That’s why I said the terms are colorable. United States National is a citizen of the United States. It could probably be said, in some definitions, that a State National is as well. But using state, as in state Citizen, in its common form attempts to make a distinction from any colorable term of art. United States is usually defined as the District of Columbia and its possessions, so Guam, the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico etc. and often times they’ll start it with “the States and District of Columbia…” and when you find their definition of State, it’s the District of Columbia and its possessions; so “DC and DC…”. Even when the definition tries to say something along the lines of “in the geographical sense…” it always has an exception for how the term is being applied, and therefore the geographical sense of the term means nothing in context.
The 14th amendment says in clause 1 “This provision grants citizenship to formerly enslaved individuals and ensures that all citizens have equal protection under the law”
“A person who is a citizen of the United States is necessarily a citizen of the particular State in which he resides. But a person may be a citizen of a particular state and not a citizen of the United States. To hold otherwise would be to deny to the state the highest exercise of its sovereignty, the right to declare who are its citizens.” State V. Fowler, (41 La. Ann. 380 6 S. 602)
“There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens. One of the United States and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in a person, without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District of Columbia; but both classes usually exist in the same person.”
Gardina V. Board of Registrars, (160 Ala. 155 48 S. 788, 791)
“There is a distinction between citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a particular state, and a person may be the former without being the latter.”
Alla V. Kornfield, (84 F. Supp. 823)
It has been referred to as State National as well, which I believe came from the Naturalization Act, 1779. It is also defined in 8 USC s 1101 (a) (21) The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.
(23) The term “naturalization” means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.
Some prefer to only use the term National, and stay clear of the term Citizen completely. If you read the Constitution, you’ll notice the term Citizen is used until the 14th amendment when the Congress created its federal citizenship
America’s original 13 colonies were property of England, and everyone that lived there were subjects to the king. After the war and subsequent peace treaty, the people were recognized as sovereign on the land. All born on American soil have birthright Citizenship. That is to say, a human born on the soil of Texas is a Texan etc. so state Citizen, State National et al as long as you recognize the distinction between that status and that of a citizen of the United States or a U.S. citizen or a US citizen or whatever colorable terms they invent
United States is defined almost everywhere as the District of Columbia and its possessions. The republic is not the same thing as their democracy, which came with the usury bank. It had to, really, as our Constitution for the united States of America clearly states that only the Congress can coin money, and it must be gold, silver, or notes redeemable in gold or silver. So they created a democracy where private kike banking can print monopoly currency and nothing can ever be paid for since it’s not redeemable in gold or silver. Just a giant debt scam of IOUs
Nor is state National / Citizenship the same thing as US citizenship, which was created for niggers because our actual laws don’t recognize them as Citizens, so the district created citizenship for them, and through social security, offered it to an unsuspecting nation.
The fact that they were uniformly calling it an “insurrection” that same night lets you know they planned it in advance and set it up as a means of election interference and false justification to remove a candidate from ballots.
I have a hard time believing that guy snuck into anything. I don’t know the reason they wanted any info leaked about bohemian grove but maybe they wanted him to have a little credibility so he could mix in a bunch of bullshit to make people sound crazy for believing him. Not sure though
As I understand it: America declared independence and won the war in 1782. They went into debt (13 million) and couldn’t pay it back. This led to the constitution (debt agreement) in 1789, which the bank allowed 70 years to pay off.
Fast forward 70 years and you get to 1859, when the debt is due. North wants the south to pay it since their export business are more profitable etc. South says no. Civil war and debt goes unpaid again. Failure to pay results in a military democracy and federal “citizenship” for the freed negro class. Again, 70 years is given to pay off the debts.
Now we are at 1929 (Great Depression) and it again goes unpaid. New Deal in this bankruptcy leads to confiscation of all gold, silver, bullion, and gold certificates and a new currency based on the full faith and credit of the American people. All future labor was promised to the bank as collateral, and social insurance would be the means of getting free white men into 14th amendment federal citizenship, and sureties for the debts of United States. 70 years is given to pay off the debts.
Now we find ourselves in 1999, no one has paid the bank, the debt is sky high, and our land, or states, our assets, our properties, and our people have been pledged to the bank. Now it’s time to take this show on the road. 9/11/01 is a foot in the door for the bank’s soldiers to go to Iraq and do what? “Establish (military) democracy and get them a constitution. Sound familiar?
Similar thing happened to me and a couple friends. The man had a temper tantrum because we were ignoring the arrows, had no masks, and were too close together. We just laughed and told him we don’t watch television
DontStoneStephen 0 points 6 months ago
That’s why I said the terms are colorable. United States National is a citizen of the United States. It could probably be said, in some definitions, that a State National is as well. But using state, as in state Citizen, in its common form attempts to make a distinction from any colorable term of art. United States is usually defined as the District of Columbia and its possessions, so Guam, the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico etc. and often times they’ll start it with “the States and District of Columbia…” and when you find their definition of State, it’s the District of Columbia and its possessions; so “DC and DC…”. Even when the definition tries to say something along the lines of “in the geographical sense…” it always has an exception for how the term is being applied, and therefore the geographical sense of the term means nothing in context.
The 14th amendment says in clause 1 “This provision grants citizenship to formerly enslaved individuals and ensures that all citizens have equal protection under the law”
“A person who is a citizen of the United States is necessarily a citizen of the particular State in which he resides. But a person may be a citizen of a particular state and not a citizen of the United States. To hold otherwise would be to deny to the state the highest exercise of its sovereignty, the right to declare who are its citizens.” State V. Fowler, (41 La. Ann. 380 6 S. 602)
“There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens. One of the United States and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in a person, without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District of Columbia; but both classes usually exist in the same person.”
Gardina V. Board of Registrars, (160 Ala. 155 48 S. 788, 791)
“There is a distinction between citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a particular state, and a person may be the former without being the latter.”
Alla V. Kornfield, (84 F. Supp. 823)
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=670c61ea41f16
DontStoneStephen 0 points 6 months ago
It has been referred to as State National as well, which I believe came from the Naturalization Act, 1779. It is also defined in 8 USC s 1101 (a) (21) The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.
(23) The term “naturalization” means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.
Some prefer to only use the term National, and stay clear of the term Citizen completely. If you read the Constitution, you’ll notice the term Citizen is used until the 14th amendment when the Congress created its federal citizenship
America’s original 13 colonies were property of England, and everyone that lived there were subjects to the king. After the war and subsequent peace treaty, the people were recognized as sovereign on the land. All born on American soil have birthright Citizenship. That is to say, a human born on the soil of Texas is a Texan etc. so state Citizen, State National et al as long as you recognize the distinction between that status and that of a citizen of the United States or a U.S. citizen or a US citizen or whatever colorable terms they invent
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=670c61ea41f16
DontStoneStephen 5 points 6 months ago
United States is defined almost everywhere as the District of Columbia and its possessions. The republic is not the same thing as their democracy, which came with the usury bank. It had to, really, as our Constitution for the united States of America clearly states that only the Congress can coin money, and it must be gold, silver, or notes redeemable in gold or silver. So they created a democracy where private kike banking can print monopoly currency and nothing can ever be paid for since it’s not redeemable in gold or silver. Just a giant debt scam of IOUs
Nor is state National / Citizenship the same thing as US citizenship, which was created for niggers because our actual laws don’t recognize them as Citizens, so the district created citizenship for them, and through social security, offered it to an unsuspecting nation.
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=670c61ea41f16
DontStoneStephen 4 points 9 months ago
Fake and gay
/v/NutziHiveKickers viewpost?postid=66acf70138596
DontStoneStephen 2 points 1.3 years ago
The fact that they were uniformly calling it an “insurrection” that same night lets you know they planned it in advance and set it up as a means of election interference and false justification to remove a candidate from ballots.
/v/random viewpost?postid=6599be04dd5cb
DontStoneStephen 2 points 1.5 years ago
I have a hard time believing that guy snuck into anything. I don’t know the reason they wanted any info leaked about bohemian grove but maybe they wanted him to have a little credibility so he could mix in a bunch of bullshit to make people sound crazy for believing him. Not sure though
/v/anything viewpost?postid=654fb23da4cab
DontStoneStephen 1 point 1.7 years ago
As I understand it: America declared independence and won the war in 1782. They went into debt (13 million) and couldn’t pay it back. This led to the constitution (debt agreement) in 1789, which the bank allowed 70 years to pay off.
Fast forward 70 years and you get to 1859, when the debt is due. North wants the south to pay it since their export business are more profitable etc. South says no. Civil war and debt goes unpaid again. Failure to pay results in a military democracy and federal “citizenship” for the freed negro class. Again, 70 years is given to pay off the debts.
Now we are at 1929 (Great Depression) and it again goes unpaid. New Deal in this bankruptcy leads to confiscation of all gold, silver, bullion, and gold certificates and a new currency based on the full faith and credit of the American people. All future labor was promised to the bank as collateral, and social insurance would be the means of getting free white men into 14th amendment federal citizenship, and sureties for the debts of United States. 70 years is given to pay off the debts.
Now we find ourselves in 1999, no one has paid the bank, the debt is sky high, and our land, or states, our assets, our properties, and our people have been pledged to the bank. Now it’s time to take this show on the road. 9/11/01 is a foot in the door for the bank’s soldiers to go to Iraq and do what? “Establish (military) democracy and get them a constitution. Sound familiar?
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=64f36793cdfbb
DontStoneStephen 4 points 1.7 years ago
Similar thing happened to me and a couple friends. The man had a temper tantrum because we were ignoring the arrows, had no masks, and were too close together. We just laughed and told him we don’t watch television
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=64e3ad6b20eb3
DontStoneStephen 4 points 1.7 years ago
Virex.health has 50 packs of 12mg pill form for $70. They also sell fenbendazole 50 packs for $80 and a multi vitamin with quercetin for $40
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=64e22a6046935