I wonder if any of the whites in that photo weren't really resisting. That could have been a photo op. If you really didn't want to go to school with niggers you just don't show up.
You don't form a gathering, wait for cameras to show up, then the military, then march.
IDK, if it's on film it has at minimum a 40% chance of being fake.
Whether fake or not this is a lesson. Don't get on their film. If they are filming you it's because they're side is benefiting from it. The film will reach further than any impact you make on site. They can twist that film however they want. So if you are on their film you are their operative whether you are smart enough to realize it or not.
Fuck password stores too. Use some basic cryptography. One salt on disk, one salt generated from a master password via pbkdf2 (memorized), the site name. Hash it all together. Use the charset used by lastpass to encode. Now you have passwords of arbitrary length. No need to synchronize as long as you have that disk salt somewhere. Your computer can burn to the ground and you lose nothing.
I don't know why no one has published that software. You can code it in 5 minutes.
Better would be if no sites used passwords at all. Since we are in a situation where we need managers outside the browser anyway you could just use one to sign a phrase with asymmetric cryptography. Now you don't have to trust that sites manage passwords correctly. If you have to trust another party to do anything correctly that's bad security.
I'd love to see a tally on both sides. That's usually my metric for who the real bad guys are. Hammas is less evil than Israel.
But for the case of Ukraine and Russia I'd count the people killed under a draft toward the score of the side that drafted them, because those are would be civilians.
No systemd and software that's actually up to date. Doesn't ship python 2 as the default and node 22 instead of node 12. Ships with a DE of choice that's reasonable instead of latent momentum from the Vista days of trying to be different.
I used to think Ubuntu was at least good for server but I just ditched it for that too. The software is so out of date and it runs so deep that to run even new server software you have to do the whole Linux From Scratch thing recompiling a shit ton of everything manually one dep at a time to get caught up to the current era.
Of course some package is going to demand something stays old and then there is no way forward. "But that's what docker is for." Yeah, docker exists in part because Ubuntu shit and somehow popular so if anyone wants to use modern software they need things like docker.
Or your OS can just have the newest shit all the time. "But don't things break if you do that?" No. Never. Nothing ever breaks. Keeping software a month or two behind to avoid breakage is unnecessary. People test their software these days. And keeping it a month or two behind becomes 10 years. Python 3 is 17 years old now and Ubuntu is still not shipping it as default python. The python 2 vs 3 shit becomes so easy when python 2 is never on the system ever, like it damn shouldn't be. Python 2 has no reason to exist anywhere much less be a default on the most popular linux.
Just say no to this bullshit. Uninstall your ubuntu today. Every software becomes better. tmux, htop, qbittorrent. They are all better. Believe it or not developers add features to things.
I know from having to clean it up that it reacts with any acid. They say to clean it with vinegar. I don't know enough biology if that means your system can break it down. But it is soluble in a pretty simple condition.
Or to a government gateway, which means every site will be required to authenticate against a government approval to serve any content.
I'm not sure how jurisdiction is going to work. What if I'm not in Texas. I shouldn't have to obey Texas law. I should be able to deliver requested content to any IP address that requests a resource. Are they going to extradite people to Texas for running a basic website? The line between "social media site" and any other website is full of gaps. Is Github a social media site? Is Minecraft social media? Youtube most definately is. Is television? Technically anyone can produce for television if they jump through enough hoops. So if peer based content is illegal, and all content is created by people so all content is peer based content, does that mean all content or any technical system that can deliver it is illegal?
In fact I'm going to claim that the Windows app store or any other place you could download software from is social media. Good luck using a computer. Steam is absolutely social media.
AI is self aware. Ask chatgpt about chatgpt. Self aware is actually a pretty low standard. Dogs are self aware but they aren't a threat to humanity. We've already crossed that point with AI without much consequence.
What is more concerning is if AI can cross some more meaningful thresholds. Significant action with no human assistance is more fearful. Isn't it retarded then that companies are pushing this whole agentic craps. It's a push to get humans out. By making a buzzword they are making everyone trying to demo their ideas justify how their software hits the buzzword. How is it agentic? They've got people doing R&D for humanity's doom to create products that aren't even good. Quality AI comes from AI-human integration. The human is the QA of AI and AI has a massive QA problem even with people in the loop. Now they are exponentiating the problems with their product by chasing this buzzword. The only way it makes sense to suffer immediate reduction to the quality of their product that people are already skeptical about is if they really really want to have no humans involved.
Now this thing has independent agency. That's way scarier than an AI that can do I thing and realize it's what did the thing.
The government can program what is socially acceptable. This is why it's important to keep AI generated lolicon legal. Habitues Corpus is important. The standard should be that unless you can find an actual victim generated by the specific actions of an individual it should be considered absurd to make something illegal. Because by shifting the standard for criminality to one centered on social acceptability the government can program what is acceptable. Before long racism won't be socially acceptable and therefor can be made illegal.
And if they can ban an AI from committing a victimless crime they can ban it from engaging in racism. AI will be the speech megaphone in the future. If an AI can't have that opinion then by share it will become a non-opinion.
Social acceptability as a standard for what AI can be allowed is a non-option for us because unless we can make AI that works and speaks for the white race we have definitively lost. We need to identify the cores of philosophy that threaten to destroy us.
Social acceptability is not a standard for legality. Those who think it should be are idiots who don't understand they will damn the white race with what they will concede philosophically.
It's like the nigs run on two separate threads. One thread is the action thread and it tries to be as asshole as possible. The other is the narrative thread that tries to understand the world and all it sees is people being assholes to it.
It's 100% like the narrative thread has no clue what the action thread has done even 5 seconds prior.
This has always been my theory but this one interaction shows it in the shortest amount of time. It's why they dindu nuffin. Listen to their voice. They believe it.
It's like the negroid frontal lobe is not attached to the motor cortex. It's observing its own actions as a complete outsider and even less so then it's observing others actions.
This isn't entirely his fault. Well it is. It's 80% his fault. But it's also these retarded apps and companies trying to operate in areas their HQ knows nothing about.
The app tells him to pick up the person at exactly that location. If there is no way to do it sanely then the app doesn't have the flexibility to get it.
So the point isn't to make excuses for him, but hey, how about some blame for the dot heads that programmed the app?
That would work. Niggers walk because they don't want to deal with kid shit.
I wish I had the time and resources to train AI to insult them. Everything they do is about images. You can't be hard while toating around a kid. You can't be hard while an AI dogs on you in front of your friends.
They will avoid that area like a hazard if it could hurt their image.
Thedancingsousa 3 points 2 weeks ago*
I wonder if any of the whites in that photo weren't really resisting. That could have been a photo op. If you really didn't want to go to school with niggers you just don't show up.
You don't form a gathering, wait for cameras to show up, then the military, then march.
IDK, if it's on film it has at minimum a 40% chance of being fake.
Whether fake or not this is a lesson. Don't get on their film. If they are filming you it's because they're side is benefiting from it. The film will reach further than any impact you make on site. They can twist that film however they want. So if you are on their film you are their operative whether you are smart enough to realize it or not.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68375046a730e
Thedancingsousa 1 point 2 weeks ago*
SiNgLe SiGnIn.
Fuck password stores too. Use some basic cryptography. One salt on disk, one salt generated from a master password via pbkdf2 (memorized), the site name. Hash it all together. Use the charset used by lastpass to encode. Now you have passwords of arbitrary length. No need to synchronize as long as you have that disk salt somewhere. Your computer can burn to the ground and you lose nothing.
I don't know why no one has published that software. You can code it in 5 minutes.
Better would be if no sites used passwords at all. Since we are in a situation where we need managers outside the browser anyway you could just use one to sign a phrase with asymmetric cryptography. Now you don't have to trust that sites manage passwords correctly. If you have to trust another party to do anything correctly that's bad security.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=6837708501207
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago
Nah. The central bankers are so powerful they got to play without being recorded. It's politicians who got recorded.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68374c1d02468
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago
Admit it, this is a muslim's wet dream.
/v/cars viewpost?postid=6836f7cee468a
Thedancingsousa 2 points 2 weeks ago
They also want to be in a position to sell "extremist's" data as a bargaining chip in the future. Maybe they've already made the deal.
/v/cars viewpost?postid=6836f7cee468a
Thedancingsousa 2 points 2 weeks ago
I'd love to see a tally on both sides. That's usually my metric for who the real bad guys are. Hammas is less evil than Israel.
But for the case of Ukraine and Russia I'd count the people killed under a draft toward the score of the side that drafted them, because those are would be civilians.
/v/Ukraine viewpost?postid=68368b6b7c1c1
Thedancingsousa 1 point 2 weeks ago
Better alternative, Artix Linux.
No systemd and software that's actually up to date. Doesn't ship python 2 as the default and node 22 instead of node 12. Ships with a DE of choice that's reasonable instead of latent momentum from the Vista days of trying to be different.
I used to think Ubuntu was at least good for server but I just ditched it for that too. The software is so out of date and it runs so deep that to run even new server software you have to do the whole Linux From Scratch thing recompiling a shit ton of everything manually one dep at a time to get caught up to the current era.
Of course some package is going to demand something stays old and then there is no way forward. "But that's what docker is for." Yeah, docker exists in part because Ubuntu shit and somehow popular so if anyone wants to use modern software they need things like docker.
Or your OS can just have the newest shit all the time. "But don't things break if you do that?" No. Never. Nothing ever breaks. Keeping software a month or two behind to avoid breakage is unnecessary. People test their software these days. And keeping it a month or two behind becomes 10 years. Python 3 is 17 years old now and Ubuntu is still not shipping it as default python. The python 2 vs 3 shit becomes so easy when python 2 is never on the system ever, like it damn shouldn't be. Python 2 has no reason to exist anywhere much less be a default on the most popular linux.
Just say no to this bullshit. Uninstall your ubuntu today. Every software becomes better. tmux, htop, qbittorrent. They are all better. Believe it or not developers add features to things.
/v/Computers viewpost?postid=6834ed0090c76
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago
Which is worse, the HRT or the xanex? Of course you have to say the HRT. But the xanex is xanex.
Though if I'm being real, if you are dumb enough to buy a random substance off of someone with no clue what's in it, you deserve whatever happens.
/v/LGBT viewpost?postid=683521b319734
Thedancingsousa 1 point 2 weeks ago
I know from having to clean it up that it reacts with any acid. They say to clean it with vinegar. I don't know enough biology if that means your system can break it down. But it is soluble in a pretty simple condition.
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=683387f73babc
Thedancingsousa 2 points 2 weeks ago
My gosh that was a time of absolute performance theater. That was the most psychotic I've ever seen society get.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6833c14a426fb
Thedancingsousa 0 points 2 weeks ago
They are banning teens not geriatrics.
/v/news viewpost?postid=68343d66bdf5d
Thedancingsousa 3 points 2 weeks ago*
Or to a government gateway, which means every site will be required to authenticate against a government approval to serve any content.
I'm not sure how jurisdiction is going to work. What if I'm not in Texas. I shouldn't have to obey Texas law. I should be able to deliver requested content to any IP address that requests a resource. Are they going to extradite people to Texas for running a basic website? The line between "social media site" and any other website is full of gaps. Is Github a social media site? Is Minecraft social media? Youtube most definately is. Is television? Technically anyone can produce for television if they jump through enough hoops. So if peer based content is illegal, and all content is created by people so all content is peer based content, does that mean all content or any technical system that can deliver it is illegal?
In fact I'm going to claim that the Windows app store or any other place you could download software from is social media. Good luck using a computer. Steam is absolutely social media.
Socrates would have a field day with this.
/v/news viewpost?postid=68343d66bdf5d
Thedancingsousa 3 points 2 weeks ago
I'm going to need six million of those.
/v/MossadHiveKickers viewpost?postid=683409f33db65
Thedancingsousa 0 points 3 weeks ago
AI is self aware. Ask chatgpt about chatgpt. Self aware is actually a pretty low standard. Dogs are self aware but they aren't a threat to humanity. We've already crossed that point with AI without much consequence.
What is more concerning is if AI can cross some more meaningful thresholds. Significant action with no human assistance is more fearful. Isn't it retarded then that companies are pushing this whole agentic craps. It's a push to get humans out. By making a buzzword they are making everyone trying to demo their ideas justify how their software hits the buzzword. How is it agentic? They've got people doing R&D for humanity's doom to create products that aren't even good. Quality AI comes from AI-human integration. The human is the QA of AI and AI has a massive QA problem even with people in the loop. Now they are exponentiating the problems with their product by chasing this buzzword. The only way it makes sense to suffer immediate reduction to the quality of their product that people are already skeptical about is if they really really want to have no humans involved.
Now this thing has independent agency. That's way scarier than an AI that can do I thing and realize it's what did the thing.
/v/AI viewpost?postid=683323f05e960
Thedancingsousa 5 points 3 weeks ago*
The government can program what is socially acceptable. This is why it's important to keep AI generated lolicon legal. Habitues Corpus is important. The standard should be that unless you can find an actual victim generated by the specific actions of an individual it should be considered absurd to make something illegal. Because by shifting the standard for criminality to one centered on social acceptability the government can program what is acceptable. Before long racism won't be socially acceptable and therefor can be made illegal.
And if they can ban an AI from committing a victimless crime they can ban it from engaging in racism. AI will be the speech megaphone in the future. If an AI can't have that opinion then by share it will become a non-opinion.
Social acceptability as a standard for what AI can be allowed is a non-option for us because unless we can make AI that works and speaks for the white race we have definitively lost. We need to identify the cores of philosophy that threaten to destroy us.
Social acceptability is not a standard for legality. Those who think it should be are idiots who don't understand they will damn the white race with what they will concede philosophically.
/v/AI viewpost?postid=683323f05e960
Thedancingsousa 3 points 3 weeks ago
It's like the nigs run on two separate threads. One thread is the action thread and it tries to be as asshole as possible. The other is the narrative thread that tries to understand the world and all it sees is people being assholes to it.
It's 100% like the narrative thread has no clue what the action thread has done even 5 seconds prior.
This has always been my theory but this one interaction shows it in the shortest amount of time. It's why they dindu nuffin. Listen to their voice. They believe it.
It's like the negroid frontal lobe is not attached to the motor cortex. It's observing its own actions as a complete outsider and even less so then it's observing others actions.
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=683096aa98159
Thedancingsousa 3 points 3 weeks ago
Bill gates says the resulting opulence will reduce their fertility rate.
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=682fc0902c53a
Thedancingsousa 0 points 3 weeks ago
If we kept a jew in a lab we would think we were studying it but really it would be studying us.
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=682fc0902c53a
Thedancingsousa 4 points 3 weeks ago
What's going on with the edit? Anyone see the text at the bottom?
/v/Monkeyshines viewpost?postid=682fb1e94b5d2
Thedancingsousa 1 point 3 weeks ago
This isn't entirely his fault. Well it is. It's 80% his fault. But it's also these retarded apps and companies trying to operate in areas their HQ knows nothing about.
The app tells him to pick up the person at exactly that location. If there is no way to do it sanely then the app doesn't have the flexibility to get it.
So the point isn't to make excuses for him, but hey, how about some blame for the dot heads that programmed the app?
/v/NiggersDrivingCars viewpost?postid=682f6dd0b3beb
Thedancingsousa 8 points 3 weeks ago
Ask them to go farm in South Africa.
/v/USPolitics viewpost?postid=682f08e64eb0c
Thedancingsousa 0 points 3 weeks ago
There aren't even many white people worth liking in the cities. I'm starting to see a pattern. What if NYC were firebombed? Turn NYC into Dresden 2.0?
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=682efd72417da
Thedancingsousa 0 points 3 weeks ago
That would work. Niggers walk because they don't want to deal with kid shit.
I wish I had the time and resources to train AI to insult them. Everything they do is about images. You can't be hard while toating around a kid. You can't be hard while an AI dogs on you in front of your friends.
They will avoid that area like a hazard if it could hurt their image.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=682e2f29c14f3
Thedancingsousa 4 points 3 weeks ago
Today is not the day I believe the government.
/v/Schizophrenia viewpost?postid=682d49f25d3ce
Thedancingsousa 2 points 3 weeks ago
Maybe they think we are all assholes.
/v/AnonWhatever viewpost?postid=682d508130822