> if so they deserve what they voted for
Everyone that has ever uttered this phrase is a useful idiot or a shill.
No one has voted for anything since the 1890s, when the secret ballot was implemented, and by extension, all verification that anyone was actually elected was ended.
>This guy doesn't have to explain shit
Yet he did. He could have said nothing or even "I found a better job opportunity and will no longer be representing that nigger". He did not do this, instead he cried over "antisemitism".
>Two weeks ago.
I take it you do what I do and put a thread you want to respond to on a new tab, then promptly forget about it, only to realize several days later you never responded?
Also correct. With that being said, he could have just refused to let the publisher have his way with his book.
It's why everything is so shit now. No good writers will let the publisher fuck up their story to shove degeneracy in it, so the publishers have to find someone who can't write to write the same story.
Not his thread but he addresses it here: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=679eab4514896
His comment alone: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=679eab4514896&commentid=679ed9d25b603
His account, there's no other information available. https://www.voat.xyz/profile?user=system
>Each day this platform keeps surprising me more with their ignorance.
>
>ignorance.
Alright, what are you?
No NatSoc would ever use the phrase "you're ignorant" or any variation thereof.
Obviously you just soft cap it. It you haven't made any threads in a long while you can post more than normal, but if you've been making the maximum amount of threads constantly your limit is reduced.
As an example, not actually suggesting these numbers.
5 per hour up to 10. 20 per day up to 30. 100 per weak up to 140. The lower time caps take into account the higher time post volume which adjusts the amount you're allowed to post.
This is made clear in the thread creation page so no one can ever get blindsided by it and think they are getting "shadowbanned".
(funny) The bravest of jeets deleted his account after I told him what I would do to him if he ever tried to make good on his threats against European people.
Also (funny), the best of your race, your literally gods amongst men, is the miscegenated abominable offspring of the trash that my ancient forefathers threw out.
All elections are fake because we can't verify that anyone was actually voted for.
The only proof that any election result is legitimate is a trust me bro.
This is due to the secret ballot that was introduced across most of the US in the 1890s.
No other problem with democratic systems can be fixed until this incredibly basic problem is fixed.
It has remained a problem for around 135 years. It will not be fixed until the nation itself dies.
>What the fuck do you think the purpose of gathering and anchoring sources is?
Name one time when someone who is actually writing about a topic listed their sources on individual pages across thousands of pages, and most people who witnessed this format considered it to be a good idea.
It's never happened because it's retarded. You put your sources in a centralized area, compressing as many onto a single page as you can. This is true for both books and webpages.
A retard would have realized what you're doing is retarded at this point. Which again leaves only the malicious explanation.
You know what you're doing is wrong, you're doing because it's wrong, and your going to keep doing it until nobody but me is listening, and I'm only going to bully you for it. At which point you'll post a rant thread about how shit this site is, and quit just as so many before you have done.
Until then you will create thousands of excuses for your behavior, all of which fall flat in the face of just putting your "news" or "sources" into a single thread. As there is not, nor will there ever be a good reason for spamming regardless of the content of the spam.
>I take reporting corruption seriously because that is what a responsible citizen does and I have a variety of ways that I do it.
Which is why you repost other peoples work without adding anything to it, and why you post things that are of no relevance to your goals. Functioning closer to a scraper with an occasional thought of your own. All because you take your job of "reporting corruption" so "seriously".
>You are literally nothing to anyone, as far as we can tell.
Correct, and yet you listen to me all the same, trying desperately to argue the contrary with me like I am someone of importance.
>So you admit they've been bullied.
Yes. It's literally the only way you can get tards to behave.
>Keep crying you censorious faggot.
"Oy vey you're cutting out my tong for asking that I compile my news into one thread rather than spamming it. Oy vey you're literally trying to shoah my content. Oy vey you're going to kill 6,000,000 of my threads."
Lol.
>I can use the Internet however the fuck I want.
True, you are entirely entitled to use it like a shill who is also retarded, and I'm entirely entitled to bully you for it.
>You can block me.
Nope, ignoring you wouldn't fix the problem, and it wouldn't be nearly as much fun.
>What a sad fucking joke your life is if that is how you are spending your time.
You're a pastime bud. Now if you want to know what's a pathetic waste of time, it's wasting your time copying and pasting news articles on a free speech forum where you can say nearly anything. Or unironically paying to host a bot to do it for you. All while larping like you are actually doing anything.
"But, I write books, I'm actually doing something" - Said by every pseudo intellectual part of any movement ever.
You're ego is comically overblown for just how worthless your work actually is.
>Ignores being pointed out as committing bot like behavior.
>
>Ignores the issue is being taken with the thread spam and tries to redirect with "insightful" comments.
Again, get out. I don't know what you are exactly, but I know now you're not a real user.
>I write books therefore its perfectly fine that I spam news threads, copying and pasting everything I can from the article like a bot, and add nothing else to the thread.
Get out.
Paul and Con spam but do so to a significantly lesser degree, largely because they've been bullied into not spamming as much. McCarthy is no longer active due to being bullied for his porn and spam.
A good chunk of it gets ignored. Of the sixteen threads you posted 9-10 hours ago, only 4 had comments on them.
Also, the more I look at this the more it looks like you're a bot given you copy and paste some weird shit from the articles you link.
In no world should you be quoting:
>Please consider upgrading to a VIP account to keep up with all the latest, because this is going to get better fast. VIP status will open a great deal of information and commentary here at RedState. And remember that a Gold-level account gets you access to all of our sister sites in Townhall Media: PJ Media, Twitchy, Hot Air, Bearing Arms, and Townhall.com, while the Platinum level gets you all that plus access to a catalog of feature-length films, and a credit to the new Townhall store. Use promo code FIGHT for a 60% discount.*
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=679dd7b70e926
>provide a service of compressing the news is not something I'm inclined to do for free.
>Good predictions can result in making good money.
>and called out how to make good money on the crash.
I can hear the hand wringing and shekel sniffing through my computer screen.
>My predictions are good, as a result.
You barely comment or add a description for most of your threads. Mainly you just copy and paste what was written within the article you're linking. A good chunk of your threads are just news slop and aren't worth reposting. No an article on a bison stampede is not note worthy.
>So, "by volume" isn't really a good argument. Shall I produce a list of accounts with far more volume than me? Plenty of accounts posted 10x as much as me or more.
There isn't a single account consistently posting as much as you are daily and posting massive blocks of threads within short periods of time. Most of the accounts that did that were bullied off of here a while ago.
This isn't magic or complicated. Make a daily news thread rather than spamming a bunch of news threads within a short period of time. Put all the article links within that thread. If there's something of interest going on and is worthy of posting multiple news sources for it, give it its own dedicated thread.
Even a nigger could figure this out.
No sources, I highly doubt this is true.
Author bio from the same site likely from the author himself says he attended a Jesuit college.
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/author/173/harry-schnitker-phd
If you want to bother, I'm sure you'll find plenty of information to the contrary of what he said.
I won't since his education alone makes everything that comes out of his mouth worthless.
The content gets ignored because it's spam by volume.
You've made 58 threads over the last 24 hours, and have made no attempts to compress the "news" you're sharing into compilation threads.
If you were just a sperg, you would have gotten clued in by now as multiple users saying you're spamming is due to volume.
You aren't a sperg and this behavior is malicious and is done to drown out the actual sharing of information.
There's no good reason not to compress information. Any refusal to do so has to be seen as malicious intent.
If you genuinely have a lot to say each and every day, you can compile it easily within a single news thread.
There's no reason to spam unless you're off ill intentions.
Since everything points to you being of ill intentions, just about anything you post in regards to bad actors will be ignored by me and everyone else.
Meaning if you actually care about catching bad actors, you'll stop spamming.
>Spams like hell.
>Tries to deflect using past drama.
Well I thought you were just another Conspirologist, but it looks like you're more suspect then that.
s23erdctfvyg 8 points 4 months ago
> if so they deserve what they voted for
Everyone that has ever uttered this phrase is a useful idiot or a shill.
No one has voted for anything since the 1890s, when the secret ballot was implemented, and by extension, all verification that anyone was actually elected was ended.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67b132e1d9776
s23erdctfvyg 2 points 4 months ago
Okay, I'm going to need some context about how this happened.
/v/ShitpostLitterBox viewpost?postid=67afaecabb4af
s23erdctfvyg 2 points 4 months ago
>This guy doesn't have to explain shit
Yet he did. He could have said nothing or even "I found a better job opportunity and will no longer be representing that nigger". He did not do this, instead he cried over "antisemitism".
/v/UpliftingNews viewpost?postid=67abae4252b6f
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
I provided a comment of his confirming that it was him and not a hack. Right below your comment, you damn blind bot.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=67a980dc6849f
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
>Two weeks ago.
I take it you do what I do and put a thread you want to respond to on a new tab, then promptly forget about it, only to realize several days later you never responded?
Also correct. With that being said, he could have just refused to let the publisher have his way with his book.
It's why everything is so shit now. No good writers will let the publisher fuck up their story to shove degeneracy in it, so the publishers have to find someone who can't write to write the same story.
/v/VIBE viewpost?postid=679662bc6779c
s23erdctfvyg 2 points 4 months ago
Not his thread but he addresses it here: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=679eab4514896
His comment alone: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=679eab4514896&commentid=679ed9d25b603
His account, there's no other information available. https://www.voat.xyz/profile?user=system
/v/videos viewpost?postid=67a980dc6849f
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
When that happens, you should link and archive it. As he is likely to delete it if system ever starts to look into his use of bots.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67a7ea5eb8d7b
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
At a minimum they share a computer.
One too many "it works fine in Opera" moments from videos DWB posts for me to ignore.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67a7ede622f0d
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
>Each day this platform keeps surprising me more with their ignorance.
>
>ignorance.
Alright, what are you?
No NatSoc would ever use the phrase "you're ignorant" or any variation thereof.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67a5d33c20766
s23erdctfvyg 2 points 4 months ago
jews first, anything else fails to solve the problem.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67a561544a1c1
s23erdctfvyg 2 points 4 months ago
Your children are an extension of your life. To not care for them is a form of suicide.
/v/FightingBackAgainstTheNWO viewpost?postid=67a3a34f2d66a
s23erdctfvyg 1 point 4 months ago
Obviously you just soft cap it. It you haven't made any threads in a long while you can post more than normal, but if you've been making the maximum amount of threads constantly your limit is reduced.
As an example, not actually suggesting these numbers.
5 per hour up to 10. 20 per day up to 30. 100 per weak up to 140. The lower time caps take into account the higher time post volume which adjusts the amount you're allowed to post.
This is made clear in the thread creation page so no one can ever get blindsided by it and think they are getting "shadowbanned".
/v/all viewpost?postid=67a2b7117a3f8
s23erdctfvyg 2 points 4 months ago
(funny) The bravest of jeets deleted his account after I told him what I would do to him if he ever tried to make good on his threats against European people.
Also (funny), the best of your race, your literally gods amongst men, is the miscegenated abominable offspring of the trash that my ancient forefathers threw out.
/v/4Chan viewpost?postid=67a114b929af7
s23erdctfvyg 1 point 4 months ago
All elections are fake because we can't verify that anyone was actually voted for.
The only proof that any election result is legitimate is a trust me bro.
This is due to the secret ballot that was introduced across most of the US in the 1890s.
No other problem with democratic systems can be fixed until this incredibly basic problem is fixed.
It has remained a problem for around 135 years. It will not be fixed until the nation itself dies.
/v/government viewpost?postid=67a11e98aceb7
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
>What the fuck do you think the purpose of gathering and anchoring sources is?
Name one time when someone who is actually writing about a topic listed their sources on individual pages across thousands of pages, and most people who witnessed this format considered it to be a good idea.
It's never happened because it's retarded. You put your sources in a centralized area, compressing as many onto a single page as you can. This is true for both books and webpages.
A retard would have realized what you're doing is retarded at this point. Which again leaves only the malicious explanation.
You know what you're doing is wrong, you're doing because it's wrong, and your going to keep doing it until nobody but me is listening, and I'm only going to bully you for it. At which point you'll post a rant thread about how shit this site is, and quit just as so many before you have done.
Until then you will create thousands of excuses for your behavior, all of which fall flat in the face of just putting your "news" or "sources" into a single thread. As there is not, nor will there ever be a good reason for spamming regardless of the content of the spam.
/v/ReportSpammers viewpost?postid=679d1c79f132d
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
>I take reporting corruption seriously because that is what a responsible citizen does and I have a variety of ways that I do it.
Which is why you repost other peoples work without adding anything to it, and why you post things that are of no relevance to your goals. Functioning closer to a scraper with an occasional thought of your own. All because you take your job of "reporting corruption" so "seriously".
>You are literally nothing to anyone, as far as we can tell.
Correct, and yet you listen to me all the same, trying desperately to argue the contrary with me like I am someone of importance.
You do this because I'm correct about you.
/v/ReportSpammers viewpost?postid=679d1c79f132d
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
>So you admit they've been bullied.
Yes. It's literally the only way you can get tards to behave.
>Keep crying you censorious faggot.
"Oy vey you're cutting out my tong for asking that I compile my news into one thread rather than spamming it. Oy vey you're literally trying to shoah my content. Oy vey you're going to kill 6,000,000 of my threads."
Lol.
>I can use the Internet however the fuck I want.
True, you are entirely entitled to use it like a shill who is also retarded, and I'm entirely entitled to bully you for it.
>You can block me.
Nope, ignoring you wouldn't fix the problem, and it wouldn't be nearly as much fun.
>What a sad fucking joke your life is if that is how you are spending your time.
You're a pastime bud. Now if you want to know what's a pathetic waste of time, it's wasting your time copying and pasting news articles on a free speech forum where you can say nearly anything. Or unironically paying to host a bot to do it for you. All while larping like you are actually doing anything.
"But, I write books, I'm actually doing something" - Said by every pseudo intellectual part of any movement ever.
You're ego is comically overblown for just how worthless your work actually is.
/v/ReportSpammers viewpost?postid=679d1c79f132d
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago*
>Ignores being pointed out as committing bot like behavior.
>
>Ignores the issue is being taken with the thread spam and tries to redirect with "insightful" comments.
Again, get out. I don't know what you are exactly, but I know now you're not a real user.
/v/ReportSpammers viewpost?postid=679d1c79f132d
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago*
>I write books therefore its perfectly fine that I spam news threads, copying and pasting everything I can from the article like a bot, and add nothing else to the thread.
Get out.
Paul and Con spam but do so to a significantly lesser degree, largely because they've been bullied into not spamming as much. McCarthy is no longer active due to being bullied for his porn and spam.
/v/ReportSpammers viewpost?postid=679d1c79f132d
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
A good chunk of it gets ignored. Of the sixteen threads you posted 9-10 hours ago, only 4 had comments on them.
Also, the more I look at this the more it looks like you're a bot given you copy and paste some weird shit from the articles you link.
In no world should you be quoting:
>Please consider upgrading to a VIP account to keep up with all the latest, because this is going to get better fast. VIP status will open a great deal of information and commentary here at RedState. And remember that a Gold-level account gets you access to all of our sister sites in Townhall Media: PJ Media, Twitchy, Hot Air, Bearing Arms, and Townhall.com, while the Platinum level gets you all that plus access to a catalog of feature-length films, and a credit to the new Townhall store. Use promo code FIGHT for a 60% discount.*
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=679dd7b70e926
/v/ReportSpammers viewpost?postid=679d1c79f132d
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
>provide a service of compressing the news is not something I'm inclined to do for free.
>Good predictions can result in making good money.
>and called out how to make good money on the crash.
I can hear the hand wringing and shekel sniffing through my computer screen.
>My predictions are good, as a result.
You barely comment or add a description for most of your threads. Mainly you just copy and paste what was written within the article you're linking. A good chunk of your threads are just news slop and aren't worth reposting. No an article on a bison stampede is not note worthy.
>So, "by volume" isn't really a good argument. Shall I produce a list of accounts with far more volume than me? Plenty of accounts posted 10x as much as me or more.
There isn't a single account consistently posting as much as you are daily and posting massive blocks of threads within short periods of time. Most of the accounts that did that were bullied off of here a while ago.
This isn't magic or complicated. Make a daily news thread rather than spamming a bunch of news threads within a short period of time. Put all the article links within that thread. If there's something of interest going on and is worthy of posting multiple news sources for it, give it its own dedicated thread.
Even a nigger could figure this out.
/v/ReportSpammers viewpost?postid=679d1c79f132d
s23erdctfvyg 0 points 4 months ago
No sources, I highly doubt this is true.
Author bio from the same site likely from the author himself says he attended a Jesuit college.
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/author/173/harry-schnitker-phd
If you want to bother, I'm sure you'll find plenty of information to the contrary of what he said.
I won't since his education alone makes everything that comes out of his mouth worthless.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=679d473009a91
s23erdctfvyg 4 points 4 months ago
The content gets ignored because it's spam by volume.
You've made 58 threads over the last 24 hours, and have made no attempts to compress the "news" you're sharing into compilation threads.
If you were just a sperg, you would have gotten clued in by now as multiple users saying you're spamming is due to volume.
You aren't a sperg and this behavior is malicious and is done to drown out the actual sharing of information.
There's no good reason not to compress information. Any refusal to do so has to be seen as malicious intent.
/v/ReportSpammers viewpost?postid=679d1c79f132d
s23erdctfvyg 3 points 4 months ago
Nobody of consequence.
Emotional manipulation doesn't work on me bud.
If you genuinely have a lot to say each and every day, you can compile it easily within a single news thread.
There's no reason to spam unless you're off ill intentions.
Since everything points to you being of ill intentions, just about anything you post in regards to bad actors will be ignored by me and everyone else.
Meaning if you actually care about catching bad actors, you'll stop spamming.
/v/ReportSpammers viewpost?postid=679d1c79f132d
s23erdctfvyg 1 point 4 months ago
>Spams like hell.
>Tries to deflect using past drama.
Well I thought you were just another Conspirologist, but it looks like you're more suspect then that.
/v/ReportSpammers viewpost?postid=679d1c79f132d