An example is "student loans", basically state enforced and implemented usury (a sin and destroyer of nations). There are 3 solutions that I can see: Remove the interest rate so that people pay back what is borrowed, but nothing else; have a set amount that will be repaid (no interest, but penalty for borrowing); ending the program completely and moving it to the private sector without government guarantees (allow bankruptcy, very high risk for debt holders).
The 3rd of these would mean that schools would have to change drastically; they wouldn't be able to bring in worthless students anymore, no more diversity quotas, no more worthless programs, etc. But all of these make this not politically feasible.
The 1st and 2nd ones are solutions that people would support. Any politician who said these would get support of 75+% of the population. So why isn't it proposed? Why is the only proposal to cancel current debt, but allowing new debt to happen? Because this is something that the female thinkers (leftists) will strongly support, and the male thinkers (productive class) will be against it; causing a strong divide that is then moved to "red vs. blue".
i would get a small sawmill along with your wooded property to process the trees (and find a larger one you can contract with for the big trees if there are any).
I think you were joking about crypto, but I would invest maybe 10% in it. Think of these 2 things: Lots of money has gone into it (colleges, billionaires, funds, etc.) that is not wishful nerd money; those entities are not going to allow regulation to crash their investments if they can help it. There is a high certainty that the price in 20 years will either be zero or much much higher than it is; if it gains utility and needs to be dispersed to more people, takes a portion of financial transactions, etc. then it would have to increase a huge way.
Also, you are playing against the people who set everything. I would guess that there will be a "farm crisis" at some point, maybe usd will lose reserve status, a famine, who knows?
I mean, this is a yes and no thing. If it is small enough (no combine or tiling) then i don't think it would be bad. Same with animals, they need shelter, but not a ton of it if there are 5 of them total. Most rural houses should have a barn already anyway.
Define "socialist" and you will have your answer. There is a huge difference between their nat-soc and Marxist socialism. Hitler would say the huge difference was meritocracy.
It happens, but look at how far it got, how much time and money was wasted. That is a tactic; hurt the enemy with wasting time and money. Now what *should* happen is that everyone prosecuted under that DA should open their cases.
isn't 1350 for murder specifically? if it was extended to violence it would be higher imho, especially interracially (between black and chinese it is probably 99% in one direction).
Since people are starting to play by the rules of activists I think the next step is a repository of dox. Is there a decentralized service that could be used?
"Rich" countries are forcing their plebs to reduce their comfort. Wealthy people will still have jets, vacation homes, trips to the mountains, etc. They want us to all stay home.
Dad is pa dutch and so a farmer would be good. College boys could have done shitty as well, I'd try to find someone through networking. There are good guys all over, but it is so hard to know who is good. Old women know a lot.
I think that he also looks at frequency of posts at certain times. For example, when voat has issues some of us might post at poal more. He could see this for every event and then ban on that, while making up some stupid excuse "muh algorithm".
GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.8 years ago
Feminism (communism/judaism in general) is the reason for divorce. They set out to destroy the family and did a pretty damn good job.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=62e52da4d02f2
GoldenAgeWhen 2 points 2.8 years ago
For commenting about a jew lying to people.
/v/Universal viewpost?postid=62e2ef9f31a25
GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.8 years ago
This is from a sick society, this person should have been kicked out long ago as an example of why you live a productive life.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62e29ff40bdc8
GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 2.8 years ago
Too bad they are so expensive.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62e2c13bebe13
GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 2.8 years ago
The uniparty makes conflict to pacify the plebs.
An example is "student loans", basically state enforced and implemented usury (a sin and destroyer of nations). There are 3 solutions that I can see: Remove the interest rate so that people pay back what is borrowed, but nothing else; have a set amount that will be repaid (no interest, but penalty for borrowing); ending the program completely and moving it to the private sector without government guarantees (allow bankruptcy, very high risk for debt holders).
The 3rd of these would mean that schools would have to change drastically; they wouldn't be able to bring in worthless students anymore, no more diversity quotas, no more worthless programs, etc. But all of these make this not politically feasible.
The 1st and 2nd ones are solutions that people would support. Any politician who said these would get support of 75+% of the population. So why isn't it proposed? Why is the only proposal to cancel current debt, but allowing new debt to happen? Because this is something that the female thinkers (leftists) will strongly support, and the male thinkers (productive class) will be against it; causing a strong divide that is then moved to "red vs. blue".
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62e295a48c15e
GoldenAgeWhen 4 points 2.8 years ago
Wait, how do you know my wife?
/v/Jokes viewpost?postid=62e1bda9edbd2
GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.8 years ago
i would get a small sawmill along with your wooded property to process the trees (and find a larger one you can contract with for the big trees if there are any).
I think you were joking about crypto, but I would invest maybe 10% in it. Think of these 2 things: Lots of money has gone into it (colleges, billionaires, funds, etc.) that is not wishful nerd money; those entities are not going to allow regulation to crash their investments if they can help it. There is a high certainty that the price in 20 years will either be zero or much much higher than it is; if it gains utility and needs to be dispersed to more people, takes a portion of financial transactions, etc. then it would have to increase a huge way.
Also, you are playing against the people who set everything. I would guess that there will be a "farm crisis" at some point, maybe usd will lose reserve status, a famine, who knows?
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=62e00d067c161
GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.8 years ago
I mean, this is a yes and no thing. If it is small enough (no combine or tiling) then i don't think it would be bad. Same with animals, they need shelter, but not a ton of it if there are 5 of them total. Most rural houses should have a barn already anyway.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=62e00d067c161
GoldenAgeWhen 4 points 2.8 years ago
Define "socialist" and you will have your answer. There is a huge difference between their nat-soc and Marxist socialism. Hitler would say the huge difference was meritocracy.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62dfd914b2080
GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 2.8 years ago
It happens, but look at how far it got, how much time and money was wasted. That is a tactic; hurt the enemy with wasting time and money. Now what *should* happen is that everyone prosecuted under that DA should open their cases.
outlaw plea bargains.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62deb64b1615d
GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.8 years ago
IP addresses. sorry, it does look weird typed out. (eye-pee-sss)
/v/MeanwhileOnPoal viewpost?postid=62dbe7e68fdbe
GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.8 years ago
Newport box, but maybe it is regional.
/v/AskGoats viewpost?postid=62dea6b94eab5
GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 2.8 years ago
isn't 1350 for murder specifically? if it was extended to violence it would be higher imho, especially interracially (between black and chinese it is probably 99% in one direction).
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=62de80c4dd70a
GoldenAgeWhen 2 points 2.8 years ago
That is a very specific joke. I can't think of many people who would get it.
/v/Jokes viewpost?postid=62ddbdb3ca1d9
GoldenAgeWhen 4 points 2.8 years ago
Since people are starting to play by the rules of activists I think the next step is a repository of dox. Is there a decentralized service that could be used?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62ddc7d904916
GoldenAgeWhen 7 points 2.8 years ago
The issue is the asymmetry in application of the law; they can burn cities, we can't protest.
As things get worse there will be a lower application of the law overall, and this will even it a lot.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62ddc7d904916
GoldenAgeWhen 2 points 2.8 years ago
"Rich" countries are forcing their plebs to reduce their comfort. Wealthy people will still have jets, vacation homes, trips to the mountains, etc. They want us to all stay home.
/v/ClimateChangeSkeptic viewpost?postid=62dd81313f817
GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 2.8 years ago
Or coal power and chemical waste in the countries that produce everything.
/v/ClimateChangeSkeptic viewpost?postid=62dd81313f817
GoldenAgeWhen 2 points 2.8 years ago
Dad is pa dutch and so a farmer would be good. College boys could have done shitty as well, I'd try to find someone through networking. There are good guys all over, but it is so hard to know who is good. Old women know a lot.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62dc84c357a1a
GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 2.8 years ago
He absolutely looks at ips
/v/MeanwhileOnPoal viewpost?postid=62dbe7e68fdbe
GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.8 years ago
she is kind of like the top doctor. Meritocracy at work.
/v/killallpedophiles viewpost?postid=62dc1e8435005
GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.8 years ago
activists are "pedo adjacent". spread the word.
/v/killallpedophiles viewpost?postid=62dc1e8435005
GoldenAgeWhen 2 points 2.8 years ago
I think that he also looks at frequency of posts at certain times. For example, when voat has issues some of us might post at poal more. He could see this for every event and then ban on that, while making up some stupid excuse "muh algorithm".
/v/MeanwhileOnPoal viewpost?postid=62dbe7e68fdbe
GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.8 years ago
IIRC (my timeline could be off, it's been a while) remdesivir is the newer way to kill people and wasn't there for the first wave of homicide.
/v/Controlavirus viewpost?postid=62d90ea9631ca
GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 2.8 years ago
Was aou doxxed?
/v/MeanwhileOnGab viewpost?postid=62d9a91854d55