300w threadripper CPU's bro with 256 GB of 4800 RAM, do you even CPU lift? Your little peasant Intel is cute and all but it's bottle-necking you everywhere.
I run real hardware, not your consumer garbage. Every moron with an Intel CPU @ 130 TDP and a 3090 TI is doing the equivalent of skipping leg day.
In the USSA, you cannot have a movie with any type of USSA Military hardware, uniform, or even civilian firearms without the script being approved by the Pentagon.
He's being intentionally obtuse to shitlord. It's like he just discovered Milo Yianopolis videos from 10 years ago and he's trying to emulate the pose of a provocateur.
Unfortunately, he's just coming off like an autistic faggot.
>I get what you're saying but can't reconcile it with the post's subject matter unfortunately.
You can't reconcile it because it completely defeats your argument, but you have yet to demonstrate the technical competency to appreciate it.
For all your posturing about others living in bubbles, you're viewing this through the lens of an American. The planet is much bigger than just America.
Bitcoin, just one of many innovations developed using blockchain technology, solved the problem of the unbanked - this is, entire Countries and populations around the world that were previously locked out entirely of the traditional FIAT systems, were given instant access to finance and FIAT arbitrage simply by having a mobile device in a post Bitcoin world.
So, in other words, no, you don't get what yesiknow is saying. That's the problem.
Your immediate problem appears to be the fact that you cannot differentiate between the blockchain as a technology, and cryptocurrency which is one of many technological innovations built using blockchain technology.
This is specifically what I refer to when I say you clearly lack the technical competency to have this conversation.
Pretending like people who are pointing out your ignorant position of trying to make analogies to gold confiscation are defending crypto so you don't lose face for being ignorant of the subject is an even bigger low than I anticipated you would be capable of.
The fact that you're so technically ignorant you think government has the level of competency necessary to do a similar thing with blockchain just shows you're subvesive as fuck and represent that governments interests. Intentionally, or otherwise.
The part your jew addled brain is willingly ignoring is that if government bans crypto, anyone with crypto can simply leave and not look back and they don't need to worry about a suitcase full of gold. They just need 12 words in their head.
You're so stupid it's physically painful. To think I once respected you.
The core concept you appear to be suffering from too much boomer dementia to understand is that I can have a crypto wallet 100% in my head without the Internet at all, and go anywhere on the planet and extract it into fiat even if I got there completely naked.
Do you legitimately believe the US Government can decide tomorrow to make Bitcoin illegal, and it will stop being used?
More than 180 COUNTRIES in the world now peg their reserve currency to Bitcoin. They do not care about the USD or any other FIAT, because they were not even part of that system in the first place and Bitcoin solved that problem for them so they no longer even need to.
You cannot ban Bitcoin without shutting off the Internet.
All money is dependent on the Internet. A minuscule fraction of a fraction of transactions use cash, and even those require the Internet to transact with the non-cash.
You have not illustrated any logical explanation for why Bitcoin is any different than SWIFT or BRICS.
All you and @Rotteuxx have done is illustrate a degree of technical incompetency which makes it very difficult to have a realistic discussion on this subject.
Once again, I'm trying to help, but your lack of comprehension on this subject is making it irreconcilable.
>Your entire printed out log book thing is a retarded argument.
Please illustrate a single circumstance where the Bitcoin network no longer functions that does not involve cascade failure of the Internet at large leading to an extinction level event.
ALL finance stops if the Internet goes away, not just Bitcoin.
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
Why is it a sad day?
/v/USPolitics viewpost?postid=63bead5770956
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
300w threadripper CPU's bro with 256 GB of 4800 RAM, do you even CPU lift? Your little peasant Intel is cute and all but it's bottle-necking you everywhere.
I run real hardware, not your consumer garbage. Every moron with an Intel CPU @ 130 TDP and a 3090 TI is doing the equivalent of skipping leg day.
/v/oldgoats viewpost?postid=63bcb1468183c
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
My 3090ti system pulls 950w average load, 1200w peak.
You run weak ass TDP CPU & memory.
/v/oldgoats viewpost?postid=63bcb1468183c
rage -1 points 2.4 years ago
Fuck off, faggot.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=63bdac5140fca
rage 1 point 2.4 years ago
What is more evil?
Those who now lie to cover up their mistakes? Or those who did nothing and accepted it while it was being forced on them and their families?
/v/aII viewpost?postid=63bcc7466ea59
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
In the USSA, you cannot have a movie with any type of USSA Military hardware, uniform, or even civilian firearms without the script being approved by the Pentagon.
/v/FakeandGay viewpost?postid=63bc6fe938779
rage -1 points 2.4 years ago
He's being intentionally obtuse to shitlord. It's like he just discovered Milo Yianopolis videos from 10 years ago and he's trying to emulate the pose of a provocateur.
Unfortunately, he's just coming off like an autistic faggot.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 2 points 2.4 years ago
>I get what you're saying but can't reconcile it with the post's subject matter unfortunately.
You can't reconcile it because it completely defeats your argument, but you have yet to demonstrate the technical competency to appreciate it.
For all your posturing about others living in bubbles, you're viewing this through the lens of an American. The planet is much bigger than just America.
Bitcoin, just one of many innovations developed using blockchain technology, solved the problem of the unbanked - this is, entire Countries and populations around the world that were previously locked out entirely of the traditional FIAT systems, were given instant access to finance and FIAT arbitrage simply by having a mobile device in a post Bitcoin world.
So, in other words, no, you don't get what yesiknow is saying. That's the problem.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
Your immediate problem appears to be the fact that you cannot differentiate between the blockchain as a technology, and cryptocurrency which is one of many technological innovations built using blockchain technology.
This is specifically what I refer to when I say you clearly lack the technical competency to have this conversation.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
It's an unusual trend of subversive accounts pushing narratives about no Internet.
/v/PredictiveProgramming viewpost?postid=63bc5a947573b
rage 4 points 2.4 years ago
Nowadays two systems 3080's would trip a 15a breaker, you'd need to run extension cords from all over the house to power that shit.
/v/oldgoats viewpost?postid=63bcb1468183c
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
>The very simple fact that you believe something like crypto is safe & untouchable is a monument to your naivety.
Lying about what I said does not help your position.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
I just now realized you're not the OG Rott, but a 4chan autist imposter.
Bravo, my good sir. Bravo.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
Pretending like people who are pointing out your ignorant position of trying to make analogies to gold confiscation are defending crypto so you don't lose face for being ignorant of the subject is an even bigger low than I anticipated you would be capable of.
The fact that you're so technically ignorant you think government has the level of competency necessary to do a similar thing with blockchain just shows you're subvesive as fuck and represent that governments interests. Intentionally, or otherwise.
It's pathetic. I pity you for this.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage -1 points 2.4 years ago
OK boomer Milo. The US runs all the rest of the world other than a private crypto island.
You are much better arguing things you understand. This one ain't for you dipshit, just move on.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage -1 points 2.4 years ago
The part your jew addled brain is willingly ignoring is that if government bans crypto, anyone with crypto can simply leave and not look back and they don't need to worry about a suitcase full of gold. They just need 12 words in their head.
You're so stupid it's physically painful. To think I once respected you.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
>What's the proportion of unpasteurized milk drinkers to pasteurized milk drinkers?
Roughly the same proportion of people who use crypto vs. the ignorant luddites like you who don't, probably.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
The core concept you appear to be suffering from too much boomer dementia to understand is that I can have a crypto wallet 100% in my head without the Internet at all, and go anywhere on the planet and extract it into fiat even if I got there completely naked.
It's sad to see what you've become.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage -1 points 2.4 years ago
I mean.. he's right, though.
>Do you understand how gold seizures went down less than 100 years ago with criminal penalties?
Straight up boomer tier bullshit.
Be jackboot government thugs. Beat down Rotteuxx's door and find his gold. Confiscate it, arrest him.
Be jackbook government thugs. Beat down Rotteuxx's door and not find any crypto on his computer because he has the 12 words in his head. Now what?
You're shilling hard for some obscene reason. It's.. really sad to watch how dumb you are on this subject.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage -1 points 2.4 years ago
OK, good luck with that man.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage -1 points 2.4 years ago
Since when did making something illegal stop it?
Do you legitimately believe the US Government can decide tomorrow to make Bitcoin illegal, and it will stop being used?
More than 180 COUNTRIES in the world now peg their reserve currency to Bitcoin. They do not care about the USD or any other FIAT, because they were not even part of that system in the first place and Bitcoin solved that problem for them so they no longer even need to.
You cannot ban Bitcoin without shutting off the Internet.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 1 point 2.4 years ago
All money is dependent on the Internet. A minuscule fraction of a fraction of transactions use cash, and even those require the Internet to transact with the non-cash.
You have not illustrated any logical explanation for why Bitcoin is any different than SWIFT or BRICS.
All you and @Rotteuxx have done is illustrate a degree of technical incompetency which makes it very difficult to have a realistic discussion on this subject.
Once again, I'm trying to help, but your lack of comprehension on this subject is making it irreconcilable.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 0 points 2.4 years ago
Just to make sure I understand, your argument is that it will be stopped by making it illegal..?
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 1 point 2.4 years ago
>Your entire printed out log book thing is a retarded argument.
Please illustrate a single circumstance where the Bitcoin network no longer functions that does not involve cascade failure of the Internet at large leading to an extinction level event.
ALL finance stops if the Internet goes away, not just Bitcoin.
Your argument is technically ignorant.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0
rage 2 points 2.4 years ago
Governments cannot ban the blockchain traffic without shutting off the Internet.
This was said plainly in a congressional hearing in 2016. It is still a fact today.
Get angry all you want, I'm trying to help you.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=63bc3a9e4f1a0