: 3.2 years

scp: 1886 (+1959/-73)
ccp: 7463 (+7898/-435)
votes given: 11134 (+7480/-3654)
score: 9349





Trophies

Tell me how you do that. And tell me what you do about withholding. Do you allow your company to withhold money from your pay? What about social security withholding?


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63bb6b597fe8b

HughBriss 1 point 1.4 years ago

No, trannies who do that are emasculated. Circumcision literally means "cut around", that is, cutting around the tip of the penis to remove the foreskin.


/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc4b751eb9b

HughBriss 1 point 1.4 years ago

>I have top tier iq levels

Sure. So do I. I was tested by that ridiculous group Mensa. Give me your percentile, or just another internet blowhard. Right now, you just sound like an idiot.


/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bbb181b1539

The article said it was mainly people in the US who took the EIC - Earned Income Credit. That is almost exclusively immigrants, mostly from Mexico and further south. It's about time those people started paying their share of taxes. The entire tax structure and taxation table need to be adjusted.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63bb6b597fe8b

Reagan was bought and paid for. He personally didn't have the money to fund his own campaign and he had to make a lot of Faustian deals, including the one that forced him to take GHW Bush as his running mate. He personally disliked Bush because he had no ideology but was an opportunist and only worked for his family, not the country, the people, the party, or anything else. I think Reagan, knowing his VP was a former head of the CIA, would eventually attempt to kill him made him resigned to that idea. After he was almost assassinated, he got the message and went along with a lot of stuff he found objectionable and wrong.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63bb057721d13

I've been reading about this for decades and my thoughts on this are mostly based on observation confirming what should be obvious to everyone. I've read about a dozen books, some very helpful, some less (like "Kon Tiki").

There's been a considerable amount of cover-up and deliberate disinformation and misinformation from the archaeological field and the Smithsonian to enforce The Narrative, that all of the Americans were populated by transients across the Bering ice bridge beginning about 20,000 years ago. This is only partly true.

Central and South American natives are small people who bear remarkably Asian features. This, to me, is the best evidence that these people are not descendants of Siberians but descendants of Asians and Pacific islanders. They took several plants and animals that weren't native to the Americas originally but are now associated with it, such as chilis and sweet potatoes. (There were many more, but I need to do some research on this.)


/v/History viewpost?postid=63b9ec5385228

That's hilarious. He actually thinks he's always correct, impervious to correction, and thinks that literally everyone else here is inferior to him. I'm glad OP posted this. I needed a good laugh.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63ba52940b44f

HughBriss 1 point 1.4 years ago

Oh, what a zinger! You totally invalidated OP's post!


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63ba5e0b35fa2

He did not. It was law passed under the Carter administration in which both the House and Senate were controlled by Democrats with a 60% supermajority. Reagan had no control over it, although he's always blamed for it.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63ba5e0b35fa2

HughBriss 1 point 1.4 years ago

You're right. I had to look again. At first I only saw the sloop. The sailing ship looks like it's a three-master.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63ba69e275665

Just another piece of evidence that Ronald Reagan was a RINO and not a populist.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63bb057721d13

I don't disagree with anything you say except for your suggesting North, Central, and South America were populated by people coming across the Bering strait when it was an ice bridge. Indians in Canada and the northern US are the descendants of these people, but South and Central America was populated by a migration of South Pacific islanders, who were exceptionally talented at navigating the open sea. They used numerous navigation tools such as the mattang, which took many forms.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=polynesian+boat+navigation+tool&t=ffab&iax=images&ia=images

The Polynesians were late-comers to South America. Roughly 17,000 years ago, Tiwanaku (also called Tiahuanaco) was established in western Bolivia near Lake Titicaca. Posnansky spent 20 years studying the site and determined the Gate of the Sun and the Gate of the Moon are sophisticated astronomical observation points and are calibrated to align with several earth movements, such as the axial tilt which causes a 26,000 precession cycle. I don't think it was the ancestors of the Polynesians who did that.


/v/History viewpost?postid=63b9ec5385228

HughBriss 1 point 1.4 years ago

White man, get the FUCK out of Queens. It's turning you into a nigger. The longer you live there, the more you lose rational capacity to discourse with other White people. Don't be a nigger. Please.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63ba2307dc026

HughBriss 1 point 1.4 years ago

No, you aren't just "saying he said it". Your post title was "Jon Stewart Nicely Calls Bullshit On His Own People", and the video shows that he manifestly did not. Don't *ever* trust jews.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63ba2307dc026

HughBriss 5 points 1.4 years ago*

He absolutely did NOT do that. He was criticizing that belief held among non-jews, but can never be said because it means destruction of their lives and livelihoods. He wants this kind of reconciliation to make non-jews think that that this belief is wrong.

I don't ever trust a fucking word from John Stewart, aka Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz. His brothers Lawrence Leibowitz was previously the chief operating officer of NYSE Euronext, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange.

"Stewart" is a powerful man in Hollywood, and his brother is a powerful man in finance. Is he going to torpedo that with direct accusations that jews control Hollywood and finance? Don't be an idiot.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63ba2307dc026

That's rather vague. Can you elaborate on that, please? I'd like to know a little more detail.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63b9ec1dd8982

Fair point, and I see your reasoning. I watched the video of him and he spoke like a Detroit nigger, so I just assumed. Niggers are incredibly racist, even among their own, and they really dislike light-skinned niggers, especially when they live among very dark skinned niggers.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63ba00e12e6ee

Niggers will be niggers. Your title is wrong: Detroit "man" should be Detroit nigger. He is a light-skinned nigger and he lives in a nigger neighborhood. At least his nigger neighbors have a sense of decency and justice.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63ba00e12e6ee

I think you mean "nigger arrested". That was no woman.


/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=63ba0194a5901

He is *LITERALLY* a half nigger. Plus, I think there's some jew in his ancestry. Take a look at this picture and tell me he doesn't look kikey, not so much in the nose, but that ashkenazi jew grin. I notice his Early Life section doesn't even give his mother's name.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Tate


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63b9e51099e33

The source for this likely attributed quote is from "House of Stone: A Memoir of Home, Family, and a Lost Middle East" by Anthony Shadid. This is the full quote of the wikipedia source for the quote in the meme:

"He is remembered in the Levant primarily for this role, and for an apocryphal anecdote. Following the Battle of Maysalun, Gouraud allegedly went to the Tomb of Saladin, kicked it, and said: Awake, Saladin. We have returned. My presence here consecrates the victory of the Cross over the Crescent." The quote is sometimes attributed to Mariano Goybet instead of Gouraud."

So, in other words, Gouraud never said that.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63b9ec1dd8982

HughBriss 6 points 1.4 years ago*

Archaeology is not a science, it is an interpretive study, and the method how discoveries are reported and documented is extremely subjective. It acts as a gatekeeper to a single narrative, and if anyone tries to introduce evidence or postulate on something that is contrary or even contradicts the narrative, they are shunned, their funding is cut, and often lose their livelihood.


/v/History viewpost?postid=63b9ec5385228

I remember when they were trying to scare us with global cooling, saying that a new ice age was coming upon us. A little after that it was the whole acid rain scare.


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63b7ba7230a4a

HughBriss 1 point 1.4 years ago

What's the name of this place? Fantasyland?


/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63b9c7827e4af

I think you're spending too much on batteries. I myself never by name brand.


/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63b9b7f1cccad