Yeah, I'm no Biden fan, but I do the "nom nom nom" on my (10 month old) daughter all the time and she loves it.
I'm not stupid enough to do it on a stranger's kid, and frankly I pity Joe for being in a position to put his dementia on display, but Joe not understanding where (or who) he is is old news to anyone here.
I mean this video is bad, but I'd prefer MSM show his being handled by the easter bunny, or shaking hands with ghost people. Even if you want the "Joe Biden is a pedophile" angle, showing him smelling the hair of pre-teens is better than a video where he could possibly just be doing "nom nom" with a baby.
This is the one thing I don't get about voat: everyone is super "individual rights" and recognizes that Thomas Sowell is better than Bill Clinton, but then also groups all [jews/black/women] with nearly intentional disregard to the hypocrisy.
That link only mention humans in the cases of: bone marrow transplants, pregnant women getting fetal cells from their unborn son and people absorbing twin siblings in the womb. No mention of sexual partners.
This is the #1 problem with Voat. I come here because it's one of the last bastions of truly free speech, but I'd had problems where so many of the posts were easily disproven (or taken out of context). Don't get me wrong, I've had (and shared) a TON of solid red pills from here, but if more of the posts had easy, clear sources it would garner so much more traction.
Every post which is blatantly false, meanwhile, degrades the credibility. That's why /r/politics (and FactCheck.org) are jokes.
Why have a WNBA if men and women can co-compete? Why have different leagues?
They either admit the physical advantages of male muscle and bone development and that they concede they need to be separated due to these differences, or they agree they should be allowed together and thus support abolishing women's sports by "integration".
If they do concede the physical differences, we have to ask if hormone therapy is sufficient to offset these physical growth advantages, given the bones do not revert, the muscles do not naturally change, just as the Y chromosome does not become an X.
Will your people be better off with neighbors of a different race who are intelligent (Asian?) and who SUPPORT segregation, or a white family who had network TV and porn raise their children?
I'm not talking about generalizations here, I'm talking about individuals. Hillary Clinton is "extremely successful" by most standards, but I'd take Thomas Sowell as my neighbor over her 10 times out of 10.
Gotcha, guess you were part of the second example in the first sentence of my second paragraph. I'd prefer Thomas Sowell as my neighbor than Hillary Clinton. Guess you disagree.
I love bluffing games, so Avalon and Secret Hitler are two of my favorites (despite not considering myself the "Voat norm" vis-a-vi the Fuhrer). Other suggestions:
Medium:
2: Patchwork
2+: Dominion (deck building game, where you make the deck AS YOU PLAY, not like Pokemon or Magic where you collect)
3+: Munchkins
3+: Lords of Waterdeep (one of my favorites)
Hard I'd save until you're a little more experienced.
Co-op: Pandemic (my wife's favorite, long predates Covid)
> Oh look, a 12 year old White male figured out how to engineer a bridge, we should start having all 12 year old White males build our bridges.
That's my point because that's exactly what you did in your original post. There are 1000s of black women smarter than white men. It might be 0.00001% of the time, but it doesn't make it not true. This is the argument for self-governance: that we leave individuals to fend for themselves (or those they care for), effectively as the smallest form of government, and let those who fail, fail.
Do you care more about race than if your neighbor is blasphemous, ignorant, arrogant, rude, poor? Personally I'd prefer an affluent black nuclear family than a white trailer park as my neighbor. I don't care which is the exception; I'm judging the individuals.
Bing 1 point 10 months ago
Yeah, I'm no Biden fan, but I do the "nom nom nom" on my (10 month old) daughter all the time and she loves it.
I'm not stupid enough to do it on a stranger's kid, and frankly I pity Joe for being in a position to put his dementia on display, but Joe not understanding where (or who) he is is old news to anyone here.
I mean this video is bad, but I'd prefer MSM show his being handled by the easter bunny, or shaking hands with ghost people. Even if you want the "Joe Biden is a pedophile" angle, showing him smelling the hair of pre-teens is better than a video where he could possibly just be doing "nom nom" with a baby.
/v/cringe viewpost?postid=64b1d32a0c601
Bing 0 points 11 months ago
> She still holds genetic responsibility
This is the one thing I don't get about voat: everyone is super "individual rights" and recognizes that Thomas Sowell is better than Bill Clinton, but then also groups all [jews/black/women] with nearly intentional disregard to the hypocrisy.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=646c36921e9a7
Bing 2 points 1.1 years ago
Shut up, you probably do it yourself.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=641ddb94d6abe
Bing 0 points 1.1 years ago
I hate when people do that.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=641ddb94d6abe
Bing 5 points 1.3 years ago
That link only mention humans in the cases of: bone marrow transplants, pregnant women getting fetal cells from their unborn son and people absorbing twin siblings in the womb. No mention of sexual partners.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63c0387635d43
Bing 4 points 1.6 years ago
Hmmm, still working on this one myself.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=634eed58699fd
Bing 1 point 1.7 years ago
https://youtu.be/vbsHox73mRo?t=201
/v/ClownWorld viewpost?postid=632b3d44446a9
Bing 1 point 1.8 years ago
This is the #1 problem with Voat. I come here because it's one of the last bastions of truly free speech, but I'd had problems where so many of the posts were easily disproven (or taken out of context). Don't get me wrong, I've had (and shared) a TON of solid red pills from here, but if more of the posts had easy, clear sources it would garner so much more traction.
Every post which is blatantly false, meanwhile, degrades the credibility. That's why /r/politics (and FactCheck.org) are jokes.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62e9c60401100
Bing 23 points 1.9 years ago
FWIW he was claiming his opposition was doing this, not him. Just as his opposition claims he's doing it, not them.
The truth is they both lie. That's why we need much, much less government. And the little bit we do have should be as localized as possible.
/v/WakeUpWhitePeople viewpost?postid=62b38045d50d9
Bing 5 points 2.0 years ago
....should we invade Canada? They're unarmed.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=629543a325dd6
Bing 2 points 2.0 years ago*
Simple argument against men in women's sports:
Why have a WNBA if men and women can co-compete? Why have different leagues?
They either admit the physical advantages of male muscle and bone development and that they concede they need to be separated due to these differences, or they agree they should be allowed together and thus support abolishing women's sports by "integration".
If they do concede the physical differences, we have to ask if hormone therapy is sufficient to offset these physical growth advantages, given the bones do not revert, the muscles do not naturally change, just as the Y chromosome does not become an X.
/v/PNW viewpost?postid=628d15b293394
Bing 7 points 2.1 years ago
He's mocking the Critical Race Theory (CRT) advocates.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=624f9f6d5a798
Bing 0 points 2.1 years ago
Love how you admit my point while still trying to pretend you didn't. Well done.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62283f966932b
Bing 1 point 2.1 years ago
For what it's worth, if you look up the Twitter account mentioned here, it's a parody. This was not a sincere tweet.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=624b339d53a0b
Bing 0 points 2.1 years ago
> This generalization says that Hunter Biden is smarter than Thomas Sowell.
This is literally the counter example I gave originally. That you _ignored_ my point is your own arrogant ignorance.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62283f966932b
Bing 0 points 2.1 years ago
Will your people be better off with neighbors of a different race who are intelligent (Asian?) and who SUPPORT segregation, or a white family who had network TV and porn raise their children?
I'm not talking about generalizations here, I'm talking about individuals. Hillary Clinton is "extremely successful" by most standards, but I'd take Thomas Sowell as my neighbor over her 10 times out of 10.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62283f966932b
Bing 0 points 2.1 years ago
Gotcha, guess you were part of the second example in the first sentence of my second paragraph. I'd prefer Thomas Sowell as my neighbor than Hillary Clinton. Guess you disagree.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62283f966932b
Bing 0 points 2.1 years ago
I love bluffing games, so Avalon and Secret Hitler are two of my favorites (despite not considering myself the "Voat norm" vis-a-vi the Fuhrer). Other suggestions:
Quick Pick-up:
2 Player: Onitama
3+: Splendor
4: Blockus
3-8: Tsuaro
Medium:
2: Patchwork
2+: Dominion (deck building game, where you make the deck AS YOU PLAY, not like Pokemon or Magic where you collect)
3+: Munchkins
3+: Lords of Waterdeep (one of my favorites)
Hard I'd save until you're a little more experienced.
Co-op: Pandemic (my wife's favorite, long predates Covid)
/v/WhatCouldGoWrong viewpost?postid=6247bab8af47a
Bing 0 points 2.1 years ago
> Oh look, a 12 year old White male figured out how to engineer a bridge, we should start having all 12 year old White males build our bridges.
That's my point because that's exactly what you did in your original post. There are 1000s of black women smarter than white men. It might be 0.00001% of the time, but it doesn't make it not true. This is the argument for self-governance: that we leave individuals to fend for themselves (or those they care for), effectively as the smallest form of government, and let those who fail, fail.
Do you care more about race than if your neighbor is blasphemous, ignorant, arrogant, rude, poor? Personally I'd prefer an affluent black nuclear family than a white trailer park as my neighbor. I don't care which is the exception; I'm judging the individuals.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62283f966932b
Bing 0 points 2.1 years ago
Your grammar and punctuation prove my point. Are you white? Black? Does it matter? You're clearly an idiot. We need not look any further.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62283f966932b
Bing 0 points 2.2 years ago
This generalization says that Hunter Biden is smarter than Thomas Sowell.
Such is the problem with generalizations.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62283f966932b